SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Wild Bill strikes early again

Created by: Schmidty2go
Team: 2020-21 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 25, 2021
Published: Feb. 25, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Billy makes two big moves to finally bring home a #1 Center for a franchise that has never had one. Moves both picks this year (that could be lottery picks) and moves out of the first round of a D-heavy draft. He also solves his expansion draft plans as Kahkonen & Addison allow the Wild to move on from Talbot and Dumba.
Trades
1.
MIN
  1. Pinto, Shane [Reserve List]
  2. 2022 1st round pick (OTT)
Additional Details:
Ottawa can't be in rebuild forever, and have an available D protection spot with the 7-3-1. They added 6 prospects in the first two rounds of the 2020 draft, so they use some assets to add backend scoring while its RHD prospects continue to develop which don't look ready.
OTT
  1. Dumba, Matt
Additional Details:
Wild get a needed young Center who can win the dot. They also open up flexibility to go into the expansion draft with a 7-3-1 plan as Addison looks like the real deal for next year.
2.
MIN
  1. Eichel, Jack
Additional Details:
Buffalo needs a change of scenery, this isn't working. With Cozens looking to be legit, Eichel's 10m salary will be better divided across players that can help now and 2 picks to continue to build from below.
BUF
  1. Fiala, Kevin
  2. Khovanov, Alexander
  3. Talbot, Cam
  4. 2021 1st round pick (MIN)
  5. 2021 1st round pick (PIT)
Additional Details:
Wild offer 2 1st round picks that could be lottery. A young dynamic goal scorer in Fiala. A legit starting goalie, something Buffalo has been lacking. And a big young center prospect who is almost NHL ready.
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2022
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$76,757,757$0$925,000$4,742,243
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,900,000$1,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,875,000$2,875,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,487,500$1,487,500
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,050,000$2,050,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,100,000$4,100,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$725,000$725,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,575,000$7,575,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$725,000$725,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,166,667$4,166,667
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,450,000$3,450,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$785,000$785,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 25, 2021 at 9:48 p.m.
#26
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,225
Likes: 9,027
Quoting: Caerii
Have you watched Kaprizov this season?


yes, thats why he would be included
Feb. 25, 2021 at 9:49 p.m.
#27
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Shibbal18
Well it does, prove me wrong. If you think a 33 year old back up and your 4th best center prospect gets you Eichel you are on something good


MIN can’t really put together a great Eichel package but Fiala and 2 1sts is a good start. They just aren’t willing to add the Rossi or Boldy that it would take to get it done.
TanSor and Morzski liked this.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 9:50 p.m.
#28
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,347
Likes: 3,385
Quoting: Shibbal18
yes, thats why he would be included


The only scenario he would be included in is if we're offering minimal value on top of him. If you had actually watched him this season you would feel ridiculous asking for what you have been. There is not a single GM that doesn't laugh in your face when you suggest Kaprizov+Rossi+ is the return for Eichel.
Schmidty2go liked this.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 9:50 p.m.
#29
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,225
Likes: 9,027
Quoting: Schmidty2go
And like the Rangers... the Wild hang up the phone. One small correction is that Khovanov is their 4th best prospect (not 4th best Center prospect). I can get your concern around the unknown of this years draft. I can give you that but I think even you know deep down that Eichel won't be playing for Buffalo next year.


Good?, like the Sabres would be upset that the Minnesota Wild didnt just absolutely fleeced them rofl. Eichel isnt going to be moved, you can all calm down
Feb. 25, 2021 at 9:51 p.m.
#30
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 974
Quoting: Schmidty2go
I get the frustration of losing a franchise player (we lost Gaborik... our only franchise player to date)... but what offer are you expecting as a Buffalo fan? 2 lottery picks, a young 30 goal scorer, a starting goalie which even you have to admit hasn't existed in Buffalo since Hasek and a the Wild's 4th best prospect (a Center). You won't get top dollar as your star wants out.... that puts you at a disadvantage. So what does your offer need to look like as I think that is as competitive with any you'll see.....


Sure they are 2 firsts but in a bad draft and nearly impossible to properly scout. Fiala is a good piece but sabres have wings so definitely not a needed position. Talbot is not really an upgrade in net to ullmark and if we lose our 1c I don't see why having a 35 year old starting goalie would be an important piece. And your 4th best prospect for a top 7 Center that's chump change.
I get that there have been ridiculous asking prices. But top centers don't get traded so there really isn't a comparison out there for a guy like eichel.
I can promise a trade for him would probably make a team wince at first not shrugging off your 4th beat prospect.
Shibbal18 and sabres89 liked this.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 9:51 p.m.
#31
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,601
Likes: 22,712
Quoting: Caerii
Unreal. You're doubling down without even understanding why it's a completely off-base comparison. Keep going, I'll try not to stop you.


Dumba has just two full years left on his contract. Ottawa isn't making the playoffs this year or likely the next two even with Dumba. It's a horrid trade for Ottawa.
Now Dumba going to a team more in playoff contention, and has cap...that's a better option.
So you should understand why team make trades...and not fantasying that out of the playoff teams would give up so much for Dumba.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 9:52 p.m.
#32
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,225
Likes: 9,027
Quoting: Caerii
The only scenario he would be included in is if we're offering minimal value on top of him. If you had actually watched him this season you would feel ridiculous asking for what you have been. There is not a single GM that doesn't laugh in your face when you suggest Kaprizov+Rossi+ is the return for Eichel.


Good that should be the reaction. Eichel has 5 years left. They dont have to do anything with him
Feb. 25, 2021 at 9:52 p.m.
#33
Thread Starter
Schmidty2go
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 146
Likes: 26
Quoting: Caerii
Have you watched Kaprizov this season?


Agreed on Kaprizov. I wouldn't trade him straight up for Eichel. He has more points then him this year and is going to be a game changer for the Wild for a long time.....
Feb. 25, 2021 at 9:53 p.m.
#34
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,347
Likes: 3,385
Quoting: Shibbal18
Good that should be the reaction. Eichel has 5 years left. They dont have to do anything with him


Cool, then don't move him, I'm okay with that. Don't act like he'll only be moved for Kaprizov+Rossi+ though. Because there is a relatively high chance he will be moved before his contract is up, and the return won't be anything close to that.
Schmidty2go liked this.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 9:55 p.m.
#35
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,601
Likes: 22,712
Quoting: jnowariak
Dude, this may not be great for Eichel but to say a 30 goal guy and 2 1sts is a weak offer for Forsberg is absurd.


Actually I don't think it too bad an offer for Eichel. The Sabres get those young assets and cap space.
So many of the Forsberg to the Leafs....is three regulars off the team now and top prospect Liljegren and first.
jnowariak liked this.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 9:57 p.m.
#36
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,225
Likes: 9,027
Quoting: Caerii
Cool, then don't move him, I'm okay with that. Don't act like he'll only be moved for Kaprizov+Rossi+ though. Because there is a relatively high chance he will be moved before his contract is up, and the return won't be anything close to that.


Im not the one that made the offer lol. why are you all acting like I should be happy that Buffalo gets fleeced
sabres89 liked this.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 9:58 p.m.
#37
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,225
Likes: 9,027
Quoting: palhal
Actually I don't think it too bad an offer for Eichel. The Sabres get those young assets and cap space.
So many of the Forsberg to the Leafs....is three regulars off the team now and top prospect Liljegren and first.


33 year old cam talbot, young asset
sabres89 liked this.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 9:59 p.m.
#38
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: palhal
Actually I don't think it too bad an offer for Eichel. The Sabres get those young assets and cap space.
So many of the Forsberg to the Leafs....is three regulars off the team now and top prospect Liljegren and first.


Well that’s just a regular leafs trade then. Your all star for my scraps. Apologies if I misunderstood you.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 9:59 p.m.
#39
Thread Starter
Schmidty2go
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 146
Likes: 26
Quoting: Shibbal18
Im not the one that made the offer lol. why are you all acting like I should be happy that Buffalo gets fleeced


WHEN it goes down, and it will be within the next year... based on your expectations you'll feel fleeced with the real offer once you see it. It might not be the Wild, but it will be closer to my offer than yours. smile
Feb. 25, 2021 at 10:00 p.m.
#40
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,347
Likes: 3,385
Quoting: Shibbal18
Im not the one that made the offer lol. why are you all acting like I should be happy that Buffalo gets fleeced


My post was pointing out that it's pointless to try to have a discussion in good faith about the very realistic chance that Eichel could be traded, because your counter-offer is as ridiculous as all the offers you claim are complete garbage, such as the offer in the OP.

I get that you don't want to trade him, but if you're just going to make horrible counter offers instead of trying to find a deal that works for both sides, there is no point in talking to you. Do you disagree?
Schmidty2go liked this.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 10:01 p.m.
#41
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Shibbal18
Im not the one that made the offer lol. why are you all acting like I should be happy that Buffalo gets fleeced


A 23 year old 30 goal scorer and 2 1sts is the base, and not a bad one. Haggle over the prospect BUF wants but MIN won’t part with Rossi or Boldy so BUF says no.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 10:06 p.m.
#42
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 41
Likes: 8
Fiala and Khovanov aren't for sale. Wild decline.

Also, Ottawa is not trading a promising prospect in Pinto.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 10:08 p.m.
#43
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,347
Likes: 3,385
Quoting: Wildman21
Fiala and Khovanov aren't for sale. Wild decline.

Also, Ottawa is not trading a promising prospect in Pinto.


For Eichel? Sure they are.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 10:08 p.m.
#44
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 8,260
Likes: 6,242
Quoting: Schmidty2go
WHEN it goes down, and it will be within the next year... based on your expectations you'll feel fleeced with the real offer once you see it. It might not be the Wild, but it will be closer to my offer than yours. smile


Eichel wont ask for a trade til his ntc kicks in NEXT summer. Why go play in minnesota or ottawa or winnipeg (glass houses and all that, but its not my decision) when you could wait a year before opening your trap and force a trade to new york, chicago, anaheim, la, or one of the florida teams? The sabres arent going to move him because they arent winning, they might move him if he kicks up a fuss next year. And my guess is after the epic fail that was the ror trade, they wont be taken out to the woodshed again. The market will decide whats fair, and if adams and the pegulas dont like it, he gets bonus time here or in the khl if he chooses.
Shibbal18 liked this.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 10:08 p.m.
#45
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,127
Likes: 2,015
Quoting: jnowariak
A 23 year old 30 goal scorer and 2 1sts is the base, and not a bad one. Haggle over the prospect BUF wants but MIN won’t part with Rossi or Boldy so BUF says no.


This is my take. Fiala two first and Rossi is my ask. Wild say no. But it wouldn’t be Karill otherwise why trade for Eichel?
jnowariak liked this.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 10:10 p.m.
#46
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Not sure why this deal is being criticized so much, Fiala is probably our best player (if not a very close second to Kaprizov), and I see him scoring 30 goals in an 82 game season. If you made it Kahkonen and not Talbot, I think the Sabres would have to think about that. That said, I could see the Kings, Rangers, and even Canes offering better packages.

The problem is that to get Eichel, it will almost certainly take Fiala or Kaprizov with quality picks/prospects, but in doing that is Eichel really in a better situation than the one he is leaving in Buffalo? I know our team is winning, but talent-for-talent we're probably pretty equal to the Sabres after this trade. Eichel would have to be patient for our forward prospects to develop.
jnowariak, OldNYIfan and Morzski liked this.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 10:10 p.m.
#47
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Lsendel3
This is my take. Fiala two first and Rossi is my ask. Wild say no. But it wouldn’t be Karill otherwise why trade for Eichel?


My thoughts exactly. I’d move any prospect other than Rossi or Boldy, and that is why the trade won’t happen.
Lsendel3 liked this.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 10:11 p.m.
#48
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: TanSor
Not sure why this deal is being criticized so much, Fiala is probably our best player (if not a very close second to Kaprizov), and I see him scoring 30 goals in an 82 game season. If you made it Kahkonen and not Talbot, I think the Sabres would have to think about that. That said, I could see the Kings, Rangers, and even Canes offering better packages.

The problem is that to get Eichel, it will almost certainly take Fiala or Kaprizov with picks/prospects, but in doing that is Eichel really in a better situation than the one he is leaving in Buffalo? I know our team is winning, but talent-for-talent we're probably pretty equal to the Sabres after this trade. Eichel would have to be patient for our forward prospects to develop.


Rube against rube.
TanSor liked this.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 10:14 p.m.
#49
Thread Starter
Schmidty2go
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 146
Likes: 26
Quoting: sabres89
Eichel wont ask for a trade til his ntc kicks in NEXT summer. Why go play in minnesota or ottawa or winnipeg (glass houses and all that, but its not my decision) when you could wait a year before opening your trap and force a trade to new york, chicago, anaheim, la, or one of the florida teams? The sabres arent going to move him because they arent winning, they might move him if he kicks up a fuss next year. And my guess is after the epic fail that was the ror trade, they wont be taken out to the woodshed again. The market will decide whats fair, and if adams and the pegulas dont like it, he gets bonus time here or in the khl if he chooses.


Buffalo's leverage is until the NTC kicks in... that's when they can/will get the most for him. I get Eichel's strategy to pick his team but if Buffalo is smart they won't wait to let Eichel decide and get less value. So that's why I think he will be moved before the start of next season when the NTC kicks in and because this year, even after adding Hall has turned into a disaster. I think my offer was fair, you don't... that's fine. We'll see what he ends up getting moved for.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 10:16 p.m.
#50
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: jnowariak
Rube against rube.


I just don't see us putting together a package that beats what other teams could offer. Eichel could not be more of a perfect fit for us: top tier, right shot, offensive, center under 25 and signed long term. But we aren't in a position to give up the assets it would take to get him. Our best bet is to hope Rossi turns into a top line player or hope we can win the lottery for Wright, Savoie, or Lambert in 2022.
OldNYIfan liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll