SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Gardiner

Created by: truculence67
Team: 2020-21 Carolina Hurricanes
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 13, 2021
Published: Mar. 13, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
CAR
  1. Staal, Marc ($2,000,000 retained)
DET
  1. Bokk, Dominik
  2. Gardiner, Jake
  3. 2021 2nd round pick (CAR)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the STL
2022
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CBJ
2023
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$79,450,655$1,367,073$3,707,500$2,049,345
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$8,460,250$8,460,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,400,000$5,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,150,000$2,150,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,650,000$1,650,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,025,000$4,025,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,125,000$3,125,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,300,000$1,300,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$763,333$763,333 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$725,000$725,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$737,500$737,500 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 13, 2021 at 1:33 p.m.
#1
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,804
Likes: 3,612
Exactly what is needed
csick and aedoran liked this.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 1:33 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Very creative and makes sense to me.
aedoran liked this.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 1:34 p.m.
#3
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 9,036
Likes: 5,413
Wings pass, gardiners on waivers and hasn't been good at all. Flat cap for 4 years means you will have to pay way more then this for wings to take him. Staal will get a 3rd or 4th by himself. Pass all day on this unless you put something of value in here
Prob needs ned + one more piece at this point
Mar. 13, 2021 at 1:34 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,507
Likes: 3,033
We are waiving him to gain cap space not because he is bad / trying to get rid of him
Mar. 13, 2021 at 1:35 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,507
Likes: 3,033
Quoting: Caniac555
Exactly what is needed

It isn’t
csick and fucckadmins liked this.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 1:35 p.m.
#6
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,804
Likes: 3,612
Sarcasm didn’t come thru?

Quoting: ecupirate07
It isn’t
Mar. 13, 2021 at 1:35 p.m.
#7
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 44,005
Likes: 24,675
Quoting: ecupirate07
It isn’t


100%
ecupirate07 liked this.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 1:40 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,507
Likes: 3,033
Quoting: Caniac555
Sarcasm didn’t come thru?


No. It’s about making cap space not because he needs to be moved. He is the least likely to be claimed so create that cap space.
csick and OlegP liked this.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 2:24 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 21,890
Likes: 12,147
Quoting: ecupirate07
We are waiving him to gain cap space not because he is bad / trying to get rid of him


I think you are missing the point he's not saying Gardiner is bad. He is saying Detroit along with every other NHL team with the cap space could have claimed off waivers.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 2:40 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,507
Likes: 3,033
Quoting: aedoran
I think you are missing the point he's not saying Gardiner is bad. He is saying Detroit along with every other NHL team with the cap space could have claimed off waivers.

He is saying we would have to trade Bokk and a 2nd with Gardiner to get Staal. Gardiner isn’t bad.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 3:01 p.m.
#11
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 9,036
Likes: 5,413
Quoting: ecupirate07
He is saying we would have to trade Bokk and a 2nd with Gardiner to get Staal. Gardiner isn’t bad.


He's bad enough that he isn't a mainstay in the lineup every night. Canes pay to get rid of him.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 3:07 p.m.
#12
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,865
Likes: 10,118
Quoting: ecupirate07
No. It’s about making cap space not because he needs to be moved. He is the least likely to be claimed so create that cap space.


You're about to find out if he's bad or not. If he was good...there would be AT LEAST 1 team willing to take him.

AND what exactly do you mean by create the cap space? If he goes to the taxi squad all that the "waive" does is make enough cap space for ELC (bean) to replace him. To which, I'd point out that...YOU DON'T NEED TO WAIVE Gardiner in order to bring up Bean. You don't need to expose Gardiner to some other team if you don't want to. You could just make him a healthy scratch. This entire move is exactly because he's bad and nothing else.

BTW I'm still pissed off at Waddell/Dundon for trading away Braden Schneider for Brady Skjei...lost out at the opportunity for a good Dman for a terrible cap dump. Terrible trade.
RedWing9119 liked this.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 3:09 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,507
Likes: 3,033
Quoting: buffbry
He's bad enough that he isn't a mainstay in the lineup every night. Canes pay to get rid of him.

Not the case at all. He is injured but not IR injured. They want to gain cap space while allowing him to come back 100%
Mar. 13, 2021 at 3:12 p.m.
#14
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,865
Likes: 10,118
Quoting: ecupirate07
Not the case at all. He is injured but not IR injured. They want to gain cap space while allowing him to come back 100%


CAR has $11M in deadline cap space. They're practically swimming in cap space. What are you talking about? This move doesn't save much cap at all.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 3:13 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,507
Likes: 3,033
Quoting: exo2769
You're about to find out if he's bad or not. If he was good...there would be AT LEAST 1 team willing to take him.

AND what exactly do you mean by create the cap space? If he goes to the taxi squad all that the "waive" does is make enough cap space for ELC (bean) to replace him. To which, I'd point out that...YOU DON'T NEED TO WAIVE Gardiner in order to bring up Bean. You don't need to expose Gardiner to some other team if you don't want to. You could just make him a healthy scratch. This entire move is exactly because he's bad and nothing else.

BTW I'm still pissed and Waddell/Dundon for trading away Braden Schneider for Brady Skjei...lost out at the opportunity for a good Dman for a terrible cap dump. Terrible trade.

This entire post is wrong so you keep trucking.

1. In flat cap world, a team probably doesn’t take an injured defender on waivers. Any other year, probably so.
2. His daily cap hit is lower on the taxi squad. I.e we are gaining cap space every day with him there.
3. We never had to waive him for Bean. We’ve had 7 defenders for 1/2 the season. Bean was already going up and down the taxi squad between games. Now we get to do the same with Gardiner.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 3:14 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,507
Likes: 3,033
Quoting: exo2769
CAR has $11M in deadline cap space. They're practically swimming in cap space. What are you talking about?


We have 5.5 million right now with 2 top 6 guys on longer than expected injuries. Squeezing more cap space allows us to get a higher dollar guy in the near future and one at the deadline, if we need it. All mean while saving the cost of acquisition because we aren’t asking teams to eat half his deal. Honestly, this isn’t hard to comprehend.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 3:17 p.m.
#17
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 9,036
Likes: 5,413
Quoting: ecupirate07
Not the case at all. He is injured but not IR injured. They want to gain cap space while allowing him to come back 100%


Sure you can keep him
Mar. 13, 2021 at 3:17 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,507
Likes: 3,033
Quoting: buffbry
Sure you can keep him


Ok. That us the plan anyways.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 3:18 p.m.
#19
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,865
Likes: 10,118
Quoting: ecupirate07
We have 3 million right now with 2 top 6 guys on longer than expected injuries. Squeezing more cap space allows us to get a higher dollar guy now and one at the deadline, if we need it.


The absolute MAX CAR can save is $211,667.
Sending Gardiner down means $2,975,000 instead of $4,050,000. A whopping savings of $1,075,000... BUT you also need to fill that slot...SO Let's pretend it's CARs cheapest defenseman Bean (just making it up)...863,333. So the math is 1,075,000 - 863,333 = $211,667.

What you're telling me is that CAR is SOOO desperate for an extra $211,667 that they're willing to risk losing a "good" player with 2.5 years left?

They have $11M in deadline cap space. They don't need $211,667. He stinks.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 3:19 p.m.
#20
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 9,036
Likes: 5,413
Quoting: exo2769
The absolute MAX CAR can save is $211,667.
Sending Gardiner down means $2,975,000 instead of $4,050,000. A whopping savings of $1,075,000... BUT you also need to fill that slot...SO Let's pretend it's CARs cheapest defenseman Bean (just making it up)...863,333. So the math is 1,075,000 - 863,333 = $211,667.

What you're telling me is that CAR is SOOO desperate for an extra $211,667 that they're willing to risk losing a "good" player with 2.5 years left?

He stinks.


It's getting rid of 4.5 million for 2 more years when bean is ready obviously. They need the space
Mar. 13, 2021 at 3:21 p.m.
#21
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,865
Likes: 10,118
Quoting: buffbry
It's getting rid of 4.5 million for 2 more years when bean is ready obviously. They need the space


Oh, I get that. but you can't say "he's good" and then say, but all our ELCs can fill in for him without a hitch, BUT for you guys...he'll actually be good. CAR will need to pay to lose him.
RedWing9119 liked this.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 3:22 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,507
Likes: 3,033
Quoting: exo2769
The absolute MAX CAR can save is $211,667.
Sending Gardiner down means $2,975,000 instead of $4,050,000. A whopping savings of $1,075,000... BUT you also need to fill that slot...SO Let's pretend it's CARs cheapest defenseman Bean (just making it up)...863,333. So the math is 1,075,000 - 863,333 = $211,667.

What you're telling me is that CAR is SOOO desperate for an extra $211,667 that they're willing to risk losing a "good" player with 2.5 years left?


How much of a risk is it? Very low because he is injured. We have someone to backfill so, in the ever so small case that the good player is chosen, the team is still fine. In the end, yes you can afford the loss of a good player in a position that you have good immediate backfill. To add icing to the cake, we gain another 600k or so to the deadline cap space.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 3:24 p.m.
#23
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 9,036
Likes: 5,413
Quoting: exo2769
Oh, I get that. but you can't say "he's good" and then say, but all our ELCs can fill in for him without a hitch, BUT for you guys...he'll actually be good. CAR will need to pay to lose him.


I never said he was good lol
exo2769 liked this.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 3:24 p.m.
#24
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,865
Likes: 10,118
Quoting: ecupirate07
How much of a risk is it? Very low because he is injured. We have someone to backfill so, in the ever so small case that the good player is chosen, the team is still fine. In the end, yes you can afford the loss of a good player in a position that you have good immediate backfill. To add icing to the cake, we gain another 600k or so to the deadline cap space.


The point is what @buffbry is making. No team is trying to help CAR out. Gardiner costs too much money. If he truly IS a good player. Someone will take him because they see his contract and think he's worth it for 2 more years. If he clears...the league is telling you that they don't want him.
RedWing9119 liked this.
Mar. 13, 2021 at 3:25 p.m.
#25
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,865
Likes: 10,118
Quoting: buffbry
I never said he was good lol


It was a Proverbial "you". I'm agreeing with what you're saying.
buffbry liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll