1- There's no such thing as sourced reports about impending trades? Eh? And I'm not doing any CF anything. In fact, that's precisely what I'm debating against. Yet again.

2- Heh. Mmmnokay.

3- It's my opinion that what teams want to ask for and what they can actually get are often two different things? I fail to see how that's anything more than a Captain Obvious ice cold take. As for my contention that Chiarot is not worth a 1st, gosh, I'll guess we'll find out for sure soon enough.

4- Oh good heavens. I have all the credibility required to spot a THW-level non-report, especially when the same one gets parroted ad nauseum. Don't you?

5- You literally stated that "teams say they want him". Verbatim. I simple asked where you got this from, with the proviso that is should be a legit source. Do you have an actual answer to that perfectly reasonable request to back up your statement of fact or not? You can't keep saying things as if they're facts and then deflect to ridicule the other guy every time someone asks for a source for your claim.

Ok first off you need to chill. I don't know what tone you think Im commenting in but it sure isn't the one your replying to me in.

As for the sources, have you not heard from any of the Lebruns, Dregers, Seravalli's, Freidmans, etc etc etc statements/reports/comments on various hockey shows? Do I really need to get links to them? Simple google search would suffice.

What are you on about? I'm as chill as can be. This is all quite humorous to me and I am not saying anything unreasonable or angry. You're just deflecting again.

If there are so many legit reports out there saying what you claim they are saying, surely you can manage to share one that says what you claim it says. The burden of proof lies with the claimant, dudely. Again, this is nothing out of order.

But frankly, I'm just gonna step out of this conversation now because I'm detecting an implied threat from you and I want less than zero part of it. So whatever, I said what I said, you don't seem to be interested in backing claims made, have a good one.

You were talking about "playoff types", I'm pointing out that Chiarot wasn't great in the playoffs either. That should have been self-evident.

Yeah, but Savard was also one of the only UFA dmen that moved (and was playing better than Chiarot is now). This year, there's about 15 UFA defensemen on the move plus players with term like Chychrun and even Sanheim and Provorov.

Supply and demand, Chiarot is not the hot stuff on the market.

What available UFA dmen are better than Chiarot? Giordano? He has a M-NTC and his cap hit is almost double Chiarot's. Klingberg? The price will be much higher for him than Chiarot.

Chiarot is better than every other available UFA dman and the dmen with term are likely to be dealt in the offseason, since the cost will be much higher than rentals and they'll likely demand a roster player in return. I see very little sense in what you're saying...

Chiarot has played like box of chicken nuggets, lmao. Out of the available defensemen, he isn't probably in the top10.

My point still stands: Savard deal is not a good comparable and the asking price does not mean actual value. It's a buyer's market, if the Habs hold on to Chiarot for too long with their price demands, they might not be able to move him at all.

Your point still doesn't make any sense and you're basically making stuff up. Give me your top 10 so I can have a good laugh.

I mean, my point was just basic economics, lmao😂

I think you can find the top10 by yourself by just looking at basic stats or via the eye test
You kinda haven't earned the authority to tell me to complete simple tasks for you.

he was -6 on a cinderella playoff run that got his ass saved by carey price

He played 25-30 minutes per game. He was on the ice for everything. David Gustafsson and John Merrill would be on for maybe 6-8 minutes. There was no third pairing. Find me the comparable for how the Habs ran the bench last year.

25-30 minutes a game doesnt matter when the team is bad,

1- There's no such thing as sourced reports about impending trades? Eh? And I'm not doing any CF anything. In fact, that's precisely what I'm debating against. Yet again.

2- Heh. Mmmnokay.

3- It's my opinion that what teams want to ask for and what they can actually get are often two different things? I fail to see how that's anything more than a Captain Obvious ice cold take. As for my contention that Chiarot is not worth a 1st, gosh, I'll guess we'll find out for sure soon enough.

4- Oh good heavens. I have all the credibility required to spot a THW-level non-report, especially when the same one gets parroted ad nauseum. Don't you?

5- You literally stated that "teams say they want him". Verbatim. I simple asked where you got this from, with the proviso that is should be a legit source. Do you have an actual answer to that perfectly reasonable request to back up your statement of fact or not? You can't keep saying things as if they're facts and then deflect to ridicule the other guy every time someone asks for a source for your claim.

Just here to remind you how little you know about hockey. Time to pick a new sport, bauds!

LOL florida overpayed for a bottom pairing D

Bottom pairing D on a Cup contender, yes. As if Savard wasn't a bottom pairing D on the Lightning... you'll catch up eventually.

hes a bottom pairing d and it was a massive overpay, good for the habs they fleeced florida, doesnt change the fact he isnt good lol

Doesn't change the fact you don't understand the market