This is fair.

Minnesota is stacked with winger, yet people can't do their research enough to understand no wild fans wild say yes to winger

This sounds very much like an argument I've had with some other Wild fan with different nametag.

I wonder if you have several accounts. This all seems just way too familiar.

On Minnesota, he would be. Alot of people om here are exposing themselves repeatedly trying to force winger down our throat. Just like other proposal on here that wild fans have said no to which includes Vancouver fans trading boeser to us. Watch another team. Do your research on Minnesota and the fact we don't have any C and stacked with winger

Many wild fans have turned down winger trades on here. Every time Canucks fans trade boeser to us, we say no. We aren't trading for a winger, making our d position worse or our cap worse when we need to pay boldy next year

You could say that and in my opinion like I said the trade is off but not nearly bad enough for a personal attack.

Not really bad but Bertuzzi has done nothing but improve each season and maybe its his choice not to vaccinate but he does get undervalued a lot. There is only 1 player on the Wild with ppg high than Bertuzzi.

I've watched plenty of Minnesota and plenty of this guy. I didn't say do the deal or you need him so bad but saying he's a 4th liner is nuts.

I never said he's a 4th liner,,people just read what they want to. On Minnesota he would. There's no disrespect or trying to say he’s a bad player. We have said Same thing about Canucks fans trying to trade boeser to us. We are absolutely stacked with winger and like Detroit, we needs C's. Not winger

Detroit doesn't need wingers either and every other ACGM involving Detroit has wingers going to Detroit. I respond that Detroit doesn't need any more wingers but its nothing to get mad about.

Kaprizov, Zuccarello
Kevin fiala, Matt boldy
Greenway, Joel Eriksson ek, foligno ( thus line isn't getting broken up)
Duhaime, connor dewar, nick bjustad

There's a reason Detroit team with not lot of talent Bertuzzi has so much point.

Seriously dude? This why this site can be so annoying. People like you say something outlandish and then when you're called out on it; you won't back down. It was a dumb comment. Bertuzzi would be third in points per game and fourth in points on the wild. He's 4 inches taller and seven years younger than Zuccarello. He plays both wings with equal skill. Whether you need him or not; he's a 1st or 2nd line winger even on the wild.

Never got mad about the proposal. Alot of wild fans are tired of wingers being forced on us then when we disagree or say it's bad, it's name calling. No one including me have ever said Bertuzzi is a 4th liner. Pur response to any winger trade is the winger would be 4th liner on wild and people get mad

Wild aren't going to change their lineup. It's also a bad look to say a player like Bertuzzi whose in the position he's because of playing on bad teams will be the same on a goid team. The details to say just because a player has this much point, he would be this on wild is wrong. Zuccarello and kaprizov aren't going to get taken apart. They are attached at the hop. Just like fiala and boldy are and just like pur 3rd line

This is also a lazy cop out of an argument. I've at least 20 Wild games this year and to be honest the only wingers close to Bertuzzi are; Kaprizov whose obviously a star and Boldy who will be soon.

No, it's not lazy to say our coaching staff won't break apart our lineup for anyone. It's also a fact that has been reported that aby winger trade offered to wild have been turned down.

Zuccarello and kaprizov aren't getting broken up. That will never happen

Matt boldy and fiala are absolutely nit getting broken up either , neither is our 3rd line. You should do your research on wild and how Zuccarello and kaprizov has been attached to each other

Dude just admit you're wrong our i'll just mark you down as someone I don't respect and move on. There is no team in the league that wouldn't have Bertuzzi in their top six and when say different you're the one that sounds ignorant. Maybe you should follow your own advice and do some "research",I already had a bad opinion about you before this "discussion" because you never, ever say anything positive about any trade you see and you're usually really rude about it.

Our whole team is also Vaccinated. So take your own word and do research. Wild won't. That is factual.

Apparently it's trolling to think Wild aren't going to take Zuccarello from kaprizov, or fiala from boldy. He won't be in top 4 or top 6 no matter what you think. Do some research on Minnesota wild before trying to call someone out. It's honestly sad how some don't watch other teams and try to call people ignorant. No matter what you think Zuccarello and kaprizov will always be together, just like our 3rd line. For thus year, boldy and fiala will. The fact you are blind to thus is telling.

The whole deal is not awful, but Minny doesn't real need any more wingers. If I'm Detroit I would prefer Stankoven even though I've made that trade a few times with bourque just to keep Dallas fans happy, I wouldn't include Back then.

After 43 comments on the same subject, it's time for a new topic:

We'd add to the Fiala trade. In either of two dimensions: either an additional player, or an improvement on Anderson-Dolan -- perhaps a possible future top-6 center?

Kupari then?

If they move Fiala, I think they need a replacement. I suppose they could keep Fiala if they move Dumba, but it's all relative to how much he'll cost.

pathetic...

Beckman whose about to get called up . We will easily adapt get one from fiala trade or sign cheaper one. We need c, not another winger who needs to get paid

Thank you for the constructive criticism. This was exactly what I was after.

It very much depends on if he's NHL ready or not. Which is why I brought in Anderson Dolan in that Fiala trade, who's been lighting it up in AHL and would be pretty much an automatic NHL player if not for the center depth LA currently has.