SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Who says no

Created by: NYRxLundqvist
Team: 2022-23 New Jersey Devils
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 29, 2022
Published: Jun. 29, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$6,000,000
Trades
VAN
  1. 2022 1st round pick (NJD)
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
2023
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
2024
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$82,500,000$70,204,167$0$2,050,000$12,295,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$975,000$975,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$825,000$825,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,825,000$1,825,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,166,667$3,166,667
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$4,125,000$4,125,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$4,166,666$4,166,666
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$2,800,000$2,800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,125,000$1,125,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LD
RFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 29, 2022 at 6:23 p.m.
#1
Dougie HIMilton
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 1,628
the devils.
NYRxLundqvist liked this.
Jun. 29, 2022 at 6:23 p.m.
#2
sensonfire
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 11,872
Likes: 4,462
New Jersey
NYRxLundqvist liked this.
Jun. 29, 2022 at 6:25 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 4,078
Likes: 616
The team with the second overall pick.
Jun. 29, 2022 at 6:31 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
J.T. Miller is not worth 2 OA lmfao. You might be able to pull some 20-32 pick, but even then 33-64 is more in the ballpark with another 2nd round or 3rd round from a future draft.
Jun. 29, 2022 at 6:32 p.m.
#5
i hate don sweeney
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 216
Likes: 61
the devils lol
Jun. 29, 2022 at 6:46 p.m.
#6
Canucks Fan... Help
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 526
Likes: 328
Quoting: Shylo_Moxii
J.T. Miller is not worth 2 OA lmfao. You might be able to pull some 20-32 pick, but even then 33-64 is more in the ballpark with another 2nd round or 3rd round from a future draft.


I agree the devils say no, but you are saying you think JT Miller is worth a 2nd and 3rd?
Jun. 29, 2022 at 6:48 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: YesThisIsFlo
I agree the devils say no, but you are saying you think JT Miller is worth a 2nd and 3rd?


In 2022 deep draft and 2023 deep draft yes, if it was not as deep no he'd be worth a 1st. Way too much to invest in this draft with amazing prospects.
Jun. 29, 2022 at 6:49 p.m.
#8
Lets go Preds
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 915
Quoting: Shylo_Moxii
J.T. Miller is not worth 2 OA lmfao. You might be able to pull some 20-32 pick, but even then 33-64 is more in the ballpark with another 2nd round or 3rd round from a future draft.

I think the nucks will be upset with the return but he’s definitely bring back a 1st plus at the bare minimum
Logan_Ollivier liked this.
Jun. 29, 2022 at 6:53 p.m.
#9
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: GeauxPreds1
I think the nucks will be upset with the return but he’s definitely bring back a 1st plus at the bare minimum


Canuck fans will be disappointed with a 1st, 2 top prospects and a roster player to balance cap space. They want McDavid level return
GeauxPreds1 liked this.
Jun. 29, 2022 at 6:57 p.m.
#10
Lets go Preds
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 915
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Canuck fans will be disappointed with a 1st, 2 top prospects and a roster player to balance cap space. They want McDavid level return

I could see muller going for a 1st and prospect knowing it’s only for 1 year now. The price is just gonna get lower the longer they hold on to him
Logan_Ollivier liked this.
Jun. 29, 2022 at 6:58 p.m.
#11
Canucks Fan... Help
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 526
Likes: 328
Quoting: Shylo_Moxii
In 2022 deep draft and 2023 deep draft yes, if it was not as deep no he'd be worth a 1st. Way too much to invest in this draft with amazing prospects.


Ok so let's say, for a second, that the Blues were going to trade Tarasenko.

Scored 17 pts less than Miller, a year older, doesn't play center, and hasn't killed penalties.

What would they get in your eyes for Tarsenko, two 3rds?
Aasen6, Knuckl3s and mv21227 liked this.
Jun. 29, 2022 at 7:00 p.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Canuck fans will be disappointed with a 1st, 2 top prospects and a roster player to balance cap space. They want McDavid level return


No we don't
Jun. 29, 2022 at 7:00 p.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: YesThisIsFlo
Ok so let's say, for a second, that the Blues were going to trade Tarasenko.

Scored 17 pts less than Miller, a year older, doesn't play center, and hasn't killed penalties.

What would they get in your eyes for Tarsenko, two 3rds?


tears of joy tears of joy
YesThisIsFlo liked this.
Jun. 29, 2022 at 7:02 p.m.
#14
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: GeauxPreds1
I think the nucks will be upset with the return but he’s definitely bring back a 1st plus at the bare minimum


He'll return 3 marquee pieces minimum. A hypothetical package will most likely comprise of a mid-late 1st, a top prospect, and a quality roster player
Jun. 29, 2022 at 7:02 p.m.
#15
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: GeauxPreds1
I could see muller going for a 1st and prospect knowing it’s only for 1 year now. The price is just gonna get lower the longer they hold on to him


It'll still be a good package at the deadline but wanting 2nd overall picks, or 2 top prospects, a 1st and a 2nd and not retain salary is just silly.
Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 29, 2022 at 7:02 p.m.
#16
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Knuckl3s
He'll return 3 marquee pieces minimum. A hypothetical package will most likely comprise of a mid-late 1st, a top prospect, and a quality roster player


Yup looks like Devil fans are showing you your expectations are beyond ridiculous.
Jun. 29, 2022 at 7:03 p.m.
#17
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Yup looks like Devil fans are showing you your expectations are beyond ridiculous.


They're not my expectations, they're may fellow Canuck fans expectations
Jun. 29, 2022 at 7:05 p.m.
#18
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Knuckl3s
They're not my expectations, they're may fellow Canuck fans expectations


I think you forget all of our previous conversations.
Jun. 29, 2022 at 7:05 p.m.
#19
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
I think you forget all of our previous conversations.


No I don't, you're making false accusations like you always do
Jun. 29, 2022 at 7:08 p.m.
#20
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Knuckl3s
No I don't, you're making false accusations like you always do


You are just gonzo eh?
Jun. 29, 2022 at 7:08 p.m.
#21
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
You are just gonzo eh?


You are
Jun. 29, 2022 at 7:15 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: YesThisIsFlo
Ok so let's say, for a second, that the Blues were going to trade Tarasenko.

Scored 17 pts less than Miller, a year older, doesn't play center, and hasn't killed penalties.

What would they get in your eyes for Tarsenko, two 3rds?


I mean with 3 shoulder injuries, had 1 production season, and is a rental I think the most you could get is a 2nd and 3rd anyway. and it's Tarasenko not Tarsenko and for the record. JT Miller is a product of the players he is with playing with assists. Tarasenko had more production scoring wise. Biggest takeaway Miller is 17 percentile for forwards on PK so not that it means much. His QoT (Quality of Teammate) is way better than QoC (Quality of Competition) and JT really can't play defense where as Competition was way better than his teammates for Tarasenko he has a better A1/60 and a better G/60 and is better than 89% of players when finishing and has played well on the PP. So the basic point production numbers doesn't mean a ton in the grand scheme of things, but yes I don't think anyone would pay more than 2 3rds for Tarasenko.
Jun. 29, 2022 at 7:23 p.m.
#23
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,307
Likes: 11,369
Is this supposed to be a hard pick?
Jun. 29, 2022 at 7:50 p.m.
#24
Canucks Fan... Help
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 526
Likes: 328
Quoting: Shylo_Moxii
I mean with 3 shoulder injuries, had 1 production season, and is a rental I think the most you could get is a 2nd and 3rd anyway. and it's Tarasenko not Tarsenko and for the record. JT Miller is a product of the players he is with playing with assists. Tarasenko had more production scoring wise. Biggest takeaway Miller is 17 percentile for forwards on PK so not that it means much. His QoT (Quality of Teammate) is way better than QoC (Quality of Competition) and JT really can't play defense where as Competition was way better than his teammates for Tarasenko he has a better A1/60 and a better G/60 and is better than 89% of players when finishing and has played well on the PP. So the basic point production numbers doesn't mean a ton in the grand scheme of things, but yes I don't think anyone would pay more than 2 3rds for Tarasenko.


I'm glad your reading comprehension let you see I spelled it right at first, so I clearly knew how to spell it and later made a mistake smile Nice catch!

These are some insanely cherry picked stats though lmfao. Just for fun though, here's some context for your stats.

- Tarasenko's most common even strength linemates (Thomas 77 pts, and Buchnevich 76 pts) outscored the rest of Vancouver's forwards, so if anyone benefited from their linemates it's Tarasenko. Especially considering JT Miller's most common even strength linemates were Boeser (46 pts) and Pearson (34 pts).
- JT Miller led the Canucks forwards in short handed time on ice per game, and had the 15th most shorthanded minutes in the league amongst forwards. I have no idea what 17th percentile you were talking about.
- Due to his large SHTOI, his overall scoring rates get tanked because he spends a lot of minutes... killing penalties. I'm going to assume you didn't account for this, because I checked it for A1/60 and took our Miller's PK time, he's at 1.42 A1/60 and Tarasenko is at 1.28. Seems like you forgot to adjust.
- Tarasenko had 5g and 17a on the PP, vs Miller's 8g and 30a, so it's weird to try and flex Tarasenko being good on the PP.
- Miller is a good defensive forward, what are you talking about?
- Would *love* a source on your QoT and QoC claims, because based on the previous notes, I honestly don't think you understand how those work. From what I see on LWL, Miller had the 3rd highest QoC on the Canucks last season, and Tarasenko had like the 7th or 8th highest on the Blues, so I just can't take your word for this one.


Honestly, I'll just wait for a JT Miller trade to definitively prove your evaluation wrong. As deep as these drafts are, you are insanely overvaluing draft picks. Tarasenko would get a 1st and a good prospect, and Miller will get another asset more than that.
Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 29, 2022 at 8:00 p.m.
#25
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Shylo_Moxii
I mean with 3 shoulder injuries, had 1 production season, and is a rental I think the most you could get is a 2nd and 3rd anyway. and it's Tarasenko not Tarsenko and for the record. JT Miller is a product of the players he is with playing with assists. Tarasenko had more production scoring wise. Biggest takeaway Miller is 17 percentile for forwards on PK so not that it means much. His QoT (Quality of Teammate) is way better than QoC (Quality of Competition) and JT really can't play defense where as Competition was way better than his teammates for Tarasenko he has a better A1/60 and a better G/60 and is better than 89% of players when finishing and has played well on the PP. So the basic point production numbers doesn't mean a ton in the grand scheme of things, but yes I don't think anyone would pay more than 2 3rds for Tarasenko.


JT Miller can't play defense? You couldn't be more wrong

Secondly, Miller is NOT a product of the players he plays with. He is more than capable of driving his own line offensively
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll