Quoting: Shylo_Moxii
I mean with 3 shoulder injuries, had 1 production season, and is a rental I think the most you could get is a 2nd and 3rd anyway. and it's Tarasenko not Tarsenko and for the record. JT Miller is a product of the players he is with playing with assists. Tarasenko had more production scoring wise. Biggest takeaway Miller is 17 percentile for forwards on PK so not that it means much. His QoT (Quality of Teammate) is way better than QoC (Quality of Competition) and JT really can't play defense where as Competition was way better than his teammates for Tarasenko he has a better A1/60 and a better G/60 and is better than 89% of players when finishing and has played well on the PP. So the basic point production numbers doesn't mean a ton in the grand scheme of things, but yes I don't think anyone would pay more than 2 3rds for Tarasenko.
I'm glad your reading comprehension let you see I spelled it right at first, so I clearly knew how to spell it and later made a mistake
Nice catch!
These are some insanely cherry picked stats though lmfao. Just for fun though, here's some context for your stats.
- Tarasenko's most common even strength linemates (Thomas 77 pts, and Buchnevich 76 pts) outscored the rest of Vancouver's forwards, so if anyone benefited from their linemates it's Tarasenko. Especially considering JT Miller's most common even strength linemates were Boeser (46 pts) and Pearson (34 pts).
- JT Miller led the Canucks forwards in short handed time on ice per game, and had the 15th most shorthanded minutes in the league amongst forwards. I have no idea what 17th percentile you were talking about.
- Due to his large SHTOI, his overall scoring rates get tanked because he spends a lot of minutes... killing penalties. I'm going to assume you didn't account for this, because I checked it for A1/60 and took our Miller's PK time, he's at 1.42 A1/60 and Tarasenko is at 1.28. Seems like you forgot to adjust.
- Tarasenko had 5g and 17a on the PP, vs Miller's 8g and 30a, so it's weird to try and flex Tarasenko being good on the PP.
- Miller is a good defensive forward, what are you talking about?
- Would *love* a source on your QoT and QoC claims, because based on the previous notes, I honestly don't think you understand how those work. From what I see on LWL, Miller had the 3rd highest QoC on the Canucks last season, and Tarasenko had like the 7th or 8th highest on the Blues, so I just can't take your word for this one.
Honestly, I'll just wait for a JT Miller trade to definitively prove your evaluation wrong. As deep as these drafts are, you are insanely overvaluing draft picks. Tarasenko would get a 1st and a good prospect, and Miller will get another asset more than that.