Quoting: Cardiac
What they could of had is all a product of one move. Signing JT. They don’t do that, they are actual contenders. Also I never claimed it was science. I said “sure it’s not an exact science”. Implying it’s not science. Dubas is comical because of how he had mismanaged assets because of being cap strapped and where does that come from? JT. Leafs are a poverty franchise and enjoy the longest cup drought in NHL history.
Hindsight is 20/20 but even in hindsight why would they not sign Tavares, a superstar that has helped them become a better team, even if it hasn't been to win a series? They had Kadri and he could have been their 2C but he wouldn't have made them win a series. He probably would have had 4 consecutive series ending suspensions. His contributions to the AVS cups doesn't change what he did in Toronto and Colorado the previous 3-years. It's like saying Dallas messed up moving Nichushkin who was trash on their team.
As for Dubas mismanaging assets, that's not really true. Trading a 1st for Foligno is no different than doing it for Chariot, Savard, or Hagel, fans are going to bash their gms if their team doesn't win the cup but praise them if they win, even if the results of the loss/win might not be that player. So trading for a rental is not bad asset management if your team is good enough to win. That being said Dubas has made mistakes and he fixed them which cost them assets, and he had to fix Lou's mistakes. That isn't bad asset management either, nor is trading AHLers you can't crack the line up because the expectations of them are high and they don't get the time that they need.
As for the Leafs being a poverty franchise and enjoying the longest cup drought, Dubas only contributed to 5 years. So not really relevant to him. That being said, at least the Leafs are providing other fanbases with laughs and are among one of the teams who carry the League through profit sharing.