SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Murray Shmurry

Created by: noobmaster69
Team: 2022-23 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 16, 2022
Published: Oct. 16, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
TOR
    Some team somewhere
    2.
    TOR
    1. Karlsson, Erik ($3,500,000 retained)
    2. 2023 2nd round pick (SJS)
    3. 2024 1st round pick (SJS)
    4. 2025 1st round pick (SJS)
    SJS
    1. Murray, Matt
    2. Nylander, William
    3. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
    3.
    TOR
      Some team some where
      4.
      TOR
      1. Friedman, Mark
      2. Zucker, Jason ($2,750,000 retained)
      PIT
      1. Malgin, Denis
      2. Simmonds, Wayne
      3. 2023 2nd round pick (SJS)
      5.
      TOR
      1. Raanta, Antti
      2. 2023 6th round pick (CAR)
      CAR
      1. 2025 1st round pick (TOR)
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2023
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the OTT
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the CAR
      2024
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the OTT
      2025
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      22$82,500,000$80,795,547$212,500$0$1,704,453
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $950,000$950,000
      LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $11,640,250$11,640,250
      C
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $10,903,000$10,903,000
      RW
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $796,667$796,667
      LW, RW
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $11,000,000$11,000,000
      C, LW
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $2,750,000$2,750,000
      LW, RW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $827,500$827,500
      C, LW
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $3,500,000$3,500,000
      LW, C, RW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $2,100,000$2,100,000
      RW, C, LW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $1,500,000$1,500,000
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $840,630$840,630
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $7,500,000$7,500,000
      LD
      NMC
      UFA - 8
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $5,000,000$5,000,000
      LD/RD
      NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
      $2,000,000$2,000,000
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $5,625,000$5,625,000
      LD
      NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $6,500,000$6,500,000
      RD
      NMC
      UFA - 5
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $1,800,000$1,800,000
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $800,000$800,000
      LD
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $1,400,000$1,400,000
      RD
      RFA - 2
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $1,400,000$1,400,000
      LD
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
      $750,000$750,000
      RW
      RFA - 1

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 9:02 a.m.
      #1
      LongtimeLeafsufferer
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2015
      Posts: 59,739
      Likes: 22,775
      Thought at least till next game Holl would have good a respect.....Great game winning goal.
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 9:05 a.m.
      #2
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2022
      Posts: 2,793
      Likes: 1,010
      Why is Carolina trading it's backup goalie for a pick 3 drafts from now?
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 9:22 a.m.
      #3
      Lets Get Kraken
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2021
      Posts: 8,667
      Likes: 3,484
      It wouldn’t be ideal to trade Raanta, but I highly doubt that if Toronto offered that for Raanta, Canes would be hard pressed not to accept. If that were to happen, I think they would look at one of Dobby or Reimer to reacquire as a backup.
      Saskleaf liked this.
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 10:50 a.m.
      #4
      Go leafs go
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2020
      Posts: 13,274
      Likes: 9,211
      Quoting: Dan_the_Man
      Why is Carolina trading it's backup goalie for a pick 3 drafts from now?


      We’re just gonna ignore the fact it’s a first rounder?
      dannibalcorpse liked this.
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 10:52 a.m.
      #5
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2022
      Posts: 2,793
      Likes: 1,010
      Edited Oct. 16, 2022 at 11:04 a.m.
      Quoting: Saskleaf
      We’re just gonna ignore the fact it’s a first rounder?


      3 drafts from now they're in win now mode easy pass for Waddell. Just as you're ignoring they are serious Cup Contenders and aren't going to give up the now for a probable late first to submarine their present.
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 10:52 a.m.
      #6
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Aug. 2020
      Posts: 160
      Likes: 47
      That Sharks trade is just silly. Our 1st round picks are not going to be traded.
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 11:04 a.m.
      #7
      Go leafs go
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2020
      Posts: 13,274
      Likes: 9,211
      Quoting: Dan_the_Man
      3 drafts from now they're in win now mode easy pass for Waddell


      Lol. No GM in the right mind is going to turn down an offer on his rental backup for a freaking first round pick.

      Even if you want to stick to your “win now” argument, you can flip the first for a better player.
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 11:05 a.m.
      #8
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2022
      Posts: 2,793
      Likes: 1,010
      Quoting: Saskleaf
      Lol. No GM in the right mind is going to turn down an offer on his rental backup for a freaking first round pick.

      Even if you want to stick to your “win now” argument, you can flip the first for a better player.


      How many better backup goalies are available ZERO DUMB TRADE. If it's so easy to get a better goalie with that pick why don't you?
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 11:28 a.m.
      #9
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2019
      Posts: 2,705
      Likes: 994
      Pens decline. That return does nothing for them now.
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 11:31 a.m.
      #10
      Go leafs go
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2020
      Posts: 13,274
      Likes: 9,211
      Quoting: Dan_the_Man
      How many better backup goalies are available ZERO DUMB TRADE. If it's so easy to get a better goalie with that pick why don't you?


      Forget it, you clearly have no concept of the value of first round picks.
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 11:49 a.m.
      #11
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2022
      Posts: 2,793
      Likes: 1,010
      Quoting: Saskleaf
      Forget it, you clearly have no concept of the value of first round picks.


      A late first 3 drafts away is a lottery ticket a decent one but a lottery ticket none the less. You don't give up a guy you may seriously need on a cup run. Teams give up first all the time to make Cup runs. it's you who clearly over values it.
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 11:50 a.m.
      #12
      Go leafs go
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2020
      Posts: 13,274
      Likes: 9,211
      Quoting: Dan_the_Man
      A late first 3 drafts away is a lottery ticket a decent one but a lottery ticket none the less. You don't give up a guy you may seriously need on a cup run. Teams give up first all the time to make Cup runs. it's you who clearly over values it.


      Name one time a team gave up a 1st for a rental backup goalie.
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 11:56 a.m.
      #13
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2022
      Posts: 2,793
      Likes: 1,010
      Quoting: Saskleaf
      Name one time a team gave up a 1st for a rental backup goalie.


      Tell me a team that gave one of the best backups in the league they had for a 1 3 drafts away When their starter has the injury history of Freddie Anderson? Especially when they are a very strong Cup Contender.
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 11:57 a.m.
      #14
      Banned
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2018
      Posts: 9,687
      Likes: 4,536
      Quoting: brgh4life
      Pens decline. That return does nothing for them now.


      They decline swiftly and hard. I've been saying all year last year and this off-season that Zucker is a very good hockey player who had bad luck and just needs to get healthy. This trade makes the Pens worse. Pens should not move Zucker at this point.
      Grusofsky96 liked this.
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 12:00 p.m.
      #15
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2022
      Posts: 2,793
      Likes: 1,010
      When you are this close to a possible Cup you add now not futures. That first may do something 5-6 years from now come on use your head for something other than a hat rack.
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 12:31 p.m.
      #16
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2019
      Posts: 8,174
      Likes: 3,655
      Sharks aren’t retaining almost $20 mil and taking Murray back while giving up two likely top 10 1st rounders
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 12:55 p.m.
      #17
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2022
      Posts: 1,635
      Likes: 549
      Pens decline. 2 Ahl players and a 2nd for Zucker 50% retained who has been fantastic so far this season and Friedman who should be in the nhl but the pens just don’t have the cap space. No thanks.
      Grusofsky96 liked this.
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 2:26 p.m.
      #18
      Go leafs go
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2020
      Posts: 13,274
      Likes: 9,211
      Quoting: Dan_the_Man
      Tell me a team that gave one of the best backups in the league they had for a 1 3 drafts away When their starter has the injury history of Freddie Anderson? Especially when they are a very strong Cup Contender.


      If goaltending so your concern, flip that pick for a better goalie. Varlomov for example. It’s not a hard concept. Canes take this 11 times out of 10.
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 2:33 p.m.
      #19
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2022
      Posts: 2,793
      Likes: 1,010
      Quoting: Saskleaf
      If goaltending so your concern, flip that pick for a better goalie. Varlomov for example. It’s not a hard concept. Canes take this 11 times out of 10.


      If that pick is so easily flippable for Varlamov if he's better why doesn't Toronto do it Stop this is assinine for Carolina. You don't risk a Cup run for an asset that won't reasonably do anything for 5-6 years UTTERLY FOOLISH dumb decisions like that gets GMS FIRED
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 2:35 p.m.
      #20
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2022
      Posts: 2,793
      Likes: 1,010
      Quoting: Saskleaf
      If goaltending so your concern, flip that pick for a better goalie. Varlomov for example. It’s not a hard concept. Canes take this 11 times out of 10.


      Clearly unless Toronto management is completely incompetent if that pick gets a "better goalie" wtf isn't Toronto doing that?
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 2:40 p.m.
      #21
      Go leafs go
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2020
      Posts: 13,274
      Likes: 9,211
      Quoting: Dan_the_Man
      If that pick is so easily flippable for Varlamov if he's better why doesn't Toronto do it Stop this is assinine for Carolina. You don't risk a Cup run for an asset that won't reasonably do anything for 5-6 years UTTERLY FOOLISH dumb decisions like that gets GMS FIRED


      Quoting: Dan_the_Man
      Clearly unless Toronto management is completely incompetent if that pick gets a "better goalie" wtf isn't Toronto doing that?


      Of course Toronto would rather trade that 1st for Varlomov. Actually scratch that, Toronto would rather not trade a first for any rental goalies, period. It’s a ridiculous notion and to pretend that it’s somehow a deal that favours Toronto is stupid.
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 4:41 p.m.
      #22
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 853
      Likes: 161
      Penguins laugh
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 4:47 p.m.
      #23
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2022
      Posts: 2,793
      Likes: 1,010
      Quoting: Saskleaf
      Of course Toronto would rather trade that 1st for Varlomov. Actually scratch that, Toronto would rather not trade a first for any rental goalies, period. It’s a ridiculous notion and to pretend that it’s somehow a deal that favours Toronto is stupid.

      I think it's in a bad trade for both in some respects is Ranta worth a 1this year no but time decreased value. A 1 3 years from now isn't worth potentially throwing away a Cup run. Anderson goes down round 2 would you rather have Ranta or whoever is number 3 in Carolina right now with your season riding on it?
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 5:44 p.m.
      #24
      Go leafs go
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2020
      Posts: 13,274
      Likes: 9,211
      Quoting: Dan_the_Man
      I think it's in a bad trade for both in some respects is Ranta worth a 1this year no but time decreased value. A 1 3 years from now isn't worth potentially throwing away a Cup run. Anderson goes down round 2 would you rather have Ranta or whoever is number 3 in Carolina right now with your season riding on it?


      Obviously Raanta, but if this trade was offered you could flip the first for a better goalie then Raanta.
      Oct. 16, 2022 at 6:01 p.m.
      #25
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2022
      Posts: 2,793
      Likes: 1,010
      Edited Oct. 16, 2022 at 6:44 p.m.
      Quoting: Saskleaf
      Obviously Raanta, but if this trade was offered you could flip the first for a better goalie then Raanta.


      No I don't think so if it was that easy again why wouldn't Toronto do it ? There is zero intellectual logic in your argument.
      Edit: making a trade that forces you to make another is a bad idea. You're putting yourself in a position of having to rely on someone else that's how GM's get Fleeced.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll