SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

deadline

Created by: Wqrrior
Team: 2022-23 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 28, 2022
Published: Nov. 28, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. 2023 6th round pick (PIT)
PIT
  1. Grant, Derek ($750,000 retained)
2.
ANA
  1. Engvall, Pierre
  2. 2023 1st round pick (TOR)
TOR
  1. Klingberg, John ($3,500,000 retained)
3.
4.
ANA
  1. Tychonick, Jonathan [Reserve List]
  2. Zaitsev, Nikita ($750,000 retained)
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (WSH)
  4. 2025 2nd round pick (OTT)
OTT
  1. Shattenkirk, Kevin ($1,850,000 retained)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the PIT
2024
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2025
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$67,031,667$0$4,282,500$15,468,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,295,000$1,295,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,650,000$3,650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,037,500$2,037,500
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$425,000$425,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$762,500$762,500
C, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$5,950,000$5,950,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,125,000$1,125,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$855,000$855,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 28, 2022 at 3:12 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,580
Likes: 4,196
Value seems right for Klingberg. Leafs have struggled to generate offence from their D this year but they have been extremely good defensively. I am curious if they would be interested in Klingberg.

I assume they would try to keep Engvall unless they get a forward at the deadline as well.
Nov. 28, 2022 at 7:00 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,751
Likes: 12,134
I’d probably be fine with it besides the Rico trade

I think if we deal him it’s for futures not a more offense minded defenseman
Nov. 28, 2022 at 9:21 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 3,669
Likes: 811
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
Value seems right for Klingberg. Leafs have struggled to generate offence from their D this year but they have been extremely good defensively. I am curious if they would be interested in Klingberg.

I assume they would try to keep Engvall unless they get a forward at the deadline as well.






Leafs want nothing to do with Klingberg, we already had Tyson Barrie. We don't need another one
Nov. 28, 2022 at 9:45 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 11,203
Likes: 5,207
Quoting: Babatunde
Leafs want nothing to do with Klingberg, we already had Tyson Barrie. We don't need another one


don't often agree with you but 100% on this one
Nov. 28, 2022 at 11:27 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 645
Likes: 419
Quoting: GeneralLandro
I’d probably be fine with it besides the Rico trade

I think if we deal him it’s for futures not a more offense minded defenseman


What do you think ANA would look for in futures in a Rico trade?
Nov. 28, 2022 at 12:03 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,751
Likes: 12,134
Quoting: CF18GM
What do you think ANA would look for in futures in a Rico trade?


50% retained I think he could bring back a 1st and I think Colorado is the top option for that
Nov. 28, 2022 at 12:50 p.m.
#7
Pens are better
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 592
Kapanen for Grant and a 7th would be interesting imo
Nov. 28, 2022 at 1:03 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 16,027
Likes: 7,130
Teams don't subtract from their lineup at the TDL if they are buying. They also don't take on a bad contract for an additional year. Henrique and Winnipeg say no.
Nov. 28, 2022 at 2:03 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 58
Likes: 25
Quoting: Windjammer
Teams don't subtract from their lineup at the TDL if they are buying. They also don't take on a bad contract for an additional year. Henrique and Winnipeg say no.


Nah this would be a great trade for the Jets.
Henrique would make our top6 better, and we're essentially trading two kinda 'iffy' contracts for each other. Plus we have younger defensemen who can replace what Schmidt brings on the ice.
But you're right Henrique likely has Winnipeg on his NTC, and I highly doubt Anaheim would do this trade.
Wqrrior liked this.
Nov. 28, 2022 at 2:07 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 16,027
Likes: 7,130
Quoting: bikelh
Nah this would be a great trade for the Jets.
Henrique would make our top6 better, and we're essentially trading two kinda 'iffy' contracts for each other. Plus we have younger defensemen who can replace what Schmidt brings on the ice.
But you're right Henrique likely has Winnipeg on his NTC, and I highly doubt Anaheim would do this trade.


Nah, this would be terrible for the Jets. Trading a good starting defenseman for an older luxury player does nothing for the Jets and isn't the kind of deal you consider at the TDL. Especially getting stuck with an expensive, old LW for another year.

Schmidt simply plays a more important position.
Nov. 28, 2022 at 3:24 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 2,117
Likes: 483
I like Derek Grant but the biggest downside of him in Pittsburgh is he’ll barely get playing time again. Sully didn’t really use him much when we signed him. He didn’t get much playing time at all.
Nov. 28, 2022 at 5:19 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 58
Likes: 25
Quoting: Windjammer
Nah, this would be terrible for the Jets. Trading a good starting defenseman for an older luxury player does nothing for the Jets and isn't the kind of deal you consider at the TDL. Especially getting stuck with an expensive, old LW for another year.

Schmidt simply plays a more important position.


Schmidt is fine, but he's not a game-breaker. Henrique is a pretty good, but also not a gamebreaker. They are fairly equivalent players. You say it's a more important position, and you bring up the contract, but the Jets have too many middle-pair defensemen as it is, and not enough decent forwards. Henrique's contract is actually better than Schmidt's because it ends a year earlier. (also Henrique is only one year older than Scmidt lol). Even if you think Schmidt is better, Henrique has the better contract no question, and plays a position the JETS need more, not the more important position.
This would be a fantastic value trade for the Jets, so the fact you can't see that is kind of ridiculous.
Trade protections stop this trade in its tracks though. Henrique probably has Winnipeg on his NTC, and Schmidt might not waive for Anaheim either.
Nov. 28, 2022 at 5:26 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 16,027
Likes: 7,130
Quoting: bikelh
Schmidt is fine, but he's not a game-breaker. Henrique is a pretty good, but also not a gamebreaker. They are fairly equivalent players. You say it's a more important position, and you bring up the contract, but the Jets have too many middle-pair defensemen as it is, and not enough decent forwards. Henrique's contract is actually better than Schmidt's because it ends a year earlier. (also Henrique is only one year older than Scmidt lol). Even if you think Schmidt is better, Henrique has the better contract no question, and plays a position the JETS need more, not the more important position.
This would be a fantastic value trade for the Jets, so the fact you can't see that is kind of ridiculous.
Trade protections stop this trade in its tracks though. Henrique probably has Winnipeg on his NTC, and Schmidt might not waive for Anaheim either.


The fact that you can't see that a starting defenseman is far more important than an expensive bottom 6 LW is kind of ridiculous. It's also equally ridiculous to think that a team that is buying at the TDL is going to trade a solid starting roster player for depth help. What buying team does that at the TDL?

It's a lot harder to find competent NHL defenseman, that expensive bottom 6 role players.
Nov. 28, 2022 at 5:34 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 58
Likes: 25
Quoting: Windjammer
The fact that you can't see that a starting defenseman is far more important than an expensive bottom 6 LW is kind of ridiculous. It's also equally ridiculous to think that a team that is buying at the TDL is going to trade a solid starting roster player for depth help. What buying team does that?

It's a lot harder to find competent NHL defenseman, that expensive bottom 6 role players.


Wow. Adam Henrique is not a Bottom Six winger. he scored 42 points in 58 games last year, and is off to a slow-ish start for scoring this year. But he has great underlying stats while playing on an NHL top line, even if it is on a bad team. You realize Nate Schmidt is currently playing on our bottom pairing because we have too many defensemen right? A buying team that is prioritizing both the present and the future does this trade. This is a hockey trade, not a "buying" trade. Move other assets to pick up a depth defenseman if you need one, but right now we have too many defensemen, and not enough quality forwards. You move a defenseman with a similar cap hit, contract, age, and ability. It's really just simple.
Regardless of "importance of position" Henrique as an individual player is more valuable than Schmidt is.
Anyway, doesn't happen due to trade protections
Nov. 28, 2022 at 7:01 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 10,510
Likes: 3,722
Shattenkirk is not really what Ottawa needs


PASS


Zaitsev = obvious buyout this summer
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll