SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

SJS 2023 off-season

Created by: wi11dabeast
Team: 2023-24 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: May 23, 2023
Published: Jun. 2, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I feel like at least half of these are somewhat do-able for both sides. I have no idea what Seattle would be willing to give for Karlsson, but, personally, I feel like Karlsson at 8 mil would be worth a former 35th ovr, 20th ovr, third rd pick, and a future second. Like I say below, I wanted to include a 1 year cap dump for Seattle too but did not know who to include.

I really have no idea if any of these would work, or what other teams would be willing to do but this is my guess. I’ve seen that TOR wants to move Murray so I included that here as a reasonable deal. I do not think that a Murray cap dump could get a 1st so I included a more reasonable package. For the PIT trade, I’ve seen speculation about trying to clear some cap space to sign someone like Bertuzzi or something like that. I through back a cheap PK killing master in Sturm who plays a good 2 way game. Figured I’d throw in their 1st for the CAP dump and getting a good player/contract with sturm. I did not think that this was quite fair (despite PIT not needed draft picks now, as it would not help with the Malkin/Crosby window) so I included the sharks 3rd on the way back. I’ve seen blues fans theorizing with Ferraro, so included their first in the way back, as Ferraro is a good top 4 d man who brings a good style of leadership. I did not think that this would adequate of a 1st still so I included a 3rd and 4th back. Next is the Isles trade, where Josh Bailey is traded for Kevin LaBanc. LaBanc gets to go home to NY, and get a fresh start on a new team. I have NYI paying for this as LaBanc is on a slightly lower cap hit with more points, higher skill (I believe) and a younger age. I also have BUF trading for a cheap and great player in Barabanov. I have them trading this years 3rd, and a 2025 2nd (which will most likely be a high 50s pick). I think that this is worth it for a somewhat young 45+ point player on a cheap contract, who scored those points while playing on a horrible team. Lastly, I have DET trading up to pick #20 in the draft this year for pick 42 and 43, they can pick someone like Gulayev or Simashev with this pick, or someone who is a high skill potential player who is falling (that I’ve seen DET fans say that they need another high skill potential player, this covers that to an extent I believe. )
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,350,000
1$1,050,000
1$950,000
2$925,000
2$925,000
1$925,000
2$1,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
1$850,000
1$1,500,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Firkus, Jagger
  2. 2023 1st round pick (SEA)
  3. 2023 3rd round pick (SEA)
  4. 2024 2nd round pick (SEA)
SEA
  1. Karlsson, Erik ($3,500,000 retained)
Additional Details:
(I would like to add a cap dump that the sharks could take off of Seattles hand, however, I wasn’t sure if Seattle had anyone to send, or who they would send)
2.
SJS
  1. Murray, Matt
  2. 2023 5th round pick (TOR)
  3. 2024 3rd round pick (NYI)
TOR
  1. 2023 7th round pick (VAN)
3.
SJS
  1. Granlund, Mikael
  2. 2023 1st round pick (PIT)
PIT
  1. Sturm, Nico
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (SEA)
4.
SJS
  1. 2023 1st round pick (TOR)
STL
  1. Ferraro, Mario
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (NYI)
  3. 2025 4th round pick (SJS)
5.
SJS
  1. Bailey, Josh
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (NYI)
  3. 2024 6th round pick (NYI)
NYI
  1. Labanc, Kevin
  2. 2023 5th round pick (CBJ)
6.
SJS
  1. 2023 3rd round pick (LAK)
  2. 2025 2nd round pick (BUF)
7.
SJS
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (STL)
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
Picks 42 and 43
DET
  1. 2023 1st round pick (SEA)
  2. 2024 6th round pick (NYI)
Additional Details:
20th OVR pick and 2024 6th
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the STL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$71,009,167$25,000$1,145,000$12,490,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,050,000$1,050,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$775,000$775,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$762,500$762,500
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$835,000$835,000
LD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW, C
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 2, 2023 at 10:53 p.m.
#1
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 11,744
Likes: 4,803
The islanders probably aren’t trading the 2023 2nd round pick, due to the fact they already dealt their 2023 1st and 3rd round picks. Also if the isles trade bailey they r doing so in order to clear cap space, so trading for Labanc doesn’t make sense anyway.
wi11dabeast liked this.
Jun. 2, 2023 at 10:57 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 51
Likes: 5
Quoting: Not_Isles5513
The islanders probably aren’t trading the 2023 2nd round pick, due to the fact they already dealt their 2023 1st and 3rd round picks. Also if the isles trade bailey they r doing so in order to clear cap space, so trading for Labanc doesn’t make sense anyway.


That’s completely fair, I didn’t see that they traded their 1st, however, now that I think about it I do remember that trade. Do you think that a 3rd would be a fair deal or no?
Jun. 2, 2023 at 11:02 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 3,455
Likes: 1,624
The isles will pay to dump Bailey just as the sharks would have to pay to dump Labanc. Bailey produces as the same rate and has had better seasons than Labanc , in no way would the isles add anything in a 1 for 1 trade.
Jun. 2, 2023 at 11:04 p.m.
#4
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,503
Likes: 11,417
I doubt the Blues would trade a 23 1st for Ferraro. Maaaaybe a 24 1st. But they need to offload an LD first anyway.
wi11dabeast liked this.
Jun. 2, 2023 at 11:06 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 51
Likes: 5
Quoting: mokumboi
I doubt the Blues would trade a 23 1st for Ferraro. Maaaaybe a 24 1st. But they need to offload an LD first anyway.


That’s understandable, I tried to throw in the 3rd and 4th rounders to try and offset this, is there anyone that the blues would try to get rid of at that LD position?
Jun. 2, 2023 at 11:08 p.m.
#6
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,503
Likes: 11,417
Quoting: wi11dabeast
That’s understandable, I tried to throw in the 3rd and 4th rounders to try and offset this, is there anyone that the blues would try to get rid of at that LD position?


Krug and/or Leddy, but it seems unlikely Krug would waive for the Bay Area.
wi11dabeast liked this.
Jun. 2, 2023 at 11:29 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,223
Likes: 3,680
Trading 20 for 42 and 43 is a big drop in value. Draftprospects.com has 20 at 6250 points and 42 and 43 combine for 3950
wi11dabeast and bunnymcfoo liked this.
Jun. 2, 2023 at 11:35 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 783
Likes: 490
The closest player Seattle has to a cap dump is Driedger. A change of scenery might be a good way for him to re-establish himself as a viable NHL goalie, as he's a bit of a question mark right now.

If Seattle trades for Karlsson he'd be supplanting Justin Schultz both on the right side of the defense and on the power play, meaning Schultz would also likely be on the move. However since Schultz has positive value Seattle would be able to get assets from a contending team, so he doesn't really fit the idea of a cap dump you're looking for. Ultimately trading for Karlsson is a big risk due to his age, term, and cap hit, even with the retained salary. Whether the Kraken make a move for Karlsson will ultimately depend on whether the offensive boost is worth that risk along with the trade cost.
wi11dabeast liked this.
Jun. 2, 2023 at 11:47 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
I don't think it's a horrible deal for PIT, but Granlund's buyout is so manageable ( <900k this yr) I think they would much rather move 14 for a top 6F or top 4D
Jun. 3, 2023 at 12:29 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 51
Likes: 5
Quoting: glarson17
Trading 20 for 42 and 43 is a big drop in value. Draftprospects.com has 20 at 6250 points and 42 and 43 combine for 3950


That’s kind of what I was thinking too, I looked at a coupon draft value charts and some of them had the 2 2nds higher, some had it the same, and some had it as lower value. I just added a 6th to it because I feel like this years draft is extremely deep, and that there are a lot of players that can be picked intermittently between 20-45 that could all be as good or better than each other.
Jun. 3, 2023 at 12:33 a.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 51
Likes: 5
Quoting: KrakenTheCode
The closest player Seattle has to a cap dump is Driedger. A change of scenery might be a good way for him to re-establish himself as a viable NHL goalie, as he's a bit of a question mark right now.

If Seattle trades for Karlsson he'd be supplanting Justin Schultz both on the right side of the defense and on the power play, meaning Schultz would also likely be on the move. However since Schultz has positive value Seattle would be able to get assets from a contending team, so he doesn't really fit the idea of a cap dump you're looking for. Ultimately trading for Karlsson is a big risk due to his age, term, and cap hit, even with the retained salary. Whether the Kraken make a move for Karlsson will ultimately depend on whether the offensive boost is worth that risk along with the trade cost.


Okay that makes sense. I think that while I love that SEA is doing, I think that a star like Karlsson would greatly bolster both their even strength points, and PP points. SEA also has a couple cut down defenders that I think Karlsson could pair well with. While it may not be the perfect solution, I think that Karlsson could add some great star power to their roster that they don’t really have right now. I don’t know if that’s SEA’s solution, but he would do great there I believe. I think (as a biased sharks fan) that they should take a swing on it, however, like you said, the deal is risky because his contract length and age, even for 8 million.
KrakenTheCode liked this.
Jun. 3, 2023 at 2:10 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 319
Murray is going on LTIR so no need for a cap dump.
wi11dabeast liked this.
Jun. 3, 2023 at 1:48 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 184
Likes: 72
Although you got pushback from fans of other teams, you did a good job at crafting these trades. Most are approaching fair value, which can't be said of a lot of ACGMs.

I wonder if GMMG is plotting a rebuild like this (i.e. tear it all down for max picks) or whether he tries to slowly turn things around. A Karlsson trade and what we do at goaltender will answer that question.
wi11dabeast liked this.
Jun. 3, 2023 at 2:05 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 51
Likes: 5
Quoting: pavelski_tip_in
Although you got pushback from fans of other teams, you did a good job at crafting these trades. Most are approaching fair value, which can't be said of a lot of ACGMs.

I wonder if GMMG is plotting a rebuild like this (i.e. tear it all down for max picks) or whether he tries to slowly turn things around. A Karlsson trade and what we do at goaltender will answer that question.


Thank you! I appreciate it.

And I really hope that he is trying to do something like this. Flipping Karl for some good assets and hopefully fixing our goal development system should go a long long way to helping our team in the future.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll