SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lindholm trade - let the rebuild begin

Created by: MoxNix
Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 31, 2023
Published: Oct. 31, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
CGY
  1. Lohrei, Mason
  2. Poitras, Matthew
  3. 2025 1st round pick (BOS)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$75,483,333$0$1,142,500$8,016,667
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$825,000$825,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$870,000$870,000 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,200,000$2,200,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 31, 2023 at 8:56 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 466
Likes: 219
Definite no from Boston. Maybe something along the lines of Lysell + 1st + 2nd as a starting point.
BruinsWoahWoah and Kinger25 liked this.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 8:57 a.m.
#2
LBS
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 593
I'd love that return if I was Calgary but, Boston giving up it's most NHL ready and arguably best forward and defense prospects is asking a lot.
I'd say 1 of the 2 and maybe a different prospect, probably not both
Kinger25 liked this.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 8:57 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 564
Likes: 189
Yeah absolutely not
Kinger25 liked this.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 9:02 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 894
Likes: 393
Yeah thats a massive overpay - more likely Lysell, a first, and a non-core roster player.
Kinger25 liked this.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 9:03 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,979
Likes: 8,922
Lol. No. McDavid maybe. Not Lindholm.

1st/Lysell/2nd is roughly the value. Boston would have to include some cap going back, if that cap has value the package gets lighter.
Kinger25 liked this.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 9:05 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 28,119
Likes: 14,702
Bruh
Kinger25 liked this.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 9:10 a.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 2,981
Likes: 590
Yeah Boston definitely says no to that
Oct. 31, 2023 at 9:14 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 4,353
Likes: 1,397
I do believe there is a trade for either Hertl or Lindholm, but I am pretty comfortable that it doesn’t include Poitras. They’ll take the chance that a player hits free agency before making that deal
BruinsWoahWoah liked this.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 9:27 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 466
Likes: 219
Quoting: Celtics21
I do believe there is a trade for either Hertl or Lindholm, but I am pretty comfortable that it doesn’t include Poitras. They’ll take the chance that a player hits free agency before making that deal


Hard pass on Hertl. At best he is fairly paid, and within a few years he will likely be overpaid. Plus that contract has another 6 years after this one.
Gofnut999 liked this.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 9:29 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 4,353
Likes: 1,397
Quoting: hairyberry
Hard pass on Hertl. At best he is fairly paid, and within a few years he will likely be overpaid. Plus that contract has another 6 years after this one.


You do realize Lindholm is signing an 8 year contract when he’s 29. Hertl’s contract at his age is one of the appealing aspects of acquiring him.

There is part of me that would rather have him than Lindholm when I weigh price to acquire and contract even though I acknowledge Lindholm is the better player

If you were talking about Logan Couture, I agree 100 percent that his contract is not one that I want at all
Oct. 31, 2023 at 9:30 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 466
Likes: 219
Quoting: Celtics21
You do realize Lindholm is singing an 8 year contract when he’s 29. Hertl’s contract at his age is one of the appealing aspects of acquiring him.


Yeah I also think Lindholm would probably be a bad idea, I just didn't include him because we don't know for sure what his next contract will be.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 9:33 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 4,353
Likes: 1,397
Quoting: hairyberry
Yeah I also think Lindholm would probably be a bad idea, I just didn't include him because we don't know for sure what his next contract will be.


We know we’d have to pay for him to exit free agency. I think it’s safe to say that it exceeds Bo Hovart’s considering there is cash available at the end of this free agent class
hairyberry liked this.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 9:39 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 466
Likes: 219
Quoting: Celtics21
We know we’d have to pay for him to exit free agency. I think it’s safe to say that it exceeds Bo Hovart’s considering there is cash available at the end of this free agent class


Agreed. Personally I'd like to see what we have in Poitras with a stop-gap 2-3 year option (e.g. Stamkos would be a great target if possible) rather than committing to a full 7 years or so with Lindholm or Hertl
Oct. 31, 2023 at 10:33 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 903
2021-22 Elias Lindholm wouldn't even get this kind of package.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 11:10 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 4,353
Likes: 1,397
Edited Oct. 31, 2023 at 11:16 a.m.
Quoting: yycofred
2021-22 Elias Lindholm wouldn't even get this kind of package.


If Lindholm were 24 and signing, he would warrant a package like this. Hes not. My guess is the package would be centered around Lysell, DeBrusk, and a #1. If that isn’t enough, then we move on with our 8-0-1 team
Oct. 31, 2023 at 11:22 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 667
Likes: 201
Quoting: Gofnut999
Lol. No. McDavid maybe. Not Lindholm.

1st/Lysell/2nd is roughly the value. Boston would have to include some cap going back, if that cap has value the package gets lighter.


You are definitely not getting that without a guaranteed extension for Lindholm. That's too much for a rental. Some of that would need to be conditional on him resigning probably the 1st.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 11:22 a.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 8,014
Likes: 3,339
Quoting: Celtics21
If Lindholm were 24 and signing, he would warrant a package like this. Hes not. My guess is the package would be centered around Lysell, DeBrusk, and a #1. If that isn’t enough, then we move on with our 8-0-1 team


That's not getting Lindholm. A smaller prospect winger with questionable effort, a pending UFA winger and a very late 1st doesn't cut it.
Traptor liked this.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 11:26 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,979
Likes: 8,922
Quoting: MoxNix
That's not getting Lindholm. An smaller prospect winger with questionable effort, a pending UFA winger and a very late 1st isn't close.


Lindholm is a pending UFA. Lol. So if that devalues Debrusk it does the same for Elias.

If Debrusk is in the package you don’t get both the 1st and Lysell. Lol.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 11:29 a.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 8,014
Likes: 3,339
Quoting: Gofnut999
Lindholm is a pending UFA. Lol. So if that devalues Debrusk it does the same for Elias.

If Debrusk is in the package you don’t get both the 1st and Lysell. Lol.


Give your head a shake. Lindholm would certainly extend in Boston, Debrusk wouldn't extend in Calgary with the way things are there now especially not if they trade their 1st line center away and don't even get a half decent young center like Poitras to replace him.

Besides the very last thing Calgary needs or wants is yet another left shot winger especially not a mediocre 27 year old who'd just be blocking the young left shot wingers we already have too many of.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 11:37 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,979
Likes: 8,922
Quoting: MoxNix
Give your head a shake. Lindholm would certainly extend in Boston, Debrusk wouldn't extend in Calgary with the way things are there now especially not if they trade their 1st line center away and don't even get a half decent young center like Poitras to replace him.

Besides the very last thing Calgary needs or wants is yet another left shot winger especially not a mediocre 27 year old who'd just be blocking the young left shot wingers we already have too many of.


Team needs and player values are two different things entirely.

You may not want or need Debrusk. But as iI said, if he’s in the package you are accepting him at his value. Which means you don’t get both !st and Lysell with him, only one of those pieces. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Not wanting him in the package is a different conversation.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 12:53 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 634
Likes: 163
Quoting: Gofnut999
Team needs and player values are two different things entirely.

You may not want or need Debrusk. But as iI said, if he’s in the package you are accepting him at his value. Which means you don’t get both !st and Lysell with him, only one of those pieces. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Not wanting him in the package is a different conversation.


Flames have 0 need for debrusk with the direction they're going given his age and contract status. Lysell is also not a very interesting prospect for the flames for lindholm. A late 1st 2025 1st is also not that enticing. There will be alot of demand for Lindholm.

Lindholm would cost poitras + 2025 1st minimum
Oct. 31, 2023 at 1:59 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 4,353
Likes: 1,397
Quoting: MoxNix
That's not getting Lindholm. A smaller prospect winger with questionable effort, a pending UFA winger and a very late 1st doesn't cut it.


Whether Calgary fans like it or not, any team that trades for Lindholm is going to pay in excess of 9 million through age 37 to keep him. Do teams put the negative value associated with the backend of that deal in an offer or do they value him only for this year?

If Calgary thought he was worth that or he was willing to sign on in Calgary, he’d already be signed to a deal. There is a gap there somewhere. The best way to maximize return is to Remove uncertainty.

On a side note, Lysell is about the same size as Coronato and didn’t have the benefit of playing in Hockey East last year. Pretty comparable skill sets overall. Lysell has some warts or he’d be up with the big club, but talent wise … he also has some elite skills. Minimize him all you want. I doubt you are getting a better prospect in return coupled with a first round pick for Lindholm.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 2:28 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 8,014
Likes: 3,339
Quoting: Gofnut999
Team needs and player values are two different things entirely.

You may not want or need Debrusk. But as iI said, if he’s in the package you are accepting him at his value. Which means you don’t get both !st and Lysell with him, only one of those pieces. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Not wanting him in the package is a different conversation.


Either you pay the price or you don't get Lindholm. Low ball offers won't get you either of the two best Bergeron replacements you could find in the entire league (Barkov being the other).
Oct. 31, 2023 at 7:10 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,979
Likes: 8,922
Edited Oct. 31, 2023 at 7:17 p.m.
Quoting: Traptor
Flames have 0 need for debrusk with the direction they're going given his age and contract status. Lysell is also not a very interesting prospect for the flames for lindholm. A late 1st 2025 1st is also not that enticing. There will be alot of demand for Lindholm.

Lindholm would cost poitras + 2025 1st minimum


Lol. Boston does not trade Poitras for Lindholm straight up.

The fact that Poitras has arrived early means the need for another center is not as urgent.

As far as the 1st goes, you are not getting a top 15 pick. Buyers at the deadline all pick in the bottom half of the draft.


I agree they should not be interested in Debrusk. But that was never the point.
Oct. 31, 2023 at 7:15 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,979
Likes: 8,922
Quoting: MoxNix
Either you pay the price or you don't get Lindholm. Low ball offers won't get you either of the two best Bergeron replacements you could find in the entire league (Barkov being the other).



Keep him 🤷🏻‍♂️

Boston not paying double his market value and with the arrival Poitras the need is nowhere near what it was a month ago.

If goes free agent and they still want him they will make an offer.

If they go a trade route they are not making a move that does not make sense for Boston.

Lindholm’s value is 1st/young roster player or prospect/and 2nd or 3rd depending on who that 2nd piece is. He’s put up 3 years of first line production in 10 years. Not exactly sure fire top tier player.

He’d fit well in Boston but they are not desperate…anymore.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll