SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Shakeup

Created by: Leafsmania
Team: 2023-24 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 7, 2024
Published: Feb. 7, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Dowd, Nic
  2. van Riemsdyk, Trevor
  3. 2024 4th round pick (WSH)
WSH
2.
ANA
  1. Lagesson, William
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (NYI)
  3. 2024 4th round pick (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (DAL)
Additional Details:
Dallas adds a fifth for someone to retain half
4.
TOR
  1. Johnson, Tyler ($2,500,000 retained)
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2026
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$80,909,783$0$0$2,590,217
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,400,000$2,400,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$425,000$425,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,550,000$3,550,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$687,500$687,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$766,667$766,667
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,150,000$4,150,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 7 at 5:51 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 1,841
Johnson can definitely be had, but if the Leafs want him they would need to give up something the Hawks would want. A 5’9” injury prone player on an expiring contract is not that.
Earth and Garak liked this.
Feb. 7 at 7:28 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 3,219
Quoting: YeahRighttt
Johnson can definitely be had, but if the Leafs want him they would need to give up something the Hawks would want. A 5’9” injury prone player on an expiring contract is not that.


I'm sure Chicago would prefer picks but swapping a 5'8" injury prone pending UFA for a 5'9" 22 year old injury prone pending RFA isn't the worst option.
Hawksguy81, Garak and Snowhawk18 liked this.
Feb. 7 at 7:44 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
LeafsMania
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 290
Likes: 26
Quoting: JK74
I'm sure Chicago would prefer picks but swapping a 5'8" injury prone pending UFA for a 5'9" 22 year old injury prone pending RFA isn't the worst option.


Quoting: JK74
I'm sure Chicago would prefer picks but swapping a 5'8" injury prone pending UFA for a 5'9" 22 year old injury prone pending RFA isn't the worst option.


Robertson has been in the doghouse but his points per 60 is quite high and if given time to develop, like in Chicago, he could be a solid middle six scorer on a controlled deal.
JK74, Hawksguy81, Garak and 1 other person liked this.
Feb. 7 at 7:46 a.m.
#4
Caps123
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 145
Likes: 35
Drop McMann and Timmins, add Robertson, and the Caps accept. Caps would add NAK (50%) retention if you're still looking for fourth line defensively responsible forwards.
Feb. 7 at 8:03 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 1,841
Quoting: JK74
I'm sure Chicago would prefer picks but swapping a 5'8" injury prone pending UFA for a 5'9" 22 year old injury prone pending RFA isn't the worst option.


Quoting: JK74
I'm sure Chicago would prefer picks but swapping a 5'8" injury prone pending UFA for a 5'9" 22 year old injury prone pending RFA isn't the worst option.


Yeah, net gain is zero. So it would be making a deal just to make a deal for the Hawks. Leafs would be gaining playoff experience/winning know how.
JK74, Earth and Garak liked this.
Feb. 7 at 8:08 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 1,841
Quoting: Leafsmania
Robertson has been in the doghouse but his points per 60 is quite high and if given time to develop, like in Chicago, he could be a solid middle six scorer on a controlled deal.


I’m not saying it’s not in the realm of possibilities, but based how how many injury problems the Hawks had this year doubt they would be terribly excited to bring in another injury prone player. Also there will be more & more prospects needing ice time to develop in the upcoming season. I just don’t see any appeal in him.
JK74, Hawksguy81, Garak and 1 other person liked this.
Feb. 7 at 8:33 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 3,219
Quoting: YeahRighttt
Yeah, net gain is zero. So it would be making a deal just to make a deal for the Hawks. Leafs would be gaining playoff experience/winning know how.


Chicago could also swap him for a 3rd to another team. It could be the best way to maximize trade value if no other team is willing to pay a 3rd for TJ.
Hawksguy81, Garak and Snowhawk18 liked this.
Feb. 7 at 8:54 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 8,036
Likes: 3,235
Caps probably accept.
Garak and Snowhawk18 liked this.
Feb. 7 at 8:57 a.m.
#9
Marner rocks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 4,069
Likes: 894
Quoting: Leafsmania
Robertson has been in the doghouse but his points per 60 is quite high and if given time to develop, like in Chicago, he could be a solid middle six scorer on a controlled deal.


He's in the doghouse because Keefe has no idea on how to develop young players. Also Robertson and Domi need a puck retrieval go to the net winger. Jarnkrok gives everything he has but doesn't fit that role. Robertson for sure has a way better than average shot and Domi is a great passer but neither of them win the corner battles and can't cause havoc in front of the net.
Garak liked this.
Feb. 7 at 9:48 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 8,873
Likes: 10,791
I don't see the Hawks having much interest in another undersized F. But it's not a bad idea otherwise.
JK74 liked this.
Feb. 7 at 10:03 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 11,021
Likes: 10,882
I think CHI considers that. It isn't a bad bet considering CHI probably won't be re-signing TJ. Plus, it gives him a chance to go play some meaningful games.
Snowhawk18 and JK74 liked this.
Feb. 7 at 10:42 a.m.
#12
Snowhawk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,455
Likes: 3,517
I think the Hawks would accept, it’s a low cost risk on a player who maybe has an upside not yet reached. Odds in my opinion are higher that Robertson turns into a regular NHL contributor then the 3rd round pick you may get for trading TJ’s expiring contract.
JK74 and Garak liked this.
Feb. 7 at 12:52 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,292
Likes: 2,731
Dallas needs an upgrade on D. Brodie isn’t that which is exactly why you’re trying to unload him
Feb. 8 at 2:12 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
LeafsMania
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 290
Likes: 26
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
Dallas needs an upgrade on D. Brodie isn’t that which is exactly why you’re trying to unload him


Brodie is not a first pair D, which he is asking to be in Toronto. On a second pair, with someone else responsible like Lindell, he would be a solid #4.
I moved him in this to make room for the other adds and to try and recoup some value from him.
Feb. 8 at 2:14 a.m.
#15
Thread Starter
LeafsMania
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 290
Likes: 26
Quoting: Caps123
Drop McMann and Timmins, add Robertson, and the Caps accept. Caps would add NAK (50%) retention if you're still looking for fourth line defensively responsible forwards.


NAK had his chance with Toronto and did not go well. Could swap McMann for another cost controlled player like Abruzzese
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll