SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hanifin Colorado Tanev Vancouver

Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 7, 2024
Published: Feb. 7, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Accurate/Prorated
LTIR Enabled: No
Season Days: 192
Days Remaining: 71
Season Remaining: 37%
Projected Cap Hit Prior To Days Remaining Tooltip : $84,134,665
Description
Trade Hanifin to Colorado for Samuel Girard, Jean-Luc Foudy, Jeremy Hazel, 1st round pick 2024 and conditional 4th round pick 2025
Condition: 2025 4th round pick will turn to 2025 3rd round pick if Colorado advances to 2024 Western Conference finals

Trade Chris Tanev to Vancouver for Ian Cole and conditional 2nd round pick 2025
Condition: 2025 2nd round pick will turn to 2025 1st round pick if Vancouver advances to 2024 Stanley Cup Final

Lineup After trades
Huberdeau/Sharangovich/Kuzmenko
Zary/Kadri/Pospisil
Mangiapane/Backlund/Coleman
Pelletier/Rooney/Duehr

Girard/Andersson
Kylington/Weegar
Cole/Pachal

Markstrom/Vladar

Scratches (for now): Greer, Gilbert, Oesterle
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Foudy, Jean-Luc
  2. Girard, Samuel
  3. Hanzel, Jeremy [Reserve List]
  4. 2024 1st round pick (COL)
  5. 2025 4th round pick (COL)
Additional Details:
2025 4th round pick is conditional.
2025 4th round pick will turn to 2025 3rd round pick if Colorado advances to 2024 Western Conference finals
2.
CGY
  1. Cole, Ian
  2. 2025 2nd round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
2nd round pick is conditional.
Condition: 2025 2nd round pick will turn to 2025 1st round pick if Vancouver advances to 2024 Stanley Cup Final
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the COL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the COL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$83,163,161$0$212,500$336,839
Prorated Cap Hit

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$3,882,813
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$1,146,354
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,500,000$2,033,854
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$319,253 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$2,588,542
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$286,589
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$1,811,979
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$1,978,385
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$2,144,792
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$319,253
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$480,729
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$825,000$305,078
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$855,833$316,480
RW, C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$1,848,958
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$1,682,552
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$2,218,750
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$924,479
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$2,311,198
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,200,000$813,542
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$1,109,375
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$286,589
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$342,057
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$281,966
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$281,966
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$850,521 ($1,150,000$1M$425,260$425K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 7 at 4:28 p.m.
#1
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
Massive overpay for Noah Hanifin, And no Colorado can't afford him long term with what he's seeking. Especially not with Landy due back.
NMAvsFan, MeetYourMakar, Xqb15a and 1 other person liked this.
Feb. 7 at 4:29 p.m.
#2
sharks88
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 353
Likes: 177
Seems like too much of a lateral move for COL considering what they're giving up.
NMAvsFan, MeetYourMakar, Anus_McLeod and 1 other person liked this.
Feb. 7 at 4:33 p.m.
#3
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,866
Likes: 1,868
Flames should target Byram + Calum Ritchie for Hanifin in a Trade with COL. Simply not interested in any of the Players/Prospects being proposed here otherwise

That’s not good enough for Tanev. It needs to be a Guaranteed 1st or something decent like 2nd + Raty + Suter/Soucy and Flames might even retain some on Tanev. VAN should keep Cole as Depth for the Playoffs
Feb. 7 at 4:48 p.m.
#4
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,506
Likes: 3,690
Quoting: KingofRnR
Flames should target Byram + Calum Ritchie for Hanifin in a Trade with COL. Simply not interested in any of the Players/Prospects being proposed here otherwise


Why would the Avs do that? Trade a younger, cheaper player at the same position who has a higher ceiling PLUS a potential solution to their perennial 2C problem? That makes no sense at all from the Avs perspective.
MeetYourMakar, UpsideDownQue, Anus_McLeod and 1 other person liked this.
Feb. 7 at 5:00 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 3,444
Hanifin is a great player, but one could make a good argument that Girard, given his reasonable contract for the next three years, is more valuable than Hanifin straight up. I don't think the Avs would make the move even one for one.
MeetYourMakar, NMAvsFan and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 7 at 5:13 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,830
Likes: 2,481
Quoting: KingofRnR
Flames should target Byram + Calum Ritchie for Hanifin in a Trade with COL. Simply not interested in any of the Players/Prospects being proposed here otherwise

That’s not good enough for Tanev. It needs to be a Guaranteed 1st or something decent like 2nd + Raty + Suter/Soucy and Flames might even retain some on Tanev. VAN should keep Cole as Depth for the Playoffs


Its nice to have dreams
KingofRnR and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 7 at 5:22 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,507
Likes: 9,132
Quoting: KingofRnR
Flames should target Byram + Calum Ritchie for Hanifin in a Trade with COL. Simply not interested in any of the Players/Prospects being proposed here otherwise

That’s not good enough for Tanev. It needs to be a Guaranteed 1st or something decent like 2nd + Raty + Suter/Soucy and Flames might even retain some on Tanev. VAN should keep Cole as Depth for the Playoffs


Yeah COL isn’t interested in anything CGY has for those guys.
TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 7 at 5:27 p.m.
#8
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,866
Likes: 1,868
Quoting: NMAvsFan
Why would the Avs do that? Trade a younger, cheaper player at the same position who has a higher ceiling PLUS a potential solution to their perennial 2C problem? That makes no sense at all from the Avs perspective.

To Win another Cup presumably. Not sure why you think Byram has a higher ceiling. Hanifin is a 40+ Point Per Season Elite Skater and is better overall now while they’re still Cup Contenders. Byram’s gonna want a nice raise too

Quoting: Anus_McLeod
Hanifin is a great player, but one could make a good argument that Girard, given his reasonable contract for the next three years, is more valuable than Hanifin straight up. I don't think the Avs would make the move even one for one.

No way. Flames don’t want Girard, who the Avs have been trying to unload for years now. He’s decent offensively but nowhere near the complete player Hanifin is and his contract isn’t considered good

Quoting: MeetYourMakar
Its nice to have dreams

Yup, always wanting and wishing for the best results possible
MeetYourMakar liked this.
Feb. 7 at 5:32 p.m.
#9
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,506
Likes: 3,690
Quoting: KingofRnR
To Win another Cup presumably. Not sure why you think Byram has a higher ceiling. Hanifin is a 40+ Point Per Season Elite Skater and is better overall now while they’re still Cup Contenders. Byram’s gonna want a nice raise too


No way. Flames don’t want Girard, who the Avs have been trying to unload for years now. He’s decent offensively but nowhere near the complete player Hanifin is and his contract isn’t considered good


Yup, always wanting and wishing for the best results possible


Because Byram is a lot younger than Hanifin and could easily reach the 40+ point threshold. The Avs aren't trading Byram for a rental; that's just terrible asset management.

You are 100% wrong about the Avs trading Girard; they have never, EVER even once put him on the market. In fact, they've said the opposite. Everything that has ever been said about trading Girard has been media and fan generated rumors. YOU may not like his contract but he's a lot better player than you're giving him credit for and a top-4 D with that contract is a valuable commodity.
Feb. 7 at 5:34 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 3,444
Quoting: KingofRnR

No way. Flames don’t want Girard, who the Avs have been trying to unload for years now. He’s decent offensively but nowhere near the complete player Hanifin is and his contract isn’t considered good


You obviously don't pay enough attention to the Avs, because pretty much everything you say here is wrong.
MeetYourMakar and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 7 at 5:41 p.m.
#11
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,866
Likes: 1,868
Quoting: NMAvsFan
Because Byram is a lot younger than Hanifin and could easily reach the 40+ point threshold. The Avs aren't trading Byram for a rental; that's just terrible asset management.

You are 100% wrong about the Avs trading Girard; they have never, EVER even once put him on the market. In fact, they've said the opposite. Everything that has ever been said about trading Girard has been media and fan generated rumors. YOU may not like his contract but he's a lot better player than you're giving him credit for and a top-4 D with that contract is a valuable commodity.

Hanifin just turned 27 which is a young for a Defensemen and he’s in his Peak Prime. Byram is years away and has only played 43 games in a season

Girards just okay. He’s not a player the flames would be interested in and yes, I’ve seen trade rumors surround him for years

Quoting: Anus_dMcLeod
You obviously don't pay enough attention to the Avs, because pretty much everything you say here is wrong.

Girards often a Healthy Scratch. He’s only played in 30 Games this season…. COL would love to move him if they could, they just haven’t been offered or received the value they want for him
Feb. 7 at 5:47 p.m.
#12
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,506
Likes: 3,690
Quoting: KingofRnR
Hanifin just turned 27 which is a young for a Defensemen and he’s in his Peak Prime. Byram is years away and has only played 43 games in a season

Girards just okay. He’s not a player the flames would be interested in and yes, I’ve seen trade rumors surround him for years


Byram played the most 5v5 minutes in a SCF; he'll be just fine

You can think whatever you want of Girard; the fact that he plays top four minutes on a top team speaks volumes. And anyone can write anything and post it on the internet; doesn't make it true. The Avs have openly said they haven't shopped Girard and they aren't interested in trading him. If they were that interested - per the rumors - he'd be gone already. That isn't to say he cant't be traded at some point but the Avs are happy with him and his "compete level" which is far higher than you're giving him credit for. Bottom line, though, is that the Avs aren't trading key pieces off their team for a rental, period.
Anus_McLeod and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 7 at 5:55 p.m.
#13
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,866
Likes: 1,868
Quoting: NMAvsFan
Byram played the most 5v5 minutes in a SCF; he'll be just fine

You can think whatever you want of Girard; the fact that he plays top four minutes on a top team speaks volumes. And anyone can write anything and post it on the internet; doesn't make it true. The Avs have openly said they haven't shopped Girard and they aren't interested in trading him. If they were that interested - per the rumors - he'd be gone already. That isn't to say he cant't be traded at some point but the Avs are happy with him and his "compete level" which is far higher than you're giving him credit for. Bottom line, though, is that the Avs aren't trading key pieces off their team for a rental, period.

Happens all the time and they may wish to use the money around elsewhere

I don’t disagree with you, I’m just pitching, promising, discussing and supporting my position that the Flames would be far more interested in Byram over Girard in a Trade for Hanifin if the Avs were to consider Trading them for a Rental like Hanifin or thought they could Trade them both and just re-sign Hanifin long-term
Feb. 7 at 5:59 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 3,444
Quoting: KingofRnR
Hanifin just turned 27 which is a young for a Defensemen and he’s in his Peak Prime. Byram is years away and has only played 43 games in a season

Girards just okay. He’s not a player the flames would be interested in and yes, I’ve seen trade rumors surround him for years


Girards often a Healthy Scratch. He’s only played in 30 Games this season…. COL would love to move him if they could, they just haven’t been offered or received the value they want for him


Aside from his rookie seasin, Girard hasn't been a healthy scratch once in his career. You are seriously off base.
MeetYourMakar and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 7 at 6:10 p.m.
#15
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,866
Likes: 1,868
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
Aside from his rookie seasin, Girard hasn't been a healthy scratch once in his career. You are seriously off base.

Not really. Avs have played 51 Games and Girard has played in 30 of those with no injury status updates…

Girard a Healthy Scratch

Sounds like he has some mental health and depression issues as well, which is unfortunate and not a hit against him personally, but is a hit to his reliability and ability to help the team. We have the same issue with Oliver Kylington
Feb. 7 at 6:14 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 3,444
Quoting: KingofRnR
Not really. Avs have played 51 Games and Girard has played in 30 of those with no injury status updates…

Girard a Healthy Scratch

Sounds like he has some mental health and depression issues as well, which is unfortunate and not a hit against him personally, but is a hit to his reliability and ability to help the team. We have the same issue with Oliver Kylington


That absence was due to his issues. He announced he was in the PA program days later. Again, never once a healthy scratch.
NMAvsFan and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 7 at 6:21 p.m.
#17
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,866
Likes: 1,868
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
That absence was due to his issues. He announced he was in the PA program days later. Again, never once a healthy scratch.

Yeah, well I stand by what I said, that a) The Flames don’t want Girard and b) the Avs would like to unload him if/when possible
Feb. 7 at 8:05 p.m.
#18
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,506
Likes: 3,690
Edited Feb. 7 at 8:13 p.m.
Quoting: KingofRnR
Yeah, well I stand by what I said, that a) The Flames don’t want Girard and b) the Avs would like to unload him if/when possible


How bold of you. Pretty easy to stand behind stuff that has no basis in reality on an anonymous forum
TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 7 at 8:13 p.m.
#19
westleysnipez
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 586
Vancouver isn't paying a 2nd to make a lateral move of Cole for Tanev.

If Tanev is coming, it'll be Friedman going back along with retention on Tanev (either from the Flames or another team).

I think the Canucks shoot back with Bains + c-tier prospect (Bloom/Woo/Nielsen/etc.) + Friedman + NJD 4th for Tanev @ 50%.
theleano1 liked this.
Feb. 7 at 8:48 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 913
Likes: 1,085
Quoting: KingofRnR
Flames should target Byram + Calum Ritchie for Hanifin in a Trade with COL. Simply not interested in any of the Players/Prospects being proposed here otherwise


Avs should target Zary in a trade for Girard /s

Calgary had one player the Avs wanted and now has zero. See ya in the offseason
TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 7 at 9:17 p.m.
#21
PDG over PDO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 5,071
Likes: 4,117
Canucks pass
Feb. 7 at 9:28 p.m.
#22
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,866
Likes: 1,868
Quoting: westleysnipez
Vancouver isn't paying a 2nd to make a lateral move of Cole for Tanev.

If Tanev is coming, it'll be Friedman going back along with retention on Tanev (either from the Flames or another team).

I think the Canucks shoot back with Bains + c-tier prospect (Bloom/Woo/Nielsen/etc.) + Friedman + NJD 4th for Tanev 50%.

Ha! Play Cole at RD then lol

Either way Tanev >> Cole and VAN could definitely use another RD to bolster their defence over and above what they currently have
Feb. 9 at 8:08 p.m.
#23
westleysnipez
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 586
Quoting: KingofRnR
Ha! Play Cole at RD then lol

Either way Tanev >> Cole and VAN could definitely use another RD to bolster their defence over and above what they currently have


Nah, Cole has been the better defender so far this season. He's already been played on the right side a few times and been decent.

Chris Tanev's market value is about 4.2M

Ian Cole's market value is about 3.9M

Tanev would be an upgrade over a player like Friedman, but if the Canucks are giving up Cole, they're not adding much more. If a defenseman is being sent back the other way, it's going to be Friedman.
Feb. 9 at 8:28 p.m.
#24
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,866
Likes: 1,868
Quoting: westleysnipez
Nah, Cole has been the better defender so far this season. He's already been played on the right side a few times and been decent.

Chris Tanev's market value is about 4.2M

Ian Cole's market value is about 3.9M

Tanev would be an upgrade over a player like Friedman, but if the Canucks are giving up Cole, they're not adding much more. If a defenseman is being sent back the other way, it's going to be Friedman.

Flames would have zero interest in Cole or Friedman, so it’s all good, no Trade

We want either a 1st, A Prospect or 2nd + Raty or something like that. If we need to take Cap Back, we’d likely want Suter or Soucy
Feb. 11 at 1:18 p.m.
#25
westleysnipez
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 586
Quoting: KingofRnR
Flames would have zero interest in Cole or Friedman, so it’s all good, no Trade

We want either a 1st, A Prospect or 2nd + Raty or something like that. If we need to take Cap Back, we’d likely want Suter or Soucy


The reported ask from the Flames camp is a 2nd+, Raty is worth a 2nd+ on his own, he's a top-rated prospect.

You'll likely get a 2nd + c-tier prospect, or if you're retaining, a 1st + c-tier prospect
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll