SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Canes like deadline version 2

Created by: ecupirate07
Team: 2023-24 Carolina Hurricanes
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 12, 2024
Published: Feb. 12, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Accurate/Prorated
LTIR Enabled: No
Season Days: 192
Days Remaining: 41
Season Remaining: 21%
Projected Cap Hit Prior To Days Remaining Tooltip : $82,038,909
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Heimosalmi, Aleksi
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (PHI)
2.
CAR
  1. Carter, Jeff ($1,562,500 retained)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
2025
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
2026
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
25$83,500,000$83,424,903$450,000$500,000$75,097
Prorated Cap Hit

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$7,750,000$1,654,948
LW, RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$8,460,250$1,806,616
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,400,000$1,153,125
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,500,000$960,938
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,820,000$1,029,271
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,000,000$640,625
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,800,000$384,375
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,900,000$619,271
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$894,167$190,942 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$762,500$162,826
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$925,000$197,526
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,400,000$512,500
RW
NTC
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,300,000$1,131,771
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,280,000$1,127,500
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$427,083
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,250,000$1,121,094
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,025,000$859,505
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,500,000$320,313
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$7,750,000$1,654,948
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$939,583
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$762,500$162,826
G
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,675,000$357,682
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,400,000$726,042
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$762,500$162,826
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$800,000$170,833
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,562,500$333,659
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 12 at 12:55 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 1,160
PIT can better utilize their two remaining retention spots if they decide to sell.
Feb. 12 at 12:57 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 141
Likes: 65
Trust me you don't want Carter
Feb. 12 at 12:57 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,277
Likes: 2,969
Quoting: JuanDamienNebraska
PIT can better utilize their two remaining retention spots if they decide to sell.


Guentzel is about it for rentals to add value. Its unlikely Pitts retains on anyone with term.
Feb. 12 at 12:58 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,277
Likes: 2,969
Quoting: HillbillyPenguin88
Trust me you don't want Carter


We need a RH FO depth guy. J Williams knows Carter well. Tieksola is of little consequence so it isnt a much of a loss or gain for either team.
Feb. 12 at 12:59 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 141
Likes: 65
Quoting: ecupirate07
We need a RH FO depth guy. J Williams knows Carter well. Tieksola is of little consequence so it isnt a much of a loss or gain for either team.


I'd take this deal in a second but unfortunately Carter won't go for it
Feb. 12 at 1:00 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,074
Likes: 9,394
Hawks just may accept that deal
ecupirate07 , LivingAnew, Garak and 1 other person liked this.
Feb. 12 at 1:01 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,277
Likes: 2,969
Quoting: HillbillyPenguin88
I'd take this deal in a second but unfortunately Carter won't go for it


idk. Again Carter knows Williams in their time in LA who is a consultant for Donnie W and Carolina has a better chance at the playoffs and cup. but maybe you are right.
HillbillyPenguin88 liked this.
Feb. 12 at 1:10 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 1,160
Quoting: ecupirate07
Guentzel is about it for rentals to add value. Its unlikely Pitts retains on anyone with term.


That’s wrong. Ned can fetch a late 2nd at 50% retained. Undoubtedly at least a 3rd. Also, we could retain for another team in exchange for a more valuable asset that what you’ve offered, depending on our cap space if Guentzel were dealt. Not to mention that Carter has to agree to waive his NMC to begin with.
Feb. 12 at 1:21 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,277
Likes: 2,969
Edited Feb. 12 at 1:26 p.m.
Quoting: JuanDamienNebraska
That’s wrong. Ned can fetch a late 2nd at 50% retained. Undoubtedly at least a 3rd. Also, we could retain for another team in exchange for a more valuable asset that what you’ve offered, depending on our cap space if Guentzel were dealt. Not to mention that Carter has to agree to waive his NMC to begin with.


idk, i dont thnk teams are going to be going too hard after ned due to his size. i dont think carter would have an issue waiving for Carolina. Carter isnt a must have, so if this is a sticking point, Ill move on to another RH FO guy.
Feb. 12 at 1:26 p.m.
#10
Snowhawk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 3,421
If the Hawks are willing to move Murphy I think this proposal gets Chicago’s attention however, I don’t see it as an overpay which will probably be required to get Davidson to pull the trigger.
LivingAnew, ecupirate07 , Hawksguy81 and 4 others liked this.
Feb. 12 at 1:36 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 405
Likes: 525
Quoting: Snowhawk18
If the Hawks are willing to move Murphy I think this proposal gets Chicago’s attention however, I don’t see it as an overpay which will probably be required to get Davidson to pull the trigger.


THIS. Murph is valuable to the Hawks beyond his play; he also provides structure and guidance to the kids coming in during the early years of the rebuild... The Hawks can't simply throw newbies into the NHL without enough structure; could do much harm to the development of highly drafted, talented youngsters.

So... I agree that only an overpay - and perhaps a big one - will be what it takes to pry Murph away.
Snowhawk18, Hawksguy81, Garak and 1 other person liked this.
Feb. 12 at 1:56 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 8,708
Likes: 10,557
Hawks decline. Not enough for them to part w/ Murphy.
Garak, RicXX and Snowhawk18 liked this.
Feb. 12 at 2:33 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,074
Likes: 9,394
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Hawks decline. Not enough for them to part w/ Murphy.


What do you think Murphy is worth to the Hawks?
Garak and RicXX liked this.
Feb. 12 at 2:41 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 3,044
Honestly I’d take another year of we like our team over this
Feb. 12 at 3:29 p.m.
#15
Former Hockyluv21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 253
Likes: 42
Connor Murphy makes plenty of sense in the medium-term. I'm sure that he would love to waive to a top contender. Jeff Carter is...a bad idea. If you're going to acquire a vegetable to sit on the bench, get a guy who hasn't won the Cup yet. Someone like Okposo, for example.
Feb. 12 at 3:50 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,277
Likes: 2,969
Quoting: TheReelChuckFletcher
Connor Murphy makes plenty of sense in the medium-term. I'm sure that he would love to waive to a top contender. Jeff Carter is...a bad idea. If you're going to acquire a vegetable to sit on the bench, get a guy who hasn't won the Cup yet. Someone like Okposo, for example.

Carter only makes sense for RH FO depth since its unlikely Pono would be our number 1 option there
Feb. 12 at 4:03 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 488
This would be immensely disappointing which is why i think its one of the most realistic deadline scenarios for this team.
ecupirate07 liked this.
Feb. 12 at 4:14 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 8,708
Likes: 10,557
Quoting: ChiHawk
What do you think Murphy is worth to the Hawks?


Without retention, not less than a 1st. If the pick is a 2nd, then the prospect needs to be a lot closer to a "can't miss" guy than Heinosalmi. He's a smaller guy, which Hawks are moving away from on their blue line, and he seems to be having his struggles playing in his own end. He strikes me as Ian Mitchell 2.0.
LivingAnew, RicXX and Snowhawk18 liked this.
Feb. 13 at 12:34 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,074
Likes: 9,394
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Without retention, not less than a 1st. If the pick is a 2nd, then the prospect needs to be a lot closer to a "can't miss" guy than Heinosalmi. He's a smaller guy, which Hawks are moving away from on their blue line, and he seems to be having his struggles playing in his own end. He strikes me as Ian Mitchell 2.0.


Murphy is declining and didn't look very good last year and this year has been even worse. There is not a team that is going to offer a 1st without retention. Two years ago that was very realistic, last year maybe assuming he just had a down year, but this year not at all with an even worse year. Without retention he's worth a 2nd rounder at best, so a 2nd with a decent prospect is a very good offer that the Hawks would be silly to not seriously consider.

According to The Athletic, who just did player cards and rankings for all players, Murphy's market value is $800k. Compared to other d-men, he's in the 15% for offense, 11% defense, goals against 11%, blocks 96%, PK 62%. In other words, his 5 on 5 play is not very good with the exception of blocks and his PK is better than average....other than that he's not been good this season and was showing a fair amount of decline last season. The eye test backs this up as well.

I'm a huge murphy fan (was), but it's time to face reality that he's declining fast, battles injuries, and besides being a mentor for the youth is not anywhere worth his cap hit.
Feb. 13 at 1:36 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 8,708
Likes: 10,557
Quoting: ChiHawk
Murphy is declining and didn't look very good last year and this year has been even worse. There is not a team that is going to offer a 1st without retention. Two years ago that was very realistic, last year maybe assuming he just had a down year, but this year not at all with an even worse year. Without retention he's worth a 2nd rounder at best, so a 2nd with a decent prospect is a very good offer that the Hawks would be silly to not seriously consider.

According to The Athletic, who just did player cards and rankings for all players, Murphy's market value is $800k. Compared to other d-men, he's in the 15% for offense, 11% defense, goals against 11%, blocks 96%, PK 62%. In other words, his 5 on 5 play is not very good with the exception of blocks and his PK is better than average....other than that he's not been good this season and was showing a fair amount of decline last season. The eye test backs this up as well.

I'm a huge murphy fan (was), but it's time to face reality that he's declining fast, battles injuries, and besides being a mentor for the youth is not anywhere worth his cap hit.


The Hawks were in full tank mode last season. How can you possibly base any evaluation of Murphy on last season? Murphy played last season with a revolving door of bums who were barely NHL level players. Pretty hard to put up good numbers when you aren't playing with a consistent partner and the guys you are playing with stink. This year, Murphy has mostly been paired with Korchinski. 19 y.o. rookie who is obviously not NHL ready from the defensive side of the game. Just look at Seth. His analytics last season were pretty bad as well. This season, with Vlasic as a solid, consistent partner, Jones is playing so much better. No doubt Murphy has injury issues, but I don't agree at all on your "eye test" statement. He's still a solid 2nd pair guy. If you trade him away, you have no one internally to replace him with. So the Hawks need to make another deal to replace him or overpay for a guy in free agency. For that reason alone, I'm not trading Murphy for anything less than a 1st or a 2nd and a really good prospect. There's nothing wrong with keeping him for two more years until Rinzell is ready if you don't get good value back for him. What does Kyle from Chicago always say? You value the player more than the trade return. Murphy is a prime example of this.
Feb. 13 at 1:45 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,074
Likes: 9,394
Quoting: Hawksguy81
The Hawks were in full tank mode last season. How can you possibly base any evaluation of Murphy on last season? Murphy played last season with a revolving door of bums who were barely NHL level players. Pretty hard to put up good numbers when you aren't playing with a consistent partner and the guys you are playing with stink. This year, Murphy has mostly been paired with Korchinski. 19 y.o. rookie who is obviously not NHL ready from the defensive side of the game. Just look at Seth. His analytics last season were pretty bad as well. This season, with Vlasic as a solid, consistent partner, Jones is playing so much better. No doubt Murphy has injury issues, but I don't agree at all on your "eye test" statement. He's still a solid 2nd pair guy. If you trade him away, you have no one internally to replace him with. So the Hawks need to make another deal to replace him or overpay for a guy in free agency. For that reason alone, I'm not trading Murphy for anything less than a 1st or a 2nd and a really good prospect. There's nothing wrong with keeping him for two more years until Rinzell is ready if you don't get good value back for him. What does Kyle from Chicago always say? You value the player more than the trade return. Murphy is a prime example of this.


Actually, Seth had a pretty good season last season and this year his numbers are slightly down this year; at least advanced analytics. Check out both their player cards on The athletic.

That said, Murphy is a solid #4 (not exactly a #3 anymore) on a playoff contending team, I won't argue that, but the eye test shows, even when accounting for his linemates, he is not as quick on the skates and making some questionable decision especially on zone exits. Simply put, in a trade, he's not worth his cap hit. I don't think the Hawks will trade him this season or offseason for the reasons you mention, but next TDL they need to start considering it seriously. If the Hawks got an offer for a 1st, they should do it all day long right now.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll