SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What Are Your Thoughts

Created by: Irvine80
Team: 2023-24 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 21, 2024
Published: Feb. 21, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Smith, Reilly ($1,500,000 retained)
PIT
  1. Holmberg, Pontus
  2. Robertson, Nicholas
  3. 2024 4th round pick (TOR)
  4. 2025 3rd round pick (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Murphy, Connor ($2,200,000 retained)
CHI
  1. Timmins, Conor
  2. Tverberg, Ryan
  3. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
  4. 2024 3rd round pick (NYI)
3.
TOR
  1. Sundqvist, Oskar
  2. 2025 6th round pick (STL)
STL
  1. Kämpf, David
  2. Lagesson, William
  3. 2024 5th round pick (VAN)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
2026
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$83,184,783$0$0$315,217
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,200,000$2,200,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,550,000$3,550,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$766,667$766,667
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,150,000$4,150,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$875,000$875,000
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 21 at 7:24 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 2,165
If the Hawks can get a 1st rounder for Murphy, sign me up
Snowhawk18, Lord_Hossa, Garak and 1 other person liked this.
Feb. 21 at 7:32 p.m.
#2
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,281
Likes: 11,359
I think it's wild that anyone would imagine the Blues would add a bunch of cap in a Sunny trade. There's a good chance he's not going anywhere, and if he does loads of teams will go in for him. The offer above is a total favor to the Leafs.
Feb. 21 at 7:34 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,031
Likes: 1,457
Don't see a reason for the blues to want Kampf. Don't like that he has 3 years left
Feb. 21 at 7:34 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 258
Likes: 103
I think you overpaid in all of your trades. Don't think the Blues trade is a match
Feb. 21 at 7:46 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 8,533
Likes: 10,387
Hawks decline. That offer might not get Murphy without retention. Other than the 1st there is nothing there that interests the Hawks.
Garak liked this.
Feb. 21 at 7:48 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 8,533
Likes: 10,387
Quoting: SlickWilly
If the Hawks can get a 1st rounder for Murphy, sign me up


With no retention, it's a maybe at best. With 50% retention, this is a poor return for the Hawks
Garak liked this.
Feb. 21 at 7:54 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 917
I think your stuck with Kampf
Feb. 21 at 7:59 p.m.
#8
SEA GM v5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 879
Penguins accept
HillbillyPenguin88 liked this.
Feb. 21 at 8:10 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 2,165
Quoting: Hawksguy81
With no retention, it's a maybe at best. With 50% retention, this is a poor return for the Hawks


Connor Murphy provides no value to us beyond his current deal and is very much on the decline. If we can get another first rounder in 2024 for him, I will drive him to the airport myself.
Snowhawk18, Garak and PaulKorea liked this.
Feb. 21 at 8:21 p.m.
#10
LeafsEnthusiast
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 37
Likes: 5
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Hawks decline. That offer might not get Murphy without retention. Other than the 1st there is nothing there that interests the Hawks.


Overpay by the Leafs lmao
Feb. 21 at 8:23 p.m.
#11
pens1991
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 1,090
Don't think pens will retain on Smith, specially given there are rumors that they've received calls about him.

If they sell goal is to create cap space for summer, they'd only retain on pending UFAs
Feb. 21 at 9:07 p.m.
#12
Snowhawk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,363
Likes: 3,365
If it was just a 1st for Murphy with 50% retention I would be up in the air on it but the added 3rd round pick and Tverberg, who in my opinion is an interesting prospect, makes this an acceptable deal.

At the end of the day I think Murphy is worth an early to mid 2nd round pick. He probably carries a little more value to the Hawks because of the youth on their backend. Increasing the pick to a 1st rounder plus adding a mid pick and B - level prospect adequately covers the retention.

My feelings on Timmins have been expressed many times, he fills a jersey until his next injury, which unfortunately will be here shortly.
Garak liked this.
Feb. 22 at 8:18 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 383
Likes: 64
I like that offer from Pittsburgh's side. I think they would have taken it.
Feb. 22 at 8:45 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,812
Likes: 10,565
Quoting: SlickWilly
Connor Murphy provides no value to us beyond his current deal and is very much on the decline. If we can get another first rounder in 2024 for him, I will drive him to the airport myself.


And his current deal lasts for the most formative years of this rebuild. I think his work ethic, leadership, and knowledge make him invaluable to our young roster. I also firmly believe that he would be much better on a better team. The numbers lie, for obvious reasons, CHI is very bad right now. You put him in games that actually matter on a roster where the individual players know what they are doing and can pull their own weight in a highly competitive environment, and he is going to shine, defensively (maybe even offensively, too). We literally have no reason to move him for less. It's less about "what he is worth on the open market" and more about "what he is worth to CHI. Also, we shouldn't be shooting ourselves in the foot and contribute to a negative perception and devaluation of Murphy. Don't let the schlubs that don't actually watch him or know anything about him convince us what he is and what he isn't.

That all being said, I am not going to throw a fit if KD moves him for a package like this. A late 1st, if used properly, helps the rebuild, and we aren't going to need the cap space that retention uses. I would prefer a better player and prospect, but I understand if this is what a Murphy deal looks like.
Feb. 22 at 9:08 a.m.
#15
Snowhawk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,363
Likes: 3,365
Quoting: Garak
And his current deal lasts for the most formative years of this rebuild. I think his work ethic, leadership, and knowledge make him invaluable to our young roster. I also firmly believe that he would be much better on a better team. The numbers lie, for obvious reasons, CHI is very bad right now. You put him in games that actually matter on a roster where the individual players know what they are doing and can pull their own weight in a highly competitive environment, and he is going to shine, defensively (maybe even offensively, too). We literally have no reason to move him for less. It's less about "what he is worth on the open market" and more about "what he is worth to CHI. Also, we shouldn't be shooting ourselves in the foot and contribute to a negative perception and devaluation of Murphy. Don't let the schlubs that don't actually watch him or know anything about him convince us what he is and what he isn't.

That all being said, I am not going to throw a fit if KD moves him for a package like this. A late 1st, if used properly, helps the rebuild, and we aren't going to need the cap space that retention uses. I would prefer a better player and prospect, but I understand if this is what a Murphy deal looks like.


Thanks for the different perspective, Murphy I think is a very polarizing player, people seem to really love him or think he is total trash. A part of me would really like to see him on a good, competitive team just so we can see the value he could bring in meaningful games.
Garak liked this.
Feb. 22 at 11:59 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 2,165
Quoting: Garak
And his current deal lasts for the most formative years of this rebuild. I think his work ethic, leadership, and knowledge make him invaluable to our young roster. I also firmly believe that he would be much better on a better team. The numbers lie, for obvious reasons, CHI is very bad right now. You put him in games that actually matter on a roster where the individual players know what they are doing and can pull their own weight in a highly competitive environment, and he is going to shine, defensively (maybe even offensively, too). We literally have no reason to move him for less. It's less about "what he is worth on the open market" and more about "what he is worth to CHI. Also, we shouldn't be shooting ourselves in the foot and contribute to a negative perception and devaluation of Murphy. Don't let the schlubs that don't actually watch him or know anything about him convince us what he is and what he isn't.

That all being said, I am not going to throw a fit if KD moves him for a package like this. A late 1st, if used properly, helps the rebuild, and we aren't going to need the cap space that retention uses. I would prefer a better player and prospect, but I understand if this is what a Murphy deal looks like.


For sure I agree that he would be a lot better on a non-tanking team, however, I think it just boils down to the fact that he isnt going to be on this team when we compete, and if we can get a return similar to that of McCabe for him, I will be very much on board with accepting that offer. If we have two late firsts in the draft, that gives us so much more flexibility to think about trading into the top 15 ish picks to scoop a falling prospect , or simply to think less about drafting for need at the top. Going into the draft with 3 firsts is a whole different ball game than trading back into the 1st at the last minute to scoop a guy you want.
Garak liked this.
Feb. 22 at 12:01 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,812
Likes: 10,565
Quoting: Snowhawk18
Thanks for the different perspective, Murphy I think is a very polarizing player, people seem to really love him or think he is total trash. A part of me would really like to see him on a good, competitive team just so we can see the value he could bring in meaningful games.


I mean, we saw him on some mediocre Blackhawks teams and, outside of injury, he was looked pretty solid in the top pairing defensive D role before Bowman acquired Jones pushed him down the depth chart and then the team went right off a steep cliff. Statistically, the pairing of Zadorov and Murphy were the best shutdown pair in the league that year. His play went downhill when his reps went down and the roster got worse overall.
Feb. 22 at 12:09 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,812
Likes: 10,565
Quoting: SlickWilly
For sure I agree that he would be a lot better on a non-tanking team, however, I think it just boils down to the fact that he isnt going to be on this team when we compete, and if we can get a return similar to that of McCabe for him, I will be very much on board with accepting that offer. If we have two late firsts in the draft, that gives us so much more flexibility to think about trading into the top 15 ish picks to scoop a falling prospect , or simply to think less about drafting for need at the top. Going into the draft with 3 firsts is a whole different ball game than trading back into the 1st at the last minute to scoop a guy you want.


Yeah. I'm on the fence. I understand either way, though. I don't know how much this would play into KD's decision, either, but Murphy's wife is about to have a baby and he has been injured. Though, he did trade Cat right after his wife had a baby. But that was a draft day deal, so he didn't have to worry about being on the road right away or anything. Like @Hawksguy81 usually says, too, I doubt they move him at this years deadline, anyway, but you never know. Also, if Korch comes back improved next year and they want to keep them paired together again, that will go a long way in the public perception of Murphy and could net us an even better return than what we might get this year.
Hawksguy81 and Snowhawk18 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll