SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

San Jose Remake

Created by: Avenger2011430
Team: 2023-24 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 24, 2024
Published: Mar. 24, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. 2024 1st round pick (CHI)
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (CHI)
  3. 2025 1st round pick (CHI)
  4. 2025 2nd round pick (CHI)
2.
CGY
  1. MacDonald, Jacob
  2. 2024 1st round pick (SJS)
  3. 2024 1st round pick (CHI)
  4. 2025 7th round pick (NJD)
  5. 2026 7th round pick (SJS)
3.
4.
5.
VGK
  1. Blackwood, Mackenzie
  2. Todd, Nathan
  3. 2024 1st round pick (PIT)
Additional Details:
Future considerations
6.
WSH
    Future Considerations
    7.
    SJS
    1. Tarasenko, Vladimir
    2. 2024 6th round pick (FLA)
    FLA
      Future Considerations
      8.
      SJS
      1. 2024 1st round pick (CBJ)
      Buyouts
      Retained Salary Transactions
      Buried
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2024
      Logo of the CBJ
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the VGK
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the FLA
      Logo of the SJS
      2025
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the WPG
      Logo of the SJS
      2026
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      26$83,500,000$120,018,335$25,000$1,142,500-$36,518,335
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $10,500,000$10,500,000
      LW, RW
      NMC
      UFA - 8
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $7,000,000$7,000,000
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the Calgary Flames
      $3,100,000$3,100,000
      C, LW, RW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
      $6,000,000$6,000,000
      RW, LW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
      $2,000,000$2,000,000
      LW, RW, C
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Florida Panthers
      $2,500,000$2,500,000
      RW
      NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $4,500,000$4,500,000
      LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $5,000,000$5,000,000
      C, RW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
      $2,166,667$2,166,667
      RW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $2,000,000$2,000,000
      LW, RW
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $2,000,000$2,000,000
      C
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $4,725,000$4,725,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      LW
      RFA - 3
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $916,667$916,667
      C, LW
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $2,750,000$2,750,000
      RW, C
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $800,000$800,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 2
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
      $6,250,000$6,250,000
      LD
      NMC
      UFA - 5
      Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
      $5,250,000$5,250,000
      LD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
      $6,166,667$6,166,667
      G
      NMC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Washington Capitals
      $8,000,000$8,000,000
      RD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
      LD
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $910,000$910,000 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
      G
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $7,000,000$7,000,000
      LD/RD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $2,750,000$2,750,000
      LD/RD
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $3,250,000$3,250,000
      LD
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $1,100,000$1,100,000
      LD/RD
      UFA - 3
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $8,000,000$8,000,000
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $3,400,000$3,400,000
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $1,250,000$1,250,000
      RD
      UFA - 3

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Mar. 24 at 12:50 p.m.
      #1
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2024
      Posts: 47
      Likes: 7
      who do you think San Jose should acquire for a defense man.
      Mar. 24 at 12:52 p.m.
      #2
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Nov. 2017
      Posts: 27,778
      Likes: 14,517
      You are gonna find that people don't much care for this type of AGM
      brady_t12 and CaseyFlyman liked this.
      Mar. 24 at 1:26 p.m.
      #3
      mostly harmless
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2016
      Posts: 6,674
      Likes: 3,158
      Edited Mar. 24 at 1:33 p.m.
      Um. You literally don't have the assets to get a return like that from the Jackets. Like, there is literally nothing San Jose has or can offer that would make that viable. You could add Will Smith and William Eklund and still be told "no".

      EDIT: In case the OP ninja-edits, this is what this post is in response to:
      jfZQArL.png
      brady_t12 and CaseyFlyman liked this.
      Mar. 24 at 1:37 p.m.
      #4
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2024
      Posts: 47
      Likes: 7
      good point
      Mar. 24 at 2:39 p.m.
      #5
      Xan
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2021
      Posts: 23
      Likes: 4
      Flames say yes so fast it makes your head spin. They wouldn't let you hang up the phone, you have to submit it to central trade registry immediately, no takesy backsey!
      Mar. 24 at 2:47 p.m.
      #6
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2017
      Posts: 19,029
      Likes: 9,332
      The Hawks don't even respond
      JK74 and PaulKorea liked this.
      Mar. 24 at 2:51 p.m.
      #7
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2022
      Posts: 1,502
      Likes: 3,118
      There's something seriously wrong with you buddy. Either you're trolling or delusional. Either way you need help!
      PaulKorea liked this.
      Mar. 24 at 3:15 p.m.
      #8
      MisstheWhalers
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2019
      Posts: 23,653
      Likes: 12,372
      They can have Hellebuyck and Appleton but not those other Jets.
      Mar. 24 at 3:17 p.m.
      #9
      mostly harmless
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2016
      Posts: 6,674
      Likes: 3,158
      As anticipated, the Jackets trade has been edited:

      wIaOc4r.png

      It's technically an improvement in that we've moved on from "literally impossible" to a mere "that's not good enough". The Jackets do not need depth wingers, and even if we did that package isn't good enough for a top-5 pick.
      Mar. 24 at 3:51 p.m.
      #10
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2017
      Posts: 317
      Likes: 180
      Quoting: Viqsi
      Um. You literally don't have the assets to get a return like that from the Jackets. Like, there is literally nothing San Jose has or can offer that would make that viable. You could add Will Smith and William Eklund and still be told "no".


      Quoting: Viqsi
      As anticipated, the Jackets trade has been edited:


      It's technically an improvement in that we've moved on from "literally impossible" to a mere "that's not good enough". The Jackets do not need depth wingers, and even if we did that package isn't good enough for a top-5 pick.


      The inclusion of Barabanov makes zero impact on the trade as well. He's a pending UFA and I don't think after this year he's re-signing with any team near the bottom of the standings unless he can't get any other offers (which could reasonably happen considering his play this year, but it's unlikely he'll do it without testing free agency to see what's out there).

      In addition to that, the Chicago trade is laughable. Too lazy to screenshot but it's pending UFA fringe 4th line/AHLer Justin Bailey, pending UFA fringe 4C/AHLer Ryan Carpenter, pending UFA who couldn't get NHL games on an injured/terrible Sharks squad Oskar Lindblom, and pending RFA who is starting to play decently but has limited value Filip Zadina for Chicago's 2024 and 2025 1st and 2nd.

      I honestly can't take any of these trades seriously.

      Why is Florida paying to dump a pending free agent?

      Why is Washington giving away Carlson for free?

      Morrissey was top 5 in Norris voting last year and based on the stats he's been having another good year (I haven't watched him outside of games against the Sharks this year) and Namestnikov's been good for them this year too, so why are they giving them up for a likely late 1st, a guy who hasn't done great after being traded for a 2026 5th and a prospect who was probably included for contract numbers, and a guy who was available on waivers this year (though he's been decent for the Sharks on the rare occasions he's been healthy)?

      The other Jets trade isn't much better...a pending UFA goalie who was picked up for a 7th, a good AHLer in Scott Sabourin who isn't young enough to be more than the veteran guy down there who might occasionally be rewarded with a game or 2 at the NHL level, a pending RFA center who passed through waivers and wasn't able to stick on a Sharks team with 3 of its top 4 centers injured, a former 31st OA pick who was considered a reach when taken and is getting very close to being considered a bust (not quite there yet, still some interest in him hence Milwaukee wanting him to be loaned for the playoff push), and a 1st in 3 years for one of the better goalies in the league, Ehlers, and Appleton both of whom are good players (I'm getting lazy so I'm going to stop going through this).
      JK74 liked this.
      Mar. 24 at 8:25 p.m.
      #11
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Aug. 2022
      Posts: 7,370
      Likes: 3,166
      Calgary would probably have to accept that but it won't happen because there's no way Chicago trades their 2024 and 2025 1sts to SJ in the first place.
      JK74 liked this.
      Mar. 24 at 11:04 p.m.
      #12
      RecycleShark
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2023
      Posts: 930
      Likes: 261
      This all seems totally reasonable. Especially the Chicago trade. I wouldn't trade Addison for Morrissey, though, Addison has more offensive upside. Good idea to trade for Martinez before he hits free agency.
      Mar. 25 at 10:06 a.m.
      #13
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2024
      Posts: 47
      Likes: 7
      Quoting: RecycleShark
      This all seems totally reasonable. Especially the Chicago trade. I wouldn't trade Addison for Morrissey, though, Addison has more offensive upside. Good idea to trade for Martinez before he hits free agency.


      we do have good offense from the players that we got from Calgary.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll