SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Interesting pieces if you want Buch this summer

Created by: mokumboi
Team: 2024-25 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 3, 2024
Published: Apr. 3, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
These are not full packages or trade proposals. They're a list of things that could interest the Blues in a deal for Buch, retained or not. And yes, I'm fully aware a handful of these guys wouldn't be considered as Buch bait. Not really relevant... this is what the Blues would want, not what they think you'd give up willingly. I did leave another handful of young Dmen off the list, but a few real peaches made the cut. Because I said so.

I definitely could have included other teams, but skipped them for various reasons. If you want your team added to the list, just holler and I'll add them. Maybe. Depends on the team.
Trades
1.
STL
  1. Jokiharju, Henri [RFA Rights]
  2. Novikov, Nikita
  3. Östlund, Noah
  4. Samuelsson, Mattias
  5. Strbak, Maxim [Reserve List]
  6. Wahlberg, Anton
  7. 2024 2nd round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
* - Jokiharju only if Faulk leaves.
BUF
2.
STL
  1. Morrow, Scott
  2. Necas, Martin [RFA Rights]
  3. Nikishin, Alexander [Reserve List]
  4. 2024 1st round pick (CAR)
Additional Details:
Yes, I know they're not trading Nikishin. That's neither here not there on this list.
CAR
3.
STL
  1. Berggren, Jonatan [RFA Rights]
  2. Johansson, Anton [Reserve List]
  3. Wallinder, William
  4. 2024 1st round pick (DET)
  5. 2024 2nd round pick (DET)
DET
4.
STL
  1. Kakko, Kaapo [RFA Rights]
  2. Lindgren, Ryan [RFA Rights]
  3. Miller, K'Andre
  4. Robertson, Matthew [RFA Rights]
  5. Schneider, Braden [RFA Rights]
  6. Sýkora, Adam
  7. 2024 1st round pick (NYR)
NYR
5.
STL
  1. Bonk, Oliver
  2. Frost, Morgan
  3. Laughton, Scott
  4. 2024 1st round pick (FLA)
  5. 2024 1st round pick (PHI)
Additional Details:
* - Laughton only if Hayes (or Schenn?) leaves
PHI
6.
STL
  1. Willander, Tom [Reserve List]
VAN
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the STL
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the DET
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the DET
Logo of the STL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the NYI
2025
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
2026
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
31$87,500,000$94,143,309$0$1,705,000-$6,643,309
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,800,000$5,800,000
LW, RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$8,125,000$8,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$8,125,000$8,125,000
RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,571,429$3,571,429
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$412,500$412K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$852,500$852,500
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$835,833$835,833
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$475,000$475K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$896,667$896,667 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$838,333$838,333 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$350,000$350K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$800,000$800,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000$250K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$800,000$800,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$867,500$867,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$925,000$925,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,872,000$3,872,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,285,714$4,285,714
LD
UFA - 6

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 3 at 3:30 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,166
Likes: 9,392
Rental wingers don’t return prospects like Willander
Apr. 3 at 3:35 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 526
Likes: 261
Quoting: mv21227
Rental wingers don’t return prospects like Willander


He'd be able to sign an extension this offseason, and if traded in the offseason, I can see it coming with an extension attached already. That will drive that price up anyway

Gotta give up quality to get quality. And Blues want quality pieces in return
mokumboi liked this.
Apr. 3 at 3:36 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,166
Likes: 9,392
Quoting: StDetroitBlueWings
He'd be able to sign an extension this offseason, and if traded in the offseason, I can see it coming with an extension attached already. That will drive that price up anyway

Gotta give up quality to get quality. And Blues want quality pieces in return


They’ll get a good return if they move Buch but it won’t include a prospect like Willander
Apr. 3 at 3:37 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 8,195
Don't see the red Wings having interest in Buch. He doesn't fit our timeline. He's going to want a big extension that we likely can't afford. We also have other pressing needs to address this offseason.
Apr. 3 at 3:46 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,313
Likes: 11,371
Quoting: mv21227
Rental wingers don’t return prospects like Willander


"And yes, I'm fully aware a handful of these guys wouldn't be considered as Buch bait. Not really relevant... this is what the Blues would want, not what they think you'd give up willingly."

Sometimes, man, you ask for something they shouldn't trade and they actually say yes. Far stranger things have happened, and I also never said there couldn't be add-ons to make weight. smile
Apr. 3 at 3:48 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,313
Likes: 11,371
Quoting: Lancebmx
Don't see the red Wings having interest in Buch. He doesn't fit our timeline. He's going to want a big extension that we likely can't afford. We also have other pressing needs to address this offseason.


I hear ya, but there have been a ton of DET Buch AGMs on here, and gosh, you have so so many nice things laying around. It would have been rude to leave you off.

As for timelines, you guys are a borderline playoff team of some danger now. Adding Buch lifts you up a level. "Timelines" are not a immobile thing.
DangleCat liked this.
Apr. 3 at 3:55 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 1,417
Quoting: Lancebmx
Don't see the red Wings having interest in Buch. He doesn't fit our timeline. He's going to want a big extension that we likely can't afford. We also have other pressing needs to address this offseason.


What exactly is the Red Wings timeline? If you're shooting for younger, you aren't going to get near the impact of a player pushing you 2-3 years out versus trying to be competitive next year. In all reality, i'm curious, because it seems about time or past time that they should be competitive given where they've been.
Apr. 3 at 4:01 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,329
Likes: 2,122
Id give up any of those pieces from BUF for Buch but I doubt he waives to go to buffalo and signs an extension, cause thats the only way its worth it for the Sabres.
Apr. 3 at 4:04 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,313
Likes: 11,371
Quoting: Stadel
Id give up any of those pieces from BUF for Buch but I doubt he waives to go to buffalo and signs an extension, cause thats the only way its worth it for the Sabres.


I dunno, man. It would highly piss off the Rangers. squinty smile
Stadel liked this.
Apr. 3 at 4:14 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,539
Likes: 5,032
You're getting none of Morrow, Nikishin, or Necas for a rental Buch! Should have dealt him before the deadline if you wanted that kind of return. Now, you're looking at a package probably similar to Guentzel, since that is the natural comparable
Apr. 3 at 4:20 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 8,195
Quoting: mokumboi
I hear ya, but there have been a ton of DET Buch AGMs on here, and gosh, you have so so many nice things laying around. It would have been rude to leave you off.

As for timelines, you guys are a borderline playoff team of some danger now. Adding Buch lifts you up a level. "Timelines" are not a immobile thing.


We like our nice things and I agree, Buch would be a great add. Trust me, I would love to have him on our team. Just paying the price to acquire him would be too much for where we are. Prospects are great, but into they can show they can do something, we can't afford to be trading them yet. Everything Yzerman has done, at least in my mind, tells me that he wants to build this team from the ground up through the draft while trying to build a winning culture on the way. Considering Debrincat is the only significant player he has added through trade, I don't see us trading for 29 year old Buch. If the acquisition price was cheap enough, say Berggren, 2nd Round Pick and Albert Johansson, I would be all over it but he likely isn't that cheap.
JoeROFLCOPTER liked this.
Apr. 3 at 4:23 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,313
Likes: 11,371
Quoting: Caniac2000
You're getting none of Morrow, Nikishin, or Necas for a rental Buch! Should have dealt him before the deadline if you wanted that kind of return. Now, you're looking at a package probably similar to Guentzel, since that is the natural comparable


No, it's not a natural comp at all, and I'm kinda over explaining how that is very obviously so.

And again, I'm not making a list of what you would give up. I'm making a list of what the Blues would want. These are not the same thing.
Apr. 3 at 4:24 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 8,195
Quoting: AC14
What exactly is the Red Wings timeline? If you're shooting for younger, you aren't going to get near the impact of a player pushing you 2-3 years out versus trying to be competitive next year. In all reality, i'm curious, because it seems about time or past time that they should be competitive given where they've been.


Don't understand why you say it's past time? Yzerman took over in 2019 with an empty prospect cupboard and a pile of bad contracts to go along with nothing of value to trade on the roster for the most part. It takes a long time to draft and develop players and we haven't had any lottery luck to help us along the way. We went from the absolute worst team in the league at the end of 2020 season to a team battling for a playoff spot in 2024. I feel like that turnaround time is pretty quick considering teams that do full tear down rebuilds.
JoeROFLCOPTER liked this.
Apr. 3 at 4:24 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,313
Likes: 11,371
Quoting: Lancebmx
If the acquisition price was cheap enough, say Berggren, 2nd Round Pick and Albert Johansson, I would be all over it but he likely isn't that cheap.


No, he won't.
Apr. 3 at 4:45 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 182
Likes: 99
I think (or hope) Flyers ain't interested of him. Doesn't fit the time line, so they shouldn't be paying young assets/picks for him. He'd be like 32 when Flyers should be competitive.
mokumboi and Gunmars liked this.
Apr. 3 at 5:19 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 444
Likes: 196
From a Ranger stand point, you can keep Buch.
mokumboi liked this.
Apr. 3 at 5:41 p.m.
#17
Joe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 7,674
Likes: 5,595
Quoting: AC14
What exactly is the Red Wings timeline? If you're shooting for younger, you aren't going to get near the impact of a player pushing you 2-3 years out versus trying to be competitive next year. In all reality, i'm curious, because it seems about time or past time that they should be competitive given where they've been.


Where they've been? Please do elaborate because I watch the team Yzerman took over and by god was that team destined to be ass.
Apr. 3 at 5:50 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 1,417
Quoting: JoeROFLCOPTER
Where they've been? Please do elaborate because I watch the team Yzerman took over and by god was that team destined to be ass.


I guess you’re right on that. I guess I look at it as 16-17 as the downfall, you would have hoped they’re moreso ready to start competing again as early as next season. And they showed some flash of that this season.

I would moreso think they’re ready to turn the corner at this stage and shouldn’t be in the asset accumulation phase especially with hitting on Larkin and Seider
Apr. 3 at 6:21 p.m.
#19
Joe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 7,674
Likes: 5,595
Quoting: AC14
I guess you’re right on that. I guess I look at it as 16-17 as the downfall, you would have hoped they’re moreso ready to start competing again as early as next season. And they showed some flash of that this season.

I would moreso think they’re ready to turn the corner at this stage and shouldn’t be in the asset accumulation phase especially with hitting on Larkin and Seider


If this team started the tear-down at 16-17, this team would be vastly different.
They started when Yzerman came in.
Apr. 3 at 8:19 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 252
Likes: 67
Wouldn’t mind Woo, Hoglander, or Podkolzin from VAN. If Buch gets moved he’s probably Eastern conference bound. I can see Carolina going after him if Guentzel leaves and DET being desperate for star studded offense.
Apr. 3 at 8:41 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,166
Likes: 9,392
Quoting: JMSTL2019
Wouldn’t mind Woo, Hoglander, or Podkolzin from VAN. If Buch gets moved he’s probably Eastern conference bound. I can see Carolina going after him if Guentzel leaves and DET being desperate for star studded offense.


From a Canucks fan perspective, Woo can definitely be included as an add on to the end of the package. He obviously wouldn’t be a main piece but he doesn’t seem to be in our plans so if the Blues want him it makes sense to include him

Podkolzin could definitely be included as well, although at this point he’s not looking like much more than a bottom 6 player. Hopefully he can show some of the offensive ability he had in his rookie season next year.

Hoglander though almost definitely won’t be moved. He’s top 10 in the league in 5v5 goals and has 200+ less minutes than all of the others in the top 10 (except Marchessault who he is 178 minutes behind). That combined with his cheap salary for next season + chemistry with Pettersson means he’s probably among the least likely Canucks to be moved in a trade

I think the best offer the Canucks could do is our 2025 1st + D Petey/Raty/Podkolzin + a mid round pick + Woo. Mikheyev can be included for cap reasons if the Blues are interested in bringing a middle 6 winger back as well but wouldn’t be necessary. If another team beats that offer or the Blues prefer pieces from another team then the Canucks are likely out (they may even be out if it’s D Petey as it was reported management didn’t want to move him at the deadline)
Apr. 3 at 8:49 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 2,321
Quoting: JMSTL2019
Wouldn’t mind Woo, Hoglander, or Podkolzin from VAN. If Buch gets moved he’s probably Eastern conference bound. I can see Carolina going after him if Guentzel leaves and DET being desperate for star studded offense.


Detroit is desperate for the other end of the ice. Offense hasn’t been the issue.
Apr. 3 at 9:01 p.m.
#23
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,950
Likes: 5,366
Wings pass this is way overpayment for good not great player
Apr. 3 at 9:24 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 346
I wouldn’t mind returns from Detroit or Philly.

DET: 2024 1st + Wallinder
PHI: 2024 1st (FLA) + Bonk
Apr. 3 at 10:22 p.m.
#25
Thread Starter
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,313
Likes: 11,371
Quoting: buffbry
Wings pass this is way overpayment for good not great player


First of all, read the description. Secondly, Buch would instantly your best winger and second best forward walking in the door. He's a complete top line player.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll