SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

KPasty

Member Since
Jun. 21, 2016
Favourite Team
Winnipeg Jets
2nd Favourite Team
Vancouver Canucks
Forum Posts
1142
Posts per Day
0.4
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 23, 2022 at 11:18 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 14, 2022 at 11:10 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 5, 2022 at 12:41 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 28, 2022 at 3:08 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 28, 2022 at 3:08 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 13, 2022 at 4:02 p.m.
Thread: Gibson idea
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KPasty</b></div><div>Not a Edmonton or Anaheim fan, but I don't think Anaheim adds picks to this deal as is. I think Edmonton might have to add Samorukov and then Anaheim would add a 2nd

So I say:
<strong>Edmonton Receives:</strong>
John Gibson
2022 2nd Round Pick (PIT)

<strong>Anaheim Receives:</strong>
Puljujärvi, Jesse [RFA Rights]
Kassian, Zack
Samorukov, Dmitri
2022 1st round pick (EDM)
2022 4th round pick (ANA)</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>As you say, Kassian is a cap dump. So let's assume he has no value (not negative value, just no value). That means this trade is Puljujarvi and this year's first for Gibson, our 2023 second and a fourth. That's a joke. Either your GM think Gibson is worth trading for, or he's not.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Take out Anaheim's second and the retention and replace Samorukov with Broberg and the deal makes sense for the Ducks.</div></div>

I think the trade suggested by KPasty is certainly closer. Maybe switch who's giving the 2nd and 4th Round picks (perhaps Anaheim includes no pick at all . . . ?) Agree with OldNYFan . . . you either want the player or you don't. Retaining with that much term is tough, I will agree. But Anaheim also needs to keep it real . . . If it's a must that they trade Gibson (from the reports of his discontent, etc.), they are doing so at his lowest value and that cap hit and term don't increase his value in the slightest. Plus it dramatically reduces the number of potential suiters the Ducks will find in a trade. Edmonton shouldn't consider for a second trading a package like this with Broberg or Hollloway included . . . or anyone else I'm sure they insist GIbson is worth. JMO