SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

tleaf28

Member Since
Jul. 30, 2019
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
2nd Favourite Team
Columbus Blue Jackets
Forum Posts
68
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 29, 2023 at 9:41 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 17, 2023 at 5:07 a.m.
Fun new idea that's not the same 2-3 (rightfully) regurgitated things we always see on here for CBJ, but I think there's some issues.

Biggest issue is that by giving away 3rd ovr and not getting a center back in the deal, you're basically banking on Kent Johnson HAVING to develop into a top line center in the next year or 2. Maybe that happens, but as things stand right now, it's looking like they may have him as a winger moving forward. As the team stands right now, This center depth is just not good enough, both now and for the future unless you get a 1C out of KJ. So...that being said, I don't think the Karlsson deal makes much sense for the team. Adding onto that point, Jiricek is on his way and they've already signed Severson. Possibly as soon as this year, but definitely by next you have at least a solid, if not good top 4 blue line. There's simply not a need for Karlsson considering Jiricek and the excess of RD they have currently. The value of the trade is hard to add up since you have the Gru contract going back, a ton of retention for 4 years, and all the pieces, but I'm inclined to say it's a bit rich to give up 3rd ovr + 2 more firsts (Ceulemans was 25th in '21) for Karlsson, even with the massive retention .

The Saros trade, I would say that yeah, that's probably about fair value when you add everything up (possibly a bit short), but if you're a team moving a player of his level you need a better top piece in a package than a 1st that's a year out (and is probably in the 12-22 range). I'm not familiar enough with Nashville's prospect pool to know what specifically they may want, but that's definitely gotta have a better main piece in the package for it to happen. That being said though, I do REALLY like the idea of a Saros trade, should Nashville decide to explore a trade for him (though I think it may take some convincing to get them to take the Elvis deal back.

Bertuzzi will cost a bit more per year, but you can fit that deal in by not signing Cole (who I think is redundant and I'd rather have Bean or a non traded Blankenburg in there anyway tbh). Team doesn't necessarily need a signing like that, but I wouldn't complain if it did happen.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 2, 2023 at 2:18 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 24, 2023 at 8:20 a.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bricher33</b></div><div>This is why i keep telling people we need to just draft our picks this year and be patient. We are young dumb and full of ..... spirit. Plus we have makarov and Dolzhenkov coming over the next 2 years. Plus with 22 and 34OA this year theres a chance we could get Simashev and/or But. Patience is a virtue for the jackets fans right now.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dk325</b></div><div>It's definitely a questionable thought process to be trading away picks from 2023. I feel like this is the last draft where they should really be using all the draft capital they have to stock the cupboard and then picks for 2024 and beyond are what they should gamble on bringing in aid where they need it.</div></div>

I'll be surprised if either of Makarov or Dolzhenkov become NHLers. If they do it's certainly not going to be in the next 2 years.

Making smart moves is important, and I'm not saying we should be selling the farm, but the CBJ are closer than you think. This team has a lot of talent and should be trying to compete for a playoff spot right now. The cupboard is already stocked and overflowing. They have a surplus of young assets, and some of those should be used to upgrade on defense. I don't want them to trade away all their picks, but the extras should definitely be used to get better now so we're not wasting years of Werenski, Gaudreau, Laine, Jenner.

3OA is off limits because we HAVE to get a franchise centerman there, but the 22OA pick and the surplus 3rds should absolutely be in play, as well as a few prospects in the system. I really like Ceulemans and Mateychuk, but they're not guaranteed to be studs in the NHL. Same with Dumais, even Sillinger and Chinakhov. Again, I don't want to sell off all these guys, but if one or two can be included in a package that bring in a mid-age, legit impact top-4 defenseman or 1C, then I think we'd be foolish to turn that down.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 4, 2023 at 3:35 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 26, 2023 at 3:32 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 15, 2023 at 2:03 p.m.