Quoting: Hockeygoalie53
Ok, first, it does hold weight, it holds A LOT of weight. There is a reason why TPA was able to sign both Stamkos and Kucherov to deals under 10m per season, when both of them would have clearly gotten more on the market... Florida's lack of a state tax. It's at least a 1-2m difference on AAV depending on the amount, that's a huge difference that other teams would have to outbid them for.
Second, Kucherov was NOT a UFA. His previous deal would have expired after this past season and his status would have been RFA for this new contract.
Third, I'm sorry, but Matthews scores goals at an "unprecedented rate"??? In what world are goal totals of 40, 34 and 37 considered to be "unprecedented"? Ovechkin, who is wildly considered to be the best goal scorer in the game, consistenly pots 50+ a year and you're telling me 35-40 goals per season is "unprecedented"?? Even if you extrapolate out for full seasons, that still only puts Matthews in the low to mid 40's per season... that's great goal scoring, but hardly unprecedented... Come on man...
Lastly, while emphasis is put on goal scorers, Toronto may want to consider that before he played with Marner, Tavares never once potted 40 goals... so while Marner may not be a goal scorer, he certainly does elevate good goal scores into Great/Elite territory. Not many wingers can do that... and cue the "Tavares made Marner better" response in 3....2...1....
Ah man, you're one of those guys who likes to argue for the sake of being right, or worse, to make the other person wrong. My little kids do that.. it's kinda cute but really tiring, so here goes..
Re Kucherov being a ufa. My bad. You are right. But like I said, if you don't like him as a comparable go ahead and pick any other player in the league and we can go from there. If AM is your only comparable, then like I said, that's fine. The leafs, like the rest of the league put more value on franchise centers. That's just how it works.
Re tax free states. I didn't say it doesn't hold weight, I said it holds far less weight than people would like it to. The are a ton of variables that come into play. Taxation is but one. Endorsements, being paid in USD while living in Canuckastan, legacy deals, the evil genius of accountants etc are but a few.
Re Matthew's scoring at an unprecedented rate. Check 5 v5 goals per 60. Unprecedented.
Re Marner playing with JT. Somewhere in this contract chaos it's being lost that the whole point is to win hockey games.. not pad stats and beef up or limit contracts. JT and Mitch are a great tandem. They both got a bump by playing together, with Marner enjoying the greater bump of the 2
Re continuing this dialogue with you. I don't have the foggiest what you're looking for here. I keep saying all the power to Mitch if he can get a better offer than what the leafs have on the table. Its just that I doubt he gets it. You seem to be insisting the leafs have to pay Marner AM money. They don't. And the won't.