SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Cup Contenders

Created by: AnalyticsGeek
Team: 2020-21 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 21, 2020
Published: Mar. 21, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
What if the Hawks drafted Lafreniere & Drysdale?
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$6,000,000
3$1,500,000
3$3,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$1,500,000
3$1,500,000
2$3,000,000
2$1,500,000
1$1,000,000
4$4,500,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Lafreniere, Alexis
3$925,000
Drysdale, Jamie
3$925,000
Mitchell, Ian
2$925,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. 2020 1st round pick (DET)
DET
  1. Kubalik, Dominik [RFA Rights]
  2. Määttä, Olli
  3. Saad, Brandon ($2,000,000 retained)
  4. 2020 2nd round pick (PIT)
2.
ANA
  1. Smith, Zack
  2. 2021 5th round pick (CHI)
3.
4.
CHI
  1. Kahun, Dominik [RFA Rights]
BUF
  1. Caggiula, Drake [RFA Rights]
  2. Koekkoek, Slater [RFA Rights]
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DET
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,000,000$71,924,540$1,090,244$3,432,500$11,075,460
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Lafreniere, Alexis
$925,000$925,000
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$9,260,000$9,260,000
RW
UFA - 5
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 2
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Drysdale, Jamie
$925,000$925,000
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
UFA - 2
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD
UFA - 4
Mitchell, Ian
$925,000$925,000
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$866,667$866,667 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 21, 2020 at 7:49 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
@Jco5ta5 @exo2769 @ChiHawk @ForsbergForVezina @Stan_Bowman @MadmanFromMadison What’d you guys think of this team I made?
exo2769 liked this.
Mar. 21, 2020 at 7:54 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 17,006
Likes: 12,008
Detroit doesn't trade their first for that and Toronto definitely doesn't trade Marner for that, certainly not while retaining salary.
Mar. 21, 2020 at 7:58 p.m.
#3
Canucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 1,052
The Detroit trade is stupid (They are not trading away a pick that may get them Laferniere especially for that package)
The Toronto trade is stupid (Nowhere near enough for Marner)
And you're going to have to send a late pick or a minor prospect with Smith as compensation for taking his salary.

Oh and to top it all off, this team is definitely not a cup contender..............not yet at least.
Mar. 21, 2020 at 8:52 p.m.
#4
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,642
Likes: 9,762
Quoting: MitchMarnerElite
@Jco5ta5 @exo2769 @ChiHawk @ForsbergForVezina @Stan_Bowman @MadmanFromMadison What’d you guys think of this team I made?


If I slip you a $20...can you make it happen?!?!
AnalyticsGeek and ChiHawk liked this.
Mar. 21, 2020 at 10:22 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Detroit doesn't trade their first for that and Toronto definitely doesn't trade Marner for that, certainly not while retaining salary.


Quoting: GMmaster13
The Detroit trade is stupid (They are not trading away a pick that may get them Laferniere especially for that package)
The Toronto trade is stupid (Nowhere near enough for Marner)
And you're going to have to send a late pick or a minor prospect with Smith as compensation for taking his salary.

Oh and to top it all off, this team is definitely not a cup contender..............not yet at least.


I get Lafreniere is a great talent, but I’m not understanding why he needs to fetch more. He hasn’t played a single game & we don’t know if he’ll be a blue chip yet, so his value shouldn’t be too high. In this trade, Detroit is getting 2 high end wingers & a top 4 defenseman. That’s a already significant package. As for Marner, yeah he could probably fetch more, but the Leafs are desperate for cap relief plus they need a top 4 RHD. Nylander is a promising young player too.
Mar. 21, 2020 at 10:24 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: exo2769
If I slip you a $20...can you make it happen?!?!


Haha I would do it for free if I could. But I’m glad you like the team, wasn’t expecting that.
Mar. 21, 2020 at 10:51 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 17,006
Likes: 12,008
Quoting: MitchMarnerElite
I get Lafreniere is a great talent, but I’m not understanding why he needs to fetch more. He hasn’t played a single game & we don’t know if he’ll be a blue chip yet, so his value shouldn’t be too high. In this trade, Detroit is getting 2 high end wingers & a top 4 defenseman. That’s a already significant package. As for Marner, yeah he could probably fetch more, but the Leafs are desperate for cap relief plus they need a top 4 RHD. Nylander is a promising young player too.


Lol wait that Detroit trade was for Lafreniere? I thought it was for Drysdale and I wouldn't do it.

Lafreniere at worst projects to be A 1st liner, and at best could be the next legitimate superstar winger in the NHL. Nothing coming back from Chicago matches the potential that Lafreniere will bring. Saad is an adequate 2nd liner, and while I personally really like him, he's never been able to drive results one his own. Kubalik had a good rookie season, but at 24, he's unlikely to grow beyond what he is. Maatta is straight up just not very good in my opinion.
Mar. 22, 2020 at 12:28 a.m.
#8
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 34,008
Likes: 20,950
toronto says nope
Mar. 22, 2020 at 2:02 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 21,682
Likes: 12,028
Quoting: MitchMarnerElite
I get Lafreniere is a great talent, but I’m not understanding why he needs to fetch more. He hasn’t played a single game & we don’t know if he’ll be a blue chip yet, so his value shouldn’t be too high. In this trade, Detroit is getting 2 high end wingers & a top 4 defenseman. That’s a already significant package. As for Marner, yeah he could probably fetch more, but the Leafs are desperate for cap relief plus they need a top 4 RHD. Nylander is a promising young player too.


Looking at the Detroit trade. That pick at worst will be fourth overall. Now Maatta couldn't beat out Jack Johnson for a spot in last years playoffs. Saad is very good but at 27 he is at the top of his game do you think he wants to spend it on a rebuilding team. Kubalik well he's having a phenomenal rookie season. Ok lets say the trade goes through. Detroit gets 1 year of Saad before he goes to a contender and he probably never wants anything to do with Chicago again for sending him to Detroit in his prime. Kubalik probably won't get those numbers in Detroit at least till Detroit becomes a contender again. I don't think that is worth a top 4 pick in this years draft.

I'm going to attempt to break this down from Chicago's pov, so go easy on me if I'm off. With Kane, Towes and Keith still on the team and not part of any real trade talks means Chicago wants to take another run at cup with this core. Chicago's 1st round pick in last seasons draft supports that, Dach was NHL ready right out of the gate. So do you really they are going trade away 2 very good forwards for player that probably won't join the team for a season or two? Chicago is far closer to the playoffs not making this trade. With how wide open the west is they are a good free agent or two and a maybe a trade away from competing again.

This is definitely a CapFriendly trade, Both teams come out of it worse than they were before the trade.

This trade will never happen but It isn't as bad as I thought it was.
Mar. 22, 2020 at 12:40 p.m.
#10
Hawks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 1,665
I’m honored to be tagged in this.

Looking at the team yeah this is great. I’d replace Koekkoek with Mitchell. I think one more Dman has to go, likely De Haan for spare parts given his injury history, because I firmly believe Seabrook will be ready for next season. He won’t be any good, but he’ll be ready and he’s not a scratch candidate.

But to be fair, these teams don’t make these trades. Laf will be an 18 year old NHL player and Saad is 27 and Kubalik is 24. So they’re 9 and 6 years older than Laf respectively. It’s a bad move short and long term by Detroit who don’t have the prospects/team in place to consider themselves “a few FAs away from a playoff spot”. The Toronto trade value is just very off. Shaw is a LTIR candidate so that’ll help their cap situation but Murphy and Nylander for Marner is a robbery.
Mar. 22, 2020 at 6:38 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Lol wait that Detroit trade was for Lafreniere? I thought it was for Drysdale and I wouldn't do it.

Lafreniere at worst projects to be A 1st liner, and at best could be the next legitimate superstar winger in the NHL. Nothing coming back from Chicago matches the potential that Lafreniere will bring. Saad is an adequate 2nd liner, and while I personally really like him, he's never been able to drive results one his own. Kubalik had a good rookie season, but at 24, he's unlikely to grow beyond what he is. Maatta is straight up just not very good in my opinion.


Yeah well even if Kubalik doesn’t improve, he’ll be a 30 goal guy for the next few years which is pretty damn good. Saad will get to play with Larkin & Veleno in DET, so he should be fine. Maatta has been great for Chicago. He’s reestablished himself after a brutal season with the Pens. The Wings fixed a lot of issues by trading Lafreniere. This gets them closer to the playoffs.
Mar. 22, 2020 at 6:40 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: aedoran
Looking at the Detroit trade. That pick at worst will be fourth overall. Now Maatta couldn't beat out Jack Johnson for a spot in last years playoffs. Saad is very good but at 27 he is at the top of his game do you think he wants to spend it on a rebuilding team. Kubalik well he's having a phenomenal rookie season. Ok lets say the trade goes through. Detroit gets 1 year of Saad before he goes to a contender and he probably never wants anything to do with Chicago again for sending him to Detroit in his prime. Kubalik probably won't get those numbers in Detroit at least till Detroit becomes a contender again. I don't think that is worth a top 4 pick in this years draft.

I'm going to attempt to break this down from Chicago's pov, so go easy on me if I'm off. With Kane, Towes and Keith still on the team and not part of any real trade talks means Chicago wants to take another run at cup with this core. Chicago's 1st round pick in last seasons draft supports that, Dach was NHL ready right out of the gate. So do you really they are going trade away 2 very good forwards for player that probably won't join the team for a season or two? Chicago is far closer to the playoffs not making this trade. With how wide open the west is they are a good free agent or two and a maybe a trade away from competing again.

This is definitely a CapFriendly trade, Both teams come out of it worse than they were before the trade.

This trade will never happen but It isn't as bad as I thought it was.


Well, I respect your opinion. You are probably right about Saad, but Detroit is getting 3 quality NHL players that’ll help speed up their rebuild & get them quicker to the playoffs. As for Chicago, their defense is a little young, so they might struggle, but it’s a stacked lineup undoubtedly.
Mar. 22, 2020 at 6:44 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Edited Mar. 22, 2020 at 7:09 p.m.
Quoting: Jco5ta5
I’m honored to be tagged in this.

Looking at the team yeah this is great. I’d replace Koekkoek with Mitchell. I think one more Dman has to go, likely De Haan for spare parts given his injury history, because I firmly believe Seabrook will be ready for next season. He won’t be any good, but he’ll be ready and he’s not a scratch candidate.

But to be fair, these teams don’t make these trades. Laf will be an 18 year old NHL player and Saad is 27 and Kubalik is 24. So they’re 9 and 6 years older than Laf respectively. It’s a bad move short and long term by Detroit who don’t have the prospects/team in place to consider themselves “a few FAs away from a playoff spot”. The Toronto trade value is just very off. Shaw is a LTIR candidate so that’ll help their cap situation but Murphy and Nylander for Marner is a robbery.


Thanks for responding! You are probably right about Seabrook. As for Lafreniere, I think the trade is good for Detroit cuz they get 2 good top 6 forwards & a solid defenseman. Lafreniere is a huge talent but we’ll never know if he’ll become a legend. As for marner, yeah Hawks could probably add, but Leafs got their RHD which is most important.
Mar. 22, 2020 at 6:53 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 21,682
Likes: 12,028
Quoting: MitchMarnerElite
Well, I respect your opinion. You are probably right about Saad, but Detroit is getting 3 quality NHL players that’ll help speed up their rebuild & get them quicker to the playoffs. As for Chicago, their defense is a little young, so they might struggle, but it’s a stacked lineup undoubtedly.


2 good players and Maatta (he is not good) and since Saad would only be with Detroit this puts both teams further away from being contenders.
Mar. 22, 2020 at 7:11 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: aedoran
2 good players and Maatta (he is not good) and since Saad would only be with Detroit this puts both teams further away from being contenders.


Maatta is good. You saw him during the 2 cup runs eh? He made some mistakes, but he was a very solid top 4 defenseman. If you don’t want Saad, you can trade him for a first round pick and top prospect. That compensates the loss of Lafreniere.
Mar. 22, 2020 at 7:47 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 17,006
Likes: 12,008
Quoting: MitchMarnerElite
Yeah well even if Kubalik doesn’t improve, he’ll be a 30 goal guy for the next few years which is pretty damn good. Saad will get to play with Larkin & Veleno in DET, so he should be fine. Maatta has been great for Chicago. He’s reestablished himself after a brutal season with the Pens. The Wings fixed a lot of issues by trading Lafreniere. This gets them closer to the playoffs.


Do you think Kubalik will shoot 20% for his career? There will be regression next season. Still a good player, but I don't know that he's a consistent 30 goal guy.

Detroit needs elite, top line support more than they need complimentary depth, and you get that by drafting. Even if this trade puts Detroit "closer to the playoffs", without elite talent to surround Larkin, they'd still be further away from contending.
Mar. 22, 2020 at 10:48 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Do you think Kubalik will shoot 20% for his career? There will be regression next season. Still a good player, but I don't know that he's a consistent 30 goal guy.

Detroit needs elite, top line support more than they need complimentary depth, and you get that by drafting. Even if this trade puts Detroit "closer to the playoffs", without elite talent to surround Larkin, they'd still be further away from contending.


Well maybe Kubalik will become a good 20 goal guy, which is still awesome. Him & Saad are legit top 6 wingers. DET have Bertuzzi, Fabbri, Veleno, Larkin & Mantha already in the mix so this makes their Forward group tremendous. Detroit also gets a solid top 4 defenseman to help mentor the young core of Cholowski, Hronek, Seider & McIssac. They just need a bit experience & they’re good.
Mar. 24, 2020 at 1:47 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,028
Likes: 9,330
Quoting: MitchMarnerElite
@Jco5ta5 @exo2769 @ChiHawk @ForsbergForVezina @Stan_Bowman @MadmanFromMadison What’d you guys think of this team I made?


Yes, we would do that.
Apr. 5, 2020 at 5:57 p.m.
#19
GoCanada
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 532
nice 2nd line though
Apr. 5, 2020 at 5:59 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: jassan28
nice 2nd line though


Thanks. Marner & Strome are good friends plus they’ve played with each other before, so it should help.
Apr. 5, 2020 at 6:23 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
@mhockey91 What’d you think of my ideal Hawks team? Are they a contender?
Apr. 5, 2020 at 6:25 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: MitchMarnerElite
@mhockey91 What’d you think of my ideal Hawks team? Are they a contender?


Those trades won’t happen pal
Apr. 5, 2020 at 7:08 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: mhockey91
Those trades won’t happen pal


You are right.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll