SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

DET CHI MIN trades

Created by: Richard88
Team: 2020-21 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 12, 2020
Published: Jun. 12, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$5,000,000
3$2,250,000
1$925,000
3$2,750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,000,000
Trades
1.
COL
  1. Rasmussen, Michael
Additional Details:
Colorado pick up an unproven prospect who can compete for a bottom 6 role when Nieto/Wilson/Kamenev (2020) and Calvert/Bellemare (2021) move on.
DET
  1. Zadorov, Nikita [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Detroit move a struggling prospect for immediate help at LHD. Zadorov can play against opponents' top lines to insulate Detroit's younger Dmen, while also being young enough to fit their rebuild.
2.
CHI
  1. Jost, Tyson [RFA Rights]
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (COL)
3.
COL
  1. 2021 4th round pick (MIN)
MIN
  1. Kamenev, Vladislav [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Galchenyuk and Koivu hit UFA this offseason, and beyond Staal and Eriksson Ek Minnesota lack C depth. They could buy low on Kamenev and give him the opportunity he needs to establish himself.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the COL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the COL
2021
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$77,018,095$0$5,425,000$4,481,905

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,571,429$5,571,429
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RW
RFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,333,333$3,333,333
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,450,000$3,450,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$150,000$150K)
C
RFA - 2
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:15 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 4,954
Hawks decline. It's not really even that close
ChiHawk and KeepUps15 liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:22 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,123
Likes: 9,461
Quoting: Wadejos123
Hawks decline. It's not really even that close


Compher and a 2nd or 3rd gets interesting.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:25 p.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
On what planet has Rasmussen struggled? The only reason he played in Detroit his first year was because Juniors was no longer an option for him and he wasn't eligible to play in Grand Rapids. He was basically 3rd and 4th line material. Honestly until his injury he was our best forward in Grand Rapids this past season. Zadorov at best is worth a 2nd round pick and Rasmussen is our #9 pick from 2017. Rasmussen is worth more then Nikita Zadorov whom would be our bottom pairing LD. So no thanks.
KeepUps15, mikearky and aedoran liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:29 p.m.
#4
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
i don't think detroit does the first trade

colorado should pass on the 2nd trade. $6m and jost is a lot for a 40 pt player. avs would be better off just re-signing namestnikov or going after a free agent.

third trade is fine.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:30 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 4,954
Quoting: ChiHawk
Compher and a 2nd or 3rd gets interesting.


Maybe. I would prefer compher over jost, but it would have to be a 2nd with it. Honestly I would rather just keep saad. My guess is managment thinks we can get one more run in with toews, kane, and kieth, and having saad would be a big part of that, much more so than a compher or jost would be in my opinion
ChiHawk liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:33 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,123
Likes: 9,461
Quoting: Wadejos123
Maybe. I would prefer compher over jost, but it would have to be a 2nd with it. Honestly I would rather just keep saad. My guess is managment thinks we can get one more run in with toews, kane, and kieth, and having saad would be a big part of that, much more so than a compher or jost would be in my opinion


Agree but I like Compher's game a lot plus the hometown Northbrook kid would be great in a Hawks sweater. A 2nd and I think we should do it, but to your point, playing against Saad next season will not be fun for our guys....Saad is such a great all around 200 foot player that does most everything well
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:34 p.m.
#7
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,653
Likes: 8,294
The center depth in Detroit is just bad especially more so if we get laf so I'll take zadorov say our 2nd rounder from Washington and not rass.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:34 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,584
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Wadejos123
Hawks decline. It's not really even that close

Let's put it into context...

Hawks have $175k in capspace, and need to give raises to Kubalik, Strome, and Koekkoek, while also either resigning Crawford or acquiring a new starting goalie.

As a pending UFA with a $6m caphit coming off a 33 point season, Saad makes the most sense to move to open up sufficient capspace for the aforementioned re-signings.

That said, few teams are going to have the capspace to take on a $6m contract without sending money back. And of those that do have the capspace, most are rebuilding and won't want to pay futures for a pending UFA.

Given those circumstances, I'd say that Jost + 3rd is a fairly reasonable offer.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:35 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 3,509
Rasmussen showed promise last year when not injured. I’d much rather go after Dillon or Edmundson in free agency as they will command comparable pay and performance.
aedoran liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:41 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,584
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Wadejos123
Maybe. I would prefer compher over jost, but it would have to be a 2nd with it. Honestly I would rather just keep saad. My guess is managment thinks we can get one more run in with toews, kane, and kieth, and having saad would be a big part of that, much more so than a compher or jost would be in my opinion


Quoting: ChiHawk
Agree but I like Compher's game a lot plus the hometown Northbrook kid would be great in a Hawks sweater. A 2nd and I think we should do it, but to your point, playing against Saad next season will not be fun for our guys....Saad is such a great all around 200 foot player that does most everything well


Compher isn't really available though. Avs are buyers, not sellers, and Compher is a key part of the team given that he's our 3C and on the 1st PK unit.

How are Chicago going to manage to resign Strome, Kubalik, etc without moving a pending UFA like Saad?

Being realistic, even if Chicago sneak into the playoffs they aren't anywhere near to making noise, especially not since they have to go through two of Colorado/Dallas/St Louis to start with. As such they're better off building for the future.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:46 p.m.
#11
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Quoting: Jfstompers
The center depth in Detroit is just bad especially more so if we get laf so I'll take zadorov say our 2nd rounder from Washington and not rass.


This
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:47 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,584
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
On what planet has Rasmussen struggled? The only reason he played in Detroit his first year was because Juniors was no longer an option for him and he wasn't eligible to play in Grand Rapids. He was basically 3rd and 4th line material. Honestly until his injury he was our best forward in Grand Rapids this past season. Zadorov at best is worth a 2nd round pick and Rasmussen is our #9 pick from 2017. Rasmussen is worth more then Nikita Zadorov whom would be our bottom pairing LD. So no thanks.


Quoting: Jfstompers
The center depth in Detroit is just bad especially more so if we get laf so I'll take zadorov say our 2nd rounder from Washington and not rass.


Quoting: BStinson
Rasmussen showed promise last year when not injured. I’d much rather go after Dillon or Edmundson in free agency as they will command comparable pay and performance.


I was under the impression that his value had gone down a bit since the 2017 draft. It's been 3 years since he was drafted and he hasn't really done anything of note.

Zadorov will bring back a 2nd + 3rd, or a high 2nd.

Free agents aren't really ideal to sign as you often have to overpay in AAV and/or term. Detroit already has enough older stop-gaps they need to clear off the roster. Much better to focus on players who can be part of the actual rebuild, and at 25 Zadorov is young enough to fit.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:48 p.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Quoting: BStinson
Rasmussen showed promise last year when not injured. I’d much rather go after Dillon or Edmundson in free agency as they will command comparable pay and performance.


Same here, From what Yzerman stated he'll probably be looking for a short term LD. Unless by a miracle Krug comes home. But think he stays in Boston for cheap.
aedoran liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:28 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 4,954
Quoting: Richard88
Compher isn't really available though. Avs are buyers, not sellers, and Compher is a key part of the team given that he's our 3C and on the 1st PK unit.

How are Chicago going to manage to resign Strome, Kubalik, etc without moving a pending UFA like Saad?

Being realistic, even if Chicago sneak into the playoffs they aren't anywhere near to making noise, especially not since they have to go through two of Colorado/Dallas/St Louis to start with. As such they're better off building for the future.


We've got plenty of money for kubalik, strome, and crawford. Just have to move out a defenceman because we have like 10 that could be NHLers. Maata is probbaly the odd man out.
ChiHawk liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:30 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,123
Likes: 9,461
Quoting: Richard88
Compher isn't really available though. Avs are buyers, not sellers, and Compher is a key part of the team given that he's our 3C and on the 1st PK unit.

How are Chicago going to manage to resign Strome, Kubalik, etc without moving a pending UFA like Saad?

Being realistic, even if Chicago sneak into the playoffs they aren't anywhere near to making noise, especially not since they have to go through two of Colorado/Dallas/St Louis to start with. As such they're better off building for the future.


Which is exactly why we would move Saad for a late 1st rounder and a young player or decent prospect. At least a half dozen teams have inquired about him in the last 12 months according to the beat writer sources offering a 1st and Hawks have said no. They will wait till next year's TDL if Hawks are out of the playoffs.

Hawks have cap space, they will move Maatta or De Haan and Shaw is likely going on LITR for the remainder of his contract...they don't "need to" move Saad.
Wadejos123 liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:30 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 4,954
Quoting: Richard88
Let's put it into context...

Hawks have $175k in capspace, and need to give raises to Kubalik, Strome, and Koekkoek, while also either resigning Crawford or acquiring a new starting goalie.

As a pending UFA with a $6m caphit coming off a 33 point season, Saad makes the most sense to move to open up sufficient capspace for the aforementioned re-signings.

That said, few teams are going to have the capspace to take on a $6m contract without sending money back. And of those that do have the capspace, most are rebuilding and won't want to pay futures for a pending UFA.

Given those circumstances, I'd say that Jost + 3rd is a fairly reasonable offer.


We have plenty of money to resign our RFA's and Crawford as log as we move one of Maata or Dehaan. Not worried at all. Saad does not need to be traded. Shaw will be on LTIR which saves 3.9mil, Maata gets traded which saves 4 mil, and crow will likley make 2 mil or so less than what he made this year.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:44 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 21,739
Likes: 12,063
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
On what planet has Rasmussen struggled? The only reason he played in Detroit his first year was because Juniors was no longer an option for him and he wasn't eligible to play in Grand Rapids. He was basically 3rd and 4th line material. Honestly until his injury he was our best forward in Grand Rapids this past season. Zadorov at best is worth a 2nd round pick and Rasmussen is our #9 pick from 2017. Rasmussen is worth more then Nikita Zadorov whom would be our bottom pairing LD. So no thanks.


Quoting: Jfstompers
The center depth in Detroit is just bad especially more so if we get laf so I'll take zadorov say our 2nd rounder from Washington and not rass.


I actually think this is an ok trade. imo
Richard88 liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:44 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,584
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Wadejos123
We've got plenty of money for kubalik, strome, and crawford. Just have to move out a defenceman because we have like 10 that could be NHLers. Maata is probbaly the odd man out.


Do you think Maata's $4m is going to be enough to cover those 3 contracts? And who is going to replace Maata?
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:48 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,584
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: ChiHawk
Which is exactly why we would move Saad for a late 1st rounder and a young player or decent prospect. At least a half dozen teams have inquired about him in the last 12 months according to the beat writer sources offering a 1st and Hawks have said no. They will wait till next year's TDL if Hawks are out of the playoffs.

Hawks have cap space, they will move Maatta or De Haan and Shaw is likely going on LITR for the remainder of his contract...they don't "need to" move Saad.


Maybe you did get calls on Saad, but that was when teams would have gotten 2 playoffs out of him, and also before a flat cap. It's unlikely that teams would want to pay a 1st for him now in a flat cap league. Prices for UFA's and trades will have gone down a lot due to the flat cap.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:54 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
I like Kamenev as a buy-low option. He's a very talented player, maybe our vets could light a fire under his ass
Richard88 liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 10:31 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 21,739
Likes: 12,063
Edited Jun. 13, 2020 at 3:59 p.m.
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Same here, From what Yzerman stated he'll probably be looking for a short term LD. Unless by a miracle Krug comes home. But think he stays in Boston for cheap.


I think the odds of Krug leaving are better now than they were at the start of the season. It looks like the cap is going to be $81.5M for a while given how much the revenue the owners and league have lost. So I could see Boston not resigning him,
Jun. 12, 2020 at 11:55 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,123
Likes: 9,461
Quoting: Richard88
Maybe you did get calls on Saad, but that was when teams would have gotten 2 playoffs out of him, and also before a flat cap. It's unlikely that teams would want to pay a 1st for him now in a flat cap league. Prices for UFA's and trades will have gone down a lot due to the flat cap.


Take a look at what Toffoli just pulled in as a playoff rental and 18 months older then Saad and I don't think many people would argue Saad is a superior player.
Jun. 13, 2020 at 12:29 a.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,123
Likes: 9,461
Quoting: aedoran
I think the odds of Krug leaving are better now than they were at the start of the season. It looks like the cap is going to be $81.5M for a while given how much the revenue the owners and league have lost. So I could see Boston not resigning him he.


Unfortunately the cap situation will be stagnant for this year, but when the playoffs start....if the NHL gets moving in another 6 weeks, people will be salivating to watch a sport and any sport. I bet the TV viewership will skyrocket more then a normal playoff year which should be good to recoup revenues or part of the regular season lost revenues. As such, I expect a modest increase next summer and with Seattle playing a big increase in the summer of 2022. Just my 2 cents
aedoran liked this.
Jun. 13, 2020 at 1:33 a.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 8,221
Likes: 3,642
Quoting: TanSor
I like Kamenev as a buy-low option. He's a very talented player, maybe our vets could light a fire under his ass


If Fenton was still here he would make that trade.

I don't think Guerin does though. Playing Kunin at 3C and getting Donato into the lineup would have the same overall effect as this trade and Kunin at wing. Besides is Kamenev any better than what MN has in Strum? It just seems like a low risk/low reward type of deal for a team that is already filled with LHS FWDs.
TanSor liked this.
Jun. 13, 2020 at 8:32 a.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 4,954
Quoting: Richard88
Do you think Maata's $4m is going to be enough to cover those 3 contracts? And who is going to replace Maata?


no one needs to replace maata. We have too many defenceman and ironically most of them are pretty mediocre. Currently have: Kieth, dehaan, maata, koekkoek, carlson, beaudan, seeler, gilbert, Boqvist, Seabs, Murphy who all played in the NHL last season, plus Ian Mitchell will probably play at least 40 games in the NHL next season. That makes 12 NHL defenceman fighting for 6 spots. We can afford to lose maata no problem. Seeler probably goes back on waivers, gilbert in rockford, beaudan might play some games but spends most of the year in rockford, carlson, koekkoek , and seabs can fight for 6th and 7th dman. Carlson can go to rockford if we need him to.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll