SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Palat or Rakell

Created by: SankFeravalli
Team: 2020-21 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 24, 2020
Published: Aug. 24, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Colorado’s primary position of need going into the offseason is probably at forward. They have very good depth, but they could really use one more addition to their top six. I don’t necessarily think they need a Hall or Gaudreau, though those players would be welcomed at the right price. They have 5 legit top six forwards already (MacKinnon, Rantanen, Landeskog, Kadri, Burakovsky) so you’re really talking about adding forward #5 or #6 to that group.

There are a few specific qualities - in my opinion - that would make an ideal fit:
-Offensive consistency - Aside from MacKinnon, the rest of the top six has been known to be a little streaky offensively. There’s plenty of skill to carry the load when one player is in a slump, but a 50ish point player who can consistently move the play in the right direction could help balance that streakiness.
-High IQ and competent two-way play - Of all the great qualities Colorado’s forward group possesses, their collective hockey IQ is middling. It’s bot necessarily a major weakness, but it’s an area for improvement. The DNVR crew has talked about this on their podcast a few times. In addition, they have a couple of wingers in Burakovsky and Rantanen who have had their share of defensive zone struggles. Again, not a huge weakness for the top six as a whole, but an area for improvement.
-Versatility - We have seen with recent additions that Sakic and Bednar both prefer players who can play multiple roles and/or positions. For example - Kadri’s ability to play in all situations, Burakovsky, Donskoi, and Nichushkin can play on either wing. Namestnikov can play all three forward positions, and can play in all situations.
-Contract term of 2-3 years - Since the Boedker trade with Arizona in 2016, we haven’t seen any major rental trades from Colorado. I wouldn’t expect him to be after a player that would cost significant assets that they may only have for one season. At the same time, Colorado has some significant contracts coming up in the next few season. Makar, Landeskog and Grubauer expire in 2021, Kadri expires in 2022, and MacKinnon expires in 2023. I would expect the Avs to be hesitant to add any new players signed beyond 2023, especially with some of the financial uncertainty of the next several seasons. Of course, AAV is also an important consideration. They have a good amount of cap space for a contending team, but not enough to be willingly overpaying on AAV.

With all those factors in mind, I think Palat and Rakell are two potentially available players that would make a ton of sense as trade targets. Both are signed through 2022 at reasonable AAVs. Palat can play either wing, and Rakell can play all forward positions. Palat has hovered between .53 and .69 points per game for the last 5 seasons. Rakell has been slightly better, between .60 and .72 in the same time frame, with one outlying year at .90 in 2017-18. They have both also played the left half-wall on the power play with success, which is an oddly specific area where the Avs’s 2nd power play has struggled to find the right fit. I don’t think either would be used in a PK role - given Bednar typically uses bottom six player like Compher, Calvert, Nieto, Bellemare, etc. on the PK - but both are solid in their own end.

Tampa is expected to move at least one of their top nine forwards outside of Point, Kucherov, and Stamkos to create cap space. Palat fits within that group and would provide some nice cap relief. The Ducks aren’t in a pinch to move Rakell like Tampa is, but as they rebuild they would be able to get a better return for him now with 2 years left on his deal that they would a year later. Tampa is probably looking for inexpensive NHL players who can help them now, or potentially draft picks to replenish the picks they traded away this past deadline. Anaheim is after young talent like any rebuilder. They have a good group of forward prospects, and would probably prefer a young defenseman.

I don’t think Colorado would be open to trading Byram or Newhook in this situation. Conor Timmins might be on the table, and would fit nicely with either Tampa or Anaheim as a young/inexpensive right-shot defenseman who can play in the nhl right now. Colorado is very high on him, so I don’t know if they would be willing to part with much more in this situation. Plus you’re talking about a forward who is likely only with the Avs for two years in exchange for a potential 10-12 year top-4 defenseman. The Avs also have a couple of younger NHL defenseman who could be available as Byram and Timmins should be in the NHL next year - Nikita Zadorov and Ryan Graves. Both are RFAs and I expect only one is resigned by the Avs. Would Zadorov or Graves + a young forward with upside like Jost, Kaut, or Bowers get a deal done for either of these players? There is also a possibility that Ian Cole could be moved to create roster space for a young D. He doesn’t have as mu Co long term value, but he is a solid top 6 NHL D who knows how to win. With 1 year left on his deal, Colorado could probably retain salary to make him an affordable add. Maybe Tampa would be interested in two proven NHL players in Cole (50%) and Jost, plus a draft pick.

I went with Timmins for Palat in the example below - Palat has a higher AAV to demonstrate how he fits with the cap, and I think Timmins would hurt Colorado the most to give up.

Let me know your thoughts!
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$5,000,000
2$2,000,000
2$2,500,000
1$2,000,000
Trades
1.
2.
COL
  1. 2020 2nd round pick (FLA)
FLA
  1. Zadorov, Nikita [RFA Rights]
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the COL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the COL
2021
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$78,543,095$0$5,575,000$2,956,905
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,571,429$5,571,429
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,333,333$3,333,333
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,450,000$3,450,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$150,000$150K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 24, 2020 at 11:49 a.m.
#1
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 10,711
Likes: 11,932
Out of the two I think Palat is the best option. Colorado is a place he could potentially waive his NTC for, he’s also got a great 2-way game. If you don’t want another streaky top 6 forward, Rakell probably isn’t the right fit. Palat also probably costs considerably less, I think even a 2nd gets it done because of how desperate Tampa is to clear cap. If Palat for some reason doesn’t work out on line 2, he’d probably fit well on line 3 also, even though he might be a bit expensive for that line
Aug. 24, 2020 at 11:49 a.m.
#2
alwaysnextyear
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 5,529
Likes: 1,568
I think Palat will be cheaper to acquire, as Timmins should be a fairly sought after prospect if he's on the table. On the other hand I kind of doubt that Zadorov gets the Avs a 2nd.
Josh liked this.
Aug. 24, 2020 at 11:53 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 6,060
I like both Palat and Rakell as trade targets, but I think Palat will be significantly cheaper to acquire. Not only will TBL be desperate to clear cap, many of the players they will look to move have NTCs or M-NTCs. Palat has a full NTC for next season and I doubt there are many teams he will waive for - Id definitely put in a lowball offer for him (maybe a 2nd or 2nd + 3rd) but I wouldnt even consider moving Timmins for him.
Lenny7 and Anus_McLeod liked this.
Aug. 24, 2020 at 11:54 a.m.
#4
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: AndrewLadd
Out of the two I think Palat is the best option. Colorado is a place he could potentially waive his NTC for, he’s also got a great 2-way game. If you don’t want another streaky top 6 forward, Rakell probably isn’t the right fit. Palat also probably costs considerably less, I think even a 2nd gets it done because of how desperate Tampa is to clear cap. If Palat for some reason doesn’t work out on line 2, he’d probably fit well on line 3 also, even though he might be a bit expensive for that line


I don't think Rakell is particularly streaky, he's just had a bit of bad luck with injuries, and hasn't had much in the way of help offensively over the past couple of years.
Aug. 24, 2020 at 11:54 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Not a fan Of that palat trade at all, moving Timmins is a huge mistake
Aug. 24, 2020 at 11:54 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2015
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 324
Quoting: AndrewLadd
Out of the two I think Palat is the best option. Colorado is a place he could potentially waive his NTC for, he’s also got a great 2-way game. If you don’t want another streaky top 6 forward, Rakell probably isn’t the right fit. Palat also probably costs considerably less, I think even a 2nd gets it done because of how desperate Tampa is to clear cap. If Palat for some reason doesn’t work out on line 2, he’d probably fit well on line 3 also, even though he might be a bit expensive for that line


I agree with you. Anaheim isn’t in the same pinch that Tampa is. I still think the Lightning get good value out of the player(s) they have to move for cap space. Even though their hand is forced a bit, I would expect a number of teams to be interested in a player like Palat.
Aug. 24, 2020 at 11:56 a.m.
#7
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 10,711
Likes: 11,932
Quoting: Mergus80
I agree with you. Anaheim isn’t in the same pinch that Tampa is. I still think the Lightning get good value out of the player(s) they have to move for cap space. Even though their hand is forced a bit, I would expect a number of teams to be interested in a player like Palat.


Any other offseason I’d agree ab a lot of teams wanting Palat, but w the flat cap I think a lot of teams would have a tough time fitting him w out making lots of other moves. Colorado seems to be the best fit for him
Aug. 24, 2020 at 11:56 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2015
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 324
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
I think Palat will be cheaper to acquire, as Timmins should be a fairly sought after prospect if he's on the table. On the other hand I kind of doubt that Zadorov gets the Avs a 2nd.


I have no idea what to expect with a potential Zadorov trade. At the pause, I probably would have said a 3rd and 4th is the best they could do. But he’s been very good in the playoffs, aside from game 1 against Dallas. I don’t think he will be a particularly significant loss, given the young D on the way, so whatever they can get back would be positive.
Aug. 24, 2020 at 11:58 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,286
Likes: 2,731
Palat would be amazing in Rado but don’t give up Timmins
Aug. 24, 2020 at 11:59 a.m.
#10
GO BOLTS
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 388
TB accepts, they have to clear 10-12 million and trade a RFA to make the cap work next year.
Aug. 24, 2020 at 12:05 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2015
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 324
Quoting: AndrewLadd
Any other offseason I’d agree ab a lot of teams wanting Palat, but w the flat cap I think a lot of teams would have a tough time fitting him w out making lots of other moves. Colorado seems to be the best fit for him


Quoting: coga16
Not a fan Of that palat trade at all, moving Timmins is a huge mistake


Quoting: moli92
I like both Palat and Rakell as trade targets, but I think Palat will be significantly cheaper to acquire. Not only will TBL be desperate to clear cap, many of the players they will look to move have NTCs or M-NTCs. Palat has a full NTC for next season and I doubt there are many teams he will waive for - Id definitely put in a lowball offer for him (maybe a 2nd or 2nd + 3rd) but I wouldnt even consider moving Timmins for him.


Definitely a fair point @AndrewLadd . As I said in the description, I chose Timmins as the return because he would hurt Colorado the most to give up - a worst-case scenario. I would be thrilled if they could add a player like Palat for less than Conor Timmins. I love his game and his upside. I don’t think he’s off the table in trade conversations though. I think Timmins and Byram both need to be in the NHL next season for their development to progress on pace. Assuming Makar, Girard, Johnson, and one of Graves or Zadorov return, plus those two rookies, Bednar will have a very young and inexperienced group of defenseman on a team that is trying to compete for cups in the MacKinnon window. In the right deal I think he could be available.

Again, if they could as Palat for less I would be very pleased.
AndrewLadd liked this.
Aug. 24, 2020 at 12:13 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 3,444
Quoting: Mergus80
Definitely a fair point @AndrewLadd . As I said in the description, I chose Timmins as the return because he would hurt Colorado the most to give up - a worst-case scenario. I would be thrilled if they could add a player like Palat for less than Conor Timmins. I love his game and his upside. I don’t think he’s off the table in trade conversations though. I think Timmins and Byram both need to be in the NHL next season for their development to progress on pace. Assuming Makar, Girard, Johnson, and one of Graves or Zadorov return, plus those two rookies, Bednar will have a very young and inexperienced group of defenseman on a team that is trying to compete for cups in the MacKinnon window. In the right deal I think he could be available.

Again, if they could as Palat for less I would be very pleased.


Timmins is not on the table. Rumors were that Sakic wouldn't include him for Hall, so I doubt he would for Palat or Rakell.

I will also mention that I think the cost for Rakell is going to be massively inflated due to his contract. Some cash strapped contender will end up paying more than the Avs are willing.

Palat is a good target though. He has a full NTC though, and can essentially pick where he goes. A mediocre pick should be all it takes.
Aug. 24, 2020 at 12:26 p.m.
#13
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,481
Well written, appreciate the effort on this one.
i agree that Palat fits the bill as the #6F COL could use, but i think the price of Timmins is too steep.

Thinking long term here (2-3) years, I think COL banks on the following D core:
Byram - Makar
Girard - Timmins
Graves - other (maybe Hellenson, too soon to call)

Moving a RHD creates such a hole in this top 4 that it makes more logical sense that theyd move a LHD (ie. Graves) first.
Especially considering that they may lose Graves in expansion draft anyway as they protect Makar, Girard, Johnson - NMC.
If you couple losing Graves in expansion with Timmins for Palat, the elite upside of this D core drops a notch.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll