SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Truculence is My Favorite Word

Created by: MNBassman
Team: 2020-21 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 26, 2020
Published: Sep. 26, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$825,000
2$1,625,000
2$1,000,000
3$2,750,000
3$950,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$2,250,000
4$2,950,000
2$1,250,000
Trades
1.
MIN
  1. 2020 6th round pick (DET)
DET
  1. Dubnyk, Devan ($1,000,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Dubnyk’s actual salary next season is $2.5million.
2.
MIN
  1. Bennett, Sam
  2. Monahan, Sean
  3. 2020 4th round pick (SJS)
Additional Details:
Dumba and Monahan are (obviously) the big pieces in this deal. The other pieces can be mixed and matched or removed to fit both teams needs and wants.
3.
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the DET
Logo of the MIN
2021
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2022
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$77,256,091$0$925,000$4,243,909
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,487,500$1,487,500
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,875,000$2,875,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$950,000$950,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,050,000$2,050,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,575,000$7,575,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,166,667$4,166,667
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
$2,950,000$2,950,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$825,000$825,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 26, 2020 at 10:51 a.m.
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,712
Likes: 31,449
I'd expect that to be a relatively easy no for the Leafs. A good 1G for a 2G, 4th liner, AHL player and a 4th rounder just doesn't seem that good of a package.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 10:51 a.m.
#2
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,072
Likes: 12,828
Wouldn’t keeping Greenway add more truculence
Sep. 26, 2020 at 10:52 a.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Detroit has no interest in Devan Dubnyk, There will be far more better options out there.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 10:52 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 205
Likes: 63
The Leafs are getting way more than that for Andersen. Quality over Quantity. I'd rather one guy who can truly impact the roster like Andersen does than a bunch of guys who will not even play
Sep. 26, 2020 at 10:53 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 419
I really like Dumba, but there is absolutely zero chance we move Monahan for him, as it would leave Backlund as our #1C. The only way we can afford to move Monahan is as apart of a package for a bigger fish. Also, recent rumors have suggested the asked is a 1st and a younger roster player for Dumba as no team was willing to giver up a top 6 center.

I think the 19th + Bennett for Dumba fits that criteria pretty well. Which I'm not sure the Flames would be willing to do since we've been kinked to Arizona on Kuemper; however if we can sign Markstrom as a UFA I'd happily do the 1st in 2021 (top 10 protected) and Bennett for Dumba.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 10:54 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 6,791
Likes: 5,275
Quoting: justaBoss
I'd expect that to be a relatively easy no for the Leafs. A good 1G for a 2G, 4th liner, AHL player and a 4th rounder just doesn't seem that good of a package.


Yep. It's a whole lot of nothing for a guy that they don't need to trade.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 10:56 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,154
Likes: 3,571
Quoting: justaBoss
I'd expect that to be a relatively easy no for the Leafs. A good 1G for a 2G, 4th liner, AHL player and a 4th rounder just doesn't seem that good of a package.


I think you are right. I was offering cheap, serviceable players to provide cap relief. What I cannot figure out is why so many Leafs fans want to trade Andersen in the first place...
TanSor liked this.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 10:57 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,154
Likes: 3,571
Quoting: yikes
Wouldn’t keeping Greenway add more truculence


If his truculence was on display consistently, yes...but it’s not...
TanSor liked this.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 10:59 a.m.
#9
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,712
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: MNBassman
I think you are right. I was offering cheap, serviceable players to provide cap relief. What I cannot figure out is why so many Leafs fans want to trade Andersen in the first place...


My guess is that he's a pending UFA and they'd like to get something out of him while they still can.

He's not exactly a long-term option anymore, with his age and all. They'd probably want to get a younger 1G...
MNBassman, TanSor and Wildwinswhen liked this.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 11:02 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,154
Likes: 3,571
Quoting: justaBoss
My guess is that he's a pending UFA and they'd like to get something out of him while they still can.

He's not exactly a long-term option anymore, with his age and all. They'd probably want to get a younger 1G...


That’s precisely why i am interested in him for the Wild. He’d be a great stop gap goalie for them, but only for the price Ive offered here. If it doesn’t make sense for the Leafs, no worries.
TanSor and Wildwinswhen liked this.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 11:10 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: MethodMan
I really like Dumba, but there is absolutely zero chance we move Monahan for him, as it would leave Backlund as our #1C. The only way we can afford to move Monahan is as apart of a package for a bigger fish. Also, recent rumors have suggested the asked is a 1st and a younger roster player for Dumba as no team was willing to giver up a top 6 center.

I think the 19th + Bennett for Dumba fits that criteria pretty well. Which I'm not sure the Flames would be willing to do since we've been kinked to Arizona on Kuemper; however if we can sign Markstrom as a UFA I'd happily do the 1st in 2021 (top 10 protected) and Bennett for Dumba.


Bennett and 19th would be an awful idea for the Wild. If we can't get Monahan, I'd imagine we just keep Dumba. Honestly there's no reason for us to force a trade. Guerin was on a podcast at The Athletic and said as much, he's happy keeping Dumba.
MNBassman and Wildwinswhen liked this.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 11:13 a.m.
#12
Beanmachine
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 498
Quoting: TanSor
Bennett and 19th would be an awful idea for the Wild. If we can't get Monahan, I'd imagine we just keep Dumba. Honestly there's no reason for us to force a trade. Guerin was on a podcast at The Athletic and said as much, he's happy keeping Dumba.


And lose him in expansion??
Sep. 26, 2020 at 11:14 a.m.
#13
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,072
Likes: 12,828
Quoting: MNBassman
If his truculence was on display consistently, yes...but it’s not...


Quoting: MNBassman
If his truculence was on display consistently, yes...but it’s not...


Well I’m sorry to hear greenways truculence is seeming to have issues; he is quite the truculent guy. Maybe a trade would help his truculence consistency now that you suggest this on your truculent post
TanSor and MNBassman liked this.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 11:15 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Edited Sep. 26, 2020 at 11:21 a.m.
Quoting: InTreWeTrust
And lose him in expansion??


Just protect 8 skaters. Parise (NMC), Zucc (NMC), Fiala, Ek, Suter (NMC), Spurgeon (NMC), Brodin (NMC), Dumba. Sure we lose one of Kunin/Greenway/Donato, but we can easily trade them for picks if necessary or just take the loss. Dumba is head and shoulders above all of those guys.
justaBoss, MNBassman and OutCold13 liked this.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 11:19 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 419
Quoting: TanSor
Bennett and 19th would be an awful idea for the Wild. If we can't get Monahan, I'd imagine we just keep Dumba. Honestly there's no reason for us to force a trade. Guerin was on a podcast at The Athletic and said as much, he's happy keeping Dumba.


I get that and I agree. I was just formulating a counter-offer based on the rumors.
TanSor and MNBassman liked this.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 11:32 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: justaBoss
I'd expect that to be a relatively easy no for the Leafs. A good 1G for a 2G, 4th liner, AHL player and a 4th rounder just doesn't seem that good of a package.


Leafs would love to have a player like Hartman, he’s exactly the kind of player they need and they could put him on a reasonable multi year deal after the season. I’m kinda hoping Hartman is in the long term plan, especially if foligno is too. That checking line shouldn’t be understated.
MNBassman liked this.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 11:37 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: TanSor
Just protect 8 skaters. Parise (NMC), Zucc (NMC), Fiala, Ek, Suter (NMC), Spurgeon (NMC), Brodin (NMC), Dumba. Sure we lose one of Kunin/Greenway/Donato, but we can easily trade them for picks if necessary or just take the loss. Dumba is head and shoulders above all of those guys.


I think that’s 100% accurate and I would not be upset by protecting him at all. I know we’ve focused on a “number 1 center” but I think that’s really shortsighted. A mid round first and blue chip center prospect goes a long way to fixing up the problems the Parise/Suter/Zuccarello contracts will cause in a few years and set us up to contend around then.
TanSor and MNBassman liked this.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 11:40 a.m.
#18
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,712
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: jnowariak
Leafs would love to have a player like Hartman, he’s exactly the kind of player they need and they could put him on a reasonable multi year deal after the season. I’m kinda hoping Hartman is in the long term plan, especially if foligno is too. That checking line shouldn’t be understated.


Hartman might be an interesting player for them, but knowing that they'll play a top heavy hockey in terms of cap I don't necessarily see them wasting $2M for a 4th liner.
jnowariak and MNBassman liked this.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 11:46 a.m.
#19
Thread Starter
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,154
Likes: 3,571
Quoting: TanSor
Bennett and 19th would be an awful idea for the Wild. If we can't get Monahan, I'd imagine we just keep Dumba. Honestly there's no reason for us to force a trade. Guerin was on a podcast at The Athletic and said as much, he's happy keeping Dumba.


As he should be!
In order to keep Dumba, I would have no problem trading or exposing Kunin, Greenway, or Donato.
TanSor liked this.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 11:47 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: jnowariak
I think that’s 100% accurate and I would not be upset by protecting him at all. I know we’ve focused on a “number 1 center” but I think that’s really shortsighted. A mid round first and blue chip center prospect goes a long way to fixing up the problems the Parise/Suter/Zuccarello contracts will cause in a few years and set us up to contend around then.


Not sure I agree that focusing on a 1C is short sighted if it's a young player under control. Just depends on the player, but I'd imagine if we acquired Monahan or Cirelli then the plan would be to keep them for 8-10 years. The problem with picks/prospects is they're risky. Even Byfield or Stutzle have risk.
MNBassman liked this.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 11:47 a.m.
#21
Thread Starter
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,154
Likes: 3,571
Quoting: yikes
Well I’m sorry to hear greenways truculence is seeming to have issues; he is quite the truculent guy. Maybe a trade would help his truculence consistency now that you suggest this on your truculent post


Superb employment of my favorite word, thank you!
TanSor liked this.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 11:55 a.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: TanSor
Not sure I agree that focusing on a 1C is short sighted if it's a young player under control. Just depends on the player, but I'd imagine if we acquired Monahan or Cirelli then the plan would be to keep them for 8-10 years. The problem with picks/prospects is they're risky. Even Byfield or Stutzle have risk.


Agreed. I’m thinking about it from a money perspective. What does a new Monahan deal look like? Is Cirelli at $7 mil by 6 years a deal he signs? I haven’t run the numbers on something like that but my gut tells me we’ll be in Leafs territory in 4 years, except our money will be in guys over 36. I might be in the minority but I’m all for throwing the next year away to compete after that.
MNBassman and TanSor liked this.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 11:58 a.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: jnowariak
Agreed. I’m thinking about it from a money perspective. What does a new Monahan deal look like? Is Cirelli at $7 mil by 6 years a deal he signs? I haven’t run the numbers on something like that but my gut tells me we’ll be in Leafs territory in 4 years, except our money will be in guys over 36. I might be in the minority but I’m all for throwing the next year away to compete after that.


Depends on how he performs, I don't think he touches $11M unless he magically turns into a 100 point player, which I'd be extremely happy with. I think if he's a 70 point C then $8-9M isn't too far off. We are fine cap-wise as long as Guerin doesn't sign a Zuccarello. We have a ton of money coming off the books in the next few years with Dubnyk, Rask, Johansson, Pateryn, Bjugstad, maybe even Foligno if he wants too much money. I'm not worried about our cap. If Parise or Suter retire early we can just put them on LTIR like the Leafs did with Horton and the Coyotes did with Hossa.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 12:00 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,154
Likes: 3,571
Quoting: TanSor
Depends on how he performs, I don't think he touches $11M unless he magically turns into a 100 point player, which I'd be extremely happy with. I think if he's a 70 point C then $8-9M isn't too far off. We are fine cap-wise as long as Guerin doesn't sign a Zuccarello. We have a ton of money coming off the books in the next few years with Dubnyk, Rask, Johansson, Pateryn, Bjugstad, maybe even Foligno if he wants too much money. I'm not worried about our cap. If Parise or Suter retire early we can just put them on LTIR like the Leafs did with Horton and the Coyotes did with Hossa.


Monahan better damm-well be the 2-way player you say he is if the Wild would consider paying him that much.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 12:02 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: MNBassman
Monahan better damm-well be the 2-way player you say he is if the Wild would consider paying him that much.


Well if he gets you 35 goals and 70 points I'm fine with him being meh in his own zone. Maybe he'd be closer to the $8M mark. He's shown he's capable of putting up 80 points so I don't think it's that egregious.
jnowariak and MNBassman liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll