SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Something Different

Created by: Shakabakes
Team: 2021-22 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 28, 2022
Published: Feb. 28, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Trade for the future? Who says Yes? Who says No? Who adds?
Trades
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2023
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2024
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$74,453,927$0$8,362,500$7,046,073
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Rangers
$11,642,857$11,642,857
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$775,000$775,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,641,667$3,641,667
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,300,000$2,300,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$762,500$762,500
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$412,500$412K)
C, LW
RFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,666,667$5,666,667
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,425,000$2,425,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$350,000$350K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$874,125$874,125
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New York Rangers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
RW
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 28, 2022 at 5:09 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,438
Likes: 18,437
I’d think Sabres say no
zk97, homiedaclown, sabres89 and 1 other person liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 5:17 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 1,451
Buffalo says no they're not trading Krebs
homiedaclown and sabres89 liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 5:21 p.m.
#3
Sabresguy1897
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 628
Yeah no
homiedaclown and sabres89 liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 5:23 p.m.
#4
Knuckle Danz
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 311
Likes: 88
Different, yes. I'm not sure about doable. I think IF your proposal was for Thompson, you might get closer to a done deal.

Maybe.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 5:24 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,531
Likes: 819
i really hope this is a joke
Feb. 28, 2022 at 5:36 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 2,019
Quoting: HockeyDanz
Different, yes. I'm not sure about doable. I think IF your proposal was for Thompson, you might get closer to a done deal.

Maybe.


You think Thompson for Nils is closer than Krebs for Nils? You are either very very high on Krebs or Nils, or incredibly down on Thompson.
homiedaclown and gretzkyghosts liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 5:38 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Quoting: HockeyDanz
Different, yes. I'm not sure about doable. I think IF your proposal was for Thompson, you might get closer to a done deal.

Maybe.


Thompson is on pace for 36goals
That’s not happening either

Maybe Mittelstadt or Olofsson…. MAYBE
Feb. 28, 2022 at 5:45 p.m.
#8
Sabresguy1897
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 628
Quoting: HockeyDanz
Different, yes. I'm not sure about doable. I think IF your proposal was for Thompson, you might get closer to a done deal.

Maybe.


Actually the opposite? thompson is on pace for 30 plus goals and 60 plus points. how about laffy plus for thompson
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 6:18 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 8,273
Likes: 6,247
Quoting: Buffalove
Thompson is on pace for 36goals
That’s not happening either

Maybe Mittelstadt or Olofsson…. MAYBE


Mittelstadt sure. Olofsson would be tough, but i would certainly do mittelstadt for a right d.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 7:10 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Quoting: sabres89
Mittelstadt sure. Olofsson would be tough, but i would certainly do mittelstadt for a right d.


Mitts still has a high ceiling imo
He’s just been held back by injuries so we haven’t seen it much
It’s not like Lundkvist is a sure thing
Feb. 28, 2022 at 7:24 p.m.
#11
Knuckle Danz
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 311
Likes: 88
Quoting: Lsendel3
You think Thompson for Nils is closer than Krebs for Nils? You are either very very high on Krebs or Nils, or incredibly down on Thompson.


I do enjoy the panic attacks on this site.

I'm actually high on Thompson; while people think a demotion to Hartford is a reason to be low on Lundkvist, it isn't. The Rangers actually have a solid ten defensemen, moving towards twelve. The depth on defense allows for deals; but, does not mean the receiving team is getting a dud in return.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 8:02 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 2,019
Quoting: HockeyDanz
I do enjoy the panic attacks on this site.

I'm actually high on Thompson; while people think a demotion to Hartford is a reason to be low on Lundkvist, it isn't. The Rangers actually have a solid ten defensemen, moving towards twelve. The depth on defense allows for deals; but, does not mean the receiving team is getting a dud in return.


Yeah, no panic attack, just a realist. Rangers aren’t getting Thompson equivalent, or frankly Krebs equivalent for Nils.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 8:16 p.m.
#13
Knuckle Danz
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 311
Likes: 88
Quoting: Lsendel3
Yeah, no panic attack, just a realist. Rangers aren’t getting Thompson equivalent, or frankly Krebs equivalent for Nils.


A realist? Not so much.

Anyway, don't worry. None of the precious are of the interest. Raging over ideas doesn't a realist, make.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 8:20 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 8,273
Likes: 6,247
Quoting: Buffalove
Mitts still has a high ceiling imo
He’s just been held back by injuries so we haven’t seen it much
It’s not like Lundkvist is a sure thing


It's more of a hockey trade though. We need right d in a big way, and mittelstadt doesn't do much for me, personally I don't see him as a center. I assume lundkvist isn't killing it either, it's just a hockey trade.
homiedaclown and gretzkyghosts liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 8:32 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 2,019
Quoting: HockeyDanz
A realist? Not so much.

Anyway, don't worry. None of the precious are of the interest. Raging over ideas doesn't a realist, make.


Raging 👌

Maybe Buffalo can trade Power for Kravtzov.

Just don’t want HockeyDanz from CF to feel ripped off
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 8:39 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 399
Likes: 126
No way Buffalo does this, but I wish they would.

Nils is heating up in Hartford and is probably gonna be real good, I hate that we're probably gonna lose him for like Arturri Lehkonen or some **** just because we don't have room for him.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 9:42 p.m.
#17
Hit them with a toey
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 186
Likes: 85
Quoting: Buffalove
Mitts still has a high ceiling imo
He’s just been held back by injuries so we haven’t seen it much
It’s not like Lundkvist is a sure thing


It's not like Mittelstadt is either. Injuries are a part in his poor play this year, but he also has a history of being physically weak, careless with the puck (ex. Buffalo vs St. Louis), at times lazy on defense , and inconsistent on offense. I wouldn't necessarily do a Lundkvist for Mittelstadt, but I'd at least look into it.
gretzkyghosts and sabres89 liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 9:44 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Quoting: TagesMissedShots
It's not like Mittelstadt is either. Injuries are a part in his poor play this year, but he also has a history of being physically weak, careless with the puck (ex. Buffalo vs St. Louis), at times lazy on defense , and inconsistent on offense. I wouldn't necessarily do a Lundkvist for Mittelstadt, but I'd at least look into it.


I didn’t say Mitts was a sure thing
But he does have a higher pedigree, and this a better chance at reaching his ceiling

Mitts came around last season as well
Played at a pace of 20goals & over 40points
Not that he was outstanding, but we could clearly see him progressing in the right direction once we got rid of awful Ralph Kruger & whatever the heck system he was trying to have us play
Mar. 1, 2022 at 9:30 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 8,273
Likes: 6,247
Quoting: Buffalove
I didn’t say Mitts was a sure thing
But he does have a higher pedigree, and this a better chance at reaching his ceiling

Mitts came around last season as well
Played at a pace of 20goals & over 40points
Not that he was outstanding, but we could clearly see him progressing in the right direction once we got rid of awful Ralph Kruger & whatever the heck system he was trying to have us play


Here's the thing- a 20 goal/40 point pace is fine, it's certainly not great. Center is probably the most important position on the ice, you cover from one end of the rink to the other, and he is bad in his own end. Plus minus is obviously not a great Stat, but without a deep dive, mittelstadt is a guy that provides some offense (and honestly it's inconsistent too), and is a liability in his own end as a center. I'm not talking about catching a minus because you were on for an empty net, I'm talking about routinely giving up chances and goals in your own end, and not scoring enough to make up the difference. I think he ends up on the wing eventually.
Mar. 1, 2022 at 9:30 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,352
Likes: 4,799
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I’d think Sabres say no
Quoting: HockeyDanz
Different, yes. I'm not sure about doable. I think IF your proposal was for Thompson, you might get closer to a done deal. Maybe. So you think Lundqvist has that high of a ceiling? Good trade him elsewhere but not for Thompson!
You were correct Buffalo would say no, read below.
Quoting: Howie
Buffalo says no they're not trading Krebs
Quoting: Sabresguy1987
Yeah no
Quoting: sabres89
Mittelstadt sure. Olofsson would be tough, but i would certainly do mittelstadt for a right d.
Quoting: Lsendel3
Yeah, no panic attack, just a realist. Rangers aren’t getting Thompson equivalent, or frankly Krebs equivalent for Nils.
Quoting: OldSenileGuy
No way Buffalo does this, but I wish they would...
Let's be clear here Buffalo has Thompson, Cozens, Mittelstadt, Krebs and Girgensons who can play center.
Buffalo has Jokiharju, Laaksonen who can play RHD.
Nils and Payton have similar ceilings, second line center v second pairing defenseman.
Nils is only 6 months older than Payton and Defensemen take longer to develop.
This is a hockey trade IMO which the Sabres are moving a player from a position in which they have depth to get a player who fills a need.
If I were Buffalo's GM, I would make this deal, or for Mittelstadt or for Olofsson, but not for Thompson.
For the past four years I have said it takes longer for big men to develop.
Now it appears has, he will not be traded for Nils one for one!


@Shakabakes VERY GOOD POST!
Shakabakes liked this.
Mar. 1, 2022 at 9:48 a.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Quoting: sabres89
Here's the thing- a 20 goal/40 point pace is fine, it's certainly not great. Center is probably the most important position on the ice, you cover from one end of the rink to the other, and he is bad in his own end. Plus minus is obviously not a great Stat, but without a deep dive, mittelstadt is a guy that provides some offense (and honestly it's inconsistent too), and is a liability in his own end as a center. I'm not talking about catching a minus because you were on for an empty net, I'm talking about routinely giving up chances and goals in your own end, and not scoring enough to make up the difference. I think he ends up on the wing eventually.


Well we have Cozens & Krebs & Thompson as well,
so someone has to end up on the wing
And young players- especially Centers- OFTEN have struggles in their own end & are inconsistent scorers.
This isn’t unexpected, it’s normal
I think you’re way too worried about his lack of defense

Also…. Ralph screwed up most of our players, even the Vets
Mitts looked A LOT better once he was fired
And producing at a 20goal/40+point pace was a good jump in production & development

I don’t see any reason why he can’t continue that development,
as long as he can get healthy
sabres89 liked this.
Mar. 1, 2022 at 10:09 a.m.
#22
Sabresguy1897
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 628
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
You were correct Buffalo would say no, read below. Let's be clear here Buffalo has Thompson, Cozens, Mittelstadt, Krebs and Girgensons who can play center.
Buffalo has Jokiharju, Laaksonen who can play RHD.
Nils and Payton have similar ceilings, second line center v second pairing defenseman.
Nils is only 6 months older than Payton and Defensemen take longer to develop.
This is a hockey trade IMO which the Sabres are moving a player from a position in which they have depth to get a player who fills a need.
If I were Buffalo's GM, I would make this deal, or for Mittelstadt or for Olofsson, but not for Thompson.
For the past four years I have said it takes longer for big men to develop.
Now it appears has, he will not be traded for Nils one for one!


Shakabakes VERY GOOD POST!


I am fine with olofsson or mitts, not krebs, dont forget we also have 2 late first round picks we could use on rhd that are similar to nils... or use our pick to get nemec. I think Krebs ceiling may be limited only by how the sabres use him. has the vision of a top line guy and is very smart. Also hard on pucks and difficult to play against which would make for a highly skilled checker. Krebs is playing now and is playing well for his age and situation. Nils is not a guaruntee
sabres89 liked this.
Mar. 1, 2022 at 10:52 p.m.
#23
Knuckle Danz
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 311
Likes: 88
Quoting: Lsendel3
Raging 👌

Maybe Buffalo can trade Power for Kravtzov.

Just don’t want HockeyDanz from CF to feel ripped off


You know, I was already done with both faces of you. I think for the sake of keeping my food down, I am done with your portion of the f@&ks I'm willing to give.

Nite nite, Slugger.
Mar. 1, 2022 at 11:23 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 2,019
Quoting: HockeyDanz
You know, I was already done with both faces of you. I think for the sake of keeping my food down, I am done with your portion of the f&ks I'm willing to give.

Nite nite, Slugger.


Nothing like raging on a post the next day. Kisses to you and yours sweetie.
Mar. 1, 2022 at 11:24 p.m.
#25
Knuckle Danz
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 311
Likes: 88
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
You were correct Buffalo would say no, read below. Let's be clear here Buffalo has Thompson, Cozens, Mittelstadt, Krebs and Girgensons who can play center.
Buffalo has Jokiharju, Laaksonen who can play RHD.
Nils and Payton have similar ceilings, second line center v second pairing defenseman.
Nils is only 6 months older than Payton and Defensemen take longer to develop.
This is a hockey trade IMO which the Sabres are moving a player from a position in which they have depth to get a player who fills a need.
If I were Buffalo's GM, I would make this deal, or for Mittelstadt or for Olofsson, but not for Thompson.
For the past four years I have said it takes longer for big men to develop.
Now it appears has, he will not be traded for Nils one for one!


Shakabakes VERY GOOD POST!


Since I spent some time sharing the video and scouting of Lundkvist with the scouts who were working him up (during my previous time as a liason for Central Registry, via the NHLPA's insurance provider), I think it's fair to say I can see the ceiling on him.

Let me also say, that the 2018 draft class has the potential to be on the level of 2003 and 2005's classes. Time will tell.

As an aside, I suspect that a Dahlin-Lundkvist pairing isn't just about pairing a couple of Swedish kids; it's about the potential of taking the pressure off what has been a clearly overwhelmed Dahlin. While I'm sure Owen Power will eventually do that, helping this very talented young man (Dahlin) get closer to a comfortable, consistent game ought to
be opportune to the Sabres.

Anyway, I'm not interested in a pissing match. I liked the original idea of Krebs, which I stated to the original author. I thought [Thompson], because a future move that's about cost-cutting (I.e. Strome being allowed to leave as a UFA, supplanted by someone like Thompson, so it was preemptive in theory) in its way.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll