SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Need feedback on these JT Miller trades

Created by: AK50
Team: 2022-23 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 17, 2022
Published: Jun. 17, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. Chytil, Filip
  2. Schneider, Braden
  3. 2023 1st round pick (NYR)
  4. 2024 5th round pick (NYR)
NYR
  1. Miller, J.T. ($2,625,000 retained)
2.
VAN
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. Sandin, Rasmus [RFA Rights]
  3. 2023 1st round pick (TOR)
TOR
    Miller, J.T.
    3.
    VAN
    1. Addison, Calen
    2. Greenway, Jordan
    3. 2022 2nd round pick (VAN)
    4. 2023 1st round pick (MIN)
    5. 2023 6th round pick (MIN)
    MIN
      Miller, J.T. ($2,625,000 retained)
      4.
      COL
        Miller, J.T. ($1,050,000 retained)
        5.
        VAN
        1. Jarvis, Seth
        2. Necas, Martin [RFA Rights]
        3. 2023 1st round pick (CAR)
        4. 2023 5th round pick (CAR)
        CAR
          Miller, J.T. ($2,625,000 retained)
          6.
          VAN
          1. DeBrusk, Jake
          2. Haula, Erik
          3. 2022 7th round pick (BOS)
          BOS
            Miller, J.T.
            Buyouts
            Retained Salary Transactions
            DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
            2022
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the BOS
            2023
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the NYR
            Logo of the TOR
            Logo of the MIN
            Logo of the CAR
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the NYR
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the CAR
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the MIN
            2024
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the NYR
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the VAN
            Logo of the VAN
            ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
            25$82,500,000$86,585,001$1,250,000$4,632,500-$4,085,001
            Left WingCentreRight Wing
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $7,350,000$7,350,000
            C, LW
            UFA - 2
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $4,950,000$4,950,000
            RW, LW
            UFA - 4
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $3,250,000$3,250,000
            LW
            M-NTC
            UFA - 2
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $4,125,000$4,125,000
            C
            UFA - 1
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
            RW, LW
            RFA - 2
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $2,650,000$2,650,000
            C, LW
            UFA - 2
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $750,000$750,000
            C, LW
            UFA - 1
            Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
            $3,500,000$3,500,000
            C, RW
            UFA - 1
            Logo of the Minnesota Wild
            $3,000,000$3,000,000
            LW, RW
            UFA - 3
            Logo of the New York Rangers
            $2,300,000$2,300,000
            C, LW
            UFA - 1
            Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
            $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
            RW
            RFA - 2
            Logo of the Boston Bruins
            $4,000,000$4,000,000
            RW, LW
            UFA - 2
            Logo of the Boston Bruins
            $2,375,000$2,375,000
            C, LW
            UFA - 1
            Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
            $3,500,000$3,500,000
            LW, C, RW
            M-NTC
            UFA - 1
            Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $7,850,000$7,850,000
            LD
            UFA - 5
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $6,000,000$6,000,000
            RD
            M-NTC
            UFA - 2
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $5,000,000$5,000,000
            G
            UFA - 4
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $7,260,000$7,260,000
            LD
            NMC
            UFA - 5
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $850,000$850,000
            RD
            UFA - 1
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $762,500$762,500
            G
            UFA - 2
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $1,500,000$1,500,000
            LD/RD
            UFA - 1
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $750,000$750,000
            LD/RD
            UFA - 1
            Logo of the New York Rangers
            $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
            RD
            RFA - 2
            Logo of the Minnesota Wild
            $795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
            RD
            RFA - 1
            Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
            $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
            LD/RD
            RFA - 1
            ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $2,500,000$2,500,000
            RD
            UFA - 3
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $3,500,000$3,500,000
            LW, RW
            M-NTC
            UFA - 1
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
            LW, RW
            RFA - 1
            Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
            $762,500$762,500
            RD
            UFA - 1

            Embed Code

            • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
            • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

            Text-Embed

            Click to Highlight
            Which trade would you choose
            The chart has been hidden

            Poll Options


            Jun. 17, 2022 at 9:58 a.m.
            #1
            Hurricane Waddell
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: May 2018
            Posts: 8,733
            Likes: 3,601
            Canes need to add a ton more
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 9:58 a.m.
            #2
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Sep. 2020
            Posts: 1,210
            Likes: 465
            Bruins accept very quickly.
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 9:59 a.m.
            #3
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2016
            Posts: 1,013
            Likes: 479
            MN declines. Can’t afford him
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.
            #4
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Sep. 2020
            Posts: 574
            Likes: 72
            Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
            Bruins accept very quickly.


            was going to say that bruins deal feels like a steal for boston
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 10:01 a.m.
            #5
            Hurricane Waddell
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: May 2018
            Posts: 8,733
            Likes: 3,601
            Poster clearly didn’t watch much Canes or Bruins this year

            Quoting: Kellen
            was going to say that bruins deal feels like a steal for boston
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 10:02 a.m.
            #6
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Sep. 2020
            Posts: 574
            Likes: 72
            Can't see nucks getting Byram, kid is way too good
            Will27, Anus_McLeod and SK101 liked this.
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 10:04 a.m.
            #7
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jan. 2017
            Posts: 9,577
            Likes: 4,574
            Avs is an easy 'not a hope'.
            Will27, Anus_McLeod and vikhodush liked this.
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 10:06 a.m.
            #8
            Hurricane Waddell
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: May 2018
            Posts: 8,733
            Likes: 3,601
            This was sarcasm, and now more draft picks were added to VAN. Fan base delusional on the value of one year of Miller.

            Quoting: Caniac555
            Canes need to add a ton more
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 10:08 a.m.
            #9
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2017
            Posts: 8,697
            Likes: 7,071
            Quoting: IcemanJoe
            MN declines. Can’t afford him


            At half retention we could if we moved Greenway, but that won't happen. We also could if we moved Kulikov or Jost, which are both very possible.

            Issue is that I don't see Guerin moving Greenway for a rental. Assuming we move Fiala for a top pick and we're still interested in acquiring Miller, our best offer is probably something like our 1st, Addison, and maybe Jost. That probably gets beat.
            IcemanJoe liked this.
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 10:10 a.m.
            #10
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2016
            Posts: 66
            Likes: 18
            Why are the leafs giving more than Boston for Miller? lol
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 10:13 a.m.
            #11
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2022
            Posts: 40
            Likes: 11
            NYR not trading Schneider
            AdamFox liked this.
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 10:16 a.m.
            #12
            bang bang
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Nov. 2017
            Posts: 1,195
            Likes: 351
            you'll take debrusk and haula but want byram lmfao
            vikhodush and SK101 liked this.
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 10:19 a.m.
            #13
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: May 2017
            Posts: 6,694
            Likes: 3,362
            Your values are all over the place.

            You want Jarvis Necas 1st and a 5th from CAR and then you give him away to Boston for nothing. These are awful.
            justaBoss and Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 10:21 a.m.
            #14
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2016
            Posts: 1,013
            Likes: 479
            Quoting: TanSor
            At half retention we could if we moved Greenway, but that won't happen. We also could if we moved Kulikov or Jost, which are both very possible.

            Issue is that I don't see Guerin moving Greenway for a rental. Assuming we move Fiala for a top pick and we're still interested in acquiring Miller, our best offer is probably something like our 1st, Addison, and maybe Jost. That probably gets beat.


            Yeah sorry, I meant we can’t afford him with an extension. I wouldn’t even consider JT without an extension in place.
            TanSor and Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 10:35 a.m.
            #15
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jul. 2017
            Posts: 1,574
            Likes: 455
            Some probably are too much such as Cans and Avs, and the Boston one is insanely weak. I'm not even a JT Miller trade guy- I think the ask is crazy high for a guy that had a career yr, needs a new contract and apparently people have forgotten is bad defensively and has had consistency issues- and still that Boston one is bad.

            Are all these trades working under the theoretical thought that the acquiring team would work out an extension prior to the trade?
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 10:46 a.m.
            #16
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2017
            Posts: 8,697
            Likes: 7,071
            Quoting: IcemanJoe
            Yeah sorry, I meant we can’t afford him with an extension. I wouldn’t even consider JT without an extension in place.


            I'd consider it personally if the objective is to stay competitive. I think Miller's game is a perfect fit for us (especially on the top line, imagine a 100 point player between Kaprizov and Zucc) and it is built for playoff hockey. If we move Fiala for a top pick, we would have two 1sts and two 2nds in the draft this year so we could afford to include our own 1st in a deal and with our deep prospect pool we could afford to give someone up.

            Basically you'd be looking at this for the offseason:
            In: top 10 pick/top prospect, JT Miller
            Out: Fiala, 24 OA, one of Addison/Hunt/O'Rourke/Beckman, possibly a 2nd, and Jost/Kulikov to even out cap

            Still have either 2 or 3 picks in the first 3 rounds.
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 10:51 a.m.
            #17
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2016
            Posts: 1,013
            Likes: 479
            Quoting: TanSor
            I'd consider it personally if the objective is to stay competitive. I think Miller's game is a perfect fit for us (especially on the top line, imagine a 100 point player between Kaprizov and Zucc) and it is built for playoff hockey. If we move Fiala for a top pick, we would have two 1sts and two 2nds in the draft this year so we could afford to include our own 1st in a deal and with our deep prospect pool we could afford to give someone up.

            Basically you'd be looking at this for the offseason:
            In: top 10 pick/top prospect, JT Miller
            Out: Fiala, 24 OA, one of Addison/Hunt/O'Rourke/Beckman, possibly a 2nd, and Jost/Kulikov to even out cap

            Still have either 2 or 3 picks in the first 3 rounds.


            Yeah I just don’t do that personally. I’d rather keep the pick, or trade it for a good player on his ELC.
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 11:00 a.m.
            #18
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2017
            Posts: 8,697
            Likes: 7,071
            Quoting: IcemanJoe
            Yeah I just don’t do that personally. I’d rather keep the pick, or trade it for a good player on his ELC.


            I don't think you'd get a good player on an ELC with the 24th pick in a very weak draft. I hear you though, I think this team is in a prime position to regress significantly. Hartman, Gaudreau, Foligno, and even Zucc all had pretty insane years compared to what they've accomplished in their careers. I just don't think what we saw last year is sustainable, especially if Fiala is moved and we're banking on Rossi to "replace" his production (I think Rossi will be good eventually but I'd be surprised if he put up huge numbers next season). With that in mind, maybe we're better off "tanking" for a year and getting a lottery pick in what looks to be a much stronger draft next year.
            IcemanJoe liked this.
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 11:07 a.m.
            #19
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2016
            Posts: 1,013
            Likes: 479
            Quoting: TanSor
            I don't think you'd get a good player on an ELC with the 24th pick in a very weak draft. I hear you though, I think this team is in a prime position to regress significantly. Hartman, Gaudreau, Foligno, and even Zucc all had pretty insane years compared to what they've accomplished in their careers. I just don't think what we saw last year is sustainable, especially if Fiala is moved and we're banking on Rossi to "replace" his production (I think Rossi will be good eventually but I'd be surprised if he put up huge numbers next season). With that in mind, maybe we're better off "tanking" for a year and getting a lottery pick in what looks to be a much stronger draft next year.


            Not 1-1 for the pick but in a package deal, with Dumba or someone else. Yeah, the regression is coming for sure. If I was BG I’d be looking to move more of these guys off career years, but doubt it happens. I don’t think we’ll tank, especially with Kaprisov, but it’s definitely possible we’re outside looking in around trade deadline time and flip some players for picks.
            TanSor liked this.
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 11:11 a.m.
            #20
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2017
            Posts: 8,697
            Likes: 7,071
            Quoting: IcemanJoe
            Not 1-1 for the pick but in a package deal, with Dumba or someone else. Yeah, the regression is coming for sure. If I was BG I’d be looking to move more of these guys off career years, but doubt it happens. I don’t think we’ll tank, especially with Kaprisov, but it’s definitely possible we’re outside looking in around trade deadline time and flip some players for picks.


            If we hadn't bought out Parise and Suter, I'd have moved Hartman this offseason. There's just no way he produces at that same level next year. I love him as a player, but we could get so much in a trade for him with his contract. Problem is we need players like that more than maybe anyone in the league with $13M in dead cap space.

            It will be difficult to tank with Kaprizov on our roster but if a lot of players take a step back it wouldn't surprised me, especially with losing a PPG winger. I don't mean that we'd intentionally lose, just that our roster won't be as competitive next year if we lost Fiala and didn't acquire someone like Miller.
            IcemanJoe liked this.
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 11:13 a.m.
            #21
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2016
            Posts: 1,013
            Likes: 479
            Quoting: TanSor
            If we hadn't bought out Parise and Suter, I'd have moved Hartman this offseason. There's just no way he produces at that same level next year. I love him as a player, but we could get so much in a trade for him with his contract. Problem is we need players like that more than maybe anyone in the league with $13M in dead cap space.

            It will be difficult to tank with Kaprizov on our roster but if a lot of players take a step back it wouldn't surprised me, especially with losing a PPG winger. I don't mean that we'd intentionally lose, just that our roster won't be as competitive next year if we lost Fiala and didn't acquire someone like Miller.


            We’d be in this situation regardless of the buyouts. Actually, we save a little cap with the buyouts. I agree, I’d move Hartman and Freddie if someone offered good value.

            Oh gotcha, yeah I think the same way, not intentionally tanking but just everyone regressing.
            TanSor liked this.
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 11:19 a.m.
            #22
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2017
            Posts: 8,697
            Likes: 7,071
            Quoting: IcemanJoe
            We’d be in this situation regardless of the buyouts. Actually, we save a little cap with the buyouts. I agree, I’d move Hartman and Freddie if someone offered good value.

            Oh gotcha, yeah I think the same way, not intentionally tanking but just everyone regressing.


            Oh yeah I understand that, I just meant if we didn't have to worry about the dead cap space or their contracts in general (like if they had been traded instead).
            Jun. 17, 2022 at 3:33 p.m.
            #23
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Mar. 2022
            Posts: 52
            Likes: 17
            Sakic has stated publicly that he's not trading Byram for a rental player. Besides the rental would have to be for a player a lot better than the most overrated player in the NHL
             
            Reply
            To create a post please Login or Register
            Question:
            Options:
            Loading animation
            Submit Poll Edit