SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

caro

Created by: Bruinboyo2
Team: 2022-23 Carolina Hurricanes
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 6, 2022
Published: Sep. 6, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
2.
CAR
  1. Smith, Craig ($1,000,000 retained)
BOS
  1. Pederson, Lane
  2. 2023 4th round pick (CAR)
  3. 2023 5th round pick (CAR)
  4. 2024 4th round pick (CAR)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CAR
2024
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
2025
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$82,500,000$80,266,917$112,500$1,000,000$2,233,083
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$7,750,000$7,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$8,460,250$8,460,250
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,820,000$4,820,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,400,000$5,400,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,500,000$1,500,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,025,000$4,025,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$762,500$762,500
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 6, 2022 at 1:17 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 4,030
Likes: 1,447
I doubt the jets trade happens no cap for patches as a result
Sep. 6, 2022 at 1:31 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 15,842
Likes: 7,048
No from Winnipeg. At this point of the off season, Winnipeg isn't trading Dubois without an equivalent center coming back.
Sep. 6, 2022 at 1:53 p.m.
#3
deadpool
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 626
Likes: 166
I think Winnipeg must accept that
Sep. 6, 2022 at 2:06 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 524
Likes: 275
I’d say that’s pretty close for Winnipeg. If they’re out of the playoffs by the deadline and Dubois still hasn’t changed his mind, then I would imagine they say yes.
Sep. 6, 2022 at 2:18 p.m.
#5
Sway4Vezina
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 809
Likes: 361
Edited Sep. 6, 2022 at 4:16 p.m.
Bruins should accept if they need to move Smith but for now they shouldn’t trade him
Sep. 6, 2022 at 2:23 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: cMac73
Bruins accept


They most certainly do not.

The only reason to trade craig smith is if they need cap space, and moving him is the only option. Eating salary there is not a thing, especially when they’re getting nothing in return.
Sep. 6, 2022 at 2:45 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 565
Canes likely decline
Sep. 6, 2022 at 3:42 p.m.
#8
Jet69
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 1,143
It would start with Morrow
Sep. 6, 2022 at 4:16 p.m.
#9
Sway4Vezina
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 809
Likes: 361
Quoting: DefenseFirst
They most certainly do not.

The only reason to trade craig smith is if they need cap space, and moving him is the only option. Eating salary there is not a thing, especially when they’re getting nothing in return.


Well yeah you’re right they should only trade him if they have to but that’s good value for him
Sep. 6, 2022 at 5:24 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: cMac73
Well yeah you’re right they should only trade him if they have to but that’s good value for him


No it is not. Horrific actually, especially given the retention.
Sep. 6, 2022 at 5:29 p.m.
#11
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 8,666
Likes: 3,483
Canes pass on both trades. Canes aren’t trading for a rental in PLD, which rules out any chance Necas and that 2023 first gets moved, and the Canes have no need for Smith.
Sep. 6, 2022 at 5:51 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,653
Likes: 5,234
Quoting: evelutions2
Canes pass on both trades. Canes aren’t trading for a rental in PLD


PLD's not a rental. He's an RFA next summer.
Sep. 6, 2022 at 6:14 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 565
Dubois will indeed be an RFA w/Arb rights after this upcoming season, but I don't see the Canes pursuing this one. I don't think there's long term interest on either side.
Sep. 6, 2022 at 6:42 p.m.
#14
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 8,666
Likes: 3,483
Quoting: gmgb
PLD's not a rental. He's an RFA next summer.


Assuming that PLD still only wants to play for Montreal, he will indeed be a rental when he signs that 1 year deal that walks him to UFA. It doesn’t matter who he plays for next year, he will be on a one year deal so he can sign wherever he wants for 2024-25. Canes rarely trade for rentals, and when they have, the biggest piece they have given up in the past 20+ years has been a 2nd round pick when they traded for Mark Recchi in 2005-06. Not to mention, Canes have no need for more Centers, since they already have too many as is. Just like Miller to Carolina wouldn’t work, Dubois to Carolina won’t work either.
Sep. 6, 2022 at 7:53 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,653
Likes: 5,234
Quoting: evelutions2
Assuming that PLD still only wants to play for Montreal, he will indeed be a rental when he signs that 1 year deal that walks him to UFA. It doesn’t matter who he plays for next year, he will be on a one year deal so he can sign wherever he wants for 2024-25. Canes rarely trade for rentals, and when they have, the biggest piece they have given up in the past 20+ years has been a 2nd round pick when they traded for Mark Recchi in 2005-06. Not to mention, Canes have no need for more Centers, since they already have too many as is. Just like Miller to Carolina wouldn’t work, Dubois to Carolina won’t work either.


Even if CAR mismanages the asset and only gets two years out of PLD, that still doesn't make him a rental.

Most of CAR's centers can also play wing, so too many centers doesn't seem like much of an issue. Plus, they're giving up two in this proposal, and only getting one back anyway. One of CAR's problems is they only have one top six center right now. This trade would give them an upgrade at 2C, instead of hoping one of Necas or Kotkaniemi make some big strides.

Rarely trading for rentals in the past 20 years, when CAR was out of the playoffs more often than not, isn't the flex you think it is.

Ultimately, it's not an ideal return for WPG. They should focus on trying to get a return with fewer but better pieces coming back.
Sep. 6, 2022 at 9:09 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 565
I just don't see the Canes pursuing this. The logic here is not entirely wrong, but not entirely right either. For reasons I just don't want to spend too much time explaining Dubois isn't someone they are interested in. I could see Necas being moved for a significant upgrade at C/W but for the absolute right deal. That includes cost AND term. I do think term is a commodity the Canes mgmt values. Appreciate all of the input here.
evelutions2 liked this.
Sep. 6, 2022 at 9:19 p.m.
#17
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 8,666
Likes: 3,483
Quoting: gmgb
Even if CAR mismanages the asset and only gets two years out of PLD, that still doesn't make him a rental.

Most of CAR's centers can also play wing, so too many centers doesn't seem like much of an issue. Plus, they're giving up two in this proposal, and only getting one back anyway. One of CAR's problems is they only have one top six center right now. This trade would give them an upgrade at 2C, instead of hoping one of Necas or Kotkaniemi make some big strides.

Rarely trading for rentals in the past 20 years, when CAR was out of the playoffs more often than not, isn't the flex you think it is.

Ultimately, it's not an ideal return for WPG. They should focus on trying to get a return with fewer but better pieces coming back.


First of all, the Canes don’t “mismanage” assets. If PLD is only wanting a 1 year deal so he can hit the market, it doesn’t matter what the Canes do if he is just going to walk anyway. And yes, if you are dead set on leaving as soon as you hit UFA, you are a rental, regardless if it’s 1 year or 2.

Yes, most of the Canes C can play wing, but that doesn’t mean that they should. Aho was developed as a wing until he was mature enough for the 1C role. KK can play wing, but he is much better suited for a C role, and didn’t work out that well on the wings. Staal is a C, through and through, and Brind’amour won’t play him on the wing until someone comes along and becomes better at Staal’s role than Staal. Management and Brind’amour are both content to let KK have the 2C role, with Necas and Stastny being the available safety blankets. Most people don’t know this because they spend too much time hating on KK, but when he was thrown into the 2C role during the Canes Covid stretch, he scored at about a 1.5 P/PG pace. Canes aren’t worried about KK, and it’s not like PLD is a complete upgrade. Career high of 61 points and inconsistent at best defensively, not to mention the high unlikelihood he would remain in Carolina since he will almost certainly sign a 1 year to walk to UFA, Canes are happy to rock what they currently have.

I wasn’t saying that rarely trading for rentals was a flex. I was merely pointing out the Canes don’t pay rental prices, leading them not to trade for rentals that much.

Winnipeg would be smart to take the best offer they can since, again, the likelihood PLD becomes at best, if he is traded this off-season, a 2 year rental. Every other team in the league would be smart to just wait an extra year to see if they can land him in UFA. And some teams, like the Canes, will have no interest in PLD whatsoever.

Cheers and have a nice night.
Sep. 6, 2022 at 10:07 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,539
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: jgimp69
It would start with Morrow


Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Thank you, that made me laugh. Morrow is breaking Cale Makar's UMass records. He'd need CONNOR coming back.
Sep. 7, 2022 at 8:23 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 565
Alright, time to calm down the room. Let's keep it civil. We've beat this one around pretty good. More trades to explore. Hockey season is getting closer, folks!
Mr_Canoehead and evelutions2 liked this.
Sep. 7, 2022 at 1:02 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,653
Likes: 5,234
Quoting: evelutions2
First of all, the Canes don’t “mismanage” assets.


Holy hubris, Batman!
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll