SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If They actually go after Chychrun

Created by: mcordaro
Team: 2022-23 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 7, 2023
Published: Feb. 7, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
The rumors are arizona wants carlo, but who knows if the rumors are true. I would prefer to trade Grizz. also one stop shot for forward depth.
Trades
1.
ARI
  1. Grzelcyk, Matt
  2. Lauko, Jakub
  3. Lohrei, Mason [Reserve List]
  4. 2023 1st round pick (BOS)
  5. 2024 3rd round pick (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. 2023 7th round pick (BUF)
BUF
  1. Smith, Craig
  2. 2023 5th round pick (BOS)
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the BUF
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$81,466,667$0$4,650,000$1,033,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,500,000$2,500,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000 (Performance Bonus$2,000,000$2M)
C
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,800,000$3,800,000
LW, C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$450,000$450,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,600,000$4,600,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 8
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC, NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$150,000$150K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,137,500$1,137,500
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 7, 2023 at 10:32 a.m.
#1
No longer a Virgin
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 6,030
Likes: 2,607
Boston just doesn't have what it takes to aquire Chychryun. It would start with Lysell, 2023 first +
Feb. 7, 2023 at 10:34 a.m.
#2
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,747
Likes: 3,602
If that was the package Arizona would accept it’d be done. I agree that Boston likely gets Chychrun and it’s going to cost them. It also doesn’t increase their chances of getting out of the East.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 10:36 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,872
Likes: 8,871
That is pretty light.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 10:38 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: stephane_robidas
Boston just doesn't have what it takes to aquire Chychryun. It would start with Lysell, 2023 first +


Soooo they do have what it takes.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 10:40 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,872
Likes: 8,871
Quoting: stephane_robidas
Boston just doesn't have what it takes to aquire Chychryun. It would start with Lysell, 2023 first +


Load of crap. They have all their 1sts, Lysell, Lohrei. They can put a package together that works if they WANT to.

Considering what Zona expects, don’t expect it to be Boston. They kicked the tires. Unless the tires lose some air it’s not going to happen.

Arizona turned down 1st/Lysell/Urho/2nd/Moore last year turning B’s to Lindholm. Boston is not upping the offer, especially with 1 year of term gone since then.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 10:42 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
We can use some logic here - and figure out that carlo isn’t even in this discussion.

Chychrun is a left shot D, so if this move was to be made, a left shot D would have to go out the door. Given chychrun’a style, it would surely be grzelcyk. That said, would arizona really have that much interest in Grzelcyk? Awesome player for sure, but doesn’t fit their window.

I think the only way this works is if Boston moves Grzelcyk to another team for futures, and uses those pieces - along with futures of their own - to get chychrun.

For example - grzelcyk to edmonton for a first.
To arizona:
EDM 2023 first
BOS 2023 first
Lysell
dannibalcorpse liked this.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 10:52 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,963
Likes: 14,617
We don't have a roster spot for smith
Feb. 7, 2023 at 10:55 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 732
The rumors are fake. Just like Horvat to Boston.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 10:55 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 679
Quoting: DefenseFirst
We can use some logic here - and figure out that carlo isn’t even in this discussion.

Chychrun is a left shot D, so if this move was to be made, a left shot D would have to go out the door. Given chychrun’a style, it would surely be grzelcyk. That said, would arizona really have that much interest in Grzelcyk? Awesome player for sure, but doesn’t fit their window.

I think the only way this works is if Boston moves Grzelcyk to another team for futures, and uses those pieces - along with futures of their own - to get chychrun.

For example - grzelcyk to edmonton for a first.
To arizona:
EDM 2023 first
BOS 2023 first
Lysell


Pretty sure even a desperate Oilers club wouldn't be interested in giving up a first for Grzelcyk, who seems like more of a damn good 4/5 d-man.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 10:56 a.m.
#10
No longer a Virgin
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 6,030
Likes: 2,607
Quoting: Gofnut999
Load of crap. They have all their 1sts, Lysell, Lohrei. They can put a package together that works if they WANT to.

Considering what Zona expects, don’t expect it to be Boston. They kicked the tires. Unless the tires lose some air it’s not going to happen.

Arizona turned down 1st/Lysell/Urho/2nd/Moore last year turning B’s to Lindholm. Boston is not upping the offer, especially with 1 year of term gone since then.


First, second and Lysell is nice. Vaakanainen and Moore? Gross
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 10:57 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Boos
Pretty sure even a desperate Oilers club wouldn't be interested in giving up a first for Grzelcyk, who seems like more of a damn good 4/5 d-man.


Top four d man in his 20s with three years of term under $4M is a first all day long in this league.

I think it’s pretty tough to talk about him potentially being a five when he’s been a part of arguably the best d pair in the NHL over the last three years.
LPProductions liked this.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,872
Likes: 8,871
Quoting: stephane_robidas
First, second and Lysell is nice. Vaakanainen and Moore? Gross


2nd was to take Moore. 1st/Lysell/Urho was for Chychrun. Urho was the 17th pick in his draft class and was looking pretty solid in the NHL when the offer was made. Falls right in the wheelhouse of what they are asking for. Urho was far more valuable than the 2nd.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 11:02 a.m.
#13
No longer a Virgin
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 6,030
Likes: 2,607
Quoting: Gofnut999
2nd was to take Moore. 1st/Lysell/Urho was for Chychrun. Urho was the 17th pick in his draft class and was looking pretty solid in the NHL when the offer was made. Falls right in the wheelhouse of what they are asking for. Urho was far more valuable than the 2nd.


Lol he can hardly crack the d corps of the worst team in the league lol
Feb. 7, 2023 at 11:04 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,872
Likes: 8,871
Quoting: stephane_robidas
Lol he can hardly crack the d corps of the worst team in the league lol


He’s been hurt. He was playing 20 mins a night last year.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 11:05 a.m.
#15
No longer a Virgin
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 6,030
Likes: 2,607
Quoting: Gofnut999
He’s been hurt. He was playing 20 mins a night last year.


Yeah...so does Klingberg
Feb. 7, 2023 at 11:07 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: stephane_robidas
First, second and Lysell is nice. Vaakanainen and Moore? Gross


At the time vaakanainen was playing pretty well, and over 19 minutes a night on his ELC in boston. What’s gross about an ELC d man playing well?
Feb. 7, 2023 at 11:12 a.m.
#17
No longer a Virgin
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 6,030
Likes: 2,607
Quoting: DefenseFirst
At the time vaakanainen was playing pretty well, and over 19 minutes a night on his ELC in boston. What’s gross about an ELC d man playing well?


Jonathan Kovacevic has played over 20 minutes 6 times this year as a rookie. And?
Feb. 7, 2023 at 11:13 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 679
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Top four d man in his 20s with three years of term under $4M is a first all day long in this league.

I think it’s pretty tough to talk about him potentially being a five when he’s been a part of arguably the best d pair in the NHL over the last three years.


Point taken, top-four is better. Having McAvoy by your side for a good chunk of those three seasons isn't anything to sneeze at and Carlo's pretty good as well. Don't get me wrong, I'd take Grzelcyk on the Sabres and that's a real good AAV, however I'm not sure how he'd play after taking him out of Boston which has given him all the tools with which to thrive-- the pairings he's been on, the appropriate ice-time, the system he's been in, the 200' work of the forwards including perennial Selke candidate and five-time winner, Bergeron.

Linus Ullmark struggled with consistency in Buffalo and we've seen what he can do on a team like Boston. Grzelcyk, imo, is in a similar situation.


Edit: And, yes, he's in his 20's but barely
Feb. 7, 2023 at 11:13 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: stephane_robidas
Jonathan Kovacevic has played over 20 minutes 6 times this year as a rookie. And?


Don’t deflect. What’s gross about an ELC defensemen playing over 19 minutes a night (for more than six games mind you), and playing well? Can’t really see much of a gross downside there.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 11:14 a.m.
#20
No longer a Virgin
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 6,030
Likes: 2,607
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Don’t deflect. What’s gross about an ELC defensemen playing over 19 minutes a night (for more than six games mind you), and playing well? Can’t really see much of a gross downside there.


I'm just proving a point. Anyone can play 19 minutes a night - doesn't mean they're a good piece in a trade.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 11:16 a.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Boos
Point taken, top-four is better. Having McAvoy by your side for a good chunk of those three seasons isn't anything to sneeze at and Carlo's pretty good as well. Don't get me wrong, I'd take Grzelcyk on the Sabres and that's a real good AAV, however I'm not sure how he'd play after taking him out of Boston which has given him all the tools with which to thrive-- the pairings he's been on, the appropriate ice-time, the system he's been in, the 200' work of the forwards, including perennial Selke candidate and five-time winner, Bergeron.

Linus Ullmark struggled with consistency in Buffalo and we've seen what he can do on a team like Boston. Grzelcyk, imo, is in a similar situation.


Edit: And, yes, he's in his 20's but barely


I’m not saying he’s top pair or anything, and yes, he’s certainly in a good situation in Boston. That said, his contributions can’t be overlooked. Do we think McAvoy has been by far and away the best defensemen in the NHL over the last three season? If so, fair. That pair is tops in basically every statistical category (both expected and real) over the last three seasons for any pair that’s had 1,000+ minutes together - which I think is a reasonable sample size for three seasons.
LPProductions liked this.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 11:17 a.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: stephane_robidas
I'm just proving a point. Anyone can play 19 minutes a night - doesn't mean they're a good piece in a trade.

No, you’re deflecting.

What’s gross about it? Where’s the downside?

And no, not anyone can play 19+ minutes a night for a 107 point team that played in a bear of a division.

Put it this way, i was annoyed that they traded him.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 11:24 a.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 679
Quoting: DefenseFirst
I’m not saying he’s top pair or anything, and yes, he’s certainly in a good situation in Boston. That said, his contributions can’t be overlooked. Do we think McAvoy has been by far and away the best defensemen in the NHL over the last three season? If so, fair. That pair is tops in basically every statistical category (both expected and real) over the last three seasons for any pair that’s had 1,000+ minutes together - which I think is a reasonable sample size for three seasons.


Fair enough.

BTW, interested in where you got those expected and real stats for pairings. Would love to use it for research purposes.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 11:25 a.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Boos
Fair enough.

BTW, interested in where you got those expected and real stats for pairings. Would love to use it for research purposes.


https://www.naturalstattrick.com/pairings.php?fromseason=20202021&thruseason=20222023&stype=2&sit=5v5&score=all&rate=n&team=ALL&loc=B&toi=1000&gpfilt=none&fd=&td=&tgp=410

Takes a minute or so to load, but its valuable info.

Their numbers are nuts. Goals for % is 74.47%. Next closest is 65.22%.
Boos liked this.
Feb. 7, 2023 at 11:28 a.m.
#25
No longer a Virgin
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 6,030
Likes: 2,607
Quoting: DefenseFirst
No, you’re deflecting.

What’s gross about it? Where’s the downside?

And no, not anyone can play 19+ minutes a night for a 107 point team that played in a bear of a division.

Put it this way, i was annoyed that they traded him.


Sweet
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll