SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Discuss A Possible Lafreniere To TB trade

Created by: Brolekb2b
Team: 2023-24 Tampa Bay Lightning
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 7, 2023
Published: Oct. 7, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Lafrenière might be on the way out in NY, and if he continues his performance with the Rangers they may opt to move him for any assets. TB is in need of a potential top six winger, and Lafrenière might be a reasonable addition to the wing.

What can TB offer NYR to satisfy a possible Lafrenière-TB trade?
Trades
NYR
    Looking for actual insight from both Rangers and Bolts fans as to what TB might be able to offer/what the Rangers might be interested in from our roster/remaining pool of prospects or picks to add Lafrenière to the roster.

    Lafreniere probably gets the chance to play in a top six role in TB, filling the need of a top six winger or scoring option for the team.
    Retained Salary Transactions
    Buried
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the MIN
    2025
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    2026
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$83,500,000$76,415,000$0$0$7,085,000
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $9,500,000$9,500,000
    C, RW
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $9,500,000$9,500,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $8,500,000$8,500,000
    LW, C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $6,250,000$6,250,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $2,325,000$2,325,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    LW, RW
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $3,150,000$3,150,000
    C, LW
    NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $2,665,000$2,665,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $800,000$800,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $800,000$800,000
    C, RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $800,000$800,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $8,500,000$8,500,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $5,200,000$5,200,000
    RD
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $775,000$775,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $7,875,000$7,875,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $1,125,000$1,125,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $775,000$775,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $775,000$775,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $762,500$762,500
    RD
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $850,000$850,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $775,000$775,000
    C, LW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $6,875,000$6,875,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $762,500$762,500
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $9,500,000$9,500,000
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Taxi Squad
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $758,333$758,333 ($0$0$0$0)
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $870,000$870,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
    RW
    RFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Oct. 7, 2023 at 3:51 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 9,664
    Likes: 4,227
    IF Laf was traded - Tampa will have a very hard time being the ones to get him. They have so few good prospects and very few picks.

    Although their GM is a wild man (see Jeannot trade) - so it wouldn't surprise me to see the most ridiculous QUANTITY package offered.

    2026 1st + 2025 2nd + 2026 2nd + 2024 3rd + 2024 5th + a prospect that New York really likes.
    Oct. 7, 2023 at 3:53 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 41,958
    Likes: 19,047
    Quoting: TMLBRIAN
    IF Laf was traded - Tampa will have a very hard time being the ones to get him. They have so few good prospects and very few picks.

    Although their GM is a wild man (see Jeannot trade) - so it wouldn't surprise me to see the most ridiculous QUANTITY package offered.

    2026 1st + 2025 2nd + 2026 2nd + 2024 3rd + 2024 5th + a prospect that New York really likes.


    That is a lot.
    Oct. 7, 2023 at 3:55 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 9,664
    Likes: 4,227
    Quoting: NHLfan10506
    That is a lot.


    All the value is in several years for now, so they hold less value.

    The core of my post is that Tampa would have a VERY hard time coming up with a package that New York would want. Unless it was ALOT and in the future future.
    NHLfan10506 liked this.
    Oct. 7, 2023 at 4:08 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 41,958
    Likes: 19,047
    Quoting: TMLBRIAN
    All the value is in several years for now, so they hold less value.

    The core of my post is that Tampa would have a VERY hard time coming up with a package that New York would want. Unless it was ALOT and in the future future.


    I’d think Newhook return would be the asking price (1st, 2nd, meh prospect) if they wanted futures package. But I’d imagine they get some ‘win now’ pieces from developing club that might be better in short-run.

    (And surprised we haven’t seen any Lafreniere for Byfield trades)
    Oct. 7, 2023 at 4:16 p.m.
    #5
    Habs 7th round 1983
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2019
    Posts: 1,624
    Likes: 751
    Quoting: TMLBRIAN
    IF Laf was traded - Tampa will have a very hard time being the ones to get him. They have so few good prospects and very few picks.

    Although their GM is a wild man (see Jeannot trade) - so it wouldn't surprise me to see the most ridiculous QUANTITY package offered.

    2026 1st + 2025 2nd + 2026 2nd + 2024 3rd + 2024 5th + a prospect that New York really likes.


    That's Tanner Jeannot
    Oct. 7, 2023 at 4:32 p.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2021
    Posts: 7,024
    Likes: 2,634
    Alexis Yakapov, I mean Nail LaFreniere, I mean Alexis LaFreniere?
    Brolekb2b liked this.
    Oct. 7, 2023 at 4:32 p.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2022
    Posts: 9,395
    Likes: 11,608
    Rangers will want a player that plugs into their lineup right now. They won't want picks two and three years from now as the primary return. Laf for Hagel? Which Tampa Bay definitely shouldn't do. I actually don't think Tampa Bay has the right pieces to make a trade for Laf.
    Brolekb2b liked this.
    Oct. 7, 2023 at 4:38 p.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2021
    Posts: 7,024
    Likes: 2,634
    Quoting: Hawksguy81
    Rangers will want a player that plugs into their lineup right now. They won't want picks two and three years from now as the primary return. Laf for Hagel? Which Tampa Bay definitely shouldn't do. I actually don't think Tampa Bay has the right pieces to make a trade for Laf.


    Julien Brisebois would have to repeatedly beat his head against a concrete wall to be that brain damaged
    Oct. 7, 2023 at 4:40 p.m.
    #9
    Thread Starter
    CapEvasionEnthusiast
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2022
    Posts: 860
    Likes: 488
    Quoting: Hawksguy81
    Rangers will want a player that plugs into their lineup right now. They won't want picks two and three years from now as the primary return. Laf for Hagel? Which Tampa Bay definitely shouldn't do. I actually don't think Tampa Bay has the right pieces to make a trade for Laf.


    Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
    Julien Brisebois would have to repeatedly beat his head against a concrete wall to be that brain damaged


    Yeah can't see a world in which JBB gives up Hagel for Laf or just about anything. We'd basically be taking away a player from our top six to add another and it's back to square one, even a step back I would say.
    If the acquisition cost was different with a prospect like Howard + something else instead I think it's something JBB would consider, but even then Laf would need time and to see where he fits proper
    Hawksguy81 liked this.
    Oct. 7, 2023 at 4:40 p.m.
    #10
    Future Ducks legend
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 10,465
    Likes: 7,267
    I'm not saying Lafs getting a fair shake in NYR stuck at 3LW, but he's seems to be going backwards right now.

    He isn't improving defensively, he isn't getting better at skating, and he doesn't seem to be putting in the effort. That sounds like the kind of player Tampa DOESN'T want
    Newgod77 liked this.
    Oct. 7, 2023 at 5:24 p.m.
    #11
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2021
    Posts: 5,625
    Likes: 2,463
    Tampa has nothing of need for NYR
    Oct. 7, 2023 at 5:35 p.m.
    #12
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2023
    Posts: 1,155
    Likes: 872
    Quoting: TMLBRIAN
    All the value is in several years for now, so they hold less value.

    The core of my post is that Tampa would have a VERY hard time coming up with a package that New York would want. Unless it was ALOT and in the future future.


    While I share the concern that Tampa may need a top 6 forward, I also believe we may be fine without making a big splash, at least for the time being. Come playoffs the story could change. However, I agree that we wouldn't be able to offer a very desirable package to the Rangers. I also believe we shouldn't. We had lots of guys make big strides last season and in camp/preseason this year. While it looked like we didn't have many candidates to make our roster over the summer, another year of growth from our prospects, coupled with likely big steps in production from Eyssimont and Sheary, we should be just fine. The jury is out on ABB at the NHL level, but he's gonna get his shot this year. Goncalves made huge strides and could certainly make the team next year and be the top 6 skilled guy we need. Merela, Groshev, Gauthier. We have options and I am not in favor of big game hunting for a guy I didn't even hold that high in his draft year. While his stock may appear to have plummeted some, it doesn't seem like the right move for Tampa in my opinion
    TMLBRIAN and Brolekb2b liked this.
    Oct. 7, 2023 at 5:59 p.m.
    #13
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2023
    Posts: 1,865
    Likes: 363
    The price you’d have to pay wouldn’t be worth it
    Oct. 7, 2023 at 6:30 p.m.
    #14
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 603
    Likes: 180
    Quoting: Brolekb2b
    Yeah can't see a world in which JBB gives up Hagel for Laf or just about anything. We'd basically be taking away a player from our top six to add another and it's back to square one, even a step back I would say.
    If the acquisition cost was different with a prospect like Howard + something else instead I think it's something JBB would consider, but even then Laf would need time and to see where he fits proper


    Because Laf is a top 6 player currently? For all this debate about Laf, he's produced a decent amount for the amount of ice time, and the quality of his ice time.
    He's not fed power play time, almost all his production comes at 5v5.
    He's going to be given top 6 time for the first time this season, and the odds are his numbers are going too take a big jump, so the rangers would be insane to move him.

    Quoting: NHLfan10506
    I’d think Newhook return would be the asking price (1st, 2nd, meh prospect) if they wanted futures package. But I’d imagine they get some ‘win now’ pieces from developing club that might be better in short-run.

    (And surprised we haven’t seen any Lafreniere for Byfield trades)


    Because Byfield hasn't played more than 55 games in his NHL career. People say Laf busted, but Byfield physically can't stay healthy.
    Oct. 7, 2023 at 10:11 p.m.
    #15
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 6,427
    Likes: 2,580
    Quoting: NHLfan10506
    I’d think Newhook return would be the asking price (1st, 2nd, meh prospect) if they wanted futures package. But I’d imagine they get some ‘win now’ pieces from developing club that might be better in short-run.

    (And surprised we haven’t seen any Lafreniere for Byfield trades)


    There was a byfield deal a few days ago lol. Didn’t go over well. I’d say they want a win now piece for sure unless the idea is to move Laf, sign Kane and move OThmann in. That being said the other point was the picks aren’t 24’ so they are 2nd rate to what other teams can offer. I saw a deal in the last few days with Jarnkrok, Robertson and 1st(24’). I would consider this if I honestly thought the leafs weren’t going to the conference finals or further. Because it’s so late I’d want more. Maybe it too much, maybe too little but that where I see him valued.
    NHLfan10506 liked this.
    Oct. 7, 2023 at 10:40 p.m.
    #16
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 41,958
    Likes: 19,047
    Quoting: slater417
    Because Laf is a top 6 player currently? For all this debate about Laf, he's produced a decent amount for the amount of ice time, and the quality of his ice time.
    He's not fed power play time, almost all his production comes at 5v5.
    He's going to be given top 6 time for the first time this season, and the odds are his numbers are going too take a big jump, so the rangers would be insane to move him.



    Because Byfield hasn't played more than 55 games in his NHL career. People say Laf busted, but Byfield physically can't stay healthy.


    Byfield played 75 games last year. I don’t think either have ‘busted’ but both hurt by inflated expectations (that comes with being a top forward drafted out of CHL).

    And the “not getting time on power play” excuse is not really applicable anymore. He has gotten every opportunity to prove himself on PP, just hasn’t been effective (6 points over 276 minutes in career, 4 points in 111 minutes last year).

    Pt/60 on NYR power play last year:
    - Zibanejad 8.13
    - Panarin 7.35
    - Tarasenko 4.87
    - Kane 4.39
    - Trocheck 4.20
    - Kravtsov 3.77
    - Kreider 3.74
    - Chytil 2.93
    - Kakko 2.46
    - Lafreniere 2.15

    Yet he still remained on PP2. At least it’s progress from the 1.27 he put up in 2021-22.
    Oct. 8, 2023 at 8:38 a.m.
    #17
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 6,427
    Likes: 2,580
    Quoting: NHLfan10506
    Byfield played 75 games last year. I don’t think either have ‘busted’ but both hurt by inflated expectations (that comes with being a top forward drafted out of CHL).

    And the “not getting time on power play” excuse is not really applicable anymore. He has gotten every opportunity to prove himself on PP, just hasn’t been effective (6 points over 276 minutes in career, 4 points in 111 minutes last year).

    Pt/60 on NYR power play last year:
    - Zibanejad 8.13
    - Panarin 7.35
    - Tarasenko 4.87
    - Kane 4.39
    - Trocheck 4.20
    - Kravtsov 3.77
    - Kreider 3.74
    - Chytil 2.93
    - Kakko 2.46
    - Lafreniere 2.15

    Yet he still remained on PP2. At least it’s progress from the 1.27 he put up in 2021-22.


    Time as a whole is a bit different than real time. The 2nd unit gets the last 30 seconds so unless the unit is perfect on the 1 rush/possession in that PP chances it looks bad. Where as the first PP has plenty of time to get in, get control, move the puck around and set up shots and have multiple cracks at this. 2nd pp is rushed. I’m sure if you looked at every team out there you will see similar results. Consider this, if McJesus was on the pp2 and got a 20s shift each time would he still be as productive trying to win a faceoff in his own zone and then skate down the ice and try to make something happen.. he would for sure succeed but his rate of success/60 would decline. And this obviously isn’t a comparison between the two, McJ would still have better stats than Laf in that position but kreider or trochek might not is what I’m trying to say.
    Oct. 8, 2023 at 11:45 a.m.
    #18
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 41,958
    Likes: 19,047
    Quoting: NYR1983
    Time as a whole is a bit different than real time. The 2nd unit gets the last 30 seconds so unless the unit is perfect on the 1 rush/possession in that PP chances it looks bad. Where as the first PP has plenty of time to get in, get control, move the puck around and set up shots and have multiple cracks at this. 2nd pp is rushed. I’m sure if you looked at every team out there you will see similar results. Consider this, if McJesus was on the pp2 and got a 20s shift each time would he still be as productive trying to win a faceoff in his own zone and then skate down the ice and try to make something happen.. he would for sure succeed but his rate of success/60 would decline. And this obviously isn’t a comparison between the two, McJ would still have better stats than Laf in that position but kreider or trochek might not is what I’m trying to say.


    Lafreniere is not getting more PP time since he has not earned it.

    I don't know why there is a conspiracy that NYR brass are depriving him of his chances. They are not. He has gotten plenty of chances, plenty of minutes all throughout lineup.

    Simplest explanation is best one: He just has not been good.
    Oct. 8, 2023 at 12:55 p.m.
    #19
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 603
    Likes: 180
    Quoting: NHLfan10506
    Lafreniere is not getting more PP time since he has not earned it.

    I don't know why there is a conspiracy that NYR brass are depriving him of his chances. They are not. He has gotten plenty of chances, plenty of minutes all throughout lineup.

    Simplest explanation is best one: He just has not been good.


    Laf would be best on the PP in positions taken by mika or panarin. He's not forcing those two off the PP1.
    He's a left shot, so the bumper doesn't work well for him on pp1 with 4 other righties.

    Gallant refused to give kids a legit shot.
    Please see Kakko's run with Mika and Kreider which was a top 5 NHL line in terms of xgf, and he gave them 5 games, and pulled kakko off.

    And someone else pointed out, Laf had 111 minutes on the pp last year. Over 81 games that less than 1.5 minutes per game. Thats not any real pp time.
    Oct. 8, 2023 at 1:31 p.m.
    #20
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 41,958
    Likes: 19,047
    Quoting: slater417
    Laf would be best on the PP in positions taken by mika or panarin. He's not forcing those two off the PP1.
    He's a left shot, so the bumper doesn't work well for him on pp1 with 4 other righties.

    Gallant refused to give kids a legit shot.
    Please see Kakko's run with Mika and Kreider which was a top 5 NHL line in terms of xgf, and he gave them 5 games, and pulled kakko off.

    And someone else pointed out, Laf had 111 minutes on the pp last year. Over 81 games that less than 1.5 minutes per game. Thats not any real pp time.


    He has gotten enough PP time to show he doesn’t deserve more PP time. Even at 5v5, he has been 1.6 pts/60 player, which is decent for 3rd liner, but a bit inadequate for top-6 player.
    Oct. 8, 2023 at 6:07 p.m.
    #21
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 6,427
    Likes: 2,580
    Quoting: NHLfan10506
    Lafreniere is not getting more PP time since he has not earned it.

    I don't know why there is a conspiracy that NYR brass are depriving him of his chances. They are not. He has gotten plenty of chances, plenty of minutes all throughout lineup.

    Simplest explanation is best one: He just has not been good.


    So I’m not saying he’s deprived. I’m suggesting that if you put bread or Zib on PP2 their stat/60 would suffer.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll