Umm what… not a single one of these teams even stay on the phone line let alone make a deal.

Faulk isn't a bad contract for the blues. Also doubt we are trading our 2024 1st just to get rid of Krug. Also we don't need more winger forwards

I think it’s safe to say the Blues wouldn’t entertain that. Probably even if you removed the picks from the Blues side. Not to mention getting two guys to waive a NTC to the same destination is highly improbable.

From connecting the dots it looked like the Blues were interested in moving a first last draft when we had 3 along with Krug and a prospect for Sanheim and Hayes (who ultimately was moved for a 6th with full retention).

Would guess considering we have no one and I mean literally no one in the system that could replace Faulk they don’t have any desire to move him. Let alone dump him in this gigantic pile of a mess.

That being said rostering 16 forwards would be fun to watch.

I do like all those extra draft picks! The rest of this not so much...

gotta think that’s a no from vancouver, washington, st. louis

Canucks say no even if you drop the draft picks.

CHI doesn't like you either.

Anaheim doesn’t want Huberbeau’s contract

Gally for Huberdeau is way cheaper
Im not saying its a great deal for CGY
But it screws them anally a lot less

boeser and boevillier arent bad contracts.

garland isnt really either hes just widly undervalues league wide. doubt vancouver views him as a dump

myers is a bad deal but expires this season, no reason to trade him especially if you're just gunna take 4 other bad contracts back

Uhh Faulk is not a bad contract, dude. That trade is ludicrous.