SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

3-Team Garland Trade

Created by: phillyjabroni
Team: 2023-24 Philadelphia Flyers
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 6, 2023
Published: Nov. 6, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
To VAN
Sean Walker (75% retained by PHI & MTL)

To MTL
Conor Garland (1M retained by VAN)
2024 3rd round pick (VAN)

To PHI
Joel Armia
2024 2nd round pick (COL)
2025 2nd round pick (VAN)

My thoughts:
Vancouver adds a RHD defensemen who is on an expiring contract while also dumping Garland. They send a 2nd rounder to PHI for Walker.

Montreal is able to upgrade Armia for Garland (with retained salary) and downgrade on a pick in the 56-64 range for one in the 86-96 range. In addition they retain effectively 25% on Walker.

Philadelphia gets to utilize their available cap space and get 2nd rounder and a pick upgrade from the 86-96 range to the 56-64 range.

Might not be enough to go around but just picking some ranges here for what might make sense all around. Have seen some interest in VAN trying to get some RHD on these forums and thought this might benefit everyone. Cheers.
Trades
1.
PHI
  1. Garland, Conor ($1,000,000 retained)
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (VAN)
  3. 2025 2nd round pick (VAN)
VAN
2.
PHI
  1. Armia, Joel
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (COL)
MTL
  1. Garland, Conor
  2. Walker, Sean ($1,325,000 retained)
  3. 2024 3rd round pick (VAN)
3.
PHI
    Completion of earlier trade
    VAN
      Sean Walker (662,500 retained) by MTL
      Buyouts
      Retained Salary Transactions
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2024
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the FLA
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the CBJ
      Logo of the COL
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the LAK
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the PHI
      2025
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the VAN
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the CAR
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the PHI
      2026
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the PHI
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      22$83,500,000$83,418,762$1,187,500$457,500$81,238
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $5,875,000$5,875,000
      RW, LW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $7,750,000$7,750,000
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $1,500,000$1,500,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $5,000,000$5,000,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 5
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $2,625,000$2,625,000
      C, LW
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
      RW
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $5,500,000$5,500,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $2,100,000$2,100,000
      C
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $863,333$863,333
      RW
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $1,750,000$1,750,000
      LW, RW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $3,000,000$3,000,000
      C, LW
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $2,375,000$2,375,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 2
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $1,600,000$1,600,000
      LD/RD
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $6,250,000$6,250,000
      LD/RD
      NTC
      UFA - 8
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $3,979,000$3,979,000
      G
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $775,000$775,000
      LD/RD
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $5,100,000$5,100,000
      RD
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $859,167$859,167 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
      G
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $775,000$775,000
      LD/RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $775,000$775,000
      RD
      UFA - 2
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $1,400,000$1,400,000
      C, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $6,250,000$6,250,000
      RD
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $1,100,000$1,100,000
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $775,000$775,000
      G
      UFA - 1
      Taxi Squad
      Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
      $3,400,000$3,400,000 ($2,250,000$2M$2,250,000$2M)
      RW, LW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $5,000,000$5,000,000 ($3,850,000$4M$3,850,000$4M)
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $775,000$775,000 ($0$0$0$0)
      LD/RD
      UFA - 1

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Nov. 6, 2023 at 8:23 p.m.
      #1
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Sep. 2020
      Posts: 2,626
      Likes: 1,674
      No from mtl on a few fronts.

      They dont want to downgrade a pick to dump armia.

      They dont want to retain on walker because then they cant retain on monahan who will be one of the most coveted tdl assets.

      They dont want garland they already have too many undersized wingers
      phillyjabroni and Korax liked this.
      Nov. 6, 2023 at 8:34 p.m.
      #2
      Be Constructive
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2020
      Posts: 867
      Likes: 113
      Quoting: Black61
      No from mtl on a few fronts.

      They dont want to downgrade a pick to dump armia.

      They dont want to retain on walker because then they cant retain on monahan who will be one of the most coveted tdl assets.

      They dont want garland they already have too many undersized wingers


      IDK, I just don't think that value wise you need the 2nd from COL in this trade. Mtl help by taking Garland, his value is more negative with 3years thand Armia's.

      On the retain side, Monahan and Pearson are really cheap, at the TDL even without retaining, many team can afford their salary.

      Mtl As too many undersized player, sure, but I can't imagine this would be Mtl only move of the season, and they are in transition so maybe they'll flip some again.

      I do not totally agree with the value for Mtl if you give a 2nd, but if you adjust that I kinda like the idea of ths 3 way transaction.
      Prime_Jimbo liked this.
      Nov. 6, 2023 at 8:38 p.m.
      #3
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2020
      Posts: 10,104
      Likes: 9,359
      Quoting: Korax
      IDK, I just don't think that value wise you need the 2nd from COL in this trade. Mtl help by taking Garland, his value is more negative with 3years thand Armia's.

      On the retain side, Monahan and Pearson are really cheap, at the TDL even without retaining, many team can afford their salary.

      Mtl As too many undersized player, sure, but I can't imagine this would be Mtl only move of the season, and they are in transition so maybe they'll flip some again.

      I do not totally agree with the value for Mtl if you give a 2nd, but if you adjust that I kinda like the idea of ths 3 way transaction.


      Garland’s value is not more negative than Armia. Garland is actually a good player who is at most 500k overpaid. Armia is an AHL level player who’s 2.5m overpaid, and is also owed 8.6M in real money over this season and next season
      SGB88 liked this.
      Nov. 6, 2023 at 8:38 p.m.
      #4
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2020
      Posts: 10,104
      Likes: 9,359
      Canucks pass imo
      SGB88 liked this.
      Nov. 6, 2023 at 8:42 p.m.
      #5
      Be Constructive
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2020
      Posts: 867
      Likes: 113
      Quoting: mv21227
      Garland’s value is not more negative than Armia. Garland is actually a good player who is at most 500k overpaid. Armia is an AHL level player who’s 2.5m overpaid, and is also owed 8.6M in real money over this season and next season


      I mean.. Garland is 12M$ in real money for the same time period of Armia's contract so pretty overpaid also, not just a 500k
      Nov. 6, 2023 at 8:44 p.m.
      #6
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2020
      Posts: 10,104
      Likes: 9,359
      Quoting: Korax
      I mean.. Garland is 12M$ in real money for the same time period of Armia's contract so pretty overpaid also, not just a 500k


      I’m saying he’s 500k overpaid based on his cap hit. 4.45-4.95M for a good 2nd line winger is 2nd line money and a fair contract. 3.4M for an AHL level player is terrible
      Nov. 6, 2023 at 8:46 p.m.
      #7
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Sep. 2020
      Posts: 2,626
      Likes: 1,674
      Quoting: Korax
      IDK, I just don't think that value wise you need the 2nd from COL in this trade. Mtl help by taking Garland, his value is more negative with 3years thand Armia's.

      On the retain side, Monahan and Pearson are really cheap, at the TDL even without retaining, many team can afford their salary.

      Mtl As too many undersized player, sure, but I can't imagine this would be Mtl only move of the season, and they are in transition so maybe they'll flip some again.

      I do not totally agree with the value for Mtl if you give a 2nd, but if you adjust that I kinda like the idea of ths 3 way transaction.


      Taking on garland is a problem.

      Its still almost 4 million for 3 years gor a guy who has 3 points, is undersized, is terrible on the pp (so doesnt even help that), doesnt kill penalties.

      Its spending money farther put when we will need it more and he doesnt fill a role.

      The total buyout for armia is 2.1 million which is almost 3 million less per year. They wpuld be better off buying him out and taking that extra 3 million onto an offer for a actual difference maker and not just another body like garland
      Korax liked this.
      Nov. 6, 2023 at 8:56 p.m.
      #8
      VAN
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2022
      Posts: 6,165
      Likes: 1,881
      Edited Nov. 6, 2023 at 9:03 p.m.
      Quoting: Korax
      I mean.. Garland is 12M$ in real money for the same time period of Armia's contract so pretty overpaid also, not just a 500k


      I don't mind the parameter of this deal from a Canucks fan but the retention is an issue for Van.

      Real money doesn't mean much of anything these days. There are few owners in the league who don't spend to the cap or dish out the $. Montreal is definitely not one to hold back.
      Korax and phillyjabroni liked this.
      Nov. 6, 2023 at 8:57 p.m.
      #9
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2016
      Posts: 683
      Likes: 272
      Canucks would pass. garland isnt bad, and he doesnt get much pp time (and all their best players are on unit #1, 2nd unit is weak). They have plenty of expiring contracts after this season, so while he may be overpaid- its not a pressing concern.
      Nov. 6, 2023 at 9:00 p.m.
      #10
      Former NHL Executive
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Sep. 2023
      Posts: 702
      Likes: 156
      Why would Montreal buy this year?
      fangm liked this.
      Nov. 6, 2023 at 9:05 p.m.
      #11
      VAN
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2022
      Posts: 6,165
      Likes: 1,881
      Quoting: Korax
      IDK, I just don't think that value wise you need the 2nd from COL in this trade. Mtl help by taking Garland, his value is more negative with 3years thand Armia's.

      On the retain side, Monahan and Pearson are really cheap, at the TDL even without retaining, many team can afford their salary.

      Mtl As too many undersized player, sure, but I can't imagine this would be Mtl only move of the season, and they are in transition so maybe they'll flip some again.

      I do not totally agree with the value for Mtl if you give a 2nd, but if you adjust that I kinda like the idea of ths 3 way transaction.


      Might be able to escape with retention on Monahan. But Pearson will be a nice double dip if they get another pick in a trade. Darn you, Hughes!
      Nov. 6, 2023 at 9:12 p.m.
      #12
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2017
      Posts: 10,392
      Likes: 2,885
      @Prime_Jimbo
      @Korax
      @mv21227

      Thanks for all the feedback. Wasn't sure how to gauge Garland's value since he's still decent but in the limbo of being more of a luxury player at his cap hit but not being a surefire top-six player. Understand the points about not wanting to retain and Montreal wanting to save their last retained salary spot for one of their rentals. Probably overvalued the cap but wouldn't mind trying to trade Walker to VAN on his own for the 2025 2nd rounder.
      Prime_Jimbo and Korax liked this.
      Nov. 6, 2023 at 9:20 p.m.
      #13
      You know nothing JS
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2017
      Posts: 7,041
      Likes: 4,431
      MTL.does.not.want.more.small.wingers.
      Nov. 6, 2023 at 9:24 p.m.
      #14
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2020
      Posts: 10,104
      Likes: 9,359
      Quoting: Black61
      Taking on garland is a problem.

      Its still almost 4 million for 3 years gor a guy who has 3 points, is undersized, is terrible on the pp (so doesnt even help that), doesnt kill penalties.

      Its spending money farther put when we will need it more and he doesnt fill a role.

      The total buyout for armia is 2.1 million which is almost 3 million less per year. They wpuld be better off buying him out and taking that extra 3 million onto an offer for a actual difference maker and not just another body like garland


      You’re using an 11 game sample size to discredit Garland when he’s been a productive player for the last 4 seasons, especially 21/22 and 19/20. He would instantly become your second best winger behind Caufield

      How about we offer Phil Di Giuseppe (4 points) straight up for Slafkovsky?

      Tyler Myers has 5 points this season, so he must clearly be more valuable than Devon Toews who only has 4 points right?
      Nov. 6, 2023 at 10:13 p.m.
      #15
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2022
      Posts: 1,519
      Likes: 1,061
      Canucks decline. They won't retain and pay to dump Garland. They're most likely looking to move Garland for a RHD who also has an undesirable contract. Swapping out a position of strength (wing) for a position of need (defence). The team they deal with most likely falls on the other end of the spectrum with an excess of defensemen and a need on the wing.
      phillyjabroni liked this.
      Nov. 6, 2023 at 10:49 p.m.
      #16
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Sep. 2020
      Posts: 2,626
      Likes: 1,674
      Quoting: mv21227
      You’re using an 11 game sample size to discredit Garland when he’s been a productive player for the last 4 seasons, especially 21/22 and 19/20. He would instantly become your second best winger behind Caufield

      How about we offer Phil Di Giuseppe (4 points) straight up for Slafkovsky?

      Tyler Myers has 5 points this season, so he must clearly be more valuable than Devon Toews who only has 4 points right?


      Going back to the last 41 games hes played he only has 22 points so hes not exactly lighting the world on fire for a while now. Gallagher has 20 in his last 41 and he had a broken ankle for 20ish of those games and is trending up not down like garland. Mike hoffman had 23 in his last 41 for the habs and drouin had 24 and they got blasted into the sun.


      We already have garland in harvey pinard we just arent paying him almost 5 million.
      Nov. 7, 2023 at 2:28 a.m.
      #17
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2021
      Posts: 667
      Likes: 201
      Quoting: Black61
      Going back to the last 41 games hes played he only has 22 points so hes not exactly lighting the world on fire for a while now. Gallagher has 20 in his last 41 and he had a broken ankle for 20ish of those games and is trending up not down like garland. Mike hoffman had 23 in his last 41 for the habs and drouin had 24 and they got blasted into the sun.


      We already have garland in harvey pinard we just arent paying him almost 5 million.


      So a 44 point pace? Seems fine, not great, but fine. Also when you control for opportunity, it looks even better. He played only an average of 14.08 minutes during the time period you reference. That's good for 2.28 points per 60 he would be a very respectable 144th points per 60 among forwards. That's top 192 and definitionally in the top 6, although low end admittedly. So you're cherry-picked time period really doesn't prove your point.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll