SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Adams gets one last shot

Created by: SadSabres90
Team: 2024-25 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 24, 2023
Published: Dec. 24, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
2$850,000
3$850,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
5$6,250,000
1$800,000
2$1,100,000
2$1,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$1,100,000
1$800,000
1$975,000
1$800,000
2$2,500,000
2$2,500,000
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. Saros, Juuse
  2. 2024 4th round pick (CHI)
Additional Details:
Nashville adds more picks, a top offensive prospect, a young and developing goalie with over 50 NHL games and a strong offensive defenseman prospect in Komarov.
NSH
  1. Komarov, Vsevolod
  2. Luukkonen, Ukko-Pekka
  3. Savoie, Matthew
  4. 2024 3rd round pick (BUF)
  5. 2025 1st round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
Sabres need to address goaltending, Saros and Levi instantly become a top pairing in the league and fix a hole the Sabres have had for a decade.
2.
BUF
  1. Murphy, Connor
  2. 2026 4th round pick (OTT)
Additional Details:
Sabres get a solid skating, veteran, strong defenseman to round out their core.
CHI
  1. Greenway, Jordan
  2. Kisakov, Alexander
  3. Rosén, Isak
  4. 2024 4th round pick (CHI)
Additional Details:
Hawks get two small, fast, offensive-minded prospects to help in rebuild, Greenway is a roster clearing move for Sabres, but a good physical veteran player, protector for Bedard.
3.
BUF
  1. 2025 3rd round pick (SJS)
Additional Details:
Sharks add a young, smart defenseman to an old depleted core
SJS
  1. Jokiharju, Henri [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Sabres move on from Joki, get a mid-round pick for their efforts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2025
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NSH
2026
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$87,500,000$84,174,403$0$2,500,000$3,325,597

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$7,142,857$7,142,857
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$855,833$855,833
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$7,100,000$7,100,000
C, LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LW, C
RFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$918,333$918,333
C, LW
RFA - 2
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,250,000$1,250,000
C, LW
RFA
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, C, LW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$11,000,000$11,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 8
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,285,714$4,285,714
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$8,350,000$8,350,000
LD/RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,333,333$3,333,333
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 24, 2023 at 2:43 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 1,561
NSH totally takes that
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Dec. 24, 2023 at 2:56 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 3,124
I wholeheartedly believe Hawks accept!
SlickWilly and gretzkyghosts liked this.
Dec. 24, 2023 at 3:59 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 8,554
Likes: 10,403
Quoting: JK74
I wholeheartedly believe Hawks accept!


Seriously? Rosen is a very good prospect, but Hawks aren't trading Murphy to get him. He's another high end, but under 6' forward. Greenway is a cap dump at this point, and Kisakov isn't a good enough prospect to cover dumping Greenway. And Buffalo is likely getting the better pick too. I wholeheartedly believe the Hawks decline.
JK74 and Garak liked this.
Dec. 24, 2023 at 4:47 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,230
Likes: 2,166
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Seriously? Rosen is a very good prospect, but Hawks aren't trading Murphy to get him. He's another high end, but under 6' forward. Greenway is a cap dump at this point, and Kisakov isn't a good enough prospect to cover dumping Greenway. And Buffalo is likely getting the better pick too. I wholeheartedly believe the Hawks decline.


Murphy blows this year. We'd be lucky for anyone to offer us a Rosen equivalent for him.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Dec. 24, 2023 at 4:50 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 3,124
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Seriously? Rosen is a very good prospect, but Hawks aren't trading Murphy to get him. He's another high end, but under 6' forward. Greenway is a cap dump at this point, and Kisakov isn't a good enough prospect to cover dumping Greenway. And Buffalo is likely getting the better pick too. I wholeheartedly believe the Hawks decline.


I'm really high on Rosen. Greenway gives the middle 6 a big body that this team sorely lacks. Kisakov (who's no slouch) gives this team a countryman for Kantserov when he's ready to come over. The OP isn't asking for retention which lowers Murphy's value slightly. I see this a win-win for both teams while still keeping this team's future in mind.
Hawksguy81, Garak and SadSabres90 liked this.
Dec. 24, 2023 at 5:04 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 8,554
Likes: 10,403
Quoting: SlickWilly
Murphy blows this year. We'd be lucky for anyone to offer us a Rosen equivalent for him.


Murphy has been babysitting Korchinski and Phillips for most of the season. Korchinski is TOTALLY lost in the Hawks defensive zone. I get Kirch is a 19 y.o. rookie. But he is out of position repeatedly, doesn't block shots or hit anybody. Makes it tough for Murphy to play well when he's trying to cover both sides of the crease by himself. Murphy isn't as bad as his underlying numbers indicate the past two years. He needs a stable D partner who isn't a trainwreck when it comes to actually playing some D.

As for Rosen, yeah, he's a good prospect. But does adding yet another sub 6' guy who's only suited to play in your top 6 really make sense? Hawks have Bedard, Nazar, Moore, Reichel, Kantserov and Ludwinski in that mold already. They need some bigger body guys for their top 6 if they hope to have any success in the playoffs down the road.
Garak liked this.
Dec. 24, 2023 at 5:12 p.m.
#7
Sabres are elite
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,993
Likes: 3,305
Those are 3 trades the Sabres would not and should not make. 1 year of Saros does not cost a A+ prospect, unprotected 1st, a B prospect, and UPL (who would be a good goalie with any other D core in front of him). Murphy is an alright defenseman but wouldn't cost a A prospect, B prospect, solid 2-way forward and a pick. I'd peg his value at a B prospect and a 2nd personally. If we were to move on from Jokiharju (which I'm good with) we should be looking to acquire a solid bottom 6 forward or a D prospect
Dec. 24, 2023 at 5:13 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 8,554
Likes: 10,403
Quoting: JK74
I'm really high on Rosen. Greenway gives the middle 6 a big body that this team sorely lacks. Kisakov (who's no slouch) gives this team a countryman for Kantserov when he's ready to come over. The OP isn't asking for retention which lowers Murphy's value slightly. I see this a win-win for both teams while still keeping this team's future in mind.


Well guess we disagree. I like Rosen too. But not as much as I did before we drafted Bedard, Moore, Kantserov and Lardis in the 2023 draft. All sub 6' forwards. It's the same as the LD situation. How many sub 6' forwards can you play at the same time?

Greenway is a big body who adds nothing the Hawks don't already have. He's not a goal scorer. Not even particularly good offensively. Sound familiar? I'd rather re-sign Foligno.

Ilya Safonov can be a buddy for Kantserov. 6'4" physical C who's offensive game has continued to improve. Seems like an ideal 3rd or 4th line C for the Hawks. Kisakov is yet another small F. Again, how many of them do you want?
JK74 liked this.
Dec. 24, 2023 at 5:18 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,230
Likes: 2,166
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Murphy has been babysitting Korchinski and Phillips for most of the season. Korchinski is TOTALLY lost in the Hawks defensive zone. I get Kirch is a 19 y.o. rookie. But he is out of position repeatedly, doesn't block shots or hit anybody. Makes it tough for Murphy to play well when he's trying to cover both sides of the crease by himself. Murphy isn't as bad as his underlying numbers indicate the past two years. He needs a stable D partner who isn't a trainwreck when it comes to actually playing some D.

As for Rosen, yeah, he's a good prospect. But does adding yet another sub 6' guy who's only suited to play in your top 6 really make sense? Hawks have Bedard, Nazar, Moore, Reichel, Kantserov and Ludwinski in that mold already. They need some bigger body guys for their top 6 if they hope to have any success in the playoffs down the road.


I disagree with that. Murphy has been totally lost in the defensive zone this year, aside from the shenanigans whoever he has been paired with has been up to. Some completely inexcusable turnovers, bad gaps, and losing his guy behind the net at times has soured me on him.

As for Rosen, I agree that we have a few guys who seem to fit the same mold. However, Ludwinski and Kantserov are longshots for top 6 roles, and Nazar and Moore are both really in their first full year of being the primary producer on their own teams, so it is yet to be determined on how successful they will actually be. Rosen had last year of decent production and is now at a PPG pace in the AHL. He's closer to being an actual *guy* than anyone else we have not in the NHL. Getting a future asset for Murph, who at this point won't be a top 4 defenseman by the time we are contending again is a win regardless of whatever else goes on in the trade
JK74 liked this.
Dec. 24, 2023 at 5:25 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 8,554
Likes: 10,403
Quoting: SlickWilly
I disagree with that. Murphy has been totally lost in the defensive zone this year, aside from the shenanigans whoever he has been paired with has been up to. Some completely inexcusable turnovers, bad gaps, and losing his guy behind the net at times has soured me on him.

As for Rosen, I agree that we have a few guys who seem to fit the same mold. However, Ludwinski and Kantserov are longshots for top 6 roles, and Nazar and Moore are both really in their first full year of being the primary producer on their own teams, so it is yet to be determined on how successful they will actually be. Rosen had last year of decent production and is now at a PPG pace in the AHL. He's closer to being an actual *guy* than anyone else we have not in the NHL. Getting a future asset for Murph, who at this point won't be a top 4 defenseman by the time we are contending again is a win regardless of whatever else goes on in the trade


Solid points on Rosen! But yeah, we disagree.
SlickWilly and JK74 liked this.
Dec. 24, 2023 at 5:53 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 3,744
Quoting: Skyraider112
Those are 3 trades the Sabres would not and should not make. 1 year of Saros does not cost a A+ prospect, unprotected 1st, a B prospect, and UPL (who would be a good goalie with any other D core in front of him). Murphy is an alright defenseman but wouldn't cost a A prospect, B prospect, solid 2-way forward and a pick. I'd peg his value at a B prospect and a 2nd personally. If we were to move on from Jokiharju (which I'm good with) we should be looking to acquire a solid bottom 6 forward or a D prospect


Couldn’t agree more!
@SadSabres90 with some pretty massive overpays here
Bad trade ideas, really bad actually
ChestNut33, Skyraider112, sabres89 and 1 other person liked this.
Dec. 24, 2023 at 8:04 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 8,256
Likes: 6,241
Sabres get crushed in every deal here. Adams isn't doing anything like this, he likes his players. The values here are ridiculous, even the jokiharju deal (I'm not a fan of his mind you), if that's all you can get for him, you keep him for depth until he can be moved with something else to get something we need.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Dec. 24, 2023 at 10:47 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 135
Likes: 19
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Seriously? Rosen is a very good prospect, but Hawks aren't trading Murphy to get him. He's another high end, but under 6' forward. Greenway is a cap dump at this point, and Kisakov isn't a good enough prospect to cover dumping Greenway. And Buffalo is likely getting the better pick too. I wholeheartedly believe the Hawks decline.


Murphy is on the backside of his career. Still has some game and can contribute, but a good trade piece Hawks will move. Rosen, while smaller, has a ton of speed and crafty hands. In todays modern NHL, teams with players of the nature are in the the top of the league. Hawks need a player like Greenway, especially with young, smaller fowards needing space and protection. Kisakov is a better prospect than we have seen. Guy has nasty mits and hockey IQ. Dealt with some injuries but is now getting more AHL playing time.
Dec. 24, 2023 at 10:49 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 135
Likes: 19
Quoting: SlickWilly
Murphy blows this year. We'd be lucky for anyone to offer us a Rosen equivalent for him.


Murphy is a casualty of bad defensive partners and young/inexperienced forwards in front of him. Murphy still has plenty of game. Past trades of defenseman of Murphys age and caliber tend to get very good returns.
Hawksguy81 liked this.
Dec. 24, 2023 at 10:57 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 135
Likes: 19
Quoting: Skyraider112
Those are 3 trades the Sabres would not and should not make. 1 year of Saros does not cost a A+ prospect, unprotected 1st, a B prospect, and UPL (who would be a good goalie with any other D core in front of him). Murphy is an alright defenseman but wouldn't cost a A prospect, B prospect, solid 2-way forward and a pick. I'd peg his value at a B prospect and a 2nd personally. If we were to move on from Jokiharju (which I'm good with) we should be looking to acquire a solid bottom 6 forward or a D prospect


Sabres will need to overpay to address the goaltending void they have. UPL has shown flashes of being a good NHL goalie, but he still gives up to many bad angle goals, gets beat with a slow glove and still struggles with positioning. The Sabres cannot waste the young core they have waiting for a goalie to emerge. If the Sabres trade for Saros, he will not be a 1 year rental. I think Adams would sign Saros to a 3-4 year deal and pair him with Levi for the next half decade. To get Saros and re-sign the Sabres will need to pay.

Based on what 30 year old right shot defenseman with size and skating ability plus veteran leadership have fetched the last few years, sending a, A prospect, B prospect, mid round pick and a unproven russian talent is not an overpay. Especially with the void he fills on the Sabres defense and him being a perfect partner for Power or Johnson. Also the Sabres are going to need to trade some prospects given they will not have room for them all in the coming 1-3 years. Definitely think Kulich, Ostlund, Wahlberg, Neuchev all bring something the Sabres need and Rosen is expendable at this point.

Sabres can address bottom 6 in free agency or with Brett Murray or Rousek from Rochester. Joki could fetch a solid 3rd, which can be used to draft a D prospect. Sabres truly have no openings on the D end for the next 3-5 seasons.
Dec. 24, 2023 at 11:01 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 135
Likes: 19
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Couldn’t agree more!
SadSabres90 with some pretty massive overpays here
Bad trade ideas, really bad actually


The Sabres will need to overpay for what they need. If you trade for Saros, Adams definitely resigns him. Murphy is a 6'4 right shot, good skating, physical defenseman, which over the past 5 years fetches very good returns. Sabres also have the ability to overpay given their Top 9 is pretty much set for the next 3-5 seasons. Kulich is a better prospect and more NHL ready than Savoie or Rosen. At this point Savoie and Rosen are expendable with the emergence of Quinn, Peterka, Benson having a lock on spots for many years to come. Sabres are trading from a place of strength and addressing areas of weakness.
Dec. 24, 2023 at 11:03 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 135
Likes: 19
Quoting: sabres89
Sabres get crushed in every deal here. Adams isn't doing anything like this, he likes his players. The values here are ridiculous, even the jokiharju deal (I'm not a fan of his mind you), if that's all you can get for him, you keep him for depth until he can be moved with something else to get something we need.


Find me a spot on the Sabres roster in 24-25 season, 25-26 season where you can pencil in Savoie or Rosen. Kulich is the better prospect of those 3 and will be held onto. With Benson, Peterka, Quinn solidifying spots and continuing to grow, Mittlestadt being resigned, the Sabres essentially need to move them to address areas of weakness.
Dec. 25, 2023 at 12:28 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 3,744
Edited Dec. 25, 2023 at 9:15 a.m.
Quoting: SadSabres90
The Sabres will need to overpay for what they need. If you trade for Saros, Adams definitely resigns him. Murphy is a 6'4 right shot, good skating, physical defenseman, which over the past 5 years fetches very good returns. Sabres also have the ability to overpay given their Top 9 is pretty much set for the next 3-5 seasons. Kulich is a better prospect and more NHL ready than Savoie or Rosen. At this point Savoie and Rosen are expendable with the emergence of Quinn, Peterka, Benson having a lock on spots for many years to come. Sabres are trading from a place of strength and addressing areas of weakness.


Just bc we have “extra” assets, it doesn’t mean we should give them away

And signing Saros into his late 30s (he’s gonna demand a long term deal) would be stupid on Adams part

Also, Murphy isn’t having a good season- AT ALL-
and he’s the last guy we should overpay for- ESPECIALLY
if that’s the cost
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Dec. 25, 2023 at 1:07 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 3,744
Edited Dec. 25, 2023 at 9:14 a.m.
Quoting: sabres89
Sabres get crushed in every deal here. Adams isn't doing anything like this, he likes his players. The values here are ridiculous, even the jokiharju deal (I'm not a fan of his mind you), if that's all you can get for him, you keep him for depth until he can be moved with something else to get something we need.


@SadSabres90 doesn’t wanna listen to reason
Oh well

Merry Xmas dude
sabres89 liked this.
Dec. 25, 2023 at 8:23 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 8,256
Likes: 6,241
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
SadSabres90 doesn’t wanna listen to reason
Oh well

Merry Xmas dude


Merry christmas!!!
AntiAnalytics liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll