SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Trades

(CGY/PHI/VGK) - Hanifin for for Miromanov, 2024 5th (VGK), 2025 1st (VGK), 2025 3rd (VGK)

Who won the trade?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Mar. 6 at 11:39 p.m.
#26
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,802
Likes: 1,839
I was shooting for the moon, but this trade didn’t even leave our backyard = Weak Trade Return for Hanifin by Conroy

I was hoping for a Top Prospect and at least something extra for the retention

I hope Conroy knows what he’s doing and considers buying something, cause our defence has become extremely weak all of a sudden
TheGxForum liked this.
Mar. 6 at 11:41 p.m.
#27
You know nothing JS
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 7,041
Likes: 4,431
Edited Mar. 6 at 11:53 p.m.
Quoting: CMac66
You're telling me no one else was offering a 2024 1st? Or at least a gaurenteed 2025 1st? That seems bananas... This **** is bananas


If you take away:

1. Teams that didn't want him (NY, NSH, CAR, COL, PHI, DAL)
2. Teams without a 2024 1st (TB, FLO, VAN, EDM)
3. Teams keeping it, maybe for another deal (BOS, DET, LA)
4. Teams Hanifin didn't want to resign (TOR, WPG)

I guess only Vegas was left.
Andy_Dick, BDHockey and TheGxForum liked this.
Mar. 6 at 11:56 p.m.
#28
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 447
Likes: 242
VGK has the most stacked D core in the league and its not close
LondonNight911 and TheGxForum liked this.
Mar. 6 at 11:58 p.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 769
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
If I'm CGY I don't do anything without Hague or Edstrom. Disappointing return.


Letting Gaudreau go for nothing was a much better move. I agree.

At some point, you have to take the best offer on the table.
TheGxForum liked this.
Mar. 7 at 12:00 a.m.
#30
Good nerd
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 742
Likes: 419
Honestly, this seems pretty fair to me since at this time the deal appears to be for a rental. Vegas could still extend him, but they are taking on the risk of that not happening as part of the deal, so they have justification to keep the price lower.

The picks will either be a Late 1st + 2nd, or a mid-round 1st and a 3rd. That sounds like a fair deal for a high-end rental. I just think the talking heads got the Calgary faithful a bit too excited about potential returns. If the kid was only willing to extend in Tampa and that was leaked, then they were never going to get a good return from the outset.
TheGxForum liked this.
Mar. 7 at 12:07 a.m.
#31
SkateOrDie
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 333
" If traded by March 10, 2024"

Tell me you're trading for Guentzel without telling me you're trading for Guentzel.
Mar. 7 at 12:13 a.m.
#32
I am not Score
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 24
Likes: 21
> VGK in the standings rn: "Call an ambulance!"
> gets Hanafin
> "...but not for me!"
vmark liked this.
Mar. 7 at 12:23 a.m.
#33
hes dynamite
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 69
Likes: 36
Edited Mar. 7 at 12:34 a.m.
Quoting: luckyguessiguess
Top 1

1. Top 10 protected in 2025, so it falls to 2026 if it's top 10 in top 2025.
2. The March 10 protection is essentially if they want to trade their 2025 first round pick to someone else this deadline they can, in which case Flames get the 2026.


Thats a wild condition. Is Conroy a sub? Because it kinda seems he likes getting dominated
NARC311 liked this.
Mar. 7 at 12:26 a.m.
#34
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2024
Posts: 188
Likes: 42
another circumvention, wonder if league will ever do something about it.
1st and 2nd for Hanifin, Calgary wins
Mar. 7 at 12:28 a.m.
#35
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,877
Likes: 3,126
Damn. Looks like exactly what I said Calgary would get.

1st+Bahl+3rd offers for 50% hanifin ain’t looking too bad now
Mar. 7 at 12:29 a.m.
#36
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,877
Likes: 3,126
Quoting: KingofRnR
I was shooting for the moon, but this trade didn’t even leave our backyard = Weak Trade Return for Hanifin by Conroy

I was hoping for a Top Prospect and at least something extra for the retention

I hope Conroy knows what he’s doing and considers buying something, cause our defence has become extremely weak all of a sudden


Can I say I told you so?
Mar. 7 at 12:32 a.m.
#37
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,802
Likes: 1,839
Quoting: dgibb10
Can I say I told you so?

You absolutely did my friend
TheGxForum liked this.
Mar. 7 at 12:41 a.m.
#38
WentWughes
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 10,713
Likes: 10,271
Feels very underwhelming for Calgary and a very welcoming sign for Montreal
TheGxForum liked this.
Mar. 7 at 12:44 a.m.
#39
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 5,096
Likes: 2,370
Vegas is killing it🥵
Paid peanuts for Hanifin.
TheGxForum liked this.
Mar. 7 at 12:48 a.m.
#40
and proud of it
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 1,605
Of course this happened
TheGxForum liked this.
Mar. 7 at 12:51 a.m.
#41
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 5,096
Likes: 2,370
Quoting: Elmo21
Don't think Calgary or VGK should have made the move in the first place, but the value seems pretty fair for Calgary if he wasn't resigning.
Don't understand why Vegas adds a defenceman when they need a forward more (i.e., Guentzel).


lol who said they are done? They got 4 teams retaining on Mantha and Hanifin.
TheGxForum liked this.
Mar. 7 at 12:58 a.m.
#42
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,877
Likes: 3,126
Quoting: aadoyle
Only 2 trades have looked good

Toffoli and Lindholm

Thats it

The 3 Dman all for or under market value

RIP


Toffoli trade only looks good because Yegor is on a shooting heater of 18%. His metrics still look worse than Toffolis
TheGxForum liked this.
Mar. 7 at 1:02 a.m.
#43
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,877
Likes: 3,126
Quoting: KingofRnR
You absolutely did my friend


Always trust the comps
Mar. 7 at 1:07 a.m.
#44
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 34,033
Likes: 20,954
Quoting: dgibb10
Toffoli trade only looks good because Yegor is on a shooting heater of 18%. His metrics still look worse than Toffolis


Sharangovich since shifting to C has looked much better as of late and has helped CGY when they went on that big win streak.

That Pitt game especially he looked really good
Mar. 7 at 1:11 a.m.
#45
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 333
Wings fans - do you think we could have beat this offer? I do, or at least a similar offer to a non-divisional team. Maybe Hanifin would not guarantee an extension, otherwise I’m not sure what would have held us back.
Here are my 2 acgm’s with similar or better value than what he fetched. From earlier today and one month ago:
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4912350
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4956722
Mar. 7 at 1:17 a.m.
#46
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 333
Quoting: pavelisgoat
Wings fans - do you think we could have beat this offer? I do, or at least a similar offer to a non-divisional team. Maybe Hanifin would not guarantee an extension, otherwise I’m not sure what would have held us back.
Here are my 2 acgm’s with similar or better value than what he fetched. From earlier today and one month ago:
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4912350
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4956722


‘24 1st, Albert Johansson, 3rd, Justin Holl
Or
‘25 1st, Albert Johansson, Berggren, Maata
No retention - but an extension.
Mar. 7 at 1:23 a.m.
#47
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,877
Likes: 3,126
Quoting: aadoyle
Sharangovich since shifting to C has looked much better as of late and has helped CGY when they went on that big win streak.

That Pitt game especially he looked really good


His metrics in every area outside of shooting % look virtually identical to last year.

When pucks are going in the net it makes everything seem a lot better, even if the overall play is exactly the same
TheGxForum liked this.
Mar. 7 at 1:41 a.m.
#48
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 548
Edited Mar. 7 at 1:50 a.m.
Quoting: CameronSquires
Can someone explain the 1st condition?? I don't really get it.


Looks to me like they’re working on another trade that they think might require them to give up that pick. Maybe they already made a deal with Pittsburgh before this trade was completed, and they’re just looking for a third team to retain 25% on Guentzel before they can make it official.

Interesting that they said March 10 when the deadline is March 8. Isn’t March 10 the day that Guentzel is eligible to come off LTIR? I don’t think that makes him exempt from having to be traded before the deadline though.
Mar. 7 at 5:34 a.m.
#49
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 698
Likes: 679
Conroy might just be a bad GM. He should be thankful Chayka and Fenton are still in fairly recent memory so he can't hit the absolute bottom tier.
Mar. 7 at 5:35 a.m.
#50
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Calgary got fleeced.
TheGxForum liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit