SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hawks should take a gamble on Kaapo

Created by: ChiHawk
Team: 2024-25 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 22, 2024
Published: Mar. 22, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Hawks end up, through the lottery, with the #4 pick. Celebrini and Levshunov are off the board. Lindstrom, Demidov or Eiserman are the order to take, but Hawks may decide to push to get Bedard a linemate sooner than later. Lindstrom is a C, and Demidov is locked up in the KHL for at least 2 more years so they may look at Eiserman to be ready in just one more year.

Eiserman - Bedard - KK could end up being a very good line for a long time to come; so if nothing else, this is just spitballing out of an interesting look. KK is pretty good defensively and bedard and eiserman will need a big defensive forward so he fills that role. Bedard is a playmaker and goal scorer but Eiserman is obviously a stud of a natural goal scorer giving Bedard an option and a double threat with both feeding each other goals. KK is there to support those two and worth the late 1st in next year's draft to take a chance on.

Eiserman, Nazar and Moore are another season away of turning pro, but just taking a look here at line combos for the 25/26 season; the season after next. Donato and Hall will be gone by then.

Rinzel, Hayes, Greene still in the AHL, but the idea is to see how the team starts taking shape in the 2025/2026 season. 2026/2027 will be exciting IMO.

2nd line of Moore, Nazar and AA will be a speed line...all extremely fast players. AA's puck handling leaves a lot to be desired but he's a short term plug.

Kurashev, Dickinson and Reichel could prove to be an interesting combo as a solid 3rd line IMO. Eventually, Green, Hayes or Dach steps up to replace Dickinson. For the record, I'm not that high on Dach as some fans are. IMO, he will end up a 3rd liner, maybe 4th or not make it.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$4,000,000
3$1,750,000
2$1,000,000
2$1,000,000
3$2,500,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Eiserman, Cole
3$925,000
Moore, Oliver
3$925,000
Trades
CHI
  1. Kakko, Kaapo [RFA Rights]
NYR
  1. 2025 1st round pick (TOR)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2026
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
26$87,500,000$65,707,500$0$6,422,500$21,792,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Eiserman, Cole
$925,000$925,000
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
C
RFA - 2
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW
RFA
Moore, Oliver
$925,000$925,000
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, C
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$825,000$825,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
RFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$825,000$825,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$962,500$962,500
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$855,833$855,833 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 22 at 3:02 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 916
Likes: 525
I mean I'd take a gamble on him too but his best season was 40 points. A foward whos best season was .5 ppg isn't worth a 1st, doesn't matter if he was 2nd overall that was half a decade ago
ChiHawk, Hawksguy81 and Garak liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:03 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 1,430
Other than his draft position, there is nothing in Kakko's body of work that suggests his value should be a 1st. I would consider a non Hawks own 2nd and a prospect of some sort (nothing in the top dozen or so of the Hawks pool). Kakko has enough NHL games under multiple respected coaches that he is more likely to be what he is and not someone that blossoms in a change of scenery. And he is also going from pretty cheap to getting a pay raise as an RFA when his agent uses his 40 point season as the reference point.
ChiHawk, Hawksguy81 and Garak liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:05 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 403
Likes: 521
Thanks, ChiHawk, for all the thought you put into this post. It's exciting to contemplate the Hawks' future, and you help me see that better. It's easier to suffer the pain now, for a better glimpse of what will no doubt be a different team with MUCH more potential in a few years.

If I'm the Hawks, I'd make your deal for Kappo. Somehow, I bet that Ranger fans will have another opinion! {;- )

Cheers, LA
ChiHawk and Garak liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:12 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,029
Likes: 9,333
Quoting: FoxYou727
I mean I'd take a gamble on him too but his best season was 40 points. A foward whos best season was .5 ppg isn't worth a 1st, doesn't matter if he was 2nd overall that was half a decade ago


He's likely worth a 2nd for a flyer, but Rangers fans go crazy so was being generous smile
FoxYou727, LivingAnew and Garak liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:14 p.m.
#5
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 18,607
Likes: 6,740
No chance the Hawks trade their original 1st but NYR would consider it for Tampa's first this year (after we take care of them in the first round lol)

In all seriousness if Moore, Rinzel, Nazar, or a 1st are the table the Rangers definitely consider it.
Mar. 22 at 3:15 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 8,526
Likes: 10,371
Wouldn't pay a 1st for Kakko and wouldn't use #4 overall on Eiserman.
ChiHawk and Garak liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:18 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 5,235
Likes: 2,278
Quoting: ChiHawk
He's likely worth a 2nd for a flyer, but Rangers fans go crazy so was being generous smile


What Kakko is worth vs What it’ll take to pry him away from the Rangers are two completely different conversations….for some reason people on this site have a hard time understand

The rangers do NOT need picks. They need a top 6 RW of all things. So if that’s not what you’re offering then the trade dies
Mar. 22 at 3:20 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 916
Likes: 525
Quoting: ChiHawk
He's likely worth a 2nd for a flyer, but Rangers fans go crazy so was being generous smile


I remember when Rags fans didn't want to include him in any Eichel trade 😂
ChiHawk and Garak liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:21 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 403
Likes: 521
Hmmmm... Well, I guess if I were willing to cough up TOR's 1st next year, then I'd definitely be willing to cough up a 2nd, instead, to take a flyer on Kappo! LOL. I'd be happy to be wrong about this. {;- )
Garak liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:23 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 916
Likes: 525
Quoting: Rags21
What Kakko is worth vs What it’ll take to pry him away from the Rangers are two completely different conversations….for some reason people on this site have a hard time understand

The rangers do NOT need picks. They need a top 6 RW of all things. So if that’s not what you’re offering then the trade dies


what has Kakko done to prove he is worth a top 6 winger? His best season was 40 points in 82 games that is middle 6 winger stats. A first is already to much plus you can just trade that 1st for a top 6 winger like when the habs trade romanov for 13t overall than flipped the 13th for Dach
SociallyHawkward, ChiHawk and Garak liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:23 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 916
Likes: 525
Quoting: Rags21
What Kakko is worth vs What it’ll take to pry him away from the Rangers are two completely different conversations….for some reason people on this site have a hard time understand

The rangers do NOT need picks. They need a top 6 RW of all things. So if that’s not what you’re offering then the trade dies


what has Kakko done to prove he is worth a top 6 winger? His best season was 40 points in 82 games that is middle 6 winger stats. A first is already to much plus you can just trade that 1st for a top 6 winger like when the habs trade romanov for 13t overall than flipped the 13th for Dach
Garak liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:26 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 5,235
Likes: 2,278
Quoting: FoxYou727
what has Kakko done to prove he is worth a top 6 winger? His best season was 40 points in 82 games that is middle 6 winger stats. A first is already to much plus you can just trade that 1st for a top 6 winger like when the habs trade romanov for 13t overall than flipped the 13th for Dach


I never said the trade for be Kakko for a top 6 winger, 1 for 1….but that’s the only thing the rangers are missing

That 1st could easily be worse than Kakko, since it’ll be closer to a 2nd round pick lol

Dach hasn’t even proved he’s worth the risk yet
Garak liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:33 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 916
Likes: 525
Quoting: Rags21
I never said the trade for be Kakko for a top 6 winger, 1 for 1….but that’s the only thing the rangers are missing

That 1st could easily be worse than Kakko, since it’ll be closer to a 2nd round pick lol

Dach hasn’t even proved he’s worth the risk yet


my bad misread you. Still getting a first for Kakko even if it 20-32 is a steal, his best season was 40 points, most of his value is based upon the fact he was #2

And I was using the Romanov/Dach/13th as an example i.e trading Kakko for that 1st and flipping that 1st for a top 6 winger
SociallyHawkward, ChiHawk and Garak liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:35 p.m.
#14
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,883
Likes: 3,127
Quoting: wojohawk
Other than his draft position, there is nothing in Kakko's body of work that suggests his value should be a 1st. I would consider a non Hawks own 2nd and a prospect of some sort (nothing in the top dozen or so of the Hawks pool). Kakko has enough NHL games under multiple respected coaches that he is more likely to be what he is and not someone that blossoms in a change of scenery. And he is also going from pretty cheap to getting a pay raise as an RFA when his agent uses his 40 point season as the reference point.


The market has been set with Newhook, Dach, etc
Mar. 22 at 3:36 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 3,478
Likes: 1,451
Rangers pass, keep your pick.
Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:37 p.m.
#16
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,883
Likes: 3,127
Quoting: FoxYou727
what has Kakko done to prove he is worth a top 6 winger? His best season was 40 points in 82 games that is middle 6 winger stats. A first is already to much plus you can just trade that 1st for a top 6 winger like when the habs trade romanov for 13t overall than flipped the 13th for Dach


Kirby Dach career high 18 points 5v5: flirting
Kaapo Kahko career high 32 points 5v5: harrassment
Rags21 and seanrushton liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:38 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 5,235
Likes: 2,278
Quoting: FoxYou727
my bad misread you. Still getting a first for Kakko even if it 20-32 is a steal, his best season was 40 points, most of his value is based upon the fact he was #2

And I was using the Romanov/Dach/13th as an example i.e trading Kakko for that 1st and flipping that 1st for a top 6 winger


I mean spit out some potential top RWs they could get with Kakko/1st round pick that teams would part with….keep in mind the rangers have limited cap space as well

The good thing is the Rangers don’t need Kakko to be a point per game player. And quite frankly, not every top draft pick comes into the league as lights it up. Besides, there’s way more to hockey than just points
Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:44 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 4,323
Likes: 1,232
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
No chance the Hawks trade their original 1st but NYR would consider it for Tampa's first this year (after we take care of them in the first round lol)

In all seriousness if Moore, Rinzel, Nazar, or a 1st are the table the Rangers definitely consider it.


There is no way that Kakko is worth a first or any of those prospects... He's a bottom-6 piece who the only impressive thing about him is being a 2nd overall pick
ChiHawk and FoxYou727 liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:47 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 403
Likes: 521
Quoting: ChiHawk
He's likely worth a 2nd for a flyer, but Rangers fans go crazy so was being generous smile


Well, to all on this ACGM: thanks for edumacation.

And, ChiHawk, you seem correct in that the consensus (from fans of teams OTHER than the Rags) appears to be that Kappo is worth taking a flyer on for a 2nd rounder of some sort (perhaps with a prospect, too), AND that Rags fans deem that valuation WAY too low! grin

GLTA!
ChiHawk and Garak liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:49 p.m.
#20
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,883
Likes: 3,127
Quoting: LivingAnew
Well, to all on this ACGM: thanks for edumacation.

And, ChiHawk, you seem correct in that the consensus (from fans of teams OTHER than the Rags) appears to be that Kappo is worth taking a flyer on for a 2nd rounder of some sort (perhaps with a prospect, too), AND that Rags fans deem that valuation WAY too low! grin

GLTA!


I hate the rangers and Kaako should fetch a late 1st at least if put on the market
Mar. 22 at 3:49 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,029
Likes: 9,333
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
No chance the Hawks trade their original 1st but NYR would consider it for Tampa's first this year (after we take care of them in the first round lol)

In all seriousness if Moore, Rinzel, Nazar, or a 1st are the table the Rangers definitely consider it.


Kaapo is not worth Moore, Rinzel or Nazar; not a chance. At best he may get a late 1st but more likely a 2nd rounder is about the best the Rangers can expect in return.
Garak and Hawksguy81 liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:50 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 371
Likes: 312
It’s interesting that fans making ACGMs trading for Kakko seem to be placing him in their top-six despite the fact he’s apparently only worth a 2nd. The majority of Rangers fans don’t want to get rid of him at all, turning down these kinds of trades has nothing to do with Kakko’s value in a vacuum, but rather what he provides to the team as it is trying to compete. A 2025 late first does nothing to help the Rangers now.
Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:50 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 403
Likes: 521
Quoting: dgibb10
I hate the rangers and Kaako should fetch a late 1st at least if put on the market


Copy that, dgibb; thx
Mar. 22 at 3:51 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,029
Likes: 9,333
Quoting: dgibb10
I hate the rangers and Kaako should fetch a late 1st at least if put on the market


At best a late 1st. He's had 5 seasons in the NHL, your statement might be true after his first 3 seasons but after 5 seasons, not under contract (although an RFA), he's probably worth a 2nd and maybe a late 1st on a good day.
Garak liked this.
Mar. 22 at 3:54 p.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,029
Likes: 9,333
Quoting: Terrifiedofeveryone
It’s interesting that fans making ACGMs trading for Kakko seem to be placing him in their top-six despite the fact he’s apparently only worth a 2nd. The majority of Rangers fans don’t want to get rid of him at all, turning down these kinds of trades has nothing to do with Kakko’s value in a vacuum, but rather what he provides to the team as it is trying to compete. A 2025 first does nothing to help the Rangers now.


There's not 1 player on the Hawks roster outside of Bedard that would be in the Rangers top 6, let alone top 9. The point is, a rebuilding team has the flexibility to take a flyer and not loose much if they can't extract more value from Kaapo and if not, they overpaid slightly. The Rangers on the other hand need help now and a 1st round pick gives them an asset to help them get help now that arguably is better than they would get for KK. At this point, he's probably worth a 2nd, so Hawks slightly overpay and Rangers get that asset to make a play for someone else.

Trades don't always happen in vacuums.
LivingAnew and Garak liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll