SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sensical Off-Season Plan

Created by: Ryminister_92
Team: 2024-25 Ottawa Senators
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 29, 2024
Published: Mar. 29, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Overview:
Staios enters his first off-season as GM with about $20,049,286M in cap space and a new head coach to hire. Assuming new owner Micheal Andlauer allows him to open the books and spend to improve the team, I don’t think the roster is too far off from at least being a wild card contender. If both Staios and Andlauer get their hope fulfilled, they’ll have a new head coach by the time the draft rolls around and current Marlies head coach John Gruden is the perfect fit - he’ll be cheap and fresh as a first time NHL head coach, he has experience behind the bench of a winning team since he was an associate coach of the historical Bruins team in 2022-2023, and he has a history with both Staios and Andlauer having won a OHL championship with the Hamilton Bulldogs.

Offence:
The core will likely remain in tack as they’re young and still have room to grow, but bringing in a veteran winner and professional like Tyler Toffoli would greatly benefit the young players to learn from. Aside from Toffoli, I think also reshaping the bottom 6 to be a complete pain in the ass to play against every night is the best route - this would just allow the top 6 to focus on scoring more and also take some pressure off of Tkachuk physically. Bringing in Yanni Gourde gives the team an identity 3rd line that will just drive opponents nuts every time they’re on the ice.

Defence:
For the most part, this will be a tough area to address. The biggest area of need to address is a top 4 right handed shot defender and while Ottawa has been linked to Chris Tanev, I just don’t see the mutual interest there. However, a very solid second option should be Alex Carrier who plays a similar style and really rounds the defence out more. With Chychrun entering his final year of his contract, this would allow the team time to assess whether to sign him to an extension and try to move Chabot, or move Chychrun and still have a reliable option with Chabot to back him up.

Goalies:
This has been a major area of concern for the Sens and I personally don’t see a viable option to fix it outside of trusting the guy they signed last off-season to rebound and have a strong year. Forsberg hasn’t been good enough and has a cheap buyout option so I think that should be explored and give Mads Søgaard the opportunity as a backup.

Taxi squad players are guys to be sent to the AHL but will be first options for call-ups when needed.

Assuming Ottawa keeps their 2024 1st round pick and defers their loss of pick to a different year, it gives them a bunch of picks to work with this year for maneuvering in the draft - wouldn't be shocked to see them move up a bit and target guys as it is a weaker draft so why not go after a few guys that you like rather than add too many to the system.

Coming into the 24/25 season I'd say the biggest area to be addressed would be the defence but that would be sorted out with the Chychrun/Chabot debate. The goaltending could also be worrisome but I've also felt like that's more of an indicator of the team play in front of them so the new coach should help improve that area.

Thoughts?
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,855,500
2$875,000
1$874,125
2$805,000
1$800,000
1$775,000
2$815,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$5,115,000
5$4,000,000
1$1,215,000
1$925,000
1$865,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
2$827,500
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Levshunov, Artyom
3$950,000
Trades
1.
OTT
  1. 2024 1st round pick (CBJ)
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (LAK)
  3. 2024 6th round pick (CBJ)
Additional Details:
*Assuming picks are #8 and #27

Bold move made at the draft by new management, Sens see their shot to move up and draft right handed defender Artyom Levshunov from Michigan State of the NCAA.
CBJ
  1. 2024 1st round pick (BOS)
  2. 2024 1st round pick (OTT)
Additional Details:
*Assuming picks are #4, #83, and #179

With the Jackets already having David Jiricek in the system as their potential future top pair right handed defender, the move back a few spots and select Cayden Lindstrom from Medicine Hat of the WHL with the #8 pick and with the #27 pick they select Matvei Gridin from the Muskegon Lumberjacks of the USHL.
2.
OTT
  1. 2025 4th round pick (CAR)
Additional Details:
With Carolina likely losing a few of their defenders to free agency this summer, bringing in Brannstrom offers a young replacement that’s shown his reliable in his own end and can move the puck decently well. Should adjust and fit into Brind’Amour’s system with ease and could develop into a middle pair guy that can play both sides.
CAR
  1. Brännström, Erik [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Brannstrom has lost his spot on the Sens roster. With the team likely forfeiting their 25' 1st round pick, they look to add a mid round selection to still bring in a prospect.
3.
OTT
  1. Gourde, Yanni
  2. Ottavainen, Ville
  3. 2025 3rd round pick (SEA)
  4. 2026 6th round pick (SEA)
Additional Details:
Sens take a big risk here and make a shake up with a bold deal involving Norris. Rumours out there state that management wants to bring in more “pros and winning experience” and Gourde is just that. He’ll help bring an identity to the 3rd line and can play in the top 6 in a pinch. An extension does not come as part of the deal due to Norris’ injury concerns, but I’m sure one could be easily figured out shortly after the trade or into the season.
Ottavainen offers a prospect with some upside in case Gourde doesn’t re-sign. He’s not the most mobile of defenders, but he’s very reliable defensively and can play physical. Should have the chance to be a middle pair guy one day and being right handed he’ll give the Sens some depth at a position that lacks it.
SEA
  1. Bernard-Docker, Jacob
  2. Norris, Joshua
  3. 2025 5th round pick (OTT)
Additional Details:
Norris’ value may be at an all time low after multiple shoulder surgeries and rehab, but there’s no doubt as to what he can do on the ice when healthy - produce offence. Seattle should look to address their scoring issues and may be willing to take a chance on Norris and hope that his injuries are behind him. If he’s healthy, he’s a point per game threat and would slide in nicely as their 1C.
Bernard-Docker is in need of a change of scenery. There may be some potential left, but he’s falling down the depth chart with free agent signings and poor play when he does play. He’s still mobile defender that moves the puck well but his decision making needs to improve.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the DET
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CBJ
2025
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
2026
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the OTT
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,700,000$87,716,172$850,000$0-$16,172

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,205,714$8,205,714
LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,350,000$8,350,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 1
$5,115,000$5,115,000
RW, LW
UFA
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$3,855,500$3,855,500
C
RFA
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,975,000$4,975,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$5,166,666$5,166,666
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$2,950,000$2,950,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$894,167$894,167
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$835,000$835,000
C, RW
RFA - 1
$1,215,000$1,215,000
RW, C, LW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,050,000$8,050,000
LD
UFA - 8
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,600,000$4,600,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,600,000$4,600,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$875,000$875,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,000,000$8,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$775,000$775,000
LW
RFA
Levshunov, Artyom
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$874,125$874,125
RD
RFA
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Taxi Squad
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA
$865,000$865,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD/RD
UFA
$775,000$775,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C, RW
UFA
$775,000$775,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA
$827,500$827,500 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, LW
UFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 29 at 7:40 p.m.
#1
Dolzhenkov Is Coming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 3,645
Likes: 5,276
It's weird how the majority of CBJ proposals on here have them downgrading their top young players or picks for more depth. It seems like the most common knowledge thing about the Jackets is that they have no star players, so I don't get why people expect them to just acquire even more lower quality parts. If the CBJ have a chance to pick high they're the last team that's going to trade that chance for depth.
Nhl_oilers, Viqsi and CaseyFlyman liked this.
Mar. 29 at 7:46 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,983
Likes: 788
Quoting: dk325
It's weird how the majority of CBJ proposals on here have them downgrading their top young players or picks for more depth. It seems like the most common knowledge thing about the Jackets is that they have no star players, so I don't get why people expect them to just acquire even more lower quality parts. If the CBJ have a chance to pick high they're the last team that's going to trade that chance for depth.


As mentioned in the description - if Columbus is to pick at #4 and they're already satisfied with Jiricek being their future #1 guy I could see them trading down a few spots to get another pick. & in this scenario it's not like they're moving down 10 spots and only picking up a 3rd to do so. They're moving down 4 spots while still picking up another late round 1st round pick, and still picking a pretty sought after prospect at #8 in Lindstrom. Doesn't seem like Columbus is losing much of the talent for only moving down a few spots.
Mar. 29 at 8:37 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 7,990
Likes: 4,211
Quoting: Ryminister_92
As mentioned in the description - if Columbus is to pick at #4 and they're already satisfied with Jiricek being their future #1 guy I could see them trading down a few spots to get another pick. & in this scenario it's not like they're moving down 10 spots and only picking up a 3rd to do so. They're moving down 4 spots while still picking up another late round 1st round pick, and still picking a pretty sought after prospect at #8 in Lindstrom. Doesn't seem like Columbus is losing much of the talent for only moving down a few spots.


I know this is opinion based for where guys will rank in the draft, but coming from a guy who has researched the hell out of Lindstrom, there is no way he falls to 8OA. He will be a top 5 pick, if not top 3. Celebrini will of course be 1OA, so I see Demidov, Lindstrom, Levshunov, and Catton being very close to each other to be picked 2OA. If Lindstrom fell that much, I would be shocked!

Keeping 4OA, and just snagging Lindstrom if that’s who they want, is way better than trading back, and hoping that he will be there at 8OA imo.
Ryminister_92 liked this.
Mar. 29 at 8:40 p.m.
#4
Dolzhenkov Is Coming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 3,645
Likes: 5,276
Quoting: Ryminister_92
As mentioned in the description - if Columbus is to pick at #4 and they're already satisfied with Jiricek being their future #1 guy I could see them trading down a few spots to get another pick. & in this scenario it's not like they're moving down 10 spots and only picking up a 3rd to do so. They're moving down 4 spots while still picking up another late round 1st round pick, and still picking a pretty sought after prospect at #8 in Lindstrom. Doesn't seem like Columbus is losing much of the talent for only moving down a few spots.


I don't think that logic follows. Teams go with BPA almost uniformly no matter what they already have in the cupboard. Nashville would be a prime example of a team that didn't stop picking defensemen just because they already had solid dmen in their system. Eventually they traded one for a center that they badly needed.

For this deal to make sense I'd want something like 8 and a pick in the 10-14 range. Late firsts are wildly overvalued and very often turn into nothing.
Mar. 29 at 8:42 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,983
Likes: 788
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
I know this is opinion based for where guys will rank in the draft, but coming from a guy who has researched the hell out of Lindstrom, there is no way he falls to 8OA. He will be a top 5 pick, if not top 3. Celebrini will of course be 1OA, so I see Demidov, Lindstrom, Levshunov, and Catton being very close to each other to be picked 2OA. If Lindstrom fell that much, I would be shocked!

Keeping 4OA, and just snagging Lindstrom if that’s who they want, is way better than trading back, and hoping that he will be there at 8OA imo.


Drafts are so unpredictable. Just because one team may have a player at #4 on their board doesn't mean that other teams do. Look at last year for example - nobody had Simashev going #6 but Arizona did and kept the pick. No one also had Colby Barlow dropping to #18 but he did.. drafts are such a crap show these days
Nhl_oilers liked this.
Mar. 29 at 8:46 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 7,990
Likes: 4,211
Quoting: Ryminister_92
Drafts are so unpredictable. Just because one team may have a player at #4 on their board doesn't mean that other teams do. Look at last year for example - nobody had Simashev going #6 but Arizona did and kept the pick. No one also had Colby Barlow dropping to #18 but he did.. drafts are such a crap show these days


They are… I did my own mock draft for last year, and did so bad haha!

Honestly though, besides Arizona, who did have Simashev going 6OA? We will see who will be right, but hey, if Lindstrom does drop that much, that would be a steal for whatever team is picking there!
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 29 at 8:51 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,983
Likes: 788
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
They are… I did my own mock draft for last year, and did so bad haha!

Honestly though, besides Arizona, who did have Simashev going 6OA? We will see who will be right, but hey, if Lindstrom does drop that much, that would be a steal for whatever team is picking there!


Teams value players different internally. Everyone thinks that each team drafts the "best player available" but thats just not true even though teams will say it is. Best case of that is Toronto last season - no one had them taking Cowan in the 1st round and he was projected to be a 3rd would pick. They took him though because he was a position of need and they saw something in him that no one else did and they knew if they waited till their next pick he'd be gone so they jumped at it to take him and it worked out great so far. Then you have situations like Montreal not trading back and taking Reinbacher and he's looked awful this season.
It's so hard to predict how a 17 or 18 year old kid is going to work out in 3-5 years.
CaseyFlyman liked this.
Mar. 29 at 9:19 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,405
Likes: 892
If the Jackets were trading the 4OA they would be trading for a legit 1C. But the Jackets are very unlikely to do that bc we should have our pick of some of the top C in the draft. If the 4OA is involved the Jackets would likely want either Stutzle or Tkachuk. But since that is not going to happen, the Jackets aren’t interested.
Viqsi, SK101 and squashmaple liked this.
Mar. 29 at 9:19 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 676
Likes: 506
I appreciate taking your time with each trade and description. I wish more ppl would actually do that lmao.
Mar. 29 at 10:26 p.m.
#10
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,734
Likes: 3,222
Quoting: dk325
It's weird how the majority of CBJ proposals on here have them downgrading their top young players or picks for more depth. It seems like the most common knowledge thing about the Jackets is that they have no star players, so I don't get why people expect them to just acquire even more lower quality parts. If the CBJ have a chance to pick high they're the last team that's going to trade that chance for depth.

Frankly, at this point I think it's in most cases a subconscious impulse in which folks end up only really feeling comfortable in a world where we're a perpetual farm team that just doesn't get such players - and that in the other cases, it's conscious and deliberate. I legit cannot come up with any other plausible explanation for why something so painfully jaw-droppingly obvious would otherwise keep eluding people.

In this described scenario, even with confidence in Jiricek, taking Levshunov would be the obvious play regardless because there's nobody behind him and we need that backup policy, while there's other center candidates in the system.
squashmaple and CaseyFlyman liked this.
Mar. 29 at 10:59 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,540
Likes: 5,033
Canes pass. Don't have the cap, you'd need to take something back
Mar. 29 at 11:15 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,983
Likes: 788
Quoting: Caniac2000
Canes pass. Don't have the cap, you'd need to take something back


Don’t have the cap? They have almost $31M in projected cap space and the only notable RFA’s to sign are Jarvis and Necas.
Canes are likely losing Pesce and Skjei so there’s a need at the position.

So let’s say that on the high end Jarvis and Necas cost $15M together. Where are you spending the other $16M? They have plenty of cap.

Not to mention that Brannstrom is a RFA himself and likely won’t see a raise over the $2M he made this season. & you’ll generally spend around $2M to get a third pair guy in UFA anyways.. at least Brannstrom provides a good defensive guy with some upside.

What are you smoking.
Mar. 29 at 11:40 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,540
Likes: 5,033
Quoting: Ryminister_92
Don’t have the cap? They have almost $31M in projected cap space and the only notable RFA’s to sign are Jarvis and Necas.
Canes are likely losing Pesce and Skjei so there’s a need at the position.

So let’s say that on the high end Jarvis and Necas cost $15M together. Where are you spending the other $16M? They have plenty of cap.

Not to mention that Brannstrom is a RFA himself and likely won’t see a raise over the $2M he made this season. & you’ll generally spend around $2M to get a third pair guy in UFA anyways.. at least Brannstrom provides a good defensive guy with some upside.

What are you smoking.


Guentzel... Teravainen... Drury... also have to replace Pesce, Skjei, Chatfield, Martinook, Noesen... there isn't 2 million to blow on a 3rd pairing D man. But you know, you clearly think you know more than me on this situation. Pipe down. Carolina don't have the room without money going back, probably Fast in this situation.
Mar. 29 at 11:44 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,983
Likes: 788
Quoting: Caniac2000
Guentzel... Teravainen... Drury... also have to replace Pesce, Skjei, Chatfield, Martinook, Noesen... there isn't 2 million to blow on a 3rd pairing D man. But you know, you clearly think you know more than me on this situation. Pipe down. Carolina don't have the room without money going back, probably Fast in this situation.


Guentzel likely ain't re-signing. Teravainen can easily be replaced or not much more than he's making now. Drury won't make much as a 4th liner. If he's over $1.5M then you're wasting your money. Hmm, you say you need to find someone to replace 2 defenceman yet you're saying you don't have room to acquire a defenceman? Brannstrom likely comes in under $2M, or maybe $2M at most which is a fine price for a guy that would play on the third pair in Carolina. But sure, go spend more on a UFA defender to do the exact same thing grimace
Mar. 29 at 11:46 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 4,334
Likes: 1,237
Quoting: Ryminister_92
Drafts are so unpredictable. Just because one team may have a player at #4 on their board doesn't mean that other teams do. Look at last year for example - nobody had Simashev going #6 but Arizona did and kept the pick. No one also had Colby Barlow dropping to #18 but he did.. drafts are such a crap show these days


They are so unpredictable both in terms of where players fall and they being... just look at Nail Yakupov, Alex Galchenyuk, Jaccob Slavin and Jalen Chatfield
Mar. 29 at 11:51 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,540
Likes: 5,033
Quoting: Ryminister_92
Guentzel likely ain't re-signing. Teravainen can easily be replaced or not much more than he's making now. Drury won't make much as a 4th liner. If he's over $1.5M then you're wasting your money. Hmm, you say you need to find someone to replace 2 defenceman yet you're saying you don't have room to acquire a defenceman? Brannstrom likely comes in under $2M, or maybe $2M at most which is a fine price for a guy that would play on the third pair in Carolina. But sure, go spend more on a UFA defender to do the exact same thing grimace


Guentzel's going to cost around 9, Jarvis about 5 if he's bridged, Necas around 8, that's 23 million. Say Drury makes 2 as a good 3rd liner, 25, Teuvo makes 5, 30. Already that cap space is gone. Means Canes are going to need cheap deals and ELCs like... oh, I don't know Scott Morrow and Alexander Nikishin? Means Brannstrom is an asset they cannot afford without moving out cap, probably Fast.
Mar. 30 at 5:36 a.m.
#17
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,473
Likes: 25,370
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
I know this is opinion based for where guys will rank in the draft, but coming from a guy who has researched the hell out of Lindstrom, there is no way he falls to 8OA. He will be a top 5 pick, if not top 3. Celebrini will of course be 1OA, so I see Demidov, Lindstrom, Levshunov, and Catton being very close to each other to be picked 2OA. If Lindstrom fell that much, I would be shocked!

Keeping 4OA, and just snagging Lindstrom if that’s who they want, is way better than trading back, and hoping that he will be there at 8OA imo.

Agree completely with this. The only player that Anaheim will prefer to Levshunov is Celebrini, and I'd be willing to bet that Lindstrom is going before #6. In fact, I think that if the Ducks miss out on Levshunov, Lindstrom is their most likely consolation.
Nhl_oilers liked this.
Mar. 30 at 11:54 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 7,990
Likes: 4,211
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Agree completely with this. The only player that Anaheim will prefer to Levshunov is Celebrini, and I'd be willing to bet that Lindstrom is going before #6. In fact, I think that if the Ducks miss out on Levshunov, Lindstrom is their most likely consolation.


Same here! If Lindstrom fell to 6, then whoever is picking then would be one happy camper. I’ve been looking at the mock drafts by the folks on this site, and it seems like a lot of them underrate him.

That is actually not fair of Anaheim ahha! If they get Levshunov, their defence, if everyone pans out will be insane! Mintyukov, Zellweger, Levshunov, Helleson, Luneau, Warren.. LaCombe ain’t no scrub on defence either.
OldNYIfan and CaseyFlyman liked this.
Mar. 30 at 12:00 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,983
Likes: 788
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Agree completely with this. The only player that Anaheim will prefer to Levshunov is Celebrini, and I'd be willing to bet that Lindstrom is going before #6. In fact, I think that if the Ducks miss out on Levshunov, Lindstrom is their most likely consolation.


Not sure how Anaheim even became part of this discussion…

But who did you talk to that works for Anaheim that told you that? I’m guessing no one. Drafts are very unpredictable. What one team determines as better might not be what another team thinks.

Most people had Zach Benson going top 10 last year, or at very least top 15 and he fell to 18. Stuff like that happens ever year. It’s not all about the kids play on ice, there’s off ice things scours find out too plus the pre draft interviews. Nothing says for sure that Anaheim wants either Lindstrom or Levshunov.
Mar. 30 at 12:23 p.m.
#20
not a he )
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 3,220
Likes: 4,384
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Agree completely with this. The only player that Anaheim will prefer to Levshunov is Celebrini, and I'd be willing to bet that Lindstrom is going before #6. In fact, I think that if the Ducks miss out on Levshunov, Lindstrom is their most likely consolation.


I can’t see Lindstrom getting past Columbus unless somehow the lottery is so unkind they end up shoved down to pick sixth. He just seems like too obvious of a pick, whether he ends up as a wing on a line with Fantilli and Gaudreau or as a 2C between Johnson and Laine or Marchenko. I’m just glad it looks like the two teams’ goals are different, because watching Anaheim pick Columbus’s preferred player a fourth year in a row would be too much.
OldNYIfan, CaseyFlyman and Viqsi liked this.
Mar. 30 at 4:48 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 237
Likes: 168
Feels like the CBJ trade would only really happen if it makes sense and happens in the draft floor as the board shakes out… too many unpredictable factors before any trade comes to light.
Mar. 31 at 8:39 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 1,748
Quoting: Ryminister_92
As mentioned in the description - if Columbus is to pick at #4 and they're already satisfied with Jiricek being their future #1 guy I could see them trading down a few spots to get another pick. & in this scenario it's not like they're moving down 10 spots and only picking up a 3rd to do so. They're moving down 4 spots while still picking up another late round 1st round pick, and still picking a pretty sought after prospect at #8 in Lindstrom. Doesn't seem like Columbus is losing much of the talent for only moving down a few spots.


If Lindstrom was 100% available at 8 I'd do that in a heartbeat, but I think he'll be gone by then, so it's a little unlikely. I also don't think we should be passing up on Levshunov if he's available, and I'm high on Jiricek. The biggest issue is we barely have any NHL-ceiling RD in the system aside from Jiricek (Ceulemans is the only other one and he's been struggling), so that's one position that could actually use some help.

I think Columbus is just going to take best player available wherever they fall. Having a Jiricek or Fantilli in the system isn't a reason to pass on a Levshunov or Celebrini if we get really lucky. We just need as many potential stars as possible.
squashmaple liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll