SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Habs 24-25

Created by: UniKhorn
Team: 2024-25 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 9, 2024
Published: Apr. 9, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Berkly Catton Drafted with the 1st 2024
Josh Anderson Buyout
Martin Necas Acquired from Carolina who don't have the cap space with all the players they have to sign notably choosing Seth Jarvis over Necas
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$975,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,000,000
1$950,000
8$7,250,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Catton, Berkly
3$975,000
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. Necas, Martin [RFA Rights]
CAR
  1. Harris, Jordan
  2. Kovacevic, Johnathan
  3. 2024 1st round pick (WPG)
  4. 2025 3rd round pick (VAN)
2.
MTL
  1. 2025 3rd round pick (CHI)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the WSH
2025
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2026
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$87,700,000$68,094,305$1,022,500$3,977,500$19,605,695

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,875,000$7,875,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,900,000$2,900,000
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,362,500$3,362,500
C, RW
RFA - 2
$7,250,000$7,250,000
RW
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$835,000$835,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Catton, Berkly
$975,000$975,000
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$812,500$812,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,875,000$4,875,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$420,000$420K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,150,000$3,150,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$975,000$975,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$890,000$890,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD/RD
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$867,500$867,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 9 at 9:54 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,539
Likes: 5,032
Canes have the cap to keep all of Jarvis, Necas, and Guentzel, and this doesn't make them consider moving Necas. People seem to not understand, Carolina has 30 million in cap space. They have more than enough to keep Necas unless you meet the asking price. This doesn't.
Hawksguy81 liked this.
Apr. 9 at 9:54 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 488
A couple of depth defensemen and a late 1st is nowhere near enough for Necas.
Hawksguy81 liked this.
Apr. 9 at 9:54 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 5,657
Likes: 5,817
It'd cost a 2nd to dump Dvorak.
Billy316, ChiHawk, Snowhawk18 and 2 others liked this.
Apr. 9 at 10:15 p.m.
#4
Jesus Christ Is King
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 729
Quoting: SociallyHawkward
It'd cost a 2nd to dump Dvorak.


Not really
First 2 goal night as a habs tonight
First time he's looked healthy since we got him
TBH we might just invest in him like we did Armia who now hit a career high for Goals trying to chase down his career high in points after starting in the AHL
Post Surgery Armia took some time but adjusted well in his return while Dvo came back early and looked like a different player straight out the gate.


That said we did just sign Florian Xhekaj to a ELC then to a AHL PTO
If he makes the AHL team on their playoff run he could be skipping his final year in Junior
Given the year he's had i wouldnt count him out but we can play him on Dvo's wing until the TDL so Flo gets some Faceoff Experience.

Either way Dvo like Armia is being associated with their past Baggage.
Both are looking healthy for once and selling early after waiting all these years wouldnt be smart
I mean Hughes turned Kulak into Hutson lets not forget so being patient could pay off big for us long term

Anderson on the other hand is a player we might pay to move out if the cost isnt too high
We could RS and make moves but who wants to RS that long anyways ?

Whats the Conservative estimate on CHI taking Anderson ?
Apr. 9 at 10:21 p.m.
#5
On the Rod Meal Plan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 520
Likes: 313
Why are you buying out Anderson while also having 20 million in cap space?
Jay27 and GuyGuyGuy liked this.
Apr. 9 at 10:38 p.m.
#6
Prime Primeau
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 5,460
Likes: 2,172
Quoting: Huge_Caniac_Abe_Lincoln
Why are you buying out Anderson while also having 20 million in cap space?


While also having a 14th forward spot left
Apr. 9 at 10:55 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 5,657
Likes: 5,817
Quoting: Billy316
Not really
First 2 goal night as a habs tonight
First time he's looked healthy since we got him
TBH we might just invest in him like we did Armia who now hit a career high for Goals trying to chase down his career high in points after starting in the AHL
Post Surgery Armia took some time but adjusted well in his return while Dvo came back early and looked like a different player straight out the gate.


That said we did just sign Florian Xhekaj to a ELC then to a AHL PTO
If he makes the AHL team on their playoff run he could be skipping his final year in Junior
Given the year he's had i wouldnt count him out but we can play him on Dvo's wing until the TDL so Flo gets some Faceoff Experience.

Either way Dvo like Armia is being associated with their past Baggage.
Both are looking healthy for once and selling early after waiting all these years wouldnt be smart
I mean Hughes turned Kulak into Hutson lets not forget so being patient could pay off big for us long term

Anderson on the other hand is a player we might pay to move out if the cost isnt too high
We could RS and make moves but who wants to RS that long anyways ?

Whats the Conservative estimate on CHI taking Anderson ?


Anderson would cost Montreal's 24' unprotected 1st so probably not worth it for a team that doesn't need the cap space yet
ChiHawk, Snowhawk18 and Hawksguy81 liked this.
Apr. 9 at 11:27 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,072
Likes: 9,394
Quoting: Billy316
Not really
First 2 goal night as a habs tonight
First time he's looked healthy since we got him
TBH we might just invest in him like we did Armia who now hit a career high for Goals trying to chase down his career high in points after starting in the AHL
Post Surgery Armia took some time but adjusted well in his return while Dvo came back early and looked like a different player straight out the gate.


That said we did just sign Florian Xhekaj to a ELC then to a AHL PTO
If he makes the AHL team on their playoff run he could be skipping his final year in Junior
Given the year he's had i wouldnt count him out but we can play him on Dvo's wing until the TDL so Flo gets some Faceoff Experience.

Either way Dvo like Armia is being associated with their past Baggage.
Both are looking healthy for once and selling early after waiting all these years wouldnt be smart
I mean Hughes turned Kulak into Hutson lets not forget so being patient could pay off big for us long term

Anderson on the other hand is a player we might pay to move out if the cost isnt too high
We could RS and make moves but who wants to RS that long anyways ?

Whats the Conservative estimate on CHI taking Anderson ?


Dvorak is a dump. He can't stay healthy....he's a dump. If Montreal wants to invest in him, then take the risk and do so and hope he's healthy by the trade deadline and putting up numbers to support his almost $5M cap hit; otherwise he's a dump until that point.
Apr. 9 at 11:42 p.m.
#9
Snowhawk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 3,406
Just because he had a two goal game tonight doesn’t mean teams, especially a rebuilding team, will be offering a pick(s) to take Dvorak and his $4.45m cap hit and $5.75m actual cash payout for next season off the Habs hands. The guy has rarely been healthy this season and when he has played he has been useless.

As @SociallyHawkward stated it takes a 2nd round pick to move Dvorak with Montreal getting FC in return, if that is too steep of a price to pay then keep him.
Apr. 10 at 12:19 a.m.
#10
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,867
Likes: 5,857
Chicago could find 15 Dvoraks in free agency this year for free, I’m not sure why they would pay a 3rd round pick for MTLs
Hawksguy81, Snowhawk18, PaulKorea and 2 others liked this.
Apr. 10 at 4:20 p.m.
#11
Jesus Christ Is King
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 729
Quoting: ChiHawk
Dvorak is a dump. He can't stay healthy....he's a dump. If Montreal wants to invest in him, then take the risk and do so and hope he's healthy by the trade deadline and putting up numbers to support his almost $5M cap hit; otherwise he's a dump until that point.

Its almost like there's this magical tool that GM's have at their disposal in Retained Salary
Its pretty complex but essentially a General Manager can Retain up to 50% Salary on Dvoraks final year of his 4.45m bringing it to 2.225m
At which point and again this is all clearly too complex to consider Common Knowledge, But out GM can then pay a 4th round pick for another team to RS 50% again bringing it to 1.125m

Now follow me on this a Faceoff Center if Healthy even in a Career Worst year like Staal or Plekanec or Hanzal ,ext
Teams will still pay a decent package with more quantity then Quality as Faceoff Centers come TDL are always first off the board
Even if MTL give up a 4th to RS they'd be giving up about 40% of the average return those 3 had with a similar career average in Faceoff Stats but Dvorak didnt struggle nearly as bad as they did in those final years before they eventually retired. Dvorak is overpaid and kinda a mediocre 3rd line Center but his ability to take bulk faceoffs will see him continue to get signed even as he ages .
Just look at Glendenning he's constantly finding new homes even as he ages because he's so dominant in the Faceoff Circle.

But yeah i think gambling on Dvorak is worth it as worst case he finishes his season on LTIR and the cap hit aint our problem
Apr. 10 at 4:24 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 753
Likes: 1,146
Easy pass for Chicago.
ChiHawk and Snowhawk18 liked this.
Apr. 10 at 4:25 p.m.
#13
Jesus Christ Is King
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 729
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
Chicago could find 15 Dvoraks in free agency this year for free, I’m not sure why they would pay a 3rd round pick for MTLs


Name 15 Centers with 55% win rate over 1000 draws and we'll talk
Even in a down year 9 points in 26 games with 59% faceoff win rate isnt bad at all
He has issues sure but lets not Pretend all Centers are Equal as Faceoffs are important
If they werent then why not just flip a coin instead of have a faceoff?
Apr. 10 at 6:08 p.m.
#14
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,867
Likes: 5,857
Quoting: Billy316
Name 15 Centers with 55% win rate over 1000 draws and we'll talk
Even in a down year 9 points in 26 games with 59% faceoff win rate isnt bad at all
He has issues sure but lets not Pretend all Centers are Equal as Faceoffs are important
If they werent then why not just flip a coin instead of have a faceoff?


We are already talking so I’ll skip naming the centers request.


Also, a purely hypothetical question for no particular reason.

Would you rather have Connor Bedard on your team, or a 20 pt player who has 75% faceoff win rate?


You seem to really like faceoff wins, so I think it’s a relevant question.
ChiHawk liked this.
Apr. 10 at 6:29 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,072
Likes: 9,394
Quoting: Billy316
Its almost like there's this magical tool that GM's have at their disposal in Retained Salary
Its pretty complex but essentially a General Manager can Retain up to 50% Salary on Dvoraks final year of his 4.45m bringing it to 2.225m
At which point and again this is all clearly too complex to consider Common Knowledge, But out GM can then pay a 4th round pick for another team to RS 50% again bringing it to 1.125m

Now follow me on this a Faceoff Center if Healthy even in a Career Worst year like Staal or Plekanec or Hanzal ,ext
Teams will still pay a decent package with more quantity then Quality as Faceoff Centers come TDL are always first off the board
Even if MTL give up a 4th to RS they'd be giving up about 40% of the average return those 3 had with a similar career average in Faceoff Stats but Dvorak didnt struggle nearly as bad as they did in those final years before they eventually retired. Dvorak is overpaid and kinda a mediocre 3rd line Center but his ability to take bulk faceoffs will see him continue to get signed even as he ages .
Just look at Glendenning he's constantly finding new homes even as he ages because he's so dominant in the Faceoff Circle.

But yeah i think gambling on Dvorak is worth it as worst case he finishes his season on LTIR and the cap hit aint our problem


Chicago has no use for him so they will want assets to take him on...thus he's a dump
Snowhawk18 liked this.
Apr. 10 at 11:16 p.m.
#16
Snowhawk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 3,406
Quoting: Billy316
Name 15 Centers with 55% win rate over 1000 draws and we'll talk
Even in a down year 9 points in 26 games with 59% faceoff win rate isnt bad at all
He has issues sure but lets not Pretend all Centers are Equal as Faceoffs are important
If they werent then why not just flip a coin instead of have a faceoff?


He sounds wonderful, Montreal should keep him.

I am curious though, what is his FO win % in games where he is injured?
Apr. 12 at 5:06 p.m.
#17
Jesus Christ Is King
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 729
Quoting: Snowhawk18
He sounds wonderful, Montreal should keep him.

I am curious though, what is his FO win % in games where he is injured?


100% of the draws he didnt take obviously . . .i mean geez lol
Apr. 12 at 11:30 p.m.
#18
Snowhawk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 3,406
Quoting: Billy316
100% of the draws he didnt take obviously . . .i mean geez lol


LOL, you obviously missed the point. His face-off win % means SFA if he can’t stay healthy and be in the lineup and yet here you are pushing it as his main selling feature.
Apr. 14 at 8:34 p.m.
#19
Moosetache
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 455
Likes: 87
Quoting: fullblowncaniac90
A couple of depth defensemen and a late 1st is nowhere near enough for Necas.


Lane Hutson for Necas.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll