Forums/St. Louis Blues

ing Refs That was a ing Handpass

May 15 at 11:08
#1
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 786
Likes: 159
May 15 at 11:09
#2
Discord COL's GM
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 6,637
Likes: 1,764
it's fine they talked to Toronto they said "yeah, we can't let San Jose out the dust, and Thornton out the dust give San Jose the call"
Blues4TheCup liked this.
May 15 at 11:11
#3
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 786
Likes: 159
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
it's fine they talked to Toronto they said "yeah, we can't let San Jose out the dust, and Thornton out the dust give San Jose the call"


im so triggered. I have faith the Blues will comeback. San Jose has had so much ref luck these playoffs
mokumboi liked this.
May 15 at 11:14
#4
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 514
Simply poor officiating there. Typical, unfortunately. Only people out of roughly 20,000 in that arena that didn't see it are the four guys getting paid to see it. Then it supposedly is not reviewable.

Petro lost that game though. 80 seconds left, halfway to the blueline, no one around him and he lazily ices the puck for the zone faceoff that tied it. He has the IQ of the vacuum in space. I cannot wait to get rid of him.
May 15 at 11:14
#5
Discord COL's GM
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 6,637
Likes: 1,764
Quoting: Blues4TheCup
im so triggered. I have faith the Blues will comeback. San Jose has had so much ref luck these playoffs


Nah we lose the series 4-1 because NHL deems that Rigging it to San Jose is best scenario...
May 15 at 11:15
#6
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 7,233
Likes: 2,981
Yet another argument for more extensive replay.

When a protest is lodged at the time of the on-ice ruling, plays like this should be subject to review. It's that simple. The "conclusive evidence" standard will still restrict abuse.

Plus, any overtime goal should be reviewable on all aspects.
Blues4TheCup, Ajp_18 and CD282 liked this.
May 15 at 11:18
#7
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 1,301
Did his hand slapping the puck give a clear advantage to the goal...the answer is no. Was he intentionally passing the puck or slapping it down....the answer is too hard to say.
May 15 at 11:18
#8
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 514
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Plus, any overtime goal should be reviewable on all aspects.


This
Blues4TheCup liked this.
May 15 at 11:20
#9
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 514
Quoting: ChiHawk
Did his hand slapping the puck give a clear advantage to the goal...the answer is no. Was he intentionally passing the puck or slapping it down....the answer is too hard to say.


You are correct. However, the rules state the puck is whistled dead when a hand pass is made to another teammate. The teammate who touched it didn't score the goal. He passed it to Karlsson who scored. Whistle should have been blown; pass to Karlsson and goal is moot. The rule says nothing about intent.
OldNYIfan liked this.
May 15 at 11:20
#10
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 786
Likes: 159
Quoting: ChiHawk
Did his hand slapping the puck give a clear advantage to the goal...the answer is no. Was he intentionally passing the puck or slapping it down....the answer is too hard to say.


Watch it Again
CD282 liked this.
May 15 at 11:20
#11
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 168
Likes: 67
Fan of neither team, but admittedly biased against San Jose. That was a garbage non-call. Ridiculous the calls that have gone their way this playoff year.
Ajp_18, Blues4TheCup, OldNYIfan and 2 others liked this.
May 15 at 11:22
#12
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 786
Likes: 159
Quoting: rja40
Simply poor officiating there. Typical, unfortunately. Only people out of roughly 20,000 in that arena that didn't see it are the four guys getting paid to see it. Then it supposedly is not reviewable.

Petro lost that game though. 80 seconds left, halfway to the blueline, no one around him and he lazily ices the puck for the zone faceoff that tied it. He has the IQ of the vacuum in space. I cannot wait to get rid of him.


Id go easy on him. Having 5 defense for the majority of the game tires you out
CD282 liked this.
May 15 at 11:22
#13
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 7,233
Likes: 2,981
Quoting: rja40
This


Sorry -- I didn't get that.
May 15 at 11:22
#14
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 786
Likes: 159
Quoting: PuckLuck_77
Fan of neither team, but admittedly biased against San Jose. That was a garbage non-call. Ridiculous the calls that have gone their way this playoff year.


hard to say which was worse between this and the 5 minute major
CD282 liked this.
May 15 at 11:23
#15
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 786
Likes: 159
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Sorry -- I didn't get that.


all overtime goals should be reviewable if any controversy arises
OldNYIfan liked this.
May 15 at 11:23
#16
Formerly klondikebar
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 2,974
Likes: 1,461
No team is gonna be able to beat the Sharks if the refs r wearing a teal jersey
rja40 liked this.
May 15 at 11:23
#17
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 1,301
Quoting: Blues4TheCup
Watch it Again


He wasn't passing it, he was knocking it down to his own blade on his knees. Way too hard of a call to reverse the goal.
May 15 at 11:23
#18
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 514
Quoting: PuckLuck_77
Fan of neither team, but admittedly biased against San Jose. That was a garbage non-call. Ridiculous the calls that have gone their way this playoff year.


Bay area versus Boston Harbor area has a lot more t.v. sets than Raleigh and St. Louis. It's a common argument with plausibility, but I just find it hard to believe that there would be league-official collusion. Perhaps I am naive. Terrible non-call though nonetheless.
May 15 at 11:24
#19
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 7,233
Likes: 2,981
Quoting: Blues4TheCup
all overtime goals should be reviewable if any controversy arises


Aha! Thanks!
May 15 at 11:24
#20
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 1,301
Quoting: rja40
You are correct. However, the rules state the puck is whistled dead when a hand pass is made to another teammate. The teammate who touched it didn't score the goal. He passed it to Karlsson who scored. Whistle should have been blown; pass to Karlsson and goal is moot. The rule says nothing about intent.


It wasn't a clear hand pass, it's pretty clear to me after watching replays over and over, he was trying to knock down the puck to his own blade on his knees. Unless it's a clear hand pass, reversing that goal would have had people up in arms as well.
May 15 at 11:24
#21
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 168
Likes: 67
Quoting: Blues4TheCup
hard to say which was worse between this and the 5 minute major


Not to mention that ticky-tacky offside's call against Colorado in that serie's Game 7.
May 15 at 11:24
#22
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 514
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Sorry -- I didn't get that.


Outstanding statement. "This" (your comment) is all that needed to be said.
OldNYIfan and Jamiepo liked this.
May 15 at 11:25
#23
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 514
Quoting: ChiHawk
He wasn't passing it, he was knocking it down to his own blade on his knees. Way too hard of a call to reverse the goal.


And you (or the refs) can clearly support this assessment how?
May 15 at 11:27
#24
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 786
Likes: 159
Quoting: ChiHawk
It wasn't a clear hand pass, it's pretty clear to me after watching replays over and over, he was trying to knock down the puck to his own blade on his knees. Unless it's a clear hand pass, reversing that goal would have had people up in arms as well.


claerly you didnt watch it again
Jamiepo liked this.
May 15 at 11:27
#25
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 7,233
Likes: 2,981
Quoting: rja40
Outstanding statement. "This" (your comment) is all that needed to be said.


Thanks! Sorry this old man is slow on the uptake.
CD282 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Remove Option
Submit Poll