SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What if we gave Bracco a chance

Created by: MMXD
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 22, 2020
Published: Sep. 22, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Note: The pietrangelo contract is based off of how there was a rumour that he would take less and that the leafs would front load it, similar to Tavares
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,800,000
2$900,000
1$800,000
2$1,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$8,500,000
1$700,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. 2020 2nd round pick (WSH)
DET
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
Additional Details:
This is based on the Rumour that apparently the Red wings are interested in Kerfoot
2.
TOR
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (WSH)
SJS
  1. Johnsson, Andreas
Additional Details:
Sharks add someone who can play in their top 6
3.
TOR
  1. 2020 4th round pick (MIN)
MIN
  1. Holl, Justin
Additional Details:
Minnesota apparently wants more locals
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$81,140,616$0$400,000$359,384
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$821,667$821,667
LW, RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$8,500,000$8,500,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 22, 2020 at 10:15 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,754
Likes: 7,382
he lost his chance last season when he played like crap. He needs to earn it back
aedoran liked this.
Sep. 22, 2020 at 10:15 p.m.
#2
Isles7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 12,222
Likes: 5,299
Tavares still signed for 7 years
Sep. 22, 2020 at 10:19 p.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Isles777
Tavares still signed for 7 years


Oh right we forgot, the pandemic was already happening and wrecked the economy 2 years before it started. Relevance doesn't mean much to you does it.
Sep. 22, 2020 at 10:25 p.m.
#4
arky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 6,727
Likes: 4,348
Not a rumor I have heard here in Detroit
Sep. 22, 2020 at 10:27 p.m.
#5
Isles7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 12,222
Likes: 5,299
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Oh right we forgot, the pandemic was already happening and wrecked the economy 2 years before it started. Relevance doesn't mean much to you does it.


Pietrangelo is a top 5 RHD, he’ll get max term. Calm down
Sep. 22, 2020 at 10:30 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Isles777
Pietrangelo is a top 5 RHD, he’ll get max term. Calm down


I think that is likely the case but a smart and patient GM will block out the noise and wait to see what the market dictates, I think a couple of contracts will come early and then it'll slow right down. My hope is short term bargains will arise. Too many teams are cutting costs this summer, trades will be slow and signings may be even slower.
Saskleaf liked this.
Sep. 22, 2020 at 10:32 p.m.
#7
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,961
Likes: 5,378
The red wings are not interested in kerfoot, rumor is completely false. This trade is declined. 3rd line centers who score 27 points with 3.5M cap hits do not get 2nd round picks.

Leafs keep the player and the cap hit, wings keep the pick and the cap space
Sep. 22, 2020 at 10:32 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 968
Likes: 270
Quoting: mikearky
Not a rumor I have heard here in Detroit
I think it is one of those Toronto media begging rumors. Because Detroit doesn't need any more bottom 6 forwards. (Not better than Larkin, Mantha, Bertuzzi, Zadina, Fabbri) and I'd rather give one of the prospects or a salary cap dump a chance at that 6th forward spot rather than a 15 goal 40 point guy with a larger cap hit.
Sep. 22, 2020 at 10:33 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18
Likes: 5
Let’s give him a chance.

Then plays him on the 4th line.

Leafs shouldn’t be in the business of “giving” prospect a chance. They have to earn the chance. Bracco simply has not done so.
Sep. 22, 2020 at 10:34 p.m.
#10
Saskoiler for now
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 13,322
Likes: 9,237
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
he lost his chance last season when he played like crap. He needs to earn it back


Ya, I keep saying he should just be traded. He would fetch a late round pick (4-5th probably) so I would just trade him.
Sep. 22, 2020 at 10:36 p.m.
#11
Saskoiler for now
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 13,322
Likes: 9,237
Quoting: dca919
I think it is one of those Toronto media begging rumors. Because Detroit doesn't need any more bottom 6 forwards. (Not better than Larkin, Mantha, Bertuzzi, Zadina, Fabbri) and I'd rather give one of the prospects or a salary cap dump a chance at that 6th forward spot rather than a 15 goal 40 point guy with a larger cap hit.


I'm not saying that the Kerfoot to Detroit rumours make sense, but he would not be a bottom 6 in Detroit. You only named 5 guys, first of all. And Fabbri and Kerfoot are about the same.
Sep. 22, 2020 at 10:50 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 968
Likes: 270
Quoting: Saskleaf
I'm not saying that the Kerfoot to Detroit rumours make sense, but he would not be a bottom 6 in Detroit. You only named 5 guys, first of all. And Fabbri and Kerfoot are about the same.
Fabbri is better offensively (14 goals in 52 games vs 9 goals in 65). He's 2 yrs younger and was a higher draft pick (so more potential for continued growth). He's 550k cheaper over the next two years. So yeah he's better not about the same.

Joe Veleno or Michael Rasmussen--both 1st round picks-- are both prospects that I was referring to that I'd rather see as top 6 than Kerfoot. Also, with the Wings 34M cap space they can afford to take another team's cap dump and place them in the top 6. Again as I stated above. So that is why the current 5 listed plus either one of the prospects OR a cap dump would mean Kerfoot is bottom 6 on Detroit and not worth taking on. Just like I said.
Sep. 22, 2020 at 10:53 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 9,527
Likes: 8,968
I’m pretty sure the thing about him to the Leafs is based on the fact that he’ll make 25+ mil in the first calendar year due to signing bonuses. The rumour about the lower AAV would only come as part of a sign and trade where he gets the 8th year, not because he wants to go to Toronto.
Sep. 22, 2020 at 10:59 p.m.
#14
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,961
Likes: 5,378
Quoting: dca919
Fabbri is better offensively (14 goals in 52 games vs 9 goals in 65). He's 2 yrs younger and was a higher draft pick (so more potential for continued growth). He's 550k cheaper over the next two years. So yeah he's better not about the same.

Joe Veleno or Michael Rasmussen--both 1st round picks-- are both prospects that I was referring to that I'd rather see as top 6 than Kerfoot. Also, with the Wings 34M cap space they can afford to take another team's cap dump and place them in the top 6. Again as I stated above. So that is why the current 5 listed plus either one of the prospects OR a cap dump would mean Kerfoot is bottom 6 on Detroit and not worth taking on. Just like I said.


It makes me laugh that kerfoot is so good from Toronto fans, but they want to trade him 65 times a day. I'd think if my team couldn't get past the first round in 15 years and a guy is a top 6 player but we are lucky enough to get him playing in the bottom 6 because we are so deep, that we would want to keep him. This logic from leafs fans is such a joke, they can keep him.
Sep. 22, 2020 at 11:20 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,681
Likes: 696
Quoting: buffbry
It makes me laugh that kerfoot is so good from Toronto fans, but they want to trade him 65 times a day. I'd think if my team couldn't get past the first round in 15 years and a guy is a top 6 player but we are lucky enough to get him playing in the bottom 6 because we are so deep, that we would want to keep him. This logic from leafs fans is such a joke, they can keep him.


I myself love kerfoot, and always try to hold onto him in these, however this time i ran into cap issues.
RedWing9119 liked this.
Sep. 22, 2020 at 11:28 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 968
Likes: 270
Quoting: MMXD
I myself love kerfoot, and always try to hold onto him in these, however this time i ran into cap issues.
Toronto has cap issues? with 4 forwards signed for over 40M (SMH) ...must skimp on the defense and get bounced in the playoffs early. Yet, no one seems to address that issue other than trading bottom 6 guys or ones coming off significant injuries that no other team wants and signing the best UFA defender to a below market contract in term or AAV...might as well make up the T-shirts: pre-season and regular season champs (playoffs not included).
Sep. 22, 2020 at 11:30 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,681
Likes: 696
Quoting: dca919
Toronto has cap issues? with 4 forwards signed for over 40M....must skimp on the defense and get bounced in the playoffs early. Yet, no one seems to address that issue other than trading bottom 6 guys or ones coming off significant injuries that no other team wants and signing the best UFA defender to a below market contract in term or AAV...might as well make up the T-shirts: pre-season and regular season champs (playoffs not included).


truth. You won't believe how many times i get yelled at for proposing trading nylander or signing Gudas. Or saying Lehtonen and Barabanov in or Liljegren is a bust
Sep. 22, 2020 at 11:38 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 968
Likes: 270
Quoting: MMXD
truth. You won't believe how many times i get yelled at for proposing trading nylander or signing Gudas. Or saying Lehtonen and Barabanov in or Liljegren is a bust
I don't know what to tell you other than keep driving home that point. But know you're up against the guy that buys the 200 jersey to toss it on the ice one game later after paying 400 for the seats near the ice.

Cap-wise Toronto has perhaps a two-year window before they will be forced to dump quality players. They bet on a continually rising cap for these top 4 forward contracts and that gamble is going to cost them. What's worse is they have yet to have that long sustained run in the playoffs where guys know what level is required and they don't have the cap room to acquire depth for those types of runs particularly on the back end like a lot of other cup teams.
MMXD liked this.
Sep. 22, 2020 at 11:53 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,681
Likes: 696
Quoting: dca919
I don't know what to tell you other than keep driving home that point. But know you're up against the guy that buys the 200 jersey to toss it on the ice one game later after paying 400 for the seats near the ice.

Cap-wise Toronto has perhaps a two-year window before they will be forced to dump quality players. They bet on a continually rising cap for these top 4 forward contracts and that gamble is going to cost them. What's worse is they have yet to have that long sustained run in the playoffs where guys know what level is required and they don't have the cap room to acquire depth for those types of runs particularly on the back end like a lot of other cup teams.


yeah, all they have going for them is praying that A. Their top guys like marner and matthews don't take a lot more than what they have. Their contracts take them right into their prime years, thats when you try and lock them up. After that its a bunch of bridges until tavares is up. By then the window is still open providing the good players they have rn, led by matthews and marner are still there.
Sep. 23, 2020 at 5:58 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 485
Likes: 234
I think one of the Steve Dangle podcasts from last week had mentioned that Minnesota had interest in more centers. Maybe Kerfoot could be a fit there?
RedWing9119, MMXD and buffbry liked this.
Sep. 23, 2020 at 8:34 a.m.
#21
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Wrong Detroit's never had interest in Kerfoot, The rumor was that they had interest in Kasperi Kapanen. And you're not getting no freaking 2nd for a 3rd line C who averages around 27 points per season.
buffbry liked this.
Sep. 23, 2020 at 10:30 a.m.
#22
Saskoiler for now
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 13,322
Likes: 9,237
Quoting: dca919
Fabbri is better offensively (14 goals in 52 games vs 9 goals in 65). He's 2 yrs younger and was a higher draft pick (so more potential for continued growth). He's 550k cheaper over the next two years. So yeah he's better not about the same.

Joe Veleno or Michael Rasmussen--both 1st round picks-- are both prospects that I was referring to that I'd rather see as top 6 than Kerfoot. Also, with the Wings 34M cap space they can afford to take another team's cap dump and place them in the top 6. Again as I stated above. So that is why the current 5 listed plus either one of the prospects OR a cap dump would mean Kerfoot is bottom 6 on Detroit and not worth taking on. Just like I said.


Ok my bad. I didn’t know to much about Fabri, I was basing it on the delaross trade. That was a bad trade.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll