SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

What IF Hubby Cost

Created by: TheDuminator
Team: 2020-21 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 27, 2020
Published: Oct. 27, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Guhle make the team... trade Romanov HIGH-VALUE for Hubby.. we can Ask Florida to retain the 22$ over the cap
Trades
1.
2.
MTL
    People think its not enough... so OK let's add a FIRST
    FLA
    1. 2021 1st round pick (MTL)
    Buyouts
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2021
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the STL
    Logo of the VGK
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the OTT
    Logo of the PHI
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    2022
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the STL
    2023
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$81,500,000$74,097,142$0$3,775,000$7,402,858
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $5,900,000$5,900,000
    LW, RW
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $3,083,333$3,083,333
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $3,750,000$3,750,000
    RW, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $2,125,000$2,125,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $3,400,000$3,400,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $750,000$750,000
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $2,600,000$2,600,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $1,400,000$1,400,000
    C, RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $7,857,143$7,857,143
    RD
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $10,500,000$10,500,000
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $875,000$875,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    RD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $4,350,000$4,350,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $925,000$925,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $735,000$735,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $925,000$925,000
    LD/RD
    RFA - 5

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:09 a.m.
    #1
    Lenny7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 13,291
    Likes: 11,051
    That ain't it. Not even close.
    masterjuddi and Book_Hockey liked this.
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:10 a.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2020
    Posts: 1,024
    Likes: 1,017
    That’s not going to be enough for Huberdeau. Tatar will walk and then they’re left with Romanov and Lehkonen for their franchise points leader. You’re at least a 1st or more short
    Lenny7, yikes, Salzy and 1 other person liked this.
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:11 a.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 10,250
    Likes: 7,116
    If Huberdeau is traded, then FLA is going for a rebuild. Tatar doesn't fit that and neither does Lehkonen really -- only Romanov, who they would probably love to have. It would likely be multiple picks + Romanov + another young prospect - I'm sure they'd love Kotkaniemi, but I doubt MTL would trade him. But some center prospects would probably be of interest to FLA. Maybe throw in a roster player like Armia as well and they can decide whether to sign him or trade him at the deadline.
    yikes, Book_Hockey and Lenny7 liked this.
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:12 a.m.
    #4
    What in tarnation
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2017
    Posts: 32,709
    Likes: 31,449
    TOP5 LW in the league is not moving for a pending UFA wing, mid to bottom-6 winger and a good D prospect. That offer falls short.
    Copenhagen, yikes and Book_Hockey liked this.
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:13 a.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 5,139
    Likes: 5,943
    Romanov + Caufield/Suzuki to get FLA not to hang up immediately
    Book_Hockey and Kosterjr liked this.
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:14 a.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 15,496
    Likes: 6,436
    Like others above have said it's not enough for Florida but also Montreal is HUGE on Romanov and if he is part of the package I don't see the Habs doing it.
    masterjuddi liked this.
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:14 a.m.
    #7
    EklundCelebriniSmith
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2019
    Posts: 10,072
    Likes: 12,828
    As the handful guys said value is off - I assume Tatar and Lehk. are in there just as much as for cap purposes as for value. So they kinda mean whatever to Florida unless you offered quality pieces which you have - just not enough. I’d think Caufield and a 2nd + or whatever would work if that was added. I doubt Poehling is a major trade piece anymore so I’d say if you make it him it would have to be a first +

    Adding Tatar lehk Romanov Caufield Poehling 2nd/ first would get Florida to bite but that is a substantial offer
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:18 a.m.
    #8
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2018
    Posts: 6,784
    Likes: 1,915
    Quoting: Salzy
    Romanov + Caufield/Suzuki to get FLA not to hang up immediately


    That ain't it. When was the last time you saw 2 top 5 prospects moved for a guy? It doesn't happen in today's NHL.

    It would start with 1 of those guys plus a 1st rounder, but only 1 of those guys would be in the deal at all
    TheDuminator liked this.
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:22 a.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 5,139
    Likes: 5,943
    Quoting: Ryminister_27
    That ain't it. When was the last time you saw 2 top 5 prospects moved for a guy? It doesn't happen in today's NHL.

    It would start with 1 of those guys plus a 1st rounder, but only 1 of those guys would be in the deal at all


    None of them are even top 15 prospects? sure top 5 in MTL but in the league not close

    How often do you see a guy like Huberdeau traded? never

    FLA has less than no reason to even consider moving Huberdeau, MTL would need to blow them out of the water for them to consider it and one of Romanov/Suzuki/Caufield and a 1st doesnt blow anyone away
    Lenny7 liked this.
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:24 a.m.
    #10
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2018
    Posts: 6,784
    Likes: 1,915
    Quoting: Salzy
    None of them are even top 15 prospects? sure top 5 in MTL but in the league not close

    How often do you see a guy like Huberdeau traded? never

    FLA has less than no reason to even consider moving Huberdeau, MTL would need to blow them out of the water for them to consider it and one of Romanov/Suzuki/Caufield and a 1st doesnt blow anyone away


    Teams don't trade 2 of their top 5 prospects.

    Also learn how to read. I said it would start with 1 of those guys and a 1st rounder. Didn't say 1 of them plus a 1st would blow Florida away. Panthers have a lot of incentive to move him actually. They're always looking to shed salary, they're not a competitive team, his value has never been higher than it is right now.. all good reasons to move him
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:25 a.m.
    #11
    Thread Starter
    HabsFan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 5,448
    Likes: 933
    Quoting: villenash
    If Huberdeau is traded, then FLA is going for a rebuild. Tatar doesn't fit that and neither does Lehkonen really -- only Romanov, who they would probably love to have. It would likely be multiple picks + Romanov + another young prospect - I'm sure they'd love Kotkaniemi, but I doubt MTL would trade him. But some center prospects would probably be of interest to FLA. Maybe throw in a roster player like Armia as well and they can decide whether to sign him or trade him at the deadline.


    Armia is not the deal breaker...
    But a A+ Prospect TOP 6 winger 60pts guy playing next to Barky for sure... and a Good MID two-way player 40pts in Lehky... should be enough.
    I agree I should have added 2021-1st but that's IT !
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:26 a.m.
    #12
    Thread Starter
    HabsFan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 5,448
    Likes: 933
    Quoting: Salzy
    None of them are even top 15 prospects? sure top 5 in MTL but in the league not close

    How often do you see a guy like Huberdeau traded? never

    FLA has less than no reason to even consider moving Huberdeau, MTL would need to blow them out of the water for them to consider it and one of Romanov/Suzuki/Caufield and a 1st doesnt blow anyone away


    To sign back Hoffman and they need to fill heir roster after losing many guy's
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:29 a.m.
    #13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2019
    Posts: 1,351
    Likes: 445
    Quoting: DomCholette
    To sign back Hoffman and they need to fill heir roster after losing many guy's


    Im sure the Cats would rather have Huberdeau than Hoffman. Huberdeau is already on a bargain of a contract for the next 3 seasons and he's better than Hoffman.
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:30 a.m.
    #14
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 5,139
    Likes: 5,943
    Quoting: Ryminister_27
    Teams don't trade 2 of their top 5 prospects.

    Also learn how to read. I said it would start with 1 of those guys and a 1st rounder. Didn't say 1 of them plus a 1st would blow Florida away. Panthers have a lot of incentive to move him actually. They're always looking to shed salary, they're not a competitive team, his value has never been higher than it is right now.. all good reasons to move him


    You mad bro? lol You dont shed salary by trading an Elite player on a great contract thats just flat out dumb to even suggest. They dont need to shed salary to stay under 75M with a full 23 man roster they shed salary by letting Dadonov and Hoffman walk

    Quoting: DomCholette
    To sign back Hoffman and they need to fill heir roster after losing many guy's


    You dont trade Huberdeau to "fit" Hoffman in
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:30 a.m.
    #15
    Lenny7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 13,291
    Likes: 11,051
    Quoting: NLidstrom
    That’s not going to be enough for Huberdeau. Tatar will walk and then they’re left with Romanov and Lehkonen for their franchise points leader. You’re at least a 1st or more short


    I don't even know why, if the Panthers were selling off Huberdeau, they'd want someone like Tatar involved in the deal anyway? To me, if they're moving Huberdeau, one of the most valuable pieces in the deal isn't someone like Tatar. He's very good, but it doesn't make any sense to downgrade it's something like Young NHL player+Caufield+1st as a starting point.
    NLidstrom liked this.
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:32 a.m.
    #16
    Lenny7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 13,291
    Likes: 11,051
    Quoting: DomCholette
    Armia is not the deal breaker...
    But a A+ Prospect TOP 6 winger 60pts guy playing next to Barky for sure... and a Good MID two-way player 40pts in Lehky... should be enough.
    I agree I should have added 2021-1st but that's IT !


    Who's the A+ prospect?
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:32 a.m.
    #17
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 10,250
    Likes: 7,116
    Quoting: DomCholette
    Armia is not the deal breaker...
    But a A+ Prospect TOP 6 winger 60pts guy playing next to Barky for sure... and a Good MID two-way player 40pts in Lehky... should be enough.
    I agree I should have added 2021-1st but that's IT !


    Not saying Armia is the deal breaker...that was just a suggestion. MTL would likely have to throw in a roster player in any Huberdeau deal and he would be one that I think they'd have interest in.

    So when has Lehkonen ever gotten 40 points? or even gotten close to that? Never...

    A 30 year old UFA in Tatar, a 30-point bottom 6 forward, and Romanov isn't enough - even when you add a 1st - for a top 5 LW in the NHL that has 239 points in his last 233 games.

    I realize now that this must be a troll post. Good one.
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:33 a.m.
    #18
    Thread Starter
    HabsFan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 5,448
    Likes: 933
    Quoting: Lenny7
    Who's the A+ prospect?


    You don't think Romanov is one??? ok switch Romy by Caufield... no change for me as we have NOW enough RW for the next 6-7 years anyway
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:36 a.m.
    #19
    Thread Starter
    HabsFan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 5,448
    Likes: 933
    Quoting: villenash
    Not saying Armia is the deal breaker...that was just a suggestion. MTL would likely have to throw in a roster player in any Huberdeau deal and he would be one that I think they'd have interest in.

    So when has Lehkonen ever gotten 40 points? or even gotten close to that? Never...

    A 30 year old UFA in Tatar, a 30-point bottom 6 forward, and Romanov isn't enough - even when you add a 1st - for a top 5 LW in the NHL that has 239 points in his last 233 games.

    I realize now that this must be a troll post. Good one.


    With the clean up that Florida have started I think they are willing to trade a good asset for multiple fix option.
    They did a big mistakes when they trade Trochek away and destroy their LD
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:41 a.m.
    #20
    Lenny7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 13,291
    Likes: 11,051
    Quoting: DomCholette
    You don't think Romanov is one??? ok switch Romy by Caufield... no change for me as we have NOW enough RW for the next 6-7 years anyway


    I mean, I guess when I think A+ prospect, I think of guys like Lafreniere, or Hughes, or someone along those lines. A+ prospects are the top tier. Heck, I'm a Ducks fan who's very aware that Trevor Zegras is rated higher than both of those prospects that you listed, and I wouldn't even say that he's an A+ prospect.

    The Panthers have zero reason to move Huberdeau without being blown away by a trade offer, and that ain't it. If Huberdeau was made available, there's a ton of teams that would offer more than you have.
    TheDuminator liked this.
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:44 a.m.
    #21
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2018
    Posts: 6,784
    Likes: 1,915
    Quoting: Salzy
    You mad bro? lol You dont shed salary by trading an Elite player on a great contract thats just flat out dumb to even suggest. They dont need to shed salary to stay under 75M with a full 23 man roster they shed salary by letting Dadonov and Hoffman walk


    Couldn't care less about your opinion actually kid. Lol.
    Teams just don't trade top 5 prospects. & saying teams don't move elite talent to shed salary is false. Kessel got traded from Toronto to clear cap. Chicago dealt guys to clear cap after they won the cup. So you clearly don't know what you're talking about . Lol.
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:48 a.m.
    #22
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2019
    Posts: 679
    Likes: 126
    Quoting: Lenny7
    That ain't it. Not even close.


    This is a joke of a take. On what planet is that not enough. I would never even consider offering this as a habs backer.
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:53 a.m.
    #23
    Thread Starter
    HabsFan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 5,448
    Likes: 933
    Quoting: Lenny7
    I mean, I guess when I think A+ prospect, I think of guys like Lafreniere, or Hughes, or someone along those lines. A+ prospects are the top tier. Heck, I'm a Ducks fan who's very aware that Trevor Zegras is rated higher than both of those prospects that you listed, and I wouldn't even say that he's an A+ prospect.

    The Panthers have zero reason to move Huberdeau without being blown away by a trade offer, and that ain't it. If Huberdeau was made available, there's a ton of teams that would offer more than you have.


    FYI- Laffy is a BlueChip in our NHL roster play
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:54 a.m.
    #24
    Thread Starter
    HabsFan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 5,448
    Likes: 933
    Quoting: Steve_321
    This is a joke of a take. On what planet is that not enough. I would never even consider offering this as a habs backer.


    I think people wants KK, Suzuki, Caufield and Romanov for one TOP LW... it is ridiculous... but they all want the moon!
    Oct. 27, 2020 at 11:54 a.m.
    #25
    Lenny7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 13,291
    Likes: 11,051
    Quoting: Steve_321
    This is a joke of a take. On what planet is that not enough. I would never even consider offering this as a habs backer.


    Hello friend, welcome to Earth, a planet that doesn't revolve around one singular team, where you aren't limited to only receiving offers from one team. It's pretty simple-Why would a team sell off a star player if they weren't selling? (They wouldn't). If they were selling, why would a team trade their star player for a pending UFA, a good prospect, and a bottom 6 forward?

    There are a ton of teams that would blow this offer out of the water if Huberdeau was put on the block.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll