SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Dvorak Staying with 17 in 22 under MSL

Created by: Billy739
Team: 2022-23 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: May 31, 2022
Published: May 31, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Like the Title says im tired of people Dumping Dvorak.
They woke up with Caufield putting the blame on Ducharme
They woke up with Petry after they realized He scored 21/28pts in 30 under MSL
Why wont they wake up with Dvorak?

72% Faceoff Win Rate under MSL
Unlike Ducharme he's not Defensive Zone Faceoffs Only
MSL doesnt punish him because Poehling sucks are Faceoffs in DZ
Instead he punishes Poehling giving Pitlick and Dauphin his 3rd line role demoting him
Neither of them can win a faceoff, they replaced him cause they win puck battles

My Point is MSL knows how to use Dvorak
We'd want to keep him especially given the low price we paid.
He'll be still worth more in 5 years then KK or either pick will become
Why? His Faceoff Ability alone like Cullen will keep him in the NHL long after his offense dries up because he's so dominant there. He's the right guy to keep around to train Suzuki and Wright IMO


My Focus here is on Building a Contender
While also collecting another Lotto pick like FLA
Unless they trade Bobo they lost 1/2 their team with 4m cap


Chiarot once moved to RD in MTL for 9 games after TML asked to see him showcased there in our match up he went 9 pts in 9 games before traded. Romanov set him up for 1 timers and they created offensive chances he and others jumped on. Chiarot is here until Mailloux will be ready then again we can trade him to a contender. We have the void and he's the best and cheapest option a team like MTL will attract. Plus i really like the Physical Dominance Romanov-Chiarot showed. I mean Eddy on Romanov's Right side had some good looks but few converted into actual points they were just physically dominating. With Barron it seem Romanov is less physical focusing more on protecting his young partner.

I just feel going forward the safest option for Romanov to pair with is Chiarot.
The runner up to that woulda been Subban return which i like as he's a living reminder of what chasing money over taking less to build a contender will cost you. He's still a good player to i just couldnt justify the 5m im sure he'll land from someone who wants to sell Jersey's.


Now i said im building a contender and i meant it
But that relies on AHL players Ghule,Xhekaj,Mysak,Ylonen,Trudeau,Kidney and Simmoneau among others who aged out or are entering the AHL next year. Kidney and Trudeau could go back but their teams are rebuilding word around the Q is and they'll move on. (see it a lot in Moncton over the years like Pandemic start we went all in and were top 3 in Canada then no playoffs. Forced a rebuild and Pelltier left early as did Spence and the Andersson

We have a good mix of players in Laval who are currently in the ECF in the AHL that is looking to get a huge boost from our depth pool. Its looking like Ghule is gonna be facing off against Xhekaj and Mysak in the Memorial Cup so there's Quality there to not just quantity.

Their jobs is to push out NHL'ers by doing so good they make us trade a Byron, Hoffman,Evans,Eddy or Allen. Ylonen in particular is looking to make that sooner then later as his defensive game which is usually lacking has really stepped up this playoffs.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$850,000
2$950,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
3$2,250,000
4$2,850,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,250,000
1$850,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Wright, shane
3$925,000
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. Johnson, Tyler
  2. 2023 1st round pick (CHI)
Additional Details:
CHI trade 1st round pick Top 3 protected for Jeff Petry Bundle and MTL to RS 50% on Kane or Toews to help maximize CHI returns.

CHI caps tight and RS of 5.25m on 1/3 players they're likely to sell is possible for sure. After that though it gets sketchy and much cheaper this way with more to show for it if you're CHI

Swapping Johnson & a 1st for Petry and Drouin
It gives CHI options as they can get more for Drouin then Johnson given how steep and fast his decline was vs his contract. Now they are in a position to sell Toews 50% RS, Kane 50% RS Via MTL & Drouin 50% RS for a profit

Before anyone starts about Drouin being banged up Hanzal and Timonen were both traded on IR at the deadline for a Premium. Both were in Decline and Both Retired not long after so Drouin's issues arent very concerning to me as its mental (take him outta MTL we're hard on players, you could give up McJesus, Our fans would as for God)
CHI
  1. Drouin, Jonathan ($2,750,000 retained)
  2. Petry, Jeff
Additional Details:
Jones/Petry/Murphy to play with the many young LD from Mitchell to Beaudin to Harding. Their RD quality is about as bare as MTL's was before Barron /Mailloux so the stability will help them as a stop/gap until they draft RD of Quality.
2.
MTL
  1. Faksa, Radek
Additional Details:
Basically same contract
We're just swapping a position you're in need of for one that MTL is in need of as well. With Faksa gone DAL is still set but they've only got 5 Right Handed Shots of which 1 asked for a trade and 1 is buried in the AHL. RD like Savard helps them more then Faksa
DAL
  1. Savard, David
Additional Details:
Faksa is probably top 5 in Defensive Zone Faceoffs in the NHL and is an ideal 4th line Center to play with Armia in particular.

MTL is ALWAYS injured at Center each and every year.
It will happen again this year im sure and that's where Faksa's secondary value is because he can play middle 6 Center confidentally just doesnt have the offense for it long term
3.
MTL
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (MIN)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
2023
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2024
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$79,014,166$1,132,500$1,570,000$3,485,834
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,875,000$7,875,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Wright, shane
$925,000$925,000
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,250,000$3,250,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LD
RFA - 3
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,875,000$2,875,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$875,000$875,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$507,500$508K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 4

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 31, 2022 at 6:05 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 39,286
Likes: 20,198
That's horrible for Chicago
Billy739, SociallyHawkward, Garak and 1 other person liked this.
May 31, 2022 at 6:10 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Billy739
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 6,590
Likes: 1,629
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
That's horrible for Chicago


They're now in a position where they cannot trade both Kane and Toews at 50% RS
Go check it out they're pretty well f'd with who they got to resign vs what they have


Whats worse?
Giving up a 1st rounder you've got top 3 protection on?
Not getting to trade a Toews or a Kane for the multiple 1st's +++ they'll no doubt get ?

They'll have to make this deal with someone to RS at 50%
This way they get Petry back giving them Value at the cost of Johnson who's provided none for them
Bad as Drouin's been for missing games its not nearly as bad as its been for Johnson when he shows up to his
May 31, 2022 at 6:23 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 39,286
Likes: 20,198
Quoting: Billy739
They're now in a position where they cannot trade both Kane and Toews at 50% RS
Go check it out they're pretty well f'd with who they got to resign vs what they have


Whats worse?
Giving up a 1st rounder you've got top 3 protection on?
Not getting to trade a Toews or a Kane for the multiple 1st's +++ they'll no doubt get ?

They'll have to make this deal with someone to RS at 50%
This way they get Petry back giving them Value at the cost of Johnson who's provided none for them
Bad as Drouin's been for missing games its not nearly as bad as its been for Johnson when he shows up to his


What? Why can't they retain on both Kane and Toews? Like I can't think of a single reason why. Please explain. Also Petry doesn't ahve value. His contract is like slightly better Brent Burns
SociallyHawkward and Garak liked this.
May 31, 2022 at 6:52 a.m.
#4
Subbanator
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 7,652
Likes: 3,528
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
What? Why can't they retain on both Kane and Toews? Like I can't think of a single reason why. Please explain. Also Petry doesn't ahve value. His contract is like slightly better Brent Burns


I think in the trade above he is taking 50% retention on one of the contracts in that bundle without actually taking the player so they can move them with even less money.

Petry also has value and will be dealt for positive assets this off season.

This is a horrible deal for MTL.
May 31, 2022 at 7:47 a.m.
#5
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,780
Likes: 8,353
So I'm banging my head against the wall here. How is petry and drouin helping their cap number at all, they're adding dollars there. Chicago won't do that deal anyways. If they do move Kane and toews and go full rebuild they aren't trading 1st rounders for older dmen and retaining would mean nothing on what's left of those deals.
Garak liked this.
May 31, 2022 at 8:16 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 16,182
Likes: 12,461
I agree with the previous statements that there is no shot Chicago does this.

Not a chance they trade a 1st for a 34 year old
SociallyHawkward and TCS2020 liked this.
May 31, 2022 at 8:24 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 5,831
Likes: 6,269
Petry sucks and drouin isn't much better. What a terrible hawks trade. They have plenty of cap space to keep Johnson. This doesn't make any sense at all.
Garak and TCS2020 liked this.
May 31, 2022 at 8:52 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,328
Likes: 4,978
absolutley zero chance the hawks to that
Garak and TCS2020 liked this.
May 31, 2022 at 8:52 a.m.
#9
CHI NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,681
Likes: 2,258
Quoting: Subbanator7667
I think in the trade above he is taking 50% retention on one of the contracts in that bundle without actually taking the player so they can move them with even less money.

Petry also has value and will be dealt for positive assets this off season.

This is a horrible deal for MTL.


The Blackhawks are going to be one of the worst teams in the league next year and they’re trading their 1st round pick for a defenseman in his mid 30s and an offense-only third liner, how is that “horrible for Montreal”
Garak, TCS2020, SociallyHawkward and 1 other person liked this.
May 31, 2022 at 9:00 a.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 7,792
Likes: 4,483
Petry isn't waiving for Chicago, I doubt he waives for any Western Conference team with the brutal travel schedule. And all Canadian teams are on Tyler Johnsons no trade list That's already been reported when he waived for Chicago.
May 31, 2022 at 9:13 a.m.
#11
Subbanator
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 7,652
Likes: 3,528
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
The Blackhawks are going to be one of the worst teams in the league next year and they’re trading their 1st round pick for a defenseman in his mid 30s and an offense-only third liner, how is that “horrible for Montreal”


If they're taking on over 5 million in cap retention just for Chicago to flip Kane, plus another 2.25 retention on Drouin, that's over 7 million in retention alone. Plus Petry gas actual value, first round pick value, not top 10 pick value but still positive value. Then you add taking a cap dump in TJ and MTL has like 12 million of cap all tied up for a pick that won't be worth it.
May 31, 2022 at 10:30 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 11,732
Likes: 11,925
Hey guys. Broken record here. That trade is awful for CHI. Try to rationalize it all you want, but you'd be wrong.
May 31, 2022 at 10:40 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 39,286
Likes: 20,198
Quoting: Subbanator7667
If they're taking on over 5 million in cap retention just for Chicago to flip Kane, plus another 2.25 retention on Drouin, that's over 7 million in retention alone. Plus Petry gas actual value, first round pick value, not top 10 pick value but still positive value. Then you add taking a cap dump in TJ and MTL has like 12 million of cap all tied up for a pick that won't be worth it.


How is it a benefit to Chicago if Montreal decides to retain instead of them? Chicago has no issues retaining themselves. You are trying to justify an already flawed proposal. If Montreal wants to retain and Chicago doesnt then the receiving team pays not Chicago.

And for the last time Petry does not have positive value, let alone a 1st. He is a 35 year old 1 dimensional defenseman. His value is about the same as pre-buyout Yandle
TCS2020, SociallyHawkward and Garak liked this.
May 31, 2022 at 10:46 a.m.
#14
HenriJokiharju
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 204
Likes: 128
You aren’t getting a top 10 pick for two bums especially in the 2023 draft, also the Hawks could simply buyout Johnson if they wanted to lmao. There’s no benefit for Chicago here at all and they will have no problem at all retaining salary on Toews and Kane lol. You’re not dealing with Stan Bowman anymore, Davidson isn’t an idiot.
SociallyHawkward and Garak liked this.
May 31, 2022 at 10:48 a.m.
#15
we miss leo k
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 6,020
Likes: 5,132
Jumping in to echo that the trade is terrible for Chicago, and more so that the rationalization doesn't even make sense - you have Chicago sending out Tyler Johnson (2x$5M) to get back Jeff Petry (2x$6.25M) and Jonathan Drouin (1x$2.75M with his retention) - so Chicago sends out $5M and gets back $9M in cap.

Right now Chicago has ~$20M in cap space with not a ton of holes to fill - they need goalies, obviously, but other than that it's filling out their bottom 6 and 3rd pair. They could easily do all that for around $10M and still have the $10Mish they need to fully retain on Kane & Toews - if they even want to move them.
Garak and TCS2020 liked this.
May 31, 2022 at 11:09 a.m.
#16
Subbanator
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 7,652
Likes: 3,528
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
How is it a benefit to Chicago if Montreal decides to retain instead of them? Chicago has no issues retaining themselves. You are trying to justify an already flawed proposal. If Montreal wants to retain and Chicago doesnt then the receiving team pays not Chicago.

And for the last time Petry does not have positive value, let alone a 1st. He is a 35 year old 1 dimensional defenseman. His value is about the same as pre-buyout Yandle


It also makes no sense for MTL to take on all that retention, hence why the whole proposal makes no sense.

And for the last time, a bad 30 games doesn't make a player have negative value. Petry will return a good haul of assets and I'll be on here to enjoy it when it happens.
May 31, 2022 at 11:12 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 11,732
Likes: 11,925
Quoting: TCS2020
You aren’t getting a top 10 pick for two bums especially in the 2023 draft, also the Hawks could simply buyout Johnson if they wanted to lmao. There’s no benefit for Chicago here at all and they will have no problem at all retaining salary on Toews and Kane lol. You’re not dealing with Stan Bowman anymore, Davidson isn’t an idiot.


I'd like to agree with you. But don't think we can pass judgment on Davidson in either direction just yet. He could still turn out to be an idiot too, but we won't know for at least 2-3 years. haha
May 31, 2022 at 11:37 a.m.
#18
BW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 198
Likes: 98
Hawks trade is awful, even if the trade were close to fair, a rebuilding team isn't trading their 1st round pick in a strong draft class for no reason.
TCS2020 liked this.
May 31, 2022 at 12:59 p.m.
#19
HenriJokiharju
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 204
Likes: 128
Quoting: Garak
I'd like to agree with you. But don't think we can pass judgment on Davidson in either direction just yet. He could still turn out to be an idiot too, but we won't know for at least 2-3 years. haha


Well regardless Davidson won’t want to block both Regula and Mitchell by adding an old RHD as Jones and Murphy already are taking up two spots on the right side

Quoting: Garak
I'd like to agree with you. But don't think we can pass judgment on Davidson in either direction just yet. He could still turn out to be an idiot too, but we won't know for at least 2-3 years. haha


Quoting: Garak
I'd like to agree with you. But don't think we can pass judgment on Davidson in either direction just yet. He could still turn out to be an idiot too, but we won't know for at least 2-3 years. haha
Garak liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll