Quoting: Alfie11
Yeah but you’re getting Tkachuk lol. Also is Bourque really projecting as a centre/Hintz as a LW? I would’ve thought that you’d run Robo-Hintz-Tkachuk long term (Tkachuk does a lot of what Pavelski does while also being big and physical) and then like Benn-Seguin-Stankoven or something. I do think that Johnston would be the guy the Flames absolutely do not budge on though, and while Bourque and Stankoven are both undersized, I think Stankoven would be too small (we already have Coronato and Mangiapane at 5’10”, Bourque is also 5’10” and Stankoven’s 5’8”). You would have terrible defense, but Edmonton made it work with bad defense AND bad goaltending. At least you’d have one elite defenseman and an elite goalie lol
If we don’t move anything major, I see our future top 6 as:
Hintz-Johnston-Robo
Marchment-Bourque-Stankoven
Bourque is going to centre the 2nd line no matter what, first line could be Robo-Hintz-Johnston if Johnston can play winger. He’s your prototypical centre: smart two ways, has good vision, is majorly a playmaker. He’s like Danault with better offense and a little worse defense.
If we get Tkachuk though (big @ss if), after Pavelski retires or leaves, Tkachuk would 100% take the role, even over Johnston if he was still hypothetically here.
I would see Calgary being interested in Dallas over many teams considering they have a true number 1 centre coming up in Johnston, and a deep asf centre prospect pool (can/probably would acquire more than one of them in a trade). He’s a future two way guy who puts up 90-95 points, like a better version of prime Segs (that’s all if his development continues as planned).
Also ffs why do you think Dallas would run Benn on the 2nd line in a year or two from now? He already can’t do it currently lol, why would he be able to later on when he gets older and worse? We got Marchment for a reason lol, so Benn doesn’t play top 6, either him or Gurianov take the role from him.