SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Jason Robertson Buffalo Sabre

Created by: NeedTheCleanser
Team: 2022-23 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 2, 2022
Published: Oct. 2, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$9,500,000
Trades
BUF
  1. Robertson, Jason [RFA Rights]
DAL
  1. Olofsson, Victor
  2. Quinn, Jack
  3. 2023 1st round pick (BUF)
  4. 2023 2nd round pick (VGK)
Additional Details:
1st is top5 protected.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2024
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2025
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$59,809,167$0$2,770,000$22,690,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$855,833$855,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, RW
RFA - 3
$9,500,000$9,500,000
LW, RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$412,500$412K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$825,000$825,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,200,000$2,200,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,700,000$1,700,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,800,000$1,800,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$687,500$687,500
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,500,000$1,500,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,850,000$1,850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,916,667$4,916,667
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 2, 2022 at 5:23 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,749
Likes: 9,329
You aren’t getting Robertson and putting protection on picks.
Boltsradynasty, Goofie, justaBoss and 2 others liked this.
Oct. 2, 2022 at 5:31 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 8,536
Likes: 6,434
Quoting: Xqb15a
You aren’t getting Robertson and putting protection on picks.


Everybody protects their firsts now. Nobody is giving up the pick that becomes Bedard.
Hullsy09 and wojme liked this.
Oct. 2, 2022 at 6:14 p.m.
#3
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 31,487
Quoting: sabres89
Everybody protects their firsts now. Nobody is giving up the pick that becomes Bedard.


Ahem.

Florida.

Also DAL declines. With DAL also lacking their own first they can't afford becoming this much worse.
EsoYeezus69 liked this.
Oct. 2, 2022 at 7:32 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,749
Likes: 9,329
Quoting: sabres89
Everybody protects their firsts now. Nobody is giving up the pick that becomes Bedard.


You aren’t getting a 23yr old 40 goal scorer and putting conditions on the pick, if you think you’re in the running for Bedard you shouldn’t be making trades for Robertson anyway. Make the offer better than because it makes zero sense for DAL to accept restrictions.
TheMooterus, mokumboi, EsoYeezus69 and 1 other person liked this.
Oct. 2, 2022 at 9:39 p.m.
#5
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 10,455
Likes: 7,261
Quoting: Xqb15a
You aren’t getting a 23yr old 40 goal scorer and putting conditions on the pick, if you think you’re in the running for Bedard you shouldn’t be making trades for Robertson anyway. Make the offer better than because it makes zero sense for DAL to accept restrictions.


Dallas isnt exactly dealing from a position of strength right now. Is their plan at this point wait until they've banked enough cap to sign him to the deal he wants and only play him for part of this season?
Oct. 2, 2022 at 10:34 p.m.
#6
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 31,487
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Dallas isnt exactly dealing from a position of strength right now. Is their plan at this point wait until they've banked enough cap to sign him to the deal he wants and only play him for part of this season?


Increasingly better plan than trading him for an insufficient package
EsoYeezus69 and Xqb15a liked this.
Oct. 3, 2022 at 9:14 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,749
Likes: 9,329
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Dallas isnt exactly dealing from a position of strength right now. Is their plan at this point wait until they've banked enough cap to sign him to the deal he wants and only play him for part of this season?


He is an RFA, they are dealing from a massive position of strength. What’s he going to do sit out the whole year, sign an offer sheet with one of the 5 teams in the league that has more cap space than them? Oh wait at least 2 of those teams are actively tanking and not trading picks. If a team offersheets him there are no protections on the picks. So how is it that they aren’t dealing from a position of strength?
EsoYeezus69 and justaBoss liked this.
Oct. 3, 2022 at 11:05 a.m.
#8
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 10,455
Likes: 7,261
Quoting: Xqb15a
He is an RFA, they are dealing from a massive position of strength. What’s he going to do sit out the whole year, sign an offer sheet with one of the 5 teams in the league that has more cap space than them? Oh wait at least 2 of those teams are actively tanking and not trading picks. If a team offersheets him there are no protections on the picks. So how is it that they aren’t dealing from a position of strength?


The teams who would offer sheet him are not going to be getting a top 5 pick, especially not after acquiring Robertson. You also can't just force him to play either, even if you hold his RFA rights. Depending on how this is being handled, he may demand a trade out of Dallas before it's all over due to being fed up with management/ownership, especially if it's over a very reasonable asking price of 7 mil AAV when compared to other young players contracts this off season.
Oct. 3, 2022 at 11:05 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 466
Quoting: Xqb15a
You aren’t getting a 23yr old 40 goal scorer and putting conditions on the pick, if you think you’re in the running for Bedard you shouldn’t be making trades for Robertson anyway. Make the offer better than because it makes zero sense for DAL to accept restrictions.


Lol. This is a direct comp to the Eichel trade.
Anyone that says this isn’t a fair offer is in for a bad time if they do deal him
Oct. 3, 2022 at 11:12 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,749
Likes: 9,329
Quoting: NeedTheCleanser
Lol. This is a direct comp to the Eichel trade.
Anyone that says this isn’t a fair offer is in for a bad time if they do deal him


Who cares, Eichel was hurt and demanding a trade. That’s a hair brained comp.
EsoYeezus69 and justaBoss liked this.
Oct. 3, 2022 at 11:19 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,749
Likes: 9,329
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
The teams who would offer sheet him are not going to be getting a top 5 pick, especially not after acquiring Robertson. You also can't just force him to play either, even if you hold his RFA rights. Depending on how this is being handled, he may demand a trade out of Dallas before it's all over due to being fed up with management/ownership, especially if it's over a very reasonable asking price of 7 mil AAV when compared to other young players contracts this off season.


Yeah you can just force him to play or well play or sit that’s what an RFA is, he has zero leverage unless he wants to go to Europe which he won’t. He can demand away, doesn’t mean DAL has to take an offer that is below what they are willing to accept which imo would include an unprotected 23. Robertson has zero leverage, other teams have zero leverage. DAL holds all the cards if they want to play hard ball.
EsoYeezus69 liked this.
Oct. 3, 2022 at 11:37 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,316
Likes: 2,735
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Dallas isnt exactly dealing from a position of strength right now. Is their plan at this point wait until they've banked enough cap to sign him to the deal he wants and only play him for part of this season?


Robertson doesn’t want out. The only person with a problem is Gagliardi and somebody needs to tell him to keep his mouth shut and let his GM deal with negotiating. “These kids score 40 goals and all of a sudden they want 7 million.” Yeah Tom, that’s how that works. It is what it is. Nill and his guys will get something figured out. I took Robertson in fantasy this year. Wouldn’t have done that if I didn’t think they were gonna get something figured out. Wouldn’t be at all surprised if both sides said screw it and signed a one year deal to get Robertson back on the ice. And then immediately start working on his next deal
EsoYeezus69 and justaBoss liked this.
Oct. 3, 2022 at 4:05 p.m.
#13
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 10,455
Likes: 7,261
Quoting: Xqb15a
Yeah you can just force him to play or well play or sit that’s what an RFA is, he has zero leverage unless he wants to go to Europe which he won’t. He can demand away, doesn’t mean DAL has to take an offer that is below what they are willing to accept which imo would include an unprotected 23. Robertson has zero leverage, other teams have zero leverage. DAL holds all the cards if they want to play hard ball.


Yeah, he can refuse to play for the team again and force his way out of Dallas, whether that involves playing in Europe or taking a year off from Hockey, you can't hold a gun to his head and tell him to get on the Ice, even if he is in the state of Texas. That may be bad for his career, but it's worse for Dallas, and I don't imagine that's a secret to anyone.

If Robertson gets traded, I guarantee you will be disappointed by the return. Buffalo fans were about Eichel, Hawks fans were about Debrincat. Everyone thinks they have the golden goose on their team and other teams will have to give up their left nut, arm, leg, firstborn child, ++ in order to get them.

Fact of the matter is, if the owner in Dallas is refusing to let the GM pay Robertson, then the Stars have no leverage, RFA rights or not, because Dallas needs that points production this year, their season is sunk without it.
Oct. 3, 2022 at 6:51 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,749
Likes: 9,329
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Yeah, he can refuse to play for the team again and force his way out of Dallas, whether that involves playing in Europe or taking a year off from Hockey, you can't hold a gun to his head and tell him to get on the Ice, even if he is in the state of Texas. That may be bad for his career, but it's worse for Dallas, and I don't imagine that's a secret to anyone.

If Robertson gets traded, I guarantee you will be disappointed by the return. Buffalo fans were about Eichel, Hawks fans were about Debrincat. Everyone thinks they have the golden goose on their team and other teams will have to give up their left nut, arm, leg, firstborn child, ++ in order to get them.

Fact of the matter is, if the owner in Dallas is refusing to let the GM pay Robertson, then the Stars have no leverage, RFA rights or not, because Dallas needs that points production this year, their season is sunk without it.


You don’t understand business leverage do you? That’s why this conversation is pointless. I’m not even a Stars fan and I know they wouldn’t accept conditions on a pick, if you think you’re picking top 10 you shouldn’t be trading assets for a guy who is going to get paid.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll