SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

New York Rangers signed Alexis Lafrenière (2 Years / $2,325,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Aug. 23, 2023 at 7:11 p.m.
#26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 3,840
Likes: 2,515
Quoting: jpsnow13
NYR just gave him their left over capspace... Why did it take them so long!?!?


maybe laff wanted more?
Aug. 23, 2023 at 7:35 p.m.
#27
You know nothing JS
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 7,062
Likes: 4,447
Quoting: drambui
maybe laff wanted more?


Then logically he would have signed a one year deal and gained from the big cap increase in 2024 IMO.
Aug. 23, 2023 at 7:36 p.m.
#28
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 548
I think this makes sense for both player and team. I suspect either the Rangers didn’t want to give him a Kotkaniemi-type deal where they sign him long term and hope he grows into it because they’re afraid he might not get much better, or Lafreniere didn’t want that because he thinks he’ll be worth a lot more in two years. It limits the risk for both sides.
Aug. 23, 2023 at 7:40 p.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 772
Quoting: BroadwayBlueshirts
A team absolutely should've tried the 4.3M one on like a 2-3 year deal, they would've had to (pay to) dump Goodrow somewhere then, and it'd still make their next few summers (more) uncomfortable. But you know how it is in the NHL!


The player has to sign with another team. Why would Laf do that?

He obviously did not do that.

But we don't know if he was offered a contract by another team. He may have very well turned down several offers.
Aug. 23, 2023 at 7:44 p.m.
#30
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 772
Quoting: budgeteam
The Rangers would have dumped a contract and matched. So it would have been pointless. Yes, it would hurt the Rangers, but we saw what happened to Montreal when they sent Aho an offer sheet that the Hurricanes would obviously match. They made an enemy, and it but them in the ass down the line.

There are also very few teams who have the cap space to pay him that and aren't also budget teams.

Earlier in the off season, I wonder if any teams approached him. The Rangers clearly had the Kakko extension as their comparable because they boxed themselves into a spot where this contract was the most they could offer.


How would that be pointless? If you make another team pay more for a player than they want to, that is a W. It means less money for other players on their team.

This is a salary cap website. How could you possibly say paying less money is pointless?
Aug. 23, 2023 at 8:30 p.m.
#31
couldnt afford 2nd t
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 431
Quoting: worldwidesensei
How would that be pointless? If you make another team pay more for a player than they want to, that is a W. It means less money for other players on their team.

This is a salary cap website. How could you possibly say paying less money is pointless?


It's pointless because teams send offer sheets to get players and they know the Rangers are going to match.

Go tell Montreal how well strategically trying to hurt another team via an offer sheet they knew would probably be matched worked out...it isn't as if there aren't consequences.
Aug. 23, 2023 at 9:03 p.m.
#32
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 772
Quoting: budgeteam
It's pointless because teams send offer sheets to get players and they know the Rangers are going to match.

Go tell Montreal how well strategically trying to hurt another team via an offer sheet they knew would probably be matched worked out...it isn't as if there aren't consequences.


Montreal told me going to the Stanley Cup that year was pretty cool.
HockeyScotty liked this.
Aug. 23, 2023 at 9:41 p.m.
#33
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 3,840
Likes: 2,515
Quoting: jpsnow13
Then logically he would have signed a one year deal and gained from the big cap increase in 2024 IMO.


would haved made sense, but maybe the rangers never offered a 1 year deal too.
Aug. 23, 2023 at 10:37 p.m.
#34
Canes hockey.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 272
Likes: 346
I still see Laf being a top 6 physical guy, like Slaf one day.....but I only see that in the right system/team. Rangers just can't develop forwards correctly for some reason. Great contract otherwise, I think he can still break out and is still only 21.
HockeyScotty liked this.
Aug. 24, 2023 at 12:17 a.m.
#35
ButIActLikeIDid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 71
Likes: 37
That line played as a third line and were best in it. No special teams, third line minutes and solid third line points. Laffy will absolutely break out sooner or later.
HockeyScotty liked this.
Aug. 24, 2023 at 12:22 a.m.
#36
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,821
Likes: 624
This is a great signing, especially if Laffy can finally break out like he was projected to do for a while.
Aug. 24, 2023 at 2:09 a.m.
#37
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,583
Likes: 18,488
1st overall picks first contracts in todays dollars (by % of cap)

Ovechkin $15,831,600 x 13 years (18.96%)
Crosby $14,445,500 x 5 years (17.3%)
McDavid $13,919,450 x 8 years (16.67%)
Kovalchuk $13,702,350 x 5 years (16.41%)
Matthews $12,224,400 x 5 years (14.64%)
Nash x 5 years $11,564,750 (13.85%)
Stamkos $9,736,100 x 5 years (11.66%)
Kane $9,260,150 x 5 years (11.09%)
Ekblad $8,575,450 x 8 years (10.27%)
Hall $8,350,000 x 7 years (10%)
Hughes $8,199,700 x 8 years (9.82%)
Nugent-Hopkins $7,790,550 x 7 years (9.33%)
Hischier $7,431,500 x 7 years (8.9%)
MacKinnon $7,206,050 x 7 years (8.63%)
Tavares $7,139,250 x 6 years (8.55%)
Dahlin $6,145,600 x 3 years (7.36%)
Johnson $3,657,300 x 2 years (4.38%)
Yakupov $3,022,700 x 2 years (3.62%)
Fleury $2,454,900 x 2 years (2.94%)
Lafreniere $2,350,000 x 2 years (2.78%)
Aug. 24, 2023 at 12:16 p.m.
#38
Evans truther
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,507
Likes: 1,434
Quoting: LaffsFan
The hawks shoulda done it smh

And give a top 5 pick?
Aug. 24, 2023 at 2:11 p.m.
#39
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 5,017
Likes: 3,527
Quoting: CD282
Decent deal. I wonder where he would go in a redraft?


Definitely outside the top 5.

I would take Stutzle, Mercer, Jarvis, Raymond, and Sanderson ahead of him.
Aug. 24, 2023 at 2:30 p.m.
#40
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,097
Likes: 7,773
Quoting: Brian2016
Definitely outside the top 5.

I would take Stutzle, Mercer, Jarvis, Raymond, and Sanderson ahead of him.

Man, Ottawa really hit a grand slam with that draft, huh? And they fired their scouting director this summer, so he's available.

cool
Brian2016 liked this.
Aug. 24, 2023 at 2:37 p.m.
#41
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 705
Quoting: worldwidesensei
The player has to sign with another team. Why would Laf do that?

He obviously did not do that.

But we don't know if he was offered a contract by another team. He may have very well turned down several offers.


Money. Who knows if he's gonna get over 4M on his next contract? It's possible he doesn't.
Aug. 24, 2023 at 2:55 p.m.
#42
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 92
Likes: 45
I'm surprised he signed for that low. I think he's worth at least another million
Aug. 24, 2023 at 4:22 p.m.
#43
Big Dawg JT
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 455
Quoting: ColonelX
And give a top 5 pick?


pay 4,290,125 and all it takes is a second
ColonelX liked this.
Aug. 28, 2023 at 9:14 p.m.
#44
Why Green
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 4,443
Likes: 1,549
Great contract for the Rangers imo.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit