SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What would these guys cost and are they available

Created by: BCAPP
Team: 2023-24 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 29, 2024
Published: Feb. 29, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Just looking at some good two-way/defensive physical d with term on non playoff teams.

Are any of them available and what would they cost
Trades
1.
2.
3.
4.
NYI
    Haha okay this one is just a dream. But when they resign Dobson maybe they don't have space? Lol. I know it's not happening.
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the NYI
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the OTT
    2025
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    2026
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    26$83,500,000$100,456,450$0$0-$16,956,450
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $925,000$925,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,640,250$11,640,250
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $10,903,000$10,903,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    LW, RW
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,000,000$11,000,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $6,962,366$6,962,366
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $796,667$796,667
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    C, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,100,000$2,100,000
    RW, C, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $800,000$800,000
    C, LW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,400,000$2,400,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $775,000$775,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $7,500,000$7,500,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Seattle Kraken
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $766,667$766,667
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,400,000$1,400,000
    RD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $3,550,000$3,550,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $775,000$775,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $875,000$875,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $800,000$800,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Islanders
    $6,150,000$6,150,000
    RD
    NTC
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,625,000$5,625,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $775,000$775,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $2,450,000$2,450,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $4,687,500$4,687,500
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,350,000$1,350,000
    RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $4,400,000$4,400,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $4,150,000$4,150,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $762,500$762,500
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,100,000$1,100,000
    RD
    RFA - 2

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Feb. 29 at 9:41 p.m.
    #1
    Nightowl26
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 1,524
    Likes: 451
    Toronto and Isles don't match up.
    FoxYou727 liked this.
    Feb. 29 at 9:42 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 934
    Likes: 534
    A top pairing RD for 7 years

    One of Minten and Cowan definitely. I know Knies is untouchable but he'd be nice
    A 1st and 2nd too
    I would ask about Liligren and Timmins but neither have played a full 82 games so idk what there true value is
    BCAPP liked this.
    Feb. 29 at 9:49 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2020
    Posts: 5,347
    Likes: 3,385
    Middleton would cost a 1st or a 2nd+good prospect
    SimonVenell liked this.
    Feb. 29 at 9:56 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2022
    Posts: 769
    Likes: 480
    I created an ACGM of my own earlier today where I explained my thoughts on whether Larsson is available and what a reasonable hypothetical trade package might look like. I'll just post the link here if you want to go check it out.

    https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4932594
    KrakBirds23 liked this.
    Feb. 29 at 10:07 p.m.
    #5
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 59,577
    Likes: 22,701
    Pulock will be 30 in October and is extended for six full seasons. No thanks from the Leafs.
    Feb. 29 at 10:34 p.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 9,382
    Likes: 3,695
    Quoting: Caerii
    Middleton would cost a 1st or a 2nd+good prospect


    That much eh? He's the only guy on the list under 20 minutes a night.
    Feb. 29 at 10:36 p.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 9,382
    Likes: 3,695
    Quoting: KrakenTheCode
    I created an ACGM of my own earlier today where I explained my thoughts on whether Larsson is available and what a reasonable hypothetical trade package might look like. I'll just post the link here if you want to go check it out.

    https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4932594


    Thanks for the link! I was hoping for about one piece less. Like the first niemela and third without Robertson. But I see your point. Cheers
    KrakBirds23 liked this.
    Feb. 29 at 10:36 p.m.
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 9,382
    Likes: 3,695
    Quoting: Nightowl26
    Toronto and Isles don't match up.


    Quoting: FoxYou727
    A top pairing RD for 7 years

    One of Minten and Cowan definitely. I know Knies is untouchable but he'd be nice
    A 1st and 2nd too
    I would ask about Liligren and Timmins but neither have played a full 82 games so idk what there true value is


    The pulock one was mostly a pie in the sky dream lol
    FoxYou727 liked this.
    Mar. 1 at 12:39 a.m.
    #9
    Minnesota Wild
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2016
    Posts: 990
    Likes: 334
    Quoting: BCAPP
    That much eh? He's the only guy on the list under 20 minutes a night.


    First, he's at 19:57 with zero PP time so it's not like we're talking about someone getting 16 minutes. Second, he has another year left on a cheap contact when we still have one more year of cap hell left. We have no need to trade him so it will likely take somewhat of an overpayment to get him. To replace him in the lineup will likely cost us more so we would need a decent incentive to make our already complicated cap situation even worse.
    Mar. 1 at 2:27 a.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2020
    Posts: 5,347
    Likes: 3,385
    Quoting: futurehofer
    First, he's at 19:57 with zero PP time so it's not like we're talking about someone getting 16 minutes. Second, he has another year left on a cheap contact when we still have one more year of cap hell left. We have no need to trade him so it will likely take somewhat of an overpayment to get him. To replace him in the lineup will likely cost us more so we would need a decent incentive to make our already complicated cap situation even worse.


    He also balances the top four very well, playing well with Faber so Brodin can anchor his own pairing. And he brings size and physicality on the back end, which is something we don't have much of. Overall solid, if unspectacular, top 4 guy signed cheap for one more year with very little reason to move him.
    futurehofer and BCAPP liked this.
    Mar. 1 at 5:50 a.m.
    #11
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 9,382
    Likes: 3,695
    Quoting: futurehofer
    First, he's at 19:57 with zero PP time so it's not like we're talking about someone getting 16 minutes. Second, he has another year left on a cheap contact when we still have one more year of cap hell left. We have no need to trade him so it will likely take somewhat of an overpayment to get him. To replace him in the lineup will likely cost us more so we would need a decent incentive to make our already complicated cap situation even worse.


    Ahh your cap hell. I forgot there was another year of it.
    Mar. 1 at 8:16 a.m.
    #12
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2022
    Posts: 8,554
    Likes: 10,402
    Murphy is likely not available.
    Mar. 1 at 8:35 a.m.
    #13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 116
    Likes: 55
    I doubt Toronto would want to pay Seattle's asking price for their top pairing defenseman
    BCAPP and DealFinder67 liked this.
    Mar. 1 at 9:27 a.m.
    #14
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 9,382
    Likes: 3,695
    Quoting: Hawksguy81
    Murphy is likely not available.


    Interesting. Why not? For the record I wanted him more than McCabe last year, but am happy enough with McCabe.

    I'm surprised you say he's not available though. Seems like they'd appreciate assets as they are clearly rebuilding.
    Mar. 1 at 9:41 a.m.
    #15
    We Need D!!
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2023
    Posts: 1,241
    Likes: 354
    Borgen is my #1 target at 2.7M and another year on his deal. These other guys aside from Middlestadt will cost more than Tre wants to spend. I’d say Lily, Robertson and a 3rd and maybe another pick for Borgen
    Mar. 1 at 9:43 a.m.
    #16
    We Need D!!
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2023
    Posts: 1,241
    Likes: 354
    Quoting: jaysinhorror
    I doubt Toronto would want to pay Seattle's asking price for their top pairing defenseman


    Don’t know that until you try. Toronto fans would be willing to give a fair bit for Larsson. 😂
    Mar. 1 at 11:10 a.m.
    #17
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2022
    Posts: 8,554
    Likes: 10,402
    Quoting: BCAPP
    Interesting. Why not? For the record I wanted him more than McCabe last year, but am happy enough with McCabe.

    I'm surprised you say he's not available though. Seems like they'd appreciate assets as they are clearly rebuilding.


    The fire sale in Chicago is over. With the recent extensions given to Dickinson, Foligno and Mrazak, the Hawks are apparently looking to establish some continuity in the roster for the next two seasons with their veteran leadership group. Of which Murphy is a key guy. Hawks have accumulated a TON of prospects and draft capital already. Next season they need to start winning some games.

    McCabe was expendable last year because of the depth the Hawks had at LD in their system. They had multiple ready-to-go replacements. The Hawks don't have that same depth at RD. If they trade Murphy, it leaves a hole they can't fill internally.

    Add to that Murphy bought a new home in Chicago last summer, and he and his wife (who is from Chicago) just announced they are expecting their first child later this year.
    BCAPP liked this.
    Mar. 2 at 3:26 p.m.
    #18
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 9,382
    Likes: 3,695
    Quoting: Hawksguy81
    The fire sale in Chicago is over. With the recent extensions given to Dickinson, Foligno and Mrazak, the Hawks are apparently looking to establish some continuity in the roster for the next two seasons with their veteran leadership group. Of which Murphy is a key guy. Hawks have accumulated a TON of prospects and draft capital already. Next season they need to start winning some games.

    McCabe was expendable last year because of the depth the Hawks had at LD in their system. They had multiple ready-to-go replacements. The Hawks don't have that same depth at RD. If they trade Murphy, it leaves a hole they can't fill internally.

    Add to that Murphy bought a new home in Chicago last summer, and he and his wife (who is from Chicago) just announced they are expecting their first child later this year.


    Makes sense. Thanks for explaining.
    Hawksguy81 liked this.
    Mar. 2 at 3:29 p.m.
    #19
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 9,382
    Likes: 3,695
    Quoting: DealFinder67
    Borgen is my #1 target at 2.7M and another year on his deal. These other guys aside from Middlestadt will cost more than Tre wants to spend. I’d say Lily, Robertson and a 3rd and maybe another pick for Borgen


    Borgen is a third pairing defenseman. He's good at what h does and I'd be happy to have him but he's never played top 4 minutes and is in his late 20s. If someone thinks he can take that next step I suppose we could gamble.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll