SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

BrotherRand

Created by: Super_Randy
Team: 2024-25 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 30, 2024
Published: Apr. 5, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$825,000
2$950,000
3$810,000
3$800,000
2$800,000
3$855,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$810,000
3$1,200,000
2$925,000
2$925,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$5,500,000
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (LAK)
  2. 2026 4th round pick (OTT)
CHI
  1. Dvorak, Christian
Additional Details:
Draft 2024
2.
MTL
  1. Byfield, Quinton [RFA Rights]
LAK
  1. Beck, Owen
  2. Matheson, Michael ($2,437,500 retained)
  3. 2024 1st round pick (WPG)
  4. 2024 3rd round pick (MIN)
Additional Details:
Draft 2024
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the WSH
2025
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2026
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,500,000$66,980,972$1,022,500$3,920,000$20,519,028
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,875,000$7,875,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
LW, C
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,362,500$3,362,500
C, RW
RFA - 2
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
UFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$835,000$835,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,900,000$2,900,000
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$420,000$420K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,150,000$3,150,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$890,000$890,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LD/RD
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$875,000$875,000
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$812,500$812,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$766,667$766,667
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$800,000$800,000
C
RFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 5 at 3:15 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,200
Likes: 9,420
Highly unlikely you get positive value for Dvorak, let alone a 2nd + another pick

LA definitely isn’t moving Byfield
Hawksguy81, ChiHawk and OldNYIfan liked this.
Apr. 5 at 4:27 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 1,531
Likes: 3,180
This is probably the worst proposal involving Dvorak that I've seen. You are delusional if you think Montreal is getting positive value for him. If you want him off your roster so bad, it costs to dump him. Chicago isn't doing Montreal any favors by buying their trash.
Hawksguy81, ChiHawk and OldNYIfan liked this.
Apr. 5 at 4:47 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 102
Likes: 41
LA isn't moving Byfield. They will extend him at a 2 or 3 year bridge deal or sign him already long term after that season. But you can be sure that the bridge deal isn't going to worth only 925.000 AAV, this is pretty much what he is earning right now with his ELC. Why would he agree to earn that for two more seasons at a team that is arguably not going to clinch a playoff spot in the next few years. He can easily ask for over 3,5 Mil AAV at a bridge deal or over 7 Mil AAV when signing long term with the Kings...
I also don't see Toffoli going back to the Habs, he is in his best years and can go to any contending team, maybe even back to the Kings, if the Kings don't sign Arvidsson after the season
ChiHawk and OldNYIfan liked this.
Apr. 5 at 5:07 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,569
Likes: 19,699
Edited Apr. 5 at 5:16 a.m.
Toffoli was traded from both Calgary and New Jersey because he wants a long term deal. Calgary wasn't willing to commit to any more long term deals on 30+ players due to the teams uncertainty, and New Jersey will be short on cap space in the coming years. You aren't getting him to sign for 2 years only and with some of Montreal's other contract commitments I don't suggest they offer him the term he wants.

If he doesn't stay in Winnipeg I think he will end up in Chicago

Also that's not remotely close to getting you Byfield
OldNYIfan liked this.
Apr. 5 at 6:19 a.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 2,375
Quoting: JK74
This is probably the worst proposal involving Dvorak that I've seen. You are delusional if you think Montreal is getting positive value for him. If you want him off your roster so bad, it costs to dump him. Chicago isn't doing Montreal any favors by buying their trash.


This is the same narrow minded thinking I heard with Joel Armia, over last Summer, who now has a better goals per game pace on everyone with the Hawks, not named Bedard (16 goals in 59 games) Armia buyout was under 1m even IF he didnt have this bounce back season. The Habs dumped Petry, Hoffman, Pitlick and Edmundson for positive value last Summer. Hughes is very good at this thing called GM'ing. He can definitely get value for a faceoff center with penlaty killing prowess. The only one dreaming is YOU, thinking he cant do it with Dvorak on a site that is hypothetical, no less.
Now the Habs can sell him at the 2025 TDL for positive value as he has intangibles teams covet..penalty killing, size, playoff pedigree.

All this could be true of Dvorak at little risk with a year term but I realize 95% of players not on the Hawks are cap dumps yet Dickinson, Tyler Johnson and Beauvilier, somehow, were picked up with the same thinking. You arent on the Hawks management team and they have a history and need for salary. Stay mad.
Apr. 5 at 6:42 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 1,531
Likes: 3,180
Quoting: Andy_Dick
This is the same narrow minded thinking I heard with Joel Armia, over last Summer, who now has a better goals per game pace on everyone with the Hawks, not named Bedard (16 goals in 59 games) Armia buyout was under 1m even IF he didnt have this bounce back season. The Habs dumped Petry, Hoffman, Pitlick and Edmundson for positive value last Summer. Hughes is very good at this thing called GM'ing. He can definitely get value for a faceoff center with penlaty killing prowess. The only one dreaming is YOU, thinking he cant do it with Dvorak on a site that is hypothetical, no less.
Now the Habs can sell him at the 2025 TDL for positive value as he has intangibles teams covet..penalty killing, size, playoff pedigree.

All this could be true of Dvorak at little risk with a year term but I realize 95% of players not on the Hawks are cap dumps yet Dickinson, Tyler Johnson and Beauvilier, somehow, were picked up with the same thinking. You arent on the Hawks management team and they have a history and need for salary. Stay mad.


Where do I start with this nonsense? How about finding a different team then? Montreal fans are delusional when it comes to finding trade partners. Chicago fans have said TIME AND TIME AGAIN Chicago isn't interested in him and if they were, they could find someone via free agency. That's not just me who thinks this but other fans who closely follow this team and can make educated assessments regarding moves this front office may or may not make. Wasting draft picks on Christian freaking Dvorak isn't a move Kyle Davidson makes. You can act as salty as you want for someone pointing out the obvious to you or you can accept that you're wrong and move along. Your choice.
Apr. 5 at 7:38 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 5,669
Likes: 5,843
Got those picks going the wrong way in the Dvorak trade. And FWIW armia is still a cap dump. A decent 50 games doesn't negate the 150 games of terrible play.
JK74, Hawksguy81, ChiHawk and 1 other person liked this.
Apr. 5 at 9:04 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,902
Likes: 10,697
Edited Apr. 5 at 10:00 a.m.
Quoting: Andy_Dick
This is the same narrow minded thinking I heard with Joel Armia, over last Summer, who now has a better goals per game pace on everyone with the Hawks, not named Bedard (16 goals in 59 games) Armia buyout was under 1m even IF he didnt have this bounce back season. The Habs dumped Petry, Hoffman, Pitlick and Edmundson for positive value last Summer. Hughes is very good at this thing called GM'ing. He can definitely get value for a faceoff center with penlaty killing prowess. The only one dreaming is YOU, thinking he cant do it with Dvorak on a site that is hypothetical, no less.
Now the Habs can sell him at the 2025 TDL for positive value as he has intangibles teams covet..penalty killing, size, playoff pedigree.

All this could be true of Dvorak at little risk with a year term but I realize 95% of players not on the Hawks are cap dumps yet Dickinson, Tyler Johnson and Beauvilier, somehow, were picked up with the same thinking. You arent on the Hawks management team and they have a history and need for salary. Stay mad.


Dude... This narrative you are trying to push is nonsense. Acquiring Beauvillier was because they had a mountain of injuries and desperately needed an NHL body, otherwise they wouldn't have even considered him. They were paid to take both Johnson and Dickinson. Dickinson has turned out to be an absolute 2-way gem, that Armia and Dvorak ain't got $hit on. The Hawks are bad by design. They want growth to come from within. Stop trying to pawn off your cap dumps as valuable. No one is paying a 2nd for Dvorak. Much like Monahan was with Calgary, they are cap dumps, whatever happens after that is just a bonus for the receiving team, again, like MTL did with Monahan.
Hawksguy81, JK74, ChiHawk and 2 others liked this.
Apr. 5 at 9:29 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 1,635
#1 Byfield isn’t going anywhere

#2 that’s a garbage offer. Absolutely horrible
OldNYIfan liked this.
Apr. 5 at 10:02 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,081
Likes: 9,404
Quoting: Andy_Dick
This is the same narrow minded thinking I heard with Joel Armia, over last Summer, who now has a better goals per game pace on everyone with the Hawks, not named Bedard (16 goals in 59 games) Armia buyout was under 1m even IF he didnt have this bounce back season. The Habs dumped Petry, Hoffman, Pitlick and Edmundson for positive value last Summer. Hughes is very good at this thing called GM'ing. He can definitely get value for a faceoff center with penlaty killing prowess. The only one dreaming is YOU, thinking he cant do it with Dvorak on a site that is hypothetical, no less.
Now the Habs can sell him at the 2025 TDL for positive value as he has intangibles teams covet..penalty killing, size, playoff pedigree.

All this could be true of Dvorak at little risk with a year term but I realize 95% of players not on the Hawks are cap dumps yet Dickinson, Tyler Johnson and Beauvilier, somehow, were picked up with the same thinking. You arent on the Hawks management team and they have a history and need for salary. Stay mad.


laugh
JK74, OldNYIfan and Garak liked this.
Apr. 5 at 10:34 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 1,490
Quoting: Andy_Dick
This is the same narrow minded thinking I heard with Joel Armia, over last Summer, who now has a better goals per game pace on everyone with the Hawks, not named Bedard (16 goals in 59 games) Armia buyout was under 1m even IF he didnt have this bounce back season. The Habs dumped Petry, Hoffman, Pitlick and Edmundson for positive value last Summer. Hughes is very good at this thing called GM'ing. He can definitely get value for a faceoff center with penlaty killing prowess. The only one dreaming is YOU, thinking he cant do it with Dvorak on a site that is hypothetical, no less.
Now the Habs can sell him at the 2025 TDL for positive value as he has intangibles teams covet..penalty killing, size, playoff pedigree.

All this could be true of Dvorak at little risk with a year term but I realize 95% of players not on the Hawks are cap dumps yet Dickinson, Tyler Johnson and Beauvilier, somehow, were picked up with the same thinking. You arent on the Hawks management team and they have a history and need for salary. Stay mad.


Here is the thing, Dvorak MAY have positive value, but it is not to the Hawks. They aren't spending assets on a player like him. Look at playoff competing teams and retain 50% and you can get that positive value you are seeking. But to a rebuilding team like the Hawks, Dvorak does not have positive value.
OldNYIfan and Garak liked this.
Apr. 5 at 11:04 a.m.
#12
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,570
Likes: 25,425
You could replace the Winnipeg first with your own and Los Angeles would still say Go Away.
Garak and Robinho3799 liked this.
Apr. 7 at 9:44 a.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 2,375
Quoting: JK74
Where do I start with this nonsense? How about finding a different team then? Montreal fans are delusional when it comes to finding trade partners. Chicago fans have said TIME AND TIME AGAIN Chicago isn't interested in him and if they were, they could find someone via free agency. That's not just me who thinks this but other fans who closely follow this team and can make educated assessments regarding moves this front office may or may not make. Wasting draft picks on Christian freaking Dvorak isn't a move Kyle Davidson makes. You can act as salty as you want for someone pointing out the obvious to you or you can accept that you're wrong and move along. Your choice.


You Hawks fans think everyone is a cap dump yet management clearly disagrees by trading for actual NHL’rs.. yes… NHL’rs… actually have value when they are proven. I know it’s crazy to think everyone is NOT a cap dump.

I’ll give you an example when comparing to Dvorak. Logan Couture is 8 years older than Dvorak and makes twice the money while is signed 2 more years yet I’d never call him a cap dump like you Hawks fans because you have to meet the floor anyways and why I know the Sharks would never let Couture go for nothing. Think of the other side when accessing a deal not just Chicago.
Chicago doesn’t have this endless leverage over every team. They are 30 other teams. The Habs have over 20 million in cap space with everyone signed next season, they have no reason to dump Dvorak much like the Sharks with Couture.

Logan Couture… I’ve stated over and over… that I’d pay multiple picks despite the risks with his contract and age. Thats the game. You Hawks fans think you will only pay for any player without any risk. That isn’t how sports works or life in general. Take off the baby padding and get offline. Start thinking about not why the Hawks would take the player but why would the Habs even give away Dvorak much less pay to dump him?!

Had you traded for Armia and NOT yelled all Summer like children…oNlY iF yOu aTtAcH mUlTiPlE 1sTs.. You’d have an asset that teams will pay for at the 2025 TDL or at the very least a competent penalty killer and a mentor for your young players.

But I digress. Continue on with the mad statements and homer nonsense with laughing emojis about how everyone is a cap dump, definitely seems level headed compared to thinking about both sides.

Quoting: klassic
Here is the thing, Dvorak MAY have positive value, but it is not to the Hawks. They aren't spending assets on a player like him. Look at playoff competing teams and retain 50% and you can get that positive value you are seeking. But to a rebuilding team like the Hawks, Dvorak does not have positive value.


Again. Think of the other team. So what that the Hawks dont want him, there are 30 other teams. This site is supposed to promote the simulation of a trade it never has to be with ONLY the Hawks. Screaming Dvorak has negative value then turning around and saying but the Hawks reject and you'd have to pay them to take Dvorak, is narrow minded and simply wrong. This is just tribalism nonsense.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll