DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
boilermaker
Member Since
Jun. 24, 2019
Favourite Team
Chicago Blackhawks
Forum Posts
198
Posts per Day
0.1
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 11:22 p.m.
Thread:
revamp
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JoeMcNeely</b></div><div>Quick note: Chicago's Director of Player Personnel has already said the Blackhawks were prioritizing forwards at the top of the draft so I doubt they are trading up to 14 or staying at 19 to take a defensemen. The team's prospect pool would seem to suggest that as well.</div></div>
Agree Chicago may make that trade to move up but they won't target a D. Might go after a C like Yager or Danielson.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 6:37 p.m.
Thread:
3 way deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>newman23</b></div><div>?
Hawks keep 19OA in this deal. from Chicago perspective its boeser for a 2nd, 11OA for a 2nd and two 3rds, and hawks take on some cap dumps</div></div>
I noticed my error after I posted. Changed my comment to reflect adding another 1st. Still an overpay IMO.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 6:29 p.m.
Thread:
3 way deal
Chicago does not do those deals. They trade away 6 relatively high picks (getting 1 in return) to get another 1st and to obtain 2 cap dumps and Boesser. They all will not be with the Hawks in 3 years when those players not obtained through the traded away picks will be close to being able to contribute.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 1:41 p.m.
Thread:
just an idea
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>newman23</b></div><div>yeah maybe the 3rd is dropped. My thinking was granlund would cost a 2nd to dump, so 28+two 2nds and a 3rd would get you pens 1st.
this would be so tough for davidson to pull off in reality because all 3 trades would likely have to be made on draft day</div></div>
I hope Davidson has assigned someone to read these ACGM pages to give him some trade ideas. LOL.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 1:39 p.m.
Thread:
Trade Ups
Good start. It would be something if KD pulls that off. He could probably throw in a couple of players, depending on the other teams' needs, to sweeten the pot. Now that he has the 5 1st round picks, I'm sure he'll come up with some moves to package a few of them and move higher up into the 1st round.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 1:13 p.m.
Thread:
just an idea
Interesting. Let's assume the Toronto trade goes down and proceed to the Pittsburgh trade. I don't know if the draft pick value chart equates 14 to 28 and a couple of later picks. If it does PIT. is getting Granlund's cap space for free, so I would take back one of those picks going to the Pens. At that point would the Hawks be happy with 1, 14 and 19? Or would KD make another splash by trading 19 +++ for VAN's 11th and Boeser. Having picks 1, 11 and 14 would be something.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 12:31 p.m.
Thread:
ALLCAPS
Chicago declines. They have enough journeyman forwards and won't trade a 3rd pick for another one that has been waived several times in his career.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 1 at 12:06 p.m.
Thread:
Hmmm
All trades terribly one sided favoring Chicago.
Monahan too injury prone and not worth 2 x 2M.
If Chicago somehow acquires Myers I'd keep him on the roster and flip him at the TDL. He could replace Regula or Zaitsev.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 31 at 1:03 p.m.
Thread:
Build Around Bedard
No way Chicago does that ARI trade. Can't see them trading 2 young players who will become regulars in the lineup and 2 1st round picks in a deep draft. And to a future division rival yet.
I like the Manta trade but it depends how desperate the Caps will be to shed salary.
Unless there is someone the Hawks really, really likes at 31 or 32, I'd keep the two 2nd's.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 31 at 12:56 p.m.
Thread:
next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>Although, I understand where you are coming from, I disagree. Coghlan is a Right Shot Defensman, a position of which CHI has very little depth at. I would absolutely buyout Zaitsev and trade Mitchell to throw Cogz into the lineup and see what happens. He has shown flashes of great play and is at a ripe age for a breakout season. He is also a pretty good skater which is something CHI covets. At the price of Blackwell, I think both him and JP would be great candidates for low trade cost, low cap hit, low risk, possible high reward, acquistions.</div></div>
I didn't know Coghlan was a RD. It may be worth it taking a flyer on him, and move on from Zaitsev and Mitchell.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 31 at 11:51 a.m.
Thread:
next year
Hawks decline. They don't need another young D clogging up the pipeline and don't have a helmet to fit Poolparty.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 31 at 11:49 a.m.
Thread:
Utilizing Cap Space
Huge overpays for O'Reilly and Killorn. And with their Stanley Cup pedigrees, they would likely want to sign with contenders.
Nothing against you Patches, but personally I'm tired of seeing that Murray to Chicago trade for an exchange of picks. It's about right in value going back and forth but without Dubas GMing at Toronto, I can see them seeking other ways to rid themselves of Murray.
Since Dubas looks like he's headed to PIT and with his trading history with Davidson, that PIT trade may go down.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 30 at 1:53 p.m.
Thread:
Leveraging Cap Space
Something to remember regarding these draft pick trades is that other teams, DET with #17 and 3 2nds, and STL with 2 late 1sts also have the draft pick capital to move up. So a VAN or PIT may be in the position to take the best of 3 offers for 11or 14. Acquiring either pick may require an overpay.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 29 at 12:02 p.m.
Thread:
Sabres
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rktkt66</b></div><div>Murphy has been on my wish list for awhile because of how good a fit he seems with what the Sabres have/need but that package for him is far steeper than it should be. I know most fans are dismissing Olofsson as this worthless player that will be a cap dump out of desperation but he's a three-time 20+ goal scorer - those don't grow on trees, regardless of mediocre defensive play. Even though he had some expected rough stretches as a rookie, UPL's age and potential also don't qualify yet as bust with no value.
If Buffalo were to add Murphy, he just seems like a tailor-made partner for Power - just like Samuelsson's more physical, defensive-oriented style allows Dahlin more freedom to freewheel offensively, Murphy would provide a similar safety net so Power can advance his offensive contributions more than he was able to last season. Murphy's also a more physical player who would compensate for Power not being that.
In the end, I just don't think the Hawks - despite the publicized scorched earth path they've been on - will deal Murphy; they seem to like him and Jones to be part of their veteran leadership to all of the kids they'll bring in.</div></div>
I've been up on the trade Murphy bandwagon for quite a while. But I agree and think Chicago values his leadership and mentoring capabilities and won't trade him. I even think Murphy would be a leading candidate to have 18 year old Bedard live with him this season.
But getting back to the trade, if we're wrong about the Murphy and Chicago love affair, maybe Buffalo can keep Luukkonen and just trade Olofsson and the picks. Oloffson is likely to have a decent 20-25 goal season, and if he shows no interest in extending with the Hawks, could be flipped at the TDL to garner more assets.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 28 at 10:42 a.m.
Thread:
Tryna be realistic so bare with me
Chicago definitely does not make that trade. They don't need Foegele or Yamamoto and Raddysh is a good, cheap, up and coming forward that may be part of the Hawks long term (I hope anyway). So Chicago is potentially trading away the best player in the deal, and EDM is gaining a few million in cap space for the cost of a 3rd pound pick.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 28 at 10:29 a.m.
Thread:
Still cant believe this happened
Chicago fan here. if you go back and change the past you affect the future. If Bowman didn't make that trade and stayed, at the time, on his one year rebuild program, he most likely wouldn't have burned down the roster by trading away Debrincat and Dach last summer, and instead would be rebuilding the team around them, Boqvist and Sillinger. Of course this ignores the fact that Bowman lost his job due to the Beach scandal. Maybe his successor Davidson would have kept the existing rebuild intact and wouldn't have made those drastic moves last summer. Long story short they wouldn't have finished 3rd from the bottom in the standings last season and wouldn't have won the 1st overall pick and the grand prize in Bedard.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 28 at 10:06 a.m.
Thread:
Coming back next year stronger
I know Davidson says he doesn't want to sign a free agent to a long term deal, but whats his definition of a long term deal, 5,6,7 seasons? He can offer Domi 4 x 4.5M. Even considering Texas' lack of a state income tax, Max would still be money ahead by signing with Chicago. Plus he has the chance to pay with Bedard and under Coach Richardson who he likes a lot.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 28 at 9:47 a.m.
Thread:
Much needed Marner deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>vols94</b></div><div>Mrazek could stay healthy. Murray is just a LTIR slot waiting to happen. Chicago knows they got ripped off last year they are not taking a larger contract 2 yrs in a row.</div></div>
Chicago has tons of cap space, need to acquire some cap dumps and has deep pockets. They would take Murray if a 2023 1st round pick is offered as a sweetener. Like you said they can LTIR and pay him not to play (I assume the contract is insured anyway) or buy him out. In fact Toronto could do the same and not trade away the Boston pick.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 27 at 6:37 p.m.
Thread:
KAndre Miller Ofersheet
Everything I read says the Canes need more offense. Instead of offer sheeting Miller, offer sheet Cole Caufield for something in the $10,000,000 range. Carolina has the cap space and picks to do so. That would be entertaining given the past history between Carolina and Montreal.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
May 27 at 1:00 p.m.
Thread:
Rebuild
Well, I am all for acquiring some cap dumps that bring along some picks, but most of these are one sided in favor of Chicago.
Looking at your line up for next season, Bedard is missing. Also, your defense is loaded with veterans. It's time for some of the young D like Vlasic, Phillips, and Kaiser to play regularly, show what they got, and to determine if they'll be in the mix long term.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 27 at 10:29 a.m.
Thread:
Much needed Marner deal
That Toronto/Chicago trade involving Murray and the Boston 1st to the Hawks in return for a 2nd round pick is popular here on ACGM. I realize it's based on and similar to last year's TOR/CHI trade involving Mrazek. If Dubas was still around as the Leafs GM I could see him working with Chicago's GM Davidson again on that type of trade. With Dubas out of the picture, I think there's little chance of it happening. Although, I would like to see he Hawks get another 1st round pick somehow.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 27 at 10:18 a.m.
Thread:
Matthews
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>More importantly, where is Bedard in all of this?</div></div>
And with all those expensive long term contracts, where is the cap space to pay Bedard, Nazar and Korchinski after their ELC's are up in a few years.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 27 at 10:12 a.m.
Thread:
next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Hawks decline. They don't need retention on Myers, and they definitely aren't trading anything to get him.</div></div>
The only way I see the Hawks acquiring Myers is if they trade Murphy. Myers would take his place at RD for a season. Ideally, get a decent pick and/or prospect for Murphy and also an adder from the Canucks to take on Myers' cap hit.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
May 6 at 12:30 p.m.
Thread:
why not 11-7
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JK74</b></div><div>Seth Jones
Connor Murphy
Nikita Zaitsev
Ian Mitchell
Caleb Jones (plays both sides)
And Alex Regula is knocking on the door for a roster spot. There's no room on the right side unless someone goes. If Murphy gets traded then there's a possibility that the Hawks consider exploring a trade for Myers but for only a 6th there might be better options or better dump returns.</div></div>
I'm not a fan of this Myers trade either, but the Hawks depth at RD isn't that great. Jones is going to be here, Zaitsev could be buried in the minors, Mitchell may not be qualified, and Regula won't be a regular, maybe an injury call up at best. As for Murphy, he's got the most trade value. Personally I would like to see him moved at the draft so Davidson can get another high pick. If Murphy is moved then Davidson can take on a RD cap dump (Tyler Meyers/Tyson Barrie type) and pick up another pick along with the player.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 28 at 9:33 a.m.
Thread:
Youre Welcome
Nicely done. And it took a Chicago fan to ask for it. LOL.
1
2
Next
Page 1