SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

PHI amp OTT Trades

Created by: gdg_9
Team: 2019-20 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: May 22, 2019
Published: May 22, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
PHI & OTT both have tons of cap space to take on some salary for assets.
Both teams give up players who are 1 yr away from UFA.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,250,000
2$2,500,000
5$9,616,000
Trades
1.
PHI
  1. Bracco, Jeremy
  2. Zaitsev, Nikita
  3. 2019 4th round pick (STL)
2.
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the DAL
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,000,000$76,045,699$0$0$6,954,301
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,634,000$11,634,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$9,616,000$9,616,000
RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,345,000$2,345,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$900,000$900,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 22, 2019 at 3:14 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 2,268
Likes: 989
Philly says no
fly_iggles_fly liked this.
May 22, 2019 at 3:15 p.m.
#2
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,368
Likes: 5,688
Quoting: DH28Hockey
Philly says no


They'd be stupid to say no to that offer
GMTD liked this.
May 22, 2019 at 3:17 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 5,765
Likes: 6,091
Quoting: DH28Hockey
Philly says no


Philly also has a ton of RFAs who need raises. That cap space is gonna disappear real quick
Pmwalker liked this.
May 22, 2019 at 3:17 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,193
Likes: 1,621
OTT passes, DeMelo cost kapanen
csick liked this.
May 22, 2019 at 3:18 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 2,268
Likes: 989
Quoting: Random2152
They'd be stupid to say no to that offer


They'd be extremely stupid to take that offer. Zaitsevs contract is a joke, it's not worth replacing one of our top 4 defenseman with a worse player on an awful contract to get a 4th and a guy that wouldn't even be a top 3 forward prospect in our system
May 22, 2019 at 3:19 p.m.
#6
Bet On It
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 610
Likes: 230
Ottawa says no, imo. Borgman isn't very exciting and Brown is not an attractive asset whatsoever. DeMelo, on the other hand, plays on their top pairing and is a perfect compliment to Chabot. Going to have to be a better prospect than Borgman to get Ottawa to move from a position of weakness to a position of "strength".
ThatGuy and csick liked this.
May 22, 2019 at 3:19 p.m.
#7
Pmwalker
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 944
Likes: 302
Philly isn’t paying Zatisev for the next 5 years to help the Leafs. We are a season away from removing our own version in MacDonald. Trade proposals should at least consider the other teams situation right?
fly_iggles_fly liked this.
May 22, 2019 at 3:20 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
gdg_9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 193
Likes: 30
Quoting: DH28Hockey
Philly says no


Maybe they do... but Bracco is a legit offensive top prospect, and Zaitsev is a serviceable top 6 RD.
Zaitsev just has too high a cap hit for the Leafs, but Philly doesn't have cap issues.

As a package for a 28 year old who is 1 year away from UFA, I think Philly would think pretty hard about accepting that.
GMTD liked this.
May 22, 2019 at 3:21 p.m.
#9
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,368
Likes: 5,688
Quoting: DH28Hockey
They'd be extremely stupid to take that offer. Zaitsevs contract is a joke, it's not worth replacing one of our top 4 defenseman with a worse player on an awful contract to get a 4th and a guy that wouldn't even be a top 3 forward prospect in our system


Zaitsev's contract is overblown in how bad it is. This playoffs have proven that he is a #4 if he has a good D partner and after the Lindell signing, the only problem with Zaitsev's deal is the term.
tl;dr Zaitsev is A LOT better than this site would lead you to believe.
Gudas is nothing to write home about
Bracco could be a fantastic playmaker at the nhl level
and you get a pick.
GMTD liked this.
May 22, 2019 at 3:22 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 690
Likes: 149
..
May 22, 2019 at 3:26 p.m.
#11
Sports and Tacos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 601
Quoting: Random2152
Zaitsev's contract is overblown in how bad it is. This playoffs have proven that he is a #4 if he has a good D partner and after the Lindell signing, the only problem with Zaitsev's deal is the term.
tl;dr Zaitsev is A LOT better than this site would lead you to believe.
Gudas is nothing to write home about
Bracco could be a fantastic playmaker at the nhl level
and you get a pick.


Then why does every single Leaf AGM on here include a Zaitsev trade? Keeping in mind that the TML right defensive side is extremely thin. He can't be that good
fly_iggles_fly liked this.
May 22, 2019 at 3:29 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
gdg_9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 193
Likes: 30
Quoting: Claebom
Ottawa says no, imo. Borgman isn't very exciting and Brown is not an attractive asset whatsoever. DeMelo, on the other hand, plays on their top pairing and is a perfect compliment to Chabot. Going to have to be a better prospect than Borgman to get Ottawa to move from a position of weakness to a position of "strength".


Is Ottawa, the definition of a rebuilding team, really going to hold onto a guy who is 1 year away from UFA tho?
DeMelo is likely gone by the deadline no matter what.
Brown is the type of "hard working, good Canadian Hockey boy" who "does things the right way" that GM's like to have around during rebuilds. He is definitely an attractive asset on a reasonable contract with RFA rights retained afterwards.

I could see maybe Borgman isn't the right sweetener for the deal to work, but he could easily be replaced by a draft pick or another non-roster prospect not named "Liljegren" or "Sandin"
May 22, 2019 at 3:30 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 101
Likes: 34
Quoting: gdg_9
Maybe they do... but Bracco is a legit offensive top prospect, and Zaitsev is a serviceable top 6 RD.
Zaitsev just has too high a cap hit for the Leafs, but Philly doesn't have cap issues.

As a package for a 28 year old who is 1 year away from UFA, I think Philly would think pretty hard about accepting that.


They better not. It may look like we don't have cap issues right now, but down the line we very well could. There is no way we should be adding a contract like Zaitsev. If we add any dmen, which I think we should, they should bring veteran leadership qualities to the table. Someone like Edler would do nicely. I want zero to do with Zaitsev, and pray to God that Fletcher doesn't either.
May 22, 2019 at 3:31 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 2,268
Likes: 989
Quoting: Random2152
Zaitsev's contract is overblown in how bad it is. This playoffs have proven that he is a #4 if he has a good D partner and after the Lindell signing, the only problem with Zaitsev's deal is the term.
tl;dr Zaitsev is A LOT better than this site would lead you to believe.
Gudas is nothing to write home about
Bracco could be a fantastic playmaker at the nhl level
and you get a pick.


Gudas was one of our top 2, if not best defense man last season, and even if he is a serviceable bottom pairing guy, there's 0 denying that Zaitsev contract is awful (believe me, we are STILL suffering from the Andrew MacDonald contract, we aren't making that mistake again). Philly already had TK, Patrick, Lindblom for a young forward core with Frost, Farabee, Ratcliffe, and Rubstov all knocking on the door of making the big club. This trade just makes 0 sense for the Flyers, it gives them nothing they need to add this offseason, ships away their only solid veteran defenseman and adds in a terrible contract
May 22, 2019 at 3:31 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
gdg_9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 193
Likes: 30
Quoting: ThatGuy
Then why does every single Leaf AGM on here include a Zaitsev trade? Keeping in mind that the TML right defensive side is extremely thin. He can't be that good


Because the Leafs are in a very tight cap crunch, and his contract makes sense for them to try and shed.
It's not a great contract, and will need a sweetener included to get rid of, but for a team with cap space it's definitely manageable.
He's still a very serviceable right handed NHL Dmen.
Random2152 and GMTD liked this.
May 22, 2019 at 3:33 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 101
Likes: 34
Quoting: ThatGuy
Then why does every single Leaf AGM on here include a Zaitsev trade? Keeping in mind that the TML right defensive side is extremely thin. He can't be that good


Leafs fans are saying (hoping) the same things we Flyers fans were all saying about Andrew McDonald 4 years ago. tears of joy
DH28Hockey and ThatGuy liked this.
May 22, 2019 at 3:35 p.m.
#17
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,368
Likes: 5,688
Quoting: ThatGuy
Then why does every single Leaf AGM on here include a Zaitsev trade? Keeping in mind that the TML right defensive side is extremely thin. He can't be that good


Because the Leafs are in a cap crunch and Zaitsev is overpaid. He is a 3-3.5aav Dman getting paid 4.5aav. That isn't space we can afford to spend on him, so we move him.
The biggest problem with his contract is the term (5 years left). He is an NHL calibre RD and he successfully nullified the Bergeron line these playoffs (paired with Muzzin) which is something other teams wish they could say (I'm looking at Carolina here).
GMTD liked this.
May 22, 2019 at 3:39 p.m.
#18
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,368
Likes: 5,688
Quoting: DH28Hockey
there's 0 denying that Zaitsev contract is awful ]


Yes there is lol.
He is a bit overpaid for way too long, but that isn't awful (like the Lucic deal is). He is always the top RD on the russian National team and he successfully shut down the Bergeron line this playoffs. He is a good Dman used in the right situation with the right D partner.
Especially now with the Lindell contract being signed, it is hard to say his contract is awful.
GMTD liked this.
May 22, 2019 at 3:43 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 101
Likes: 34
Quoting: Random2152
Yes there is lol.
He is a bit overpaid for way too long, but that isn't awful (like the Lucic deal is). He is always the top RD on the russian National team and he successfully shut down the Bergeron line this playoffs. He is a good Dman used in the right situation with the right D partner.
Especially now with the Lindell contract being signed, it is hard to say his contract is awful.


Now you're arguing semantics. Bad.. awful... whatever. If Zaitsev was as good as you're trying to sell him as, a team lacking good Dmen like Toronto would be searching for a way to keep him, not trade him.
DH28Hockey and ThatGuy liked this.
May 22, 2019 at 3:45 p.m.
#20
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,368
Likes: 5,688
Quoting: fly_iggles_fly
Now you're arguing semantics. Bad.. awful... whatever. If Zaitsev was as good as you're trying to sell him as, a team lacking good Dmen like Toronto would be searching for a way to keep him, not trade him.


Cap
Crunch
GMTD liked this.
May 22, 2019 at 3:47 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 101
Likes: 34
Quoting: Random2152
Cap
Crunch


Even he wouldn't want to trade for Zaitzev. tears of joy tears of joy tears of joy
May 22, 2019 at 3:49 p.m.
#22
Pmwalker
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 944
Likes: 302
Some of these takes a laughable. If Zatisev was indeed a top 6RD as stated wouldn’t the Leafs just move another contract to accommodate the million or so he’s overpaid? Especially a team in need of right handed defenders. ?. Seems Leafs management doesn’t even think he’s a top 6 guy or they’d just keep him and accommodate the salary. Does make you wonder
May 22, 2019 at 3:52 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 17,149
Likes: 12,176
Ottawa declines. DeMelo is a top 4 guy, and a right hand shot to boot. That is worth way more than a 4th liner and a D prospect who will likely never play a signficant role on the NHL for Ottawa.
ThatGuy liked this.
May 22, 2019 at 3:52 p.m.
#24
Sports and Tacos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 601
Quoting: Random2152
Because the Leafs are in a cap crunch and Zaitsev is overpaid. He is a 3-3.5aav Dman getting paid 4.5aav. That isn't space we can afford to spend on him, so we move him.
The biggest problem with his contract is the term (5 years left). He is an NHL calibre RD and he successfully nullified the Bergeron line these playoffs (paired with Muzzin) which is something other teams wish they could say (I'm looking at Carolina here).


I get that the TML are in a cap crunch...

but Zaitsev is pretty much the only RHD in the organization right now (outside of Liljegren who's still a couple of years out). So you wanting to trade him (with picks and prospects attached) for anything goes to show how bad his contract really is.

There are other ways to get cap relief.. like trading away a forward. Something you have plenty of.
fly_iggles_fly and GMTD liked this.
May 22, 2019 at 4:00 p.m.
#25
Thread Starter
gdg_9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 193
Likes: 30
Edited May 22, 2019 at 4:09 p.m.
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Ottawa declines. DeMelo is a top 4 guy, and a right hand shot to boot. That is worth way more than a 4th liner and a D prospect who will likely never play a signficant role on the NHL for Ottawa.


Brown is not a 4th liner.
4th liners don't score 0.4 ppg over their first three seasons by the age of 25.
He slot that way on the Leafs this year because they had arguably the best FWD depth in the NHL (along with Tampa).
Brown is solidly in the top 9 of 90% of NHL teams, with the ability to play up and down the lineup.

As for Borgman, replace him in the trade if you want with a draft pick or any other non-roster prospect not named Liljegren or Sandin.

DeMelo is a pending UFA on a rebuilding team. He'll be gone one way or another. It's just a matter of where and for what.
Random2152 and GMTD liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll