Forums/NHL Trades

(TOR/PHI) - Menell for future considerations

Who won the trade?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Mar. 23 at 7:50 p.m.
#1
Trade confirmed: Philadelphia Flyers - Toronto Maple Leafs
Trade Details
Philadelphia Flyers Acquire:
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
Brennan Menell · $0$750,000$400,000 (AHL/JR)
Sum: $0$750,000$400,000
Change: $0
Change: +$750,000
Change: +$400,000
Toronto Maple Leafs Acquire:
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Future Considerations
Sum: $0$0$0
Change: $0
Change: -$750,000
Change: -$400,000
Mar. 23 at 7:54 p.m.
#2
Josh
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 387
Likes: 213
God damn... heard Future Considerations was a legend for the Flyers, can't believe they'd just give him up like that.
Mar. 23 at 7:55 p.m.
#3
Dont trade the pick
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 1,143
blockbuster
Mar. 23 at 8:03 p.m.
#4
Josies on vacation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 16,747
Likes: 13,971
FC has officially broken the record for most teams being traded to in a season
capfriendlyaccount, Saskleaf, Zuki9797 and 4 others liked this.
Mar. 23 at 8:04 p.m.
#5
GoJetsGo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 470
I'll bet there's gonna be a lot less "thought teams couldn't trade after the deadline??" comments this year with the Dadonov situation
Zuki9797 and Tntpod liked this.
Mar. 23 at 8:26 p.m.
#6
sensonfire
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 6,548
Likes: 2,302
The Wild are not getting the draft pick from the first trade for Menell.

Also, the future of the Leafs will eventually be considered by the Flyers.

Just not today.


Flyers win.

Leafs and Wild lose.
Zuki9797 and M_Swann liked this.
Mar. 23 at 8:29 p.m.
#7
Lets go Avalance
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,067
Likes: 7,534
Can Menell play of the flyers AHL team this season? If so they win. If not, fair trade.
Mar. 23 at 9:34 p.m.
#8
WentWughes
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 7,191
Likes: 6,093
Quoting: Saskleaf
Can Menell play of the flyers AHL team this season? If so they win. If not, fair trade.


Yeah he can
Saskleaf and Boubou79 liked this.
Mar. 23 at 10:34 p.m.
#9
worst poster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 7,175
Likes: 7,769
oh no he won't be able to play in the nhl anymore!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
OutDoorRinkBoy, Saskleaf, capfriendlyaccount and 1 other person liked this.
Mar. 23 at 10:52 p.m.
#10
Hi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 951
Philli wins.
Mar. 23 at 10:53 p.m.
#11
Hi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 951
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
Yeah he can


Oh K i didn't know that.
Saskleaf liked this.
Mar. 24 at 6:48 a.m.
#12
Lifelong Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 106
Likes: 57
I wonder if this trade was actually made before the deadline, or the GMs were just taking advantage of the Dadanov situation. Leafs win if Future Considerations > Roster Flexibility (Empty Roster Spot). Flyers win if Menell > Future Considerations. Future Considerations has to be something, so the real loser here is the Wild.
Mar. 24 at 5:44 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 6,321
Likes: 1,524
Is future consideration ever a team purposely playing their back up goalie against that team.... could this future consideration ever be used as a "throw a game" for us.

Or beat up the playoff team we're chasing.

Probably not, but that would be great... I love shady business.

In Bobby Clarke era, the answer would be YES.
Mar. 24 at 6:58 p.m.
#14
First NY Then LA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 26,744
Likes: 14,891
Quoting: draft_em_sign_em_trade_em
Is future consideration ever a team purposely playing their back up goalie against that team.... could this future consideration ever be used as a "throw a game" for us.

Or beat up the playoff team we're chasing.

Probably not, but that would be great... I love shady business.

In Bobby Clarke era, the answer would be YES.


You're such a cynic.

And I say that admiringly.
Saskleaf liked this.
Mar. 24 at 10:01 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 227
Likes: 111
Quoting: LeafsForLife
Future Considerations has to be something, so the real loser here is the Wild.


Does future considerations actually have to be something? Is anybody keeping track? Can Dubas call up Fletcher in August and say, “hey Chuck, remember those future considerations from March? I want ‘em now,”, and then Fletcher says, “sorry Kyle, when I said ‘future’ I meant farther in the future, like next year, or maybe the year after?”

Once Carolina traded a player to Florida for future considerations, then the next day Florida traded a different player to Carolina for future considerations. Did one player deserve more consideration than the other, or did Carolina get back their own future considerations? Wouldn’t that be past considerations? How come we don’t see anybody getting traded for past considerations?
Mar. 25 at 4:17 p.m.
#16
Lets go Avalance
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,067
Likes: 7,534
Quoting: draft_em_sign_em_trade_em
Is future consideration ever a team purposely playing their back up goalie against that team.... could this future consideration ever be used as a "throw a game" for us.

Or beat up the playoff team we're chasing.

Probably not, but that would be great... I love shady business.

In Bobby Clarke era, the answer would be YES.


Quoting: OldNYIfan
You're such a cynic.

And I say that admiringly.


Quoting: jr400
Does future considerations actually have to be something? Is anybody keeping track? Can Dubas call up Fletcher in August and say, “hey Chuck, remember those future considerations from March? I want ‘em now,”, and then Fletcher says, “sorry Kyle, when I said ‘future’ I meant farther in the future, like next year, or maybe the year after?”

Once Carolina traded a player to Florida for future considerations, then the next day Florida traded a different player to Carolina for future considerations. Did one player deserve more consideration than the other, or did Carolina get back their own future considerations? Wouldn’t that be past considerations? How come we don’t see anybody getting traded for past considerations?


I'm not sure why you guys keep acting like the elit Future Considerations isn't a real player...

He's the best in the league. Everyone wants him lol.
jr400 liked this.
Mar. 26 at 4:21 p.m.
#17
Lifelong Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 106
Likes: 57
Quoting: jr400
Does future considerations actually have to be something? Is anybody keeping track? Can Dubas call up Fletcher in August and say, “hey Chuck, remember those future considerations from March? I want ‘em now,”, and then Fletcher says, “sorry Kyle, when I said ‘future’ I meant farther in the future, like next year, or maybe the year after?”

Once Carolina traded a player to Florida for future considerations, then the next day Florida traded a different player to Carolina for future considerations. Did one player deserve more consideration than the other, or did Carolina get back their own future considerations? Wouldn’t that be past considerations? How come we don’t see anybody getting traded for past considerations?


I'm not sure, good question. Until I find out, Future Considerations have a chance to be something, and that's more than it guaranteed to be nothing, which is what Minnesota got.
Saskleaf liked this.
Mar. 26 at 4:40 p.m.
#18
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 45,824
Likes: 15,060
Mennell isn't an NHLer (according to the Leafs) and certainly wasn't going to be resigned by the Leafs/Marlies. Just gives a guy to show what he has in another organization.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit