there is absolutely 0 chance Toews gets a return of that, that is not even remotely possible. Avs are trading 2-3 extra pieces here

this is pretty solid, but even though i dont think kane is really worth that much, i think hes still worth more than that. toews is also overvalued but could be a good target to get for the avs

Avs would never consider that. I can only assume that you are vastly underestimating Girard's value.

After Blackhawks owners outburst last year i would say theres a 0% chance they get Bedard. Lottery is rigged, this year it'll be rigged against CHI

i'd say there's pretty much zero chance the Avs include Girard in a trade for Toews.

Trading Colton Dach might be a mistake…

The Isles are not going to be trading assets, they are not a Kane away from the Cup this year.

Toews has value to a contender but you're overestimating the return a little here - especially since he's likely to be picky about where (if anywhere) he will waive.

We need a bot for deadline aav and Bruins forgetting 4.5m in bonus carry over lol. Extra retention is not needed and the initial retention isn't as much as you think. Toews/Kane's cap hit at the tdl will only be 2.4m. That is a massive overpay and Hawks would be lucky to get Ambrosio. A '25 2nd and 3rd prob gets it done. I can see Kaut getting a fresh start away from Bednar.

aav(10.5m) / days in the season(186) x days remaining(42) = 2.375m tdl cap hit.

Am I reading this right? Avs trade Girard, Kaut, Meyers, Ambrosio, and a 3rd for like 20 games of Toews?

Looking at the season Stalock has had behind an awful team, I wouldnt put it past him getting dealt at the deadline, and regardless, he's signing for more than 900k next year.

Isles don't make this deal at all. Kane will not help us win the cup. Trading that many good young assets and picks does not make sense.

calgary has no benefit in that trade, we only save 150k? no thanks