SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

actualPlayoffTeam

Created by: Ludefice
Team: 2023-24 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: May 18, 2023
Published: May 18, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,000,000
2$1,000,000
2$775,000
2$775,000
2$775,000
2$775,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
2$2,000,000
1$775,000
1$1,500,000
1$1,500,000
5$6,000,000
2$1,000,000
4$4,000,000
5$4,500,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (CHI)
CHI
  1. Murray, Matt
  2. 2023 1st round pick (BOS)
2.
TOR
  1. 2023 4th round pick (ANA)
3.
TOR
  1. Wilson, Tom
  2. 2023 1st round pick (WSH)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$81,635,950$0$0$864,050
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$5,166,667$5,166,667
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C
UFA - 4
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 4
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA - 1
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$766,667$766,667
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$796,667$796,667
LW, RW
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 18, 2023 at 10:21 p.m.
#1
Joe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 7,674
Likes: 5,595
Even as ****ty as Toronto is, I don't think they take on a 6 mil cap hit to only move up what, 7 spots?
May 18, 2023 at 10:23 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Quoting: JoeROFLCOPTER
Even as ****ty as Toronto is, I don't think they take on a 6 mil cap hit to only move up what, 7 spots?


you referring to the Murray trade? It's like 4.6mill and they did basically the same trade last year with Mrazek on the same term and he's worse than Murray
May 18, 2023 at 10:26 p.m.
#3
Joe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 7,674
Likes: 5,595
Quoting: Ludefice
you referring to the Murray trade? It's like 4.6mill and they did basically the same trade last year with Mrazek on the same term and he's worse than Murray


Did forget that there's some contract retention, but the best ability is availability.
May 18, 2023 at 10:30 p.m.
#4
Casual Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 738
Likes: 207
Washington isn’t going to trade for Mitch Marner at $10M, no thanks and that’s a dramatic overpayment.
May 18, 2023 at 10:32 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Quoting: Kuzbackov
Washington isn’t going to trade for Mitch Marner at $10M, no thanks and that’s a dramatic overpayment.


Depends if they want to try for the cup or not, pretty good guy to play with Ovechkin+help the PK and no that's not an overpayment for a 100 point selke nominee with 2 years left vs 1 year left. If anything it's a bit light.
May 18, 2023 at 10:40 p.m.
#6
Interim Avian GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 77
Likes: 42
Quoting: Ludefice
you referring to the Murray trade? It's like 4.6mill and they did basically the same trade last year with Mrazek on the same term and he's worse than Murray


Hawks needed a goalie then, they don’t anymore.
SociallyHawkward and Garak liked this.
May 18, 2023 at 10:41 p.m.
#7
Casual Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 738
Likes: 207
Quoting: Ludefice
Depends if they want to try for the cup or not, pretty good guy to play with Ovechkin+help the PK and no that's not an overpayment for a 100 point selke nominee with 2 years left vs 1 year left. If anything it's a bit light.

Did you just say the Capitals could compete for the Cup with Marner? Yeah that worked so well for the Leafs. Capitals politely decline and keep their pick, time to start looking to the future and absolutely no reason to pay anyone $10M. Look at the Leafs. Having a bunch of Skill Forwards making over $10M is not how winning teams are built.
May 18, 2023 at 10:47 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Quoting: Kuzbackov
Did you just say the Capitals could compete for the Cup with Marner? Yeah that worked so well for the Leafs. Capitals politely decline and keep their pick, time to start looking to the future and absolutely no reason to pay anyone $10M. Look at the Leafs. Having a bunch of Skill Forwards making over $10M is not how winning teams are built.


I agree the caps should look to the future, but it seems at least with the moves they have made they are looking to retool and run with Ovechkin again rather than rebuild. This fits...not saying they will win or anything and it would probably need another move or 2 to actually be competitive realistically. I don't see them winning, but I could see them making a move like this.

I would also argue that Marner is a better fit on the Caps than the Leafs anyways, likewise Wilson is a better fit on the Leafs than the Caps. Leafs have small skill forwards in abundance, the caps don't.
May 18, 2023 at 10:50 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Quoting: GMtommyhawk
Hawks needed a goalie then, they don’t anymore.


My mistake actually I thought Mrazek was done...forgot how horrible that contract was, rip that deal. I would just do a similar deal with another team where it's a better fit.
May 18, 2023 at 11:16 p.m.
#10
Casual Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 738
Likes: 207
Quoting: Ludefice
I agree the caps should look to the future, but it seems at least with the moves they have made they are looking to retool and run with Ovechkin again rather than rebuild. This fits...not saying they will win or anything and it would probably need another move or 2 to actually be competitive realistically. I don't see them winning, but I could see them making a move like this.

I would also argue that Marner is a better fit on the Caps than the Leafs anyways, likewise Wilson is a better fit on the Leafs than the Caps. Leafs have small skill forwards in abundance, the caps don't.

You seem to be completely ignoring the Salary Cap. The Capitals do not need any skilled Wingers making $10M. In that case the Capitals should re-sign Wilson and spend the difference in salary on a DMan.
OldNYIfan and All_Knowing liked this.
May 18, 2023 at 11:23 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 8,025
Likes: 3,229
Caps pass. I love Marner but Caps are most likely getting Michkov with their pick and Wilson is a unicorn.
All_Knowing liked this.
May 18, 2023 at 11:24 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Quoting: Kuzbackov
You seem to be completely ignoring the Salary Cap. The Capitals do not need any skilled Wingers making $10M. In that case the Capitals should re-sign Wilson and spend the difference in salary on a DMan.


This isn't a Caps team this is a Leafs team. Obviously the Caps would have to make more moves...and really they should make more moves. Or better yet, they don't do the trade and trade Wilson + more for futures. However, I see them trying to retool and try again with Ovi based on some of the moves they have made recently.
May 18, 2023 at 11:29 p.m.
#13
Casual Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 738
Likes: 207
Quoting: Ludefice
This isn't a Caps team this is a Leafs team. Obviously the Caps would have to make more moves...and really they should make more moves. Or better yet, they don't do the trade and trade Wilson + more for futures. However, I see them trying to retool and try again with Ovi based on some of the moves they have made recently.


Most appropriately based on all the comments from the Capitals themselves they plan on building around Ovi AND Wilson.
May 18, 2023 at 11:50 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Quoting: Kuzbackov
Most appropriately based on all the comments from the Capitals themselves they plan on building around Ovi AND Wilson.


If that's actually their plan that's wild. They can't do a rebuild around them in that case, so it's a retool. Not sure how they can make that team competitive. Will be an interesting offseason for them if they follow through with that plan.
May 18, 2023 at 11:50 p.m.
#15
Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 6,999
Likes: 2,846
All you're doing here is making the team slower and the Capitals A LOT better. Probably a little counterintuitive if you're in a wildcard chase.
May 19, 2023 at 12:17 a.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Quoting: NickC1988
All you're doing here is making the team slower and the Capitals A LOT better. Probably a little counterintuitive if you're in a wildcard chase.


Yeah a bit slower true, but a better playoff team. They aren't a wild card team now, or with this team imo. They look to be a 2 or 3 in the division with this roster in my opinion with better odds of going deep assuming they don't have some catastrophic injury issues.
May 19, 2023 at 1:38 a.m.
#17
Casual Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 738
Likes: 207
Quoting: Ludefice
If that's actually their plan that's wild. They can't do a rebuild around them in that case, so it's a retool. Not sure how they can make that team competitive. Will be an interesting offseason for them if they follow through with that plan.

At least they won something once, what’s the Leafs plan? They’re going to have to lose some trades to shed salary or they’re out of luck. Tavares is getting older and his contract getting worse, how do they improve the team that they’re not going to be able to keep together already?
May 19, 2023 at 2:16 a.m.
#18
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,919
Likes: 6,710
Caps only have 7 mil in cap space next season, this deal would eat basically all of that, and they wouldn't even be able to fill out a 20 man roster afterwards.

If Marber to the Caps, Toronto needs to take back 9+ in cap. Didn't Kuznetsov want out of Washington?
May 19, 2023 at 5:54 a.m.
#19
BlackhawksReboot
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 51
Likes: 41
Blackhawks decline. Counter: Instead of the CHI 2nd round pick, they offer NYR 2nd round pick.
Garak liked this.
May 19, 2023 at 10:09 a.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Quoting: Kuzbackov
At least they won something once, what’s the Leafs plan? They’re going to have to lose some trades to shed salary or they’re out of luck. Tavares is getting older and his contract getting worse, how do they improve the team that they’re not going to be able to keep together already?


Tavares is the only player they would 'lose a trade' on because of salary and he's not going anywhere due to his NMC. If they trade Nylander they are getting great value for a 40 goal scorer under 7 mill. If they trade Marner they should get great value for a 100 pt selke nominee that's just getting better every year with 2 years left. If they trade Matthews they should get great value for a guy who is money in the bank for at least 40, plus a hart&ted lindsay, 2 rockets, etc. Marner, Matthews, and Nylander all get more than they are getting now on the open market as UFAs.

This team is just what I think would more reasonably happen as a general direction to improve the balance of the team. I would personally hit the reset button and trade at least Matthews and Marner. The goal would be to get very good young players that are more hard nosed and futures, then some guy to make the cap work out for a year or whatever is needed. Nylander could wait until the trade deadline since he only has a M-NTC on July 1...maybe they keep him maybe not. There is a world where Matthews and Marner are gone and they are still a competitive team in the playoffs. Their problem recently has always been balance, even with Tavares/Nylander/maybe O'Reilly they would have enough star power with what they get back from trades + free agency to compete.
May 19, 2023 at 10:16 a.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Edited May 19, 2023 at 10:22 a.m.
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Caps only have 7 mil in cap space next season, this deal would eat basically all of that, and they wouldn't even be able to fill out a 20 man roster afterwards.

If Marber to the Caps, Toronto needs to take back 9+ in cap. Didn't Kuznetsov want out of Washington?


That's just not an argument the cap difference isn't that egregious given their space and this trade doesn't stop them from making another move or 2 or whatever they want. We all know they are multiple moves away from a reasonable retool, or rebuild.
May 19, 2023 at 10:58 a.m.
#22
Always have 2018
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 926
Fair value for Marner for sure. I don't think the caps can give up both Wilson and 8OA.
May 19, 2023 at 12:07 p.m.
#23
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,919
Likes: 6,710
Quoting: Ludefice
That's just not an argument the cap difference isn't that egregious given their space and this trade doesn't stop them from making another move or 2 or whatever they want. We all know they are multiple moves away from a reasonable retool, or rebuild.


Assuming another cap strapped team is going to add ~6 million in cap in one trade is also unreasonable. Toronto is going to have to take more cap back to move Marner to a competitor.
May 19, 2023 at 3:51 p.m.
#24
NoQuitInNewYork
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 743
Quoting: Ludefice
you referring to the Murray trade? It's like 4.6mill and they did basically the same trade last year with Mrazek on the same term and he's worse than Murray


Yes but Chicago doesn’t need any more goalies
May 19, 2023 at 4:14 p.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Quoting: Scooter81
Yes but Chicago doesn’t need any more goalies


Just not reading the comments here I guess
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll