SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Dumba plus for Marner

Created by: Trickster
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 5, 2019
Published: Nov. 5, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I proposed the Wild trade in another ACGM and didnt get shot by Wild posters so giving this a go.

Top 8 protection on the pick OR the pick is another 1st rounder acquired via another trade.

Not sure on lines as I did this fairly quickly.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
4$900,000
4$900,000
4$900,000
4$900,000
4$900,000
4$900,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,000,000
3$1,250,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
3$3,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$5,000,000
2$700,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Georgiev, Alexandar [RFA Rights]
NYR
  1. Bracco, Jeremy [RFA Rights]
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (CBJ)
2.
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$82,185,116$0$400,000$1,314,884
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 2
$1,250,000$1,250,000
G
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
C
UFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 5, 2019 at 8:17 p.m.
#26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 2,584
Quoting: oneX
Initially, I thought best to stay away from Zucker but...I have been mulling over the idea. I've warmed up to such an idea actually.


Trickster seems to do that a lot because he presents sound logic behind his ideas
Nov. 5, 2019 at 8:19 p.m.
#27
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 2,584
Quoting: oneX
It is a very solid idea. That would upgrade Minnesota's wingers quite a bit.


Thanks, I think it works well for both teams
Trickster liked this.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 8:21 p.m.
#28
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 2,780
Likes: 2,624
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
Trickster seems to do that a lot because he presents sound logic behind his ideas


He mentioned getting Zucker months ago but..at that point Marner had not hit 90 points. Then he got 10.8 million and as my bud @blowing_the_zone would say...the shine's off the kid now.
Sign_em_up000000 and Trickster liked this.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 8:23 p.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 2,584
Quoting: oneX
the shine's off the kid now.


I couldn't have said it better myself!

Also, another person who brings sound logic too discussions
Trickster and oneX liked this.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 8:29 p.m.
#30
14m in dead cap
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 3,582
Likes: 3,064
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
Thanks, I think it works well for both teams


And still leave them with zero centers, which is what they need more. @TanSor would agree with me: Wild only move Dumba if a franchise center is coming back. Dumba is young and on a great contract, Guerin would be an idiot to trade him as part of a package.
BuFfaLOFaN, Sign_em_up000000, blowing_the_zone and 1 other person liked this.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 8:43 p.m.
#31
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 2,584
Quoting: JayTea
And still leave them with zero centers, which is what they need more. @TanSor would agree with me: Wild only move Dumba if a franchise center is coming back. Dumba is young and on a great contract, Guerin would be an idiot to trade him as part of a package.


I get what you're saying but no team is going trade you a center that you'd accept for Dumba, and it's still a good trade for both teams.
TanSor, Trickster and oneX liked this.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 8:46 p.m.
#32
14m in dead cap
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 3,582
Likes: 3,064
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
I get what you're saying but no team is going trade you a center that you'd accept for Dumba, and it's still a good trade for both teams.


Great reason to not trade him, unless it's a pure futures package coming back in another year or 2 if Guerin can't pull off some magic. Marner would be a UFA before the Wild could compete, so why bring him in? It makes no sense.
TanSor and Sign_em_up000000 liked this.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 8:51 p.m.
#33
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: JayTea
And still leave them with zero centers, which is what they need more. @TanSor would agree with me: Wild only move Dumba if a franchise center is coming back. Dumba is young and on a great contract, Guerin would be an idiot to trade him as part of a package.


I've warmed up a bit to the idea of moving Dumba for a non-center since Boldy has been playing the position in college and well likely have a good shot at getting one in the draft. We do also need a right shot wing, so this idea fills that need. I just worry that we are gunna waste the best years of Dumba and he'll walk for nothing once we're finally able to contend again
Sign_em_up000000 and Trickster liked this.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 8:51 p.m.
#34
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 2,584
Quoting: JayTea
Great reason to not trade him, unless it's a pure futures package coming back in another year or 2 if Guerin can't pull off some magic. Marner would be a UFA before the Wild could compete, so why bring him in? It makes no sense.


Fine then don't do the trade I like Dumba but personally, I'd go after Jones instead.
Trickster and oneX liked this.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 8:55 p.m.
#35
14m in dead cap
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 3,582
Likes: 3,064
Quoting: TanSor
I've warmed up a bit to the idea of moving Dumba for a non-center since Boldy has been playing the position in college and well likely have a good shot at getting one in the draft. We do also need a right shot wing, so this idea fills that need. I just worry that we are gunna waste the best years of Dumba and he'll walk for nothing once we're finally able to contend again


Problem is Marner isn't any different in the wasting his best years and losing him for nothing category. If they blow it up, and trading Dumba is exactly that, go for pure futures and prospects. Don't get a player that's signed for big money already and will be a UFA when his deal is up and definitely don't toss in a pick or another trade asset like Zucker.
blowing_the_zone liked this.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 8:56 p.m.
#36
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 1,540
It's an interesting idea and leaf fans have been fishing for Dumba for a while. I think there's a trade that could happen between the two. Definitely something that both teams need from each other.

But I doubt Minny considers Marner for Dumba plus given where both teams are at. I'm a big fan of Marner as a player, as much as that might surprise some, just not a fan of the drama behind the contract negotiations this past summer.
Anyways, I think out of the 3 he's a leaf for life, and that's a good thing cause he's a heckuva a player, despite being overpaid..

And because he's overpaid his value takes a hit. Dumba at 6M vs Marner at 11M makes everyone think twice. . Something around Nylander and Spurgeon could make alot of sense for both teams though...
Nov. 5, 2019 at 8:57 p.m.
#37
14m in dead cap
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 3,582
Likes: 3,064
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
Fine then don't do the trade I like Dumba but personally, I'd go after Jones instead.


Jones honestly is a better fit for Toronto who needs a guy to play defense. Dumba will frustrate you at times with his lapses in judgment on the defensive side.
Trickster and Sign_em_up000000 liked this.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 9:00 p.m.
#38
Thread Starter
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,052
Likes: 3,754
Quoting: blowing_the_zone
It's an interesting idea and leaf fans have been fishing for Dumba for a while. I think there's a trade that could happen between the two. Definitely something that both teams need from each other.

But I doubt Minny considers Marner for Dumba plus given where both teams are at. I'm a big fan of Marner as a player, as much as that might surprise some, just not a fan of the drama behind the contract negotiations this past summer.
Anyways, I think out of the 3 he's a leaf for life, and that's a good thing cause he's a heckuva a player, despite being overpaid..

And because he's overpaid his value takes a hit. Dumba at 6M vs Marner at 11M makes everyone think twice. . Something around Nylander and Spurgeon could make alot of sense for both teams though...


No way man.
Dont wanto trade Nylander and certainly not for Spurgeon under his new deal.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 9:04 p.m.
#39
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 1,540
Quoting: Trickster
No way man.
Dont wanto trade Nylander and certainly not for Spurgeon under his new deal.


That's like, your opinion, man.. wink
Nov. 5, 2019 at 9:13 p.m.
#40
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: JayTea
Problem is Marner isn't any different in the wasting his best years and losing him for nothing category. If they blow it up, and trading Dumba is exactly that, go for pure futures and prospects. Don't get a player that's signed for big money already and will be a UFA when his deal is up and definitely don't toss in a pick or another trade asset like Zucker.


Not necesssarily. Marner is 22, Dumba is 25. Say we take 2-3 years of rebuilding, would you rather have 2-3 years of Marner age 24-25 or 1-2 years of Dumba age 27-28?
Trickster and Sign_em_up000000 liked this.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 9:26 p.m.
#41
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
I think Nylander makes more sense from Minni's perspective as they need C potential.

If we're moving Marner (which I don't think we are, but I'd be all for), I think Jones is the target. They also have Werenski as a stud and other good dmen. And Marner replaces Panarin
Trickster and Sign_em_up000000 liked this.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 9:27 p.m.
#42
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 1,540
Quoting: TanSor
Not necesssarily. Marner is 22, Dumba is 25. Say we take 2-3 years of rebuilding, would you rather have 2-3 years of Marner age 24-25 or 1-2 years of Dumba age 27-28?


Personally, and for what it's worth, if minny is thinking about tearing down for a couple years then Dumba at 6M is better value than Mitch at 11M, considering how you can use that cap space.

Continuing that line of thinking the Nylander and Spurgeon contracts are kind of a wash. Throw in some stuff to account for the difference in age and team needs and there could be something there. Maybe?

Full disclosure.. a Rielly/Spurgeon pair would be awesome, imo. I'm biased, I get it..
Nov. 5, 2019 at 9:30 p.m.
#43
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: blowing_the_zone
Personally, and for what it's worth, if minny is thinking about tearing down for a couple years then Dumba at 6M is better value than Mitch at 11M, considering how you can use that cap space.

Continuing that line of thinking the Nylander and Spurgeon contracts are kind of a wash. Throw in some stuff to account for the difference in age and team needs and there could be something there. Maybe?

Full disclosure.. a Rielly/Spurgeon pair would be awesome, imo. I'm biased, I get it..


I'd definitely do it, but I'm sure Dubas is in love with Nylander, lol
Trickster, blowing_the_zone, Sign_em_up000000 and 1 other person liked this.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 9:37 p.m.
#44
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: blowing_the_zone
Personally, and for what it's worth, if minny is thinking about tearing down for a couple years then Dumba at 6M is better value than Mitch at 11M, considering how you can use that cap space.

Continuing that line of thinking the Nylander and Spurgeon contracts are kind of a wash. Throw in some stuff to account for the difference in age and team needs and there could be something there. Maybe?

Full disclosure.. a Rielly/Spurgeon pair would be awesome, imo. I'm biased, I get it..


F that. Spurgeon is leaving his prime and Nylander hadn't entered his yet. It is quite possible he is sub par in 2 years. Likely in 4
Trickster liked this.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 9:40 p.m.
#45
14m in dead cap
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 3,582
Likes: 3,064
Quoting: TanSor
Not necesssarily. Marner is 22, Dumba is 25. Say we take 2-3 years of rebuilding, would you rather have 2-3 years of Marner age 24-25 or 1-2 years of Dumba age 27-28?


I think with all of the problems currently facing this team, they're not going to turn it around in 2-3 years but to answer your question, honestly neither. If they're rebuilding, find an ideal trade like Sakic did with Duchene and bring in futures. Lots of teams would be interested in Dumba and I think they'd find a better offer for something that fits their needs better than Marner if they actively shopped him.
TanSor, blowing_the_zone, Sign_em_up000000 and 1 other person liked this.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 9:44 p.m.
#46
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: BCAPP
F that. Spurgeon is leaving his prime and Nylander hadn't entered his yet. It is quite possible he is sub par in 2 years. Likely in 4


Uh... Nylander is 23, prime years in the NHL are generally 22/23-28/29. But I get what you're saying
Nov. 5, 2019 at 9:45 p.m.
#47
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 2,008


Well let's start with me stating I still beleive Marner is overpaid, but only by a $1 million.

That Dumba contract right now is flat sexy on a silver platter, for everything Dumba is and still can be.

Think the talent portion of the contest is a wash really. Marner is fantastic at what he does, but Dumba can do damage in his own right......

So, it boils down to contract. And to balance that out, Zucker maybe the add here. Not sure Hyman does much for the Wild..... maybe talking Kerfoot honestly. Centre depth is an issue.

Marner and Kerfoot for Dumba and Zucker..... ????
blowing_the_zone liked this.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 9:50 p.m.
#48
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 1,540
Quoting: BCAPP
F that. Spurgeon is leaving his prime and Nylander hadn't entered his yet. It is quite possible he is sub par in 2 years. Likely in 4


The leafs have a nice but complicated window. Next year is the push year, imo. It's highly doubtful they can keep this team together beyond 2 - 3 years.

I've already mentioned my bias with Rielly. But, jesus... we're missing Hainsey this year.?! There's nothing wrong with d vets..

..this coming from an old guy.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 9:51 p.m.
#49
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 1,540
Quoting: blowing_the_zone
The leafs have a nice but complicated window. Next year is the push year, imo. It's highly doubtful they can keep this team together beyond 2 - 3 years.

I've already mentioned my bias with Rielly. But, jesus... we're missing Hainsey this year.?! There's nothing wrong with d vets..

..this coming from an old guy.


Scratch that. . Now we keep Nylandre!
palhal, BCAPP and Trickster liked this.
Nov. 5, 2019 at 10:13 p.m.
#50
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,526
Likes: 22,680
Quoting: blowing_the_zone
The leafs have a nice but complicated window. Next year is the push year, imo. It's highly doubtful they can keep this team together beyond 2 - 3 years.

I've already mentioned my bias with Rielly. But, jesus... we're missing Hainsey this year.?! There's nothing wrong with d vets..

..this coming from an old guy.


So many Leafs fans and non Leafs fans say, "you'll never be able to this team together". So? no playoff round victories, I'm all for some additions and subtractions.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll